NATION

PASSWORD

Australasia

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)
User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Australasia

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:32 am

Who supports a union between Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps some other islands in the area? If the discussion looks promising I may put up a poll.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:37 am

I want to see Australia take its rightful place in the Region and conquer all the Islands between it and mainland Asia, as well as the South Pacific. (this country will later be incorporated as the 'Oceanic Territory' in the Presidential Republic of Greater America)
Last edited by Lackadaisical2 on Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Kirrig
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Sep 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:39 am

Spiral Sun wrote:Who supports a union between Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps some other islands in the area? If the discussion looks promising I may put up a poll.


As long as we keep separate sports teams and have devolved parliaments... yeah.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.

"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
Milks Empire wrote:
Kirrig wrote:Do you guys know if George Bush is on NSG?
Wouldn't surprise me.

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:52 am

Lackadaisical2 wrote:I want to see Australia take its rightful place in the Region and conquer all the Islands between it and mainland Asia, as well as the South Pacific. (this country will later be incorporated as the 'Oceanic Territory' in the Presidential Republic of Greater America)

Indonesia has 230,000,000 people. The Philippines have 100,000,000 people. Australia has 22,000,000 people. Yah.....
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:54 am

Kirrig wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:Who supports a union between Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps some other islands in the area? If the discussion looks promising I may put up a poll.


As long as we keep separate sports teams and have devolved parliaments... yeah.

Including during the Olympics? Would you accept an ANZAC with a monetary union?
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:54 am

Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:56 am

Spiral Sun wrote:
Kirrig wrote:
As long as we keep separate sports teams and have devolved parliaments... yeah.

Including during the Olympics? Would you accept an ANZAC with a monetary union?

Oh yeah, we could bring back the Anzacs. That could be the official name for our standing army.

User avatar
Lackadaisical2
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 50831
Founded: Mar 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Lackadaisical2 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:00 am

Spiral Sun wrote:
Lackadaisical2 wrote:I want to see Australia take its rightful place in the Region and conquer all the Islands between it and mainland Asia, as well as the South Pacific. (this country will later be incorporated as the 'Oceanic Territory' in the Presidential Republic of Greater America)

Indonesia has 230,000,000 people. The Philippines have 100,000,000 people. Australia has 22,000,000 people. Yah.....

Naturally they'll have to be rehabilitated into Australians before they get the vote. They'll learn things like drinking, cockroach races and how to put on a proper barbeque and identify poisonous animals.
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:01 am

GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.

Please keep in mind that I am refering to Australasia, not Australia. Would do no good to offend the New Zealanders too much.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Australasia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 934
Founded: Oct 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Australasia » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:04 am

Ahem ahem *points to nation name*. :)

I wholly support the unification of Australia and New Zealand into one nation called Australasia. I don't think there's a need for a new government level - New Zealand would become a state like New South Wales (whose population is larger than NZ's), Victoria, etc. Perhaps since New Zealand has been an independent country for so long, NZ should receive more seats in the Senate - perhaps 20 (each Australian state currently has 12, each territory 2).

New Zealand would keep institutions, etc which are of symbolic national importance of course.

Indeed New Zealand nearly did become the 8th state about a century ago during the federation discussions but declined due to the vastness of the Tasman sea and continental delegates' insistence on a centralized system of government.

So:
1. NZ becomes the 8th state
2. Australia is renamed Australasia
3. The Constitution is amended to move powers away from the federal government to the states.
Last edited by Australasia on Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:05 am, edited 1 time in total.
Positive: Equality, world peace, Universal Human Rights (Gender equality, LGBT rights, minority rights), the United Nations, secular constitutional liberal democracy, moderate progressivism, EU countries, USA, Canada, Australia, NZ, Nordic countries, Switzerland, Argentina, Japan, South Korea, all other developed countries & civilized democracies, Buddhism, Christianity, Judaism, Humanism, free market socialism, universal healthcare & education, environmentalism, Animal welfare, internationalism
Negative: Extremism, dictatorship, fascism, communism, totalitarianism, racism, sexism, homophobia, bigotry, backwardness, authoritarian regimes (Saudi Arabia, Iran, Uganda, Pakistan, Zimbabwe, NK, etc), Islam, Mormonism, Sharia, ignorance, inequality

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:04 am

GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vo6fgZ-dbOw

I like your thinking...

