NATION

PASSWORD

Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:01 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417


I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.


I think a key difference exists between acting as the world police and defending it's own territorial sovereignty. I think it pretty amusing that you continue to bash the British military. The Type 45 Destroyer is one of the foremost warships in the world.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
Krumbia
Minister
 
Posts: 2759
Founded: Jan 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Krumbia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:06 pm

Malgrave wrote:I think a key difference exists between acting as the world police and defending it's own territorial sovereignty. I think it pretty amusing that you continue to bash the British military. The Type 45 Destroyer is one of the foremost warships in the world.


This. We're not world policeman, we're defending our territory. We'd do this (hopefully) with any other of our overseas territories under threat.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:07 pm

Malgrave wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.


I think a key difference exists between acting as the world police and defending it's own territorial sovereignty. I think it pretty amusing that you continue to bash the British military. The Type 45 Destroyer is one of the foremost warships in the world.


I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.

User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:10 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Malgrave wrote:
I think a key difference exists between acting as the world police and defending it's own territorial sovereignty. I think it pretty amusing that you continue to bash the British military. The Type 45 Destroyer is one of the foremost warships in the world.


I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.



A Wild Troll appears: it uses - Illogical and incorrect argument, with no evidence to back up and which makes the troll look like an idiot.
It's not very effective (however the last bit worked perfectly).

Seriously - I don't see how anyone who isn't more nationalist than Nick Griffin can actually believe Argentina's claim is worth anything!
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
Unchecked Expansion
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5599
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Unchecked Expansion » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:12 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417


I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.

Because war is such a nice thing to hope for

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:13 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Malgrave wrote:
I think a key difference exists between acting as the world police and defending it's own territorial sovereignty. I think it pretty amusing that you continue to bash the British military. The Type 45 Destroyer is one of the foremost warships in the world.


I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.

Aaah, I see you still have not of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:18 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.

Aaah, I see you still have not of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.


It's completely imaginary of course. ;)
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:18 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417


I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.


Nice, ignoring all the posts quoting you about the issue at hand only to come back with a boarder-line troll post.

Do you seriously think that defending your own soil is being "world policeman"? :eyebrow:
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Logic-A-Topia
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Logic-A-Topia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:19 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417


I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.


What was that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of our empire.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:20 pm

Kouralia wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.



A Wild Troll appears: it uses - Illogical and incorrect argument, with no evidence to back up and which makes the troll look like an idiot.
It's not very effective (however the last bit worked perfectly).

Seriously - I don't see how anyone who isn't more nationalist than Nick Griffin can actually believe Argentina's claim is worth anything!


In all honestly, seeing the rabit British nationalists proclaim that the military of the UK is the be-all-and-end-all amuses me to the point that I act as the role of antithesis for the lulz.

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I don't doubt it. Just let me launch a couple dozen Exocets at it for a hour or so. See how long it stays around when its reloads for its anti-missile system are at Asscension Island.

Aaah, I see you still have not of the Royal Fleet Auxiliary.


Compare the problems the Americans had during the Pacific War, with the numbers of ships they used, and the RFA numbers at present. Granted, they were not using missiles or such, but they had far more warships on the line.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:23 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Kouralia wrote:

A Wild Troll appears: it uses - Illogical and incorrect argument, with no evidence to back up and which makes the troll look like an idiot.
It's not very effective (however the last bit worked perfectly).

Seriously - I don't see how anyone who isn't more nationalist than Nick Griffin can actually believe Argentina's claim is worth anything!


In all honestly, seeing the rabit British nationalists proclaim that the military of the UK is the be-all-and-end-all amuses me to the point that I act as the role of antithesis for the lulz.


We [British] know all too well how small our navy is compared to the 80's and 40's.

Now if you excuse me, I'll go while you see all the posts you ignored a page or two back. You know, about how they are Britain's islands.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:23 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Compare the problems the Americans had during the Pacific War, with the numbers of ships they used, and the RFA numbers at present. Granted, they were not using missiles or such, but they had far more warships on the line.


Of course re-arming a couple of vessels with a few anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles requires a replenishment fleet the scale of the entire replenishment fleet of the American Navy during the massive naval campaign in the pacific.

:palm:
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:30 pm

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
In all honestly, seeing the rabit British nationalists proclaim that the military of the UK is the be-all-and-end-all amuses me to the point that I act as the role of antithesis for the lulz.


