NATION

PASSWORD

Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:24 am

Marcurix wrote:
Rio Cana wrote:
Learn about what. The Bolshoi island history follows what Argentina said was done to them. Has you pointed out the Soviets took Bolshoi. That is what Argentina said happened to them.

And you left out the part that the Spanish officially ran those islands from Buenos Aires.



Just on that last bit,

Britain did not claim sovereignty over the islands when Spain left them in 1811. Nor did Britain immediately challenge Argentina’s assertion of sovereignty in 1816.


Argentina didn't immediately challenge Britain's assertion of sovereignty of the islands (which was never revoked since the first settlement by the way), when Britain re-took the islands in 1833. For over a hundred years.


Yes, beacuse it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:26 am

Machtergreifung wrote:Yes, beacuse it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...

If they thought they owned it, they should have claimed it.

Not that it matters in the slightest when someone claimed the islands.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:15 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Marcurix wrote:
Just on that last bit,



Argentina didn't immediately challenge Britain's assertion of sovereignty of the islands (which was never revoked since the first settlement by the way), when Britain re-took the islands in 1833. For over a hundred years.


Yes, beacuse it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...


Including the Falklands...which I think has already been stated about....oh..1001 times in this thread, some of which you've apparently chosen to ignore in the last page or so.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Sun Jan 29, 2012 12:17 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Kirrig
Minister
 
Posts: 2800
Founded: Sep 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Kirrig » Sun Jan 29, 2012 6:02 pm

Rio Cana wrote:
Malgrave wrote:
You should actually learn about the Bolshoi Islands history in comparison to the Falkland Islands and you'll find out that they are nothing alike. I'll copy and earlier post on the subject.

- The Soviet Union occupied the islands from China illegally in the 1920's and as such Russia were at an immediate disadvantage in any diplomatic negotiations about the future of the islands, the amount of people in the island is not important. The British Empire on the other hand never invaded the Falkland Islands and the situation can be explained by quoting history previously posted by Bwitain.



Spain have a greater claim to the Falkland Islands then Argentina and if I remember correctly Uruguay also hold a great claim to the Falkland Islands then Argentina. You also have to remember that the people to the Falklands don't wish to be part of Argentina.


Learn about what. The Bolshoi island history follows what Argentina said was done to them. Has you pointed out the Soviets took Bolshoi. That is what Argentina said happened to them.

And you left out the part that the Spanish officially ran those islands from Buenos Aires.

Both Argentina and the islands were ruled by Spain. Spain ruled the islands from Argentina – they were therefore part of the same territory. Upon independence from Spain, Argentina rightfully asserted sovereignty over the former Spanish territory. Britain did not claim sovereignty over the islands when Spain left them in 1811. Nor did Britain immediately challenge Argentina’s assertion of sovereignty in 1816.


Except they were managed from Uruguay.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.

"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
Milks Empire wrote:
Kirrig wrote:Do you guys know if George Bush is on NSG?
Wouldn't surprise me.

User avatar
Marcurix
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5235
Founded: Nov 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Marcurix » Sun Jan 29, 2012 11:56 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Marcurix wrote:
Just on that last bit,



Argentina didn't immediately challenge Britain's assertion of sovereignty of the islands (which was never revoked since the first settlement by the way), when Britain re-took the islands in 1833. For over a hundred years.


Yes, because it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...


and....? It still isn't particularly smart to pick a fight with one of the worlds largest economies.

What I'm pointing out here is the flaw in the statement. You can't fault Britain for not actively claiming the islands for a decade when Argentina didn't for a century. It makes no sense.
I do not agree with what you have to say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it.
-Voltaire

A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject.
-Winston Churchill

Attitude is a little thing that makes a big difference.
-Winston Churchill

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Mon Jan 30, 2012 4:46 am

Machtergreifung wrote:
Marcurix wrote:
Just on that last bit,



Argentina didn't immediately challenge Britain's assertion of sovereignty of the islands (which was never revoked since the first settlement by the way), when Britain re-took the islands in 1833. For over a hundred years.


Yes, beacuse it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...

Argentina was also fairly pro-British, who invested in the country a great deal and purchased much of it's wheat and beef.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21522
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Tue Jan 31, 2012 3:38 am

Spiral Sun wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Yes, beacuse it really is smart to challenge the nation that owns 1/5th of the world at that time...

Argentina was also fairly pro-British, who invested in the country a great deal and purchased much of it's wheat and beef.


Why would that matter? The Malvinas are Argentina's.

In all seriousness, it will take a major change in Argentina for this to go away.
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:21 am

Forsher wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:Argentina was also fairly pro-British, who invested in the country a great deal and purchased much of it's wheat and beef.


Why would that matter? The Malvinas are Argentina's.


You mean the Falklands? Why?

In all seriousness, it will take a major change in Argentina for this to go away.


Or history classes.
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54753
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 4:24 am

Forsher wrote:Why would that matter? The Malvinas are Argentina's.