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:11 am

Spiral Sun wrote:Please keep in mind that I am refering to Australasia, not Australia. Would do no good to offend the New Zealanders too much.

D-don't offend the Kiwis? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:15 am

GreaterPacificNations wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:Please keep in mind that I am refering to Australasia, not Australia. Would do no good to offend the New Zealanders too much.

D-don't offend the Kiwis? :eyebrow:

Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:19 am

Australasia wrote:Ahem ahem *points to nation name*. :)

I wholly support the unification of Australia and New Zealand into one nation called Australasia. I don't think there's a need for a new government level - New Zealand would become a state like New South Wales (whose population is larger than NZ's), Victoria, etc. Perhaps since New Zealand has been an independent country for so long, NZ should receive more seats in the Senate - perhaps 20 (each Australian state currently has 12, each territory 2).

New Zealand would keep institutions, etc which are of symbolic national importance of course.

Indeed New Zealand nearly did become the 8th state about a century ago during the federation discussions but declined due to the vastness of the Tasman sea and continental delegates' insistence on a centralized system of government.

So:
1. NZ becomes the 8th state
2. Australia is renamed Australasia
3. The Constitution is amended to move powers away from the federal government to the states.

Waitangi. That was the main reason. The Australian constitution and it's disregard for the indigenous of Australia was incompatible with the treaty of Waitangi and the measures it afforded the Maori.

User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:25 am

Nope. As someone who wants Australia to break up (even just a little), the idea of an Australasian Union is just bad.
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:26 am

Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.

Yet, those four and a half million people don't even have an air force. They sold it to us. Also, they are terrible at sport. Plus the craphouse economy.

lol, not that it is all a serious suggestion, but if it was war with NZ, the way to go would be blockading them. Their economy is dependent on tourism. Australia has the means to stop all planes and ships from coming and going there. One year later Australia would approach Wellington with a peace treaty, stating that the disagreement had gone far enough and they would like to put it behind them. The terms of this treaty would heavily in Australia's favour. If we are so lucky that they refuse, then we storm them. In each case NZ could be painted as the obstinate one, Australia as reasonable, and the whole blockade as a trade dispute.

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:28 am

GreaterPacificNations wrote:
Australasia wrote:Ahem ahem *points to nation name*. :)

I wholly support the unification of Australia and New Zealand into one nation called Australasia. I don't think there's a need for a new government level - New Zealand would become a state like New South Wales (whose population is larger than NZ's), Victoria, etc. Perhaps since New Zealand has been an independent country for so long, NZ should receive more seats in the Senate - perhaps 20 (each Australian state currently has 12, each territory 2).

New Zealand would keep institutions, etc which are of symbolic national importance of course.

Indeed New Zealand nearly did become the 8th state about a century ago during the federation discussions but declined due to the vastness of the Tasman sea and continental delegates' insistence on a centralized system of government.

So:
1. NZ becomes the 8th state
2. Australia is renamed Australasia
3. The Constitution is amended to move powers away from the federal government to the states.

Waitangi. That was the main reason. The Australian constitution and it's disregard for the indigenous of Australia was incompatible with the treaty of Waitangi and the measures it afforded the Maori.

True. Perhaps there should also be some Maori representatives to the unified legislature. That or rename the whole area Greater Aotearoa.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Kirrig
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Sep 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:30 am

GreaterPacificNations wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.

Yet, those four and a half million people don't even have an air force. They sold it to us. Also, they are terrible at sport. Plus the craphouse economy.

lol, not that it is all a serious suggestion, but if it was war with NZ, the way to go would be blockading them. Their economy is dependent on tourism. Australia has the means to stop all planes and ships from coming and going there. One year later Australia would approach Wellington with a peace treaty, stating that the disagreement had gone far enough and they would like to put it behind them. The terms of this treaty would heavily in Australia's favour. If we are so lucky that they refuse, then we storm them. In each case NZ could be painted as the obstinate one, Australia as reasonable, and the whole blockade as a trade dispute.


Auckland is the fifth largest city remember...
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.

"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
Milks Empire wrote:
Kirrig wrote:Do you guys know if George Bush is on NSG?
Wouldn't surprise me.

User avatar
Kirrig
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Sep 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:31 am

Spiral Sun wrote:
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Waitangi. That was the main reason. The Australian constitution and it's disregard for the indigenous of Australia was incompatible with the treaty of Waitangi and the measures it afforded the Maori.

True. Perhaps there should also be some Maori representatives to the unified legislature. That or rename the whole area Greater Aotearoa.


Never! The name... and the earlier suggestion would be a continuation of the Maori Seats.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.

"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
Milks Empire wrote:
Kirrig wrote:Do you guys know if George Bush is on NSG?
Wouldn't surprise me.

User avatar
Creative Vikings
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11009
Founded: Jun 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Creative Vikings » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:35 am

I don't think everyone would agree with Australasia. Go with someting Orwellian, like Oceana
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.

We don't need humanatarian aid!
And what's more backwater than the outback?
And what does Australia want with few million of what are essentially the same people as they are, with a more casual, slacker, less-whiney accent and 70 thousand odd descendants of Taiwanese?
GreaterPacificNations wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.

Yet, those four and a half million people don't even have an air force. They sold it to us. Also, they are terrible at sport. Plus the craphouse economy.

lol, not that it is all a serious suggestion, but if it was war with NZ, the way to go would be blockading them. Their economy is dependent on tourism. Australia has the means to stop all planes and ships from coming and going there. One year later Australia would approach Wellington with a peace treaty, stating that the disagreement had gone far enough and they would like to put it behind them. The terms of this treaty would heavily in Australia's favour. If we are so lucky that they refuse, then we storm them. In each case NZ could be painted as the obstinate one, Australia as reasonable, and the whole blockade as a trade dispute.

Terrible at sport? What country are you from?!
Spiral Sun wrote:
GreaterPacificNations wrote:D-don't offend the Kiwis? :eyebrow:

Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.

Four and a half million people is still a lot, you mathematically oblivios sentient

And you're forgetting a few other places in Australasia
Last edited by Creative Vikings on Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:40 am

Chill out footrot flats.
<- Check the flag and learn the history of your big brother.

User avatar
Creative Vikings
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11009
Founded: Jun 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Creative Vikings » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:43 am

I approve of a union with Aussie so close, we may as well be one country. I won't approve if we're forced to be a bitch for the US in warzoness, I will pick my own wars. Shooting people in ghost blankets isn't really fun.
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Chill out footrot flats.
<- Check the flag and learn the history of your big brother.

My big brither? Which brother? William of Jack?

And the flag with the union jack in the corner was common amongst ALL colonies

User avatar
Kirrig
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Sep 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:53 am

The way to do it is UK style. Devolution on matters of education and warmongering.

Olympics, not so sure. But other sports separate.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.

"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
Milks Empire wrote:
Kirrig wrote:Do you guys know if George Bush is on NSG?
Wouldn't surprise me.

User avatar
GreaterPacificNations
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Nov 22, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 am

Creative Vikings wrote:And the flag with the union jack in the corner was common amongst ALL colonies

It's the flag of the Eureka stockade, when a force of miners roughly the size of the modern New Zealand army rose up against the colonial government of Victoria.

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 am

Creative Vikings wrote:I approve of a union with Aussie so close, we may as well be one country. I won't approve if we're forced to be a bitch for the US in warzoness, I will pick my own wars. Shooting people in ghost blankets isn't really fun.
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Chill out footrot flats.
<- Check the flag and learn the history of your big brother.

My big brither? Which brother? William of Jack?

And the flag with the union jack in the corner was common amongst ALL colonies

The Australians and New Zealanders do that by choice, as they discovered with the World Wars that the British only took ships and men and would never send any back when asked, for defense against the Japanese.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

Next

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Pasong Tirad, Port Caverton, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads