Yeah, that way they can be used as cannon fodder when we invade China 20 years from now, amirite?
Advertisement

by Hittanryan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:28 am

by Revolutopia » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:28 am

by Carcharhinidae primari » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:28 am

by Teutonic Territories » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:28 am

by Itanica » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:31 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:abortian is wrong, i mean america is a free country right? so shouldnt all americans be able to live without being murdered by some immoral lady who thinks maybe *im not ready*?

by Hittanryan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:31 am
Teutonic Territories wrote:Everyone, please. Libertarians are those who believe the government should do the bare minimum and keep out of our lives otherwise. The bare minimum means things that individuals cannot do alone, like protecting life. It is perfectly fine to be libertarian and pro-life. That just means that they believe that a fetus is alive.

by Euronion » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:32 am
Revolutopia wrote:Euronion wrote:
the fact that it will save the lives of future unborn Americans.
Future people's rights to don't out weigh present women's rights.
Additionally, why do all the people who supposedly care about Future American's rights the same people arguing that we should actively destroy the world?
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Ravineworld » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:32 am
Hittanryan wrote:Ravineworld wrote:Paleo-conservatives aren't for drug legalization, gay marriage, open borders, and other such socially liberal stances. The only thing I agree with Paleo-conservatives is their stance on states rights, and war.
States rights and war. Riiiiight. So that makes you a "libertarian" who thinks states should have authoritarian moralistic social controls akin to Iran's, while the US should use its military to impose its will abroad.
No, you're not a libertarian by any sense of the word. You're a conservative.

by Carcharhinidae primari » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:33 am


by Euronion » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:33 am
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Hittanryan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:33 am
Euronion wrote:Revolutopia wrote:
Future people's rights to don't out weigh present women's rights.
Additionally, why do all the people who supposedly care about Future American's rights the same people arguing that we should actively destroy the world?
that's the same kind of thinking that gets people and governments into the genocidal attitude. The woman doesn't have the right to kill another human, that is not choice, its murder.

by Teutonic Territories » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:34 am
Hittanryan wrote:Teutonic Territories wrote:Everyone, please. Libertarians are those who believe the government should do the bare minimum and keep out of our lives otherwise. The bare minimum means things that individuals cannot do alone, like protecting life. It is perfectly fine to be libertarian and pro-life. That just means that they believe that a fetus is alive.
Actual libertarians, an-caps, and the like believe in property rights above all else. What kind of libertarian would deny someone the most fundamental property, that of their own body?

by New Conglomerate » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:35 am

by Euronion » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:35 am
Itanica wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:abortian is wrong, i mean america is a free country right? so shouldnt all americans be able to live without being murdered by some immoral lady who thinks maybe *im not ready*?
If America is a free country as you are defending your logic with, then an actual person should be able to decide if they want to get rid of a foetus with no way of telling whats around it, and in fact what it is itself.
Also, foetuses aren't American citizens.
Your logic is horribly wrong.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by New Conglomerate » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:35 am
Teutonic Territories wrote:Hittanryan wrote:Actual libertarians, an-caps, and the like believe in property rights above all else. What kind of libertarian would deny someone the most fundamental property, that of their own body?
Property rights? No. Libertarians believe in life above all else. Besides, if they believe that fetus' are people, then abortion violates their right to their body.

by Teutonic Territories » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:36 am

by Revolutopia » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:37 am
Euronion wrote:Revolutopia wrote:
Future people's rights to don't out weigh present women's rights.
Additionally, why do all the people who supposedly care about Future American's rights the same people arguing that we should actively destroy the world?
that's the same kind of thinking that gets people and governments into the genocidal attitude. The woman doesn't have the right to kill another human, that is not choice, its murder.

by Hittanryan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:37 am


by Euronion » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:38 am
New Conglomerate wrote:Euronion wrote:
actually the majority of women are Pro-life, so it may in fact give the GOP more women votes.
The majority of women don't like probes shoved into their vaginas. And no, a vast majority is still pro-choice in some way.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Yomali » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:38 am

by Hittanryan » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:38 am

by Iuuvic » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:38 am

by New Conglomerate » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:39 am
Euronion wrote:New Conglomerate wrote:The majority of women don't like probes shoved into their vaginas. And no, a vast majority is still pro-choice in some way.
exactly, that includes if the Mother's life is in danger, which makes me Pro-Choice, would you agree with that assessment?

by Euronion » Sat Feb 18, 2012 10:39 am
Yomali wrote:What really kills me is that all these MEN(cause you know it is) who make these laws dont even know how birth controls work. Now, some may work differently, but generally they prevent the egg from implanting in the first place, therefor the woman was never pregnant therefor they dont 'cause abortions' but actually prevent women from needing them later.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Albaaa, Dimetrodon Empire, Forsher, Imperial British State, Perikuresu, Rary, Siimyardo, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, The Huskar Social Union
Advertisement