I totally agree. Now we got to find a previously-unchartered island, claimed by no-one else, call it "Malvinas" and have the Argentines stick their flag in it for a bit of nationalistic dick-waving.

Then we can get back to business as usual and start some abortion thread.
Last edited by Risottia on Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:36 am

Risottia wrote:I totally agree. Now we got to find a previously-unchartered island, claimed by no-one else, call it "Malvinas" and have the Argentines stick their flag in it for a bit of nationalistic dick-waving.

Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:38 am

Tagmatium wrote:
Risottia wrote:I totally agree. Now we got to find a previously-unchartered island, claimed by no-one else, call it "Malvinas" and have the Argentines stick their flag in it for a bit of nationalistic dick-waving.

Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417

They don't want to be attacked. Is that a problem?
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:47 am

Spiral Sun wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417

They don't want to be attacked. Is that a problem?

Of course it is a problem! It's obvious that the Falklands should be Argentinian!

Derp.

No, it's not a problem, but the idea that Argentina is going to invade the Falklands is, frankly, stupid.

But sending another warship down there is only going to inflame tensions at this time.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:48 am

Tagmatium wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:They don't want to be attacked. Is that a problem?

Of course it is a problem! It's obvious that the Falklands should be Argentinian!

Derp.

No, it's not a problem, but the idea that Argentina is going to invade the Falklands is, frankly, stupid.

But sending another warship down there is only going to inflame tensions at this time.


The sad thing is that it's not another ship, but an upgraded replacement ship. At least it's an upgrade mind you; with the government cut-backs you'd think Britain planned to defend the islands with some internet meme
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:52 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54753
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:51 am

Tagmatium wrote:No, it's not a problem, but the idea that Argentina is going to invade the Falklands is, frankly, stupid.

Then again, overestimating Kirchner's intelligence might prove a bit of a gamble.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:53 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:The sad thing is that it's not another ship, but an upgraded replacement ship. At least it's an upgrade mind you; with the government cut-backs you'd think Britain planned to defend the islands with some internet meme

Basically.

What, they're getting rid of another couple of thousand, aren't they?

Morale must be shot.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:53 am

Risottia wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:No, it's not a problem, but the idea that Argentina is going to invade the Falklands is, frankly, stupid.

Then again, overestimating Kirchner's intelligence might prove a bit of a gamble.


Funny how you never see Kirchner and Sarah Palin in the same room..
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54753
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:56 am

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Risottia wrote:Then again, overestimating Kirchner's intelligence might prove a bit of a gamble.


Funny how you never see Kirchner and Sarah Palin in the same room..


O. M. G. :shock:
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:58 am

Risottia wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
Funny how you never see Kirchner and Sarah Palin in the same room..

O. M. G. :shock:

Palin just takes off her glasses and bam!, there's Kirchner!
Last edited by Tagmatium on Tue Jan 31, 2012 5:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Bales Rant
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bales Rant » Tue Jan 31, 2012 9:42 am

Tagmatium wrote:
Spiral Sun wrote:They don't want to be attacked. Is that a problem?

Of course it is a problem! It's obvious that the Falklands should be Argentinian!

Derp.

No, it's not a problem, but the idea that Argentina is going to invade the Falklands is, frankly, stupid.

But sending another warship down there is only going to inflame tensions at this time.


I know what you're saying and it will initally increase tensions given that Dauntless is much superior to the frigate it's replacing but at the same time it's a much greater deterrent. As such, I'd say the trade-off is sound. The mixed signals London sent prior to the the war in '82 contributed to Argentina's decision to go for it.

If Argentina doesn't mobilise what aircraft it could throw at the Falklands they have nothing to worry about.

As an aside, I didn't know the Type-45 was that well equipped and had such capabilities and I'm delighted about it.

User avatar
Greater Evil Imperial Japanese Dystopia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6930
Founded: Jun 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

HMS Dauntless deployed to the Falklands, Tensions Escalate

Postby Greater Evil Imperial Japanese Dystopia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:04 am

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... rship.html

..In response to the timing of the war ship heading to the Falklands a Navy spokesperson said:
'The Royal Navy has had a continuous presence in the South Atlantic for many years.
The deployment of HMS Dauntless to the South Atlantic has been long planned, is entirely routine and replaces another ship on patrol,' he said.
But a Royal Navy source said: 'HMS Dauntless is an elite warship. She is one of six Type 45s built for the navy as the most advanced fighting ships in the world.
'She is going to the Falklands on a routine deployment, but the fact the navy is sending her there and not one of her older ships is significant.'
As the 30th anniversary of the start of the Falklands conflict approaches, the diplomatic tension between Britain and Argentina, is rising.
Argentina has recently renewed claims to what it calls Las Malvinas, and David Cameron has accused the country of 'colonialism.'
After returning to work following a cancer scare, Argentina's president wasted little time in launching a response to the comment.
During a speech, Cristina Fernandez said: ‘I heard they're calling us colonialist. ... One is always tempted to respond, but I think it's better to avoid it. When they say these things it's exactly because they don't have reasons or arguments.’
In December, the Mercosur grouping of countries, which includes Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil and Paraguay, announced that it would ban ships sailing under the Falkland Islands flag from docking at their ports.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... 3Ygw05Y....

According to this article, in the midst of growing tensions between Britain & Argentina, the British Royal Navy deploys one of it's most advanced warships to the Falklands to increase its defenses.

I see this as another possible war between both nations.

What is your opinions on this, NationStates? (British & Argentinians are more than welcome to debate this too :D)
    Currently warring.
Military, including paramilitaries: uncounted; numerous warring factions (currently state of war)
Link to Tracker I-II-III-DERP!
Compass
Power comes only from the barrel of a gun - Mao Zedong
Death is nothing, but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily. - Napoleon Bonaparte
DEFCON:
[0] Nuclear Armaggedon Inevitable, as well as Defend Reichland from Invasion!
Azrael wrote:Except that their entire appearance is a ruse!
Prussia-Steinbach wrote:You, I must admit, are a smart Commie. :clap:
Damanucus wrote:... better ones again.

User avatar
Acrainia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 597
Founded: Aug 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Acrainia » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:18 am

The islands want to be British and the Argentinian claim to them is very weak, giving the British the strongest claim.

The UK has every right to deploy a ship to an area where an increasingly hostile nation has motivations to violate their sovereignty.

Not to mention the argies only started giving a damn again once the possibility of oil in the area appeared.

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:18 am

I'm from Argentina, and I have my doubts there's going to be a war ever again. In many other Falklands threads (I call them Malvinas when I speak Spanish, Falklands when I speak English) I have stated that we have little - if any - war material left (our armed forces have been mostly dismantled), which makes any attempt to go to war again virtually impossible. Not to mention no one here, after the failed, poorly planned and even more poorly executed '82 campaign, will ever endorse the idea of going to war ever again; and our government has stated many times that Argentina's claim (which I find dubious if existent at all nowadays) will only be pursued through diplomatic means.

It is my opinion that this whole thing is nothing but a bragging contest - and not just on our side, because I believe David Cameron knows everything I've said above, and is just showing off (I mean no offense to British people with this last part, and I acknowledge that I can and may be wrong). This bickering is out of place, and once again I repeat: If the Falklands inhabitants wish to remain British, then it is their will and it should be respected.
Last edited by Samuraikoku on Tue Jan 31, 2012 10:19 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
SD_Film Artists
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13399
Founded: Jun 10, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby SD_Film Artists » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:00 am

There's already a thread for this; and unless I've missed something in the news, this hasn't escalated tensions. Britain is merely replacing a frigate which is already there (along with a nuclear subarmarine, 4 Eurofighters and ground forces). Considering that this is very recent news, perhaps Argentina has yet to give a reply; but then again, the Falklands are British waters so Britain is quite within its rights to send 100 frigates there.

Edit: Yay for thread-merge!
Last edited by SD_Film Artists on Tue Jan 31, 2012 12:06 pm, edited 7 times in total.
Lurking NSG since 2005
Economic Left/Right: -2.62, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.67

When anybody preaches disunity, tries to pit one of us against each other through class warfare, race hatred, or religious intolerance, you know that person seeks to rob us of our freedom and destroy our very lives.

User avatar
Call to power
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6908
Founded: Apr 13, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Call to power » Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:38 am

HMS Dauntless is an elite warship. She is one of six Type 45s built for the navy as the most advanced fighting ships in the world


A tenner says it runs aground and needs to be rescued at some point.

Samuraikoku wrote:It is my opinion that this whole thing is nothing but a bragging contest - and not just on our side, because I believe David Cameron knows everything I've said above, and is just showing off (I mean no offense to British people with this last part, and I acknowledge that I can and may be wrong). This bickering is out of place, and once again I repeat: If the Falklands inhabitants wish to remain British, then it is their will and it should be respected.


Aye I think both sides are pretty keen on using this to deflect criticism of deteriorating conditions at home
The Parkus Empire wrote:Theoretically, why would anyone put anytime into anything but tobacco, intoxicants and sex?

Vareiln wrote:My god, CtP is right...
Not that you haven't been right before, but... Aw, hell, you get what I meant.

Tubbsalot wrote:replace my opinions with CtP's.


User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Jan 31, 2012 1:51 pm

Tagmatium wrote:
Risottia wrote:I totally agree. Now we got to find a previously-unchartered island, claimed by no-one else, call it "Malvinas" and have the Argentines stick their flag in it for a bit of nationalistic dick-waving.

Speaking of dick-waving...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16810417


I hope it gets a couple of exocet holes in its side to teach the British for good that the empire is gone for good, and that they dont have the muscle to play world policeman.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Dtn, Elejamie, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Stellar Colonies, The Jamesian Republic, The Orson Empire

Advertisement

Remove ads