We [British] know all too well how small our navy is compared to the 80's and 40's.

Now if you excuse me, I'll go while you see all the posts you ignored a page or two back. You know, about how they are Britain's islands.


Perhaps they belong to Britain at present, but a few years down the line, they will be so dependant on Argentina that they will belong to Britain in all but name.

Malgrave wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Compare the problems the Americans had during the Pacific War, with the numbers of ships they used, and the RFA numbers at present. Granted, they were not using missiles or such, but they had far more warships on the line.


Of course re-arming a couple of vessels with a few anti-ship and anti-aircraft missiles requires a replenishment fleet the scale of the entire replenishment fleet of the American Navy during the massive naval campaign in the pacific.

:palm:


Food. Need to feed the sailors.
Fuel. Last I looked, the USN was screaming for tankers all the way through WW2. Getting to the Falklands requires a great deal of sailing, and theyre not a great bunch of safe ports to base from...
Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:31 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Compare the problems the Americans had during the Pacific War, with the numbers of ships they used, and the RFA numbers at present. Granted, they were not using missiles or such, but they had far more warships on the line.

Right, because WW2 totally equals sea based combat today! GENIUS!

The RFA is designed to keep the Royal Navy supplied across the seas and looking at then umbers of ships the RFA has to the number of ships the RN has, I think it kind of adds up.

You may not have noticed, but the Pacific is a lot bigger than the are around the Falklands, so I don't see how you can compare the two.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:35 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Food. Need to feed the sailors.
Fuel. Last I looked, the USN was screaming for tankers all the way through WW2. Getting to the Falklands requires a great deal of sailing, and theyre not a great bunch of safe ports to base from...
Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.

What is this, I don't even...

The RFA is capable of resupplying ships, wait for it, at sea, because, now brace yourself, its not 1944, its 2012, and see, using black voodoo magic, we've been able to improve efficiency and all that other stuff so that ships can operate longer.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:35 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.


mabye if it were some tin-pot half-arsed foreign navy. it is however the Royal Navy. as such it is crewed by englishmen (and associates) and more than capable of taking a ship anywhere there is water.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:37 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Food. Need to feed the sailors.
Fuel. Last I looked, the USN was screaming for tankers all the way through WW2. Getting to the Falklands requires a great deal of sailing, and theyre not a great bunch of safe ports to base from...
Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.


You made specific reference to weapons. The Royal Fleet Auxiliary can easily supply two vessels of the Royal Navy with the needed supplies and saying it cannot is fairly idiotic. Technological advancements have been made since the 1940's.

You can't compare the massive scale of the Pacific naval war to any possible conflict between Argentina and the United Kingdom. :palm:
Last edited by Malgrave on Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:39 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Compare the problems the Americans had during the Pacific War, with the numbers of ships they used, and the RFA numbers at present. Granted, they were not using missiles or such, but they had far more warships on the line.

Right, because WW2 totally equals sea based combat today! GENIUS!

The RFA is designed to keep the Royal Navy supplied across the seas and looking at then umbers of ships the RFA has to the number of ships the RN has, I think it kind of adds up.

You may not have noticed, but the Pacific is a lot bigger than the are around the Falklands, so I don't see how you can compare the two.


Explain to me what has changed then, besides the introduction of technology. Sailors need food, and ships fuel. They have to get thier. Without a major port, you're screwed.

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Food. Need to feed the sailors.
Fuel. Last I looked, the USN was screaming for tankers all the way through WW2. Getting to the Falklands requires a great deal of sailing, and theyre not a great bunch of safe ports to base from...
Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.

What is this, I don't even...

The RFA is capable of resupplying ships, wait for it, at sea, because, now brace yourself, its not 1944, its 2012, and see, using black voodoo magic, we've been able to improve efficiency and all that other stuff so that ships can operate longer.


Again, what are the major differences between the USN Replenishment Fleets of WW2 and today.

The UK in Exile wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.


mabye if it were some tin-pot half-arsed foreign navy. it is however the Royal Navy. as such it is crewed by englishmen (and associates) and more than capable of taking a ship anywhere there is water.


Yes, and Englishmen are far superior to other peoples, and so are the prime nation on this planet...wait....

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:39 pm

The Matthew Islands wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Food. Need to feed the sailors.
Fuel. Last I looked, the USN was screaming for tankers all the way through WW2. Getting to the Falklands requires a great deal of sailing, and theyre not a great bunch of safe ports to base from...
Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.

What is this, I don't even...

The RFA is capable of resupplying ships, wait for it, at sea, because, now brace yourself, its not 1944, its 2012, and see, using black voodoo magic, we've been able to improve efficiency and all that other stuff so that ships can operate longer.


The German Navy managed to re-supply on the move even during WW2.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:41 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
mabye if it were some tin-pot half-arsed foreign navy. it is however the Royal Navy. as such it is crewed by englishmen (and associates) and more than capable of taking a ship anywhere there is water.


Yes, and Englishmen are far superior to other peoples, and so are the prime nation on this planet...wait....


glad you noticed. ;)
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:41 pm

Malgrave wrote:
The Matthew Islands wrote:What is this, I don't even...

The RFA is capable of resupplying ships, wait for it, at sea, because, now brace yourself, its not 1944, its 2012, and see, using black voodoo magic, we've been able to improve efficiency and all that other stuff so that ships can operate longer.


The German Navy managed to re-supply on the move even during WW2.



The German Navy never fought a large-scale fleet engagement with a large fleet during WW2 outside of the northern hemisphere.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111689
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:41 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:Spare parts, and repairs. Ascension Island for those. Try flying them in along with everything else you need. It would be a nightmare.


mabye if it were some tin-pot half-arsed foreign navy. it is however the Royal Navy. as such it is crewed by englishmen (and associates) and more than capable of taking a ship anywhere there is water.

Ah, the British tar!

His nose should pant
and his lip should curl,
His cheeks should flame
and his brow should furl,
His bosom should heave
and his heart should glow,
And his fist be ever ready
for a knock-down blow.

Image


:)
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29265
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:48 pm

I have a couple of good ideas.

1) Kouralia, don't subtly accuse other posters of being idiots:

Kouralia wrote:A Wild Troll appears: it uses - Illogical and incorrect argument, with no evidence to back up and which makes the troll look like an idiot.
It's not very effective (however the last bit worked perfectly).

Seriously - I don't see how anyone who isn't more nationalist than Nick Griffin can actually believe Argentina's claim is worth anything!



2) Machtergreifung, it's a bad idea to "act as the role of antithesis for the lulz." This is often construed as trolling. Several of your recent posts have - by your own open admission - been deliberately provocative. Don't.


Now, gentlemen, I'm going to let everyone off with just that gentle but firm slap of the wrist.

Don't make me come back here - I might have to break out the red text.

User avatar
The Matthew Islands
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6739
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Capitalist Paradise

Postby The Matthew Islands » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:50 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Explain to me what has changed then, besides the introduction of technology. Sailors need food, and ships fuel. They have to get thier. Without a major port, you're screwed.


Again, what are the major differences between the USN Replenishment Fleets of WW2 and today.


No, see the point of the RFA is that, they don't need a major port for a while. See, the Royal Navy sails off down to the Falklands, with the supply ships, and the Destroyers use up their ammo for example. The supply ships give them some. Them some more. Then some more until the supply ship runs out, or whatever in which case, they will have already informed HQ of the impending shortage, so they will dispatch a replacement ship to arrive in time to coincide with the original ship leaving. Then, they can either go all the way back to Gibraltar, or more likely, get a port in South Africa or the Caribbean. Or, perhaps meet another ship sailing from Gibraltar with supplies, take their supplies, then sail back.

The difference between the USN replenishment fleets of WW2 and today is:
WW2: Completely different conditions and factors, with extremely high rate of ammo usage, as well as having to serve hundreds of ships in the largest ocean in the world.

Today in the Falklands: Most likely lower rates of consumption, having to serve, at best, 10-20 ships, in the general are of the Falklands and Argentina.
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5721
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Jan 31, 2012 2:55 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Malgrave wrote:
The German Navy managed to re-supply on the move even during WW2.



The German Navy never fought a large-scale fleet engagement with a large fleet during WW2 outside of the northern hemisphere.


I was referring to the re-fuelling of the u-boats which had to be done fairly rapidly under poor and extremely hostile conditions.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Dtn, Elejamie, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Stellar Colonies, The Jamesian Republic, The Orson Empire, TheKeyToJoy

Advertisement

Remove ads