
by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:32 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:37 am
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:39 am
Spiral Sun wrote:Who supports a union between Australia, New Zealand, and perhaps some other islands in the area? If the discussion looks promising I may put up a poll.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:52 am
Lackadaisical2 wrote:I want to see Australia take its rightful place in the Region and conquer all the Islands between it and mainland Asia, as well as the South Pacific. (this country will later be incorporated as the 'Oceanic Territory' in the Presidential Republic of Greater America)

by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:54 am

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:54 am

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 1:56 am

by Lackadaisical2 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:00 am
Spiral Sun wrote:Lackadaisical2 wrote:I want to see Australia take its rightful place in the Region and conquer all the Islands between it and mainland Asia, as well as the South Pacific. (this country will later be incorporated as the 'Oceanic Territory' in the Presidential Republic of Greater America)
Indonesia has 230,000,000 people. The Philippines have 100,000,000 people. Australia has 22,000,000 people. Yah.....
The Republic of Lanos wrote:Proud member of the Vile Right-Wing Noodle Combat Division of the Imperialist Anti-Socialist Economic War Army Ground Force reporting in.

by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:01 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.

by Australasia » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:04 am

by New Bazlantis » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:04 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:11 am
Spiral Sun wrote:Please keep in mind that I am refering to Australasia, not Australia. Would do no good to offend the New Zealanders too much.


by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:15 am

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:19 am
Australasia wrote:Ahem ahem *points to nation name*.![]()
I wholly support the unification of Australia and New Zealand into one nation called Australasia. I don't think there's a need for a new government level - New Zealand would become a state like New South Wales (whose population is larger than NZ's), Victoria, etc. Perhaps since New Zealand has been an independent country for so long, NZ should receive more seats in the Senate - perhaps 20 (each Australian state currently has 12, each territory 2).
New Zealand would keep institutions, etc which are of symbolic national importance of course.
Indeed New Zealand nearly did become the 8th state about a century ago during the federation discussions but declined due to the vastness of the Tasman sea and continental delegates' insistence on a centralized system of government.
So:
1. NZ becomes the 8th state
2. Australia is renamed Australasia
3. The Constitution is amended to move powers away from the federal government to the states.

by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:25 am

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:26 am
Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.

by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:28 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australasia wrote:Ahem ahem *points to nation name*.![]()
I wholly support the unification of Australia and New Zealand into one nation called Australasia. I don't think there's a need for a new government level - New Zealand would become a state like New South Wales (whose population is larger than NZ's), Victoria, etc. Perhaps since New Zealand has been an independent country for so long, NZ should receive more seats in the Senate - perhaps 20 (each Australian state currently has 12, each territory 2).
New Zealand would keep institutions, etc which are of symbolic national importance of course.
Indeed New Zealand nearly did become the 8th state about a century ago during the federation discussions but declined due to the vastness of the Tasman sea and continental delegates' insistence on a centralized system of government.
So:
1. NZ becomes the 8th state
2. Australia is renamed Australasia
3. The Constitution is amended to move powers away from the federal government to the states.
Waitangi. That was the main reason. The Australian constitution and it's disregard for the indigenous of Australia was incompatible with the treaty of Waitangi and the measures it afforded the Maori.

by Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:30 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.
Yet, those four and a half million people don't even have an air force. They sold it to us. Also, they are terrible at sport. Plus the craphouse economy.
lol, not that it is all a serious suggestion, but if it was war with NZ, the way to go would be blockading them. Their economy is dependent on tourism. Australia has the means to stop all planes and ships from coming and going there. One year later Australia would approach Wellington with a peace treaty, stating that the disagreement had gone far enough and they would like to put it behind them. The terms of this treaty would heavily in Australia's favour. If we are so lucky that they refuse, then we storm them. In each case NZ could be painted as the obstinate one, Australia as reasonable, and the whole blockade as a trade dispute.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:31 am
Spiral Sun wrote:GreaterPacificNations wrote:Waitangi. That was the main reason. The Australian constitution and it's disregard for the indigenous of Australia was incompatible with the treaty of Waitangi and the measures it afforded the Maori.
True. Perhaps there should also be some Maori representatives to the unified legislature. That or rename the whole area Greater Aotearoa.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by Creative Vikings » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:35 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Australia could be a global powerbroker if it controlled more of the South Pacific and tripled it's population. We should lift Immigration quotas and come the next cyclone or earthquake send the Australian Army to NZ and the pacific Islands to help with humanitarian aid. After the disaster has passed, we stay because the Australian Army needs to help with the humanitarian crisis in these countries, with the purpose of building better infrastructure. Months become years, years become decades. As Australia spends more and more upgrading these backwaters, Australians will feel better and better about demanding concessions from them. At the same time, dissolve trade and transit barriers between the nations. Eventually independence groups will seem silly, as they enjoy a greatly improved standard of living post-Australia's South Pacific Development Scheme.
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Spiral Sun wrote:Four and a half million people is nothing to sneaze at, especially considering how Australia only has twenty two million of it's own. Australasia is the geograpic term for both of them.
Yet, those four and a half million people don't even have an air force. They sold it to us. Also, they are terrible at sport. Plus the craphouse economy.
lol, not that it is all a serious suggestion, but if it was war with NZ, the way to go would be blockading them. Their economy is dependent on tourism. Australia has the means to stop all planes and ships from coming and going there. One year later Australia would approach Wellington with a peace treaty, stating that the disagreement had gone far enough and they would like to put it behind them. The terms of this treaty would heavily in Australia's favour. If we are so lucky that they refuse, then we storm them. In each case NZ could be painted as the obstinate one, Australia as reasonable, and the whole blockade as a trade dispute.

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:40 am

by Creative Vikings » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:43 am
GreaterPacificNations wrote:Chill out footrot flats.
<- Check the flag and learn the history of your big brother.

by Kirrig » Thu Jan 26, 2012 2:53 am
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by GreaterPacificNations » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 am
Creative Vikings wrote:And the flag with the union jack in the corner was common amongst ALL colonies

by Spiral Sun » Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:07 am
Creative Vikings wrote:I approve of a union with Aussie so close, we may as well be one country. I won't approve if we're forced to be a bitch for the US in warzoness, I will pick my own wars. Shooting people in ghost blankets isn't really fun.GreaterPacificNations wrote:Chill out footrot flats.
<- Check the flag and learn the history of your big brother.
My big brither? Which brother? William of Jack?
And the flag with the union jack in the corner was common amongst ALL colonies
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Bienenhalde, Cannot think of a name, Des-Bal, Dimetrodon Empire, Pasong Tirad, Port Caverton, Umeria, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement