Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

[Tagmatium]

Aah! Run away, another whingeing Pom!

The issue is, how can you separate the dull from the trolls?

Divining rod.

[Forsher]

Aah! Run away, another whingeing Pom!

The issue is, how can you separate the dull from the trolls?

Divining rod.

But of course. Which brand? Modliness Divining?

[Castleclose]

If the locals want to remain British the islands should remain British. End of.

[Tagmatium]

Divining rod.

But of course. Which brand? Modliness Divining?

Of obviously not a Mod divining rod. That makes you complicit in the moderator-led conspiracy to keep the opinion of the pro-Malvinas Falklander down. Duh.

You need a good forked yew tree branch to properly ascertain whether someone is a troll or not. All you need to do is send me a cheque for £50 and I'll be able to send you a divining rod that divides the trolls and the knowlessmen from those who are truly speaking their opinion.

[Ifreann]

I think the clear solution here is to pretend to make the Falklands a wholly independent state, but have it secretly stay British and sneak the population pictures of the Queen under cover of darkness once a month.

Naughty pictures?

Only for the most patriotic.

[Forsher]

But of course. Which brand? Modliness Divining?

Of obviously not a Mod divining rod. That makes you complicit in the moderator-led conspiracy to keep the opinion of the pro-Malvinas Falklander down. Duh.

You need a good forked yew tree branch to properly ascertain whether someone is a troll or not. All you need to do is send me a cheque for £50 and I'll be able to send you a divining rod that divides the trolls and the knowlessmen from those who are truly speaking their opinion.

$100 is a bit much...

[Farnhamia]

Of obviously not a Mod divining rod. That makes you complicit in the moderator-led conspiracy to keep the opinion of the pro-Malvinas Falklander down. Duh.

You need a good forked yew tree branch to properly ascertain whether someone is a troll or not. All you need to do is send me a cheque for £50 and I'll be able to send you a divining rod that divides the trolls and the knowlessmen from those who are truly speaking their opinion.

$100 is a bit much...

Depends on whether he picks up the shipping.

[Risottia]

Context? Please?

thought I had replied to this. Puricelli considers contential argentina to be de facto argentinian territory and argentinia plus falklands to be legally argentinan territory.

So he's willing to allow the continued "invasion" of what he considers "Argentine" territory.
He's either a) a wimp or b) someone who knows pretty well the Argentine claim on the Falklands, South Georgia etc is entirely meaningless.

[Isolated China]

Looks like the Monroe Doctrine isn't in effect anymore......
Time to make new colonies in America! *Prepares Chinese flag*

[Forsher]

$100 is a bit much...

Depends on whether he picks up the shipping.

Oh dear, could be even more.

[Machtergreifung]

Is it just me, or would it make more sense to make the locals independant, so they could deal with Argentina at the UN and leave everyone else out of it?

[Farnhamia]

Is it just me, or would it make more sense to make the locals independant, so they could deal with Argentina at the UN and leave everyone else out of it?

It's just you. The locals do not want to be independent.

[Machtergreifung]

Is it just me, or would it make more sense to make the locals independant, so they could deal with Argentina at the UN and leave everyone else out of it?

It's just you. The locals do not want to be independent.

Well, make them independant, and then they can be more British than Britain. Which they are already.

At least my way, Argentina can't cry to the UN, because the Falklanders won't have nuclear submarines.

[Isolated China]

It's just you. The locals do not want to be independent.

Well, make them independant, and then they can be more British than Britain. Which they are already.

At least my way, Argentina can't cry to the UN, because the Falklanders won't have nuclear submarines.

What if Britain gives them a nuclear submarine?

[Machtergreifung]

Well, make them independant, and then they can be more British than Britain. Which they are already.

At least my way, Argentina can't cry to the UN, because the Falklanders won't have nuclear submarines.

What if Britain gives them a nuclear submarine?

Then they can have fun trying to rear sheep to pay for it.

[Inky Noodles]

Argentina, the Brits found the islands first, they claimed them, then later you thought the islands were yours and no one else s, you whined and started a short war, you lost, now your whining again.

[Unchecked Expansion]

It's just you. The locals do not want to be independent.

Well, make them independant, and then they can be more British than Britain. Which they are already.

The Falklands self govern except for defence and diplomacy. It's pretty close to being independent, and it's what they want.

[Machtergreifung]

Well, make them independant, and then they can be more British than Britain. Which they are already.

The Falklands self govern except for defence and diplomacy. It's pretty close to being independent, and it's what they want.

See, it's the diplomacy that causes all the problems. Like that middle-man at the used-car showroom.

[Unchecked Expansion]

The Falklands self govern except for defence and diplomacy. It's pretty close to being independent, and it's what they want.

See, it's the diplomacy that causes all the problems. Like that middle-man at the used-car showroom.

Diplomacy was on the table until an invasion. Trying to conquer people tends to sour their opinion of you.
Basically, the only party with a problem is Argentina. The Kelpers are happy - they have self determination. The UK is happy with it's solid claim of sovereignty, and the will of the people living there.

[Libraria and Ausitoria]

Why don't the British protest outside the Argentinian embassy in London about the Argentinian wish to annex the Falklands?

[Nanatsu no Tsuki]

Your English surely isn't better than your arguments.



And if your arguments are soooooooooooooo much better, please, by all means, present them. I am waiting.

Is a colosal strugle for you take esforce in search the Argument that I posted times ago...
You `ve could still waiting.The worst thing is that you are Latin girl..The capacity f Latin America to produce sepoys is stunning
The community of people that looks fine , by opinion of "Nanatsu"the Fujimorist militant.)..Ask to me manny times for my explain about the Argentinian Sovereign over Malvinas.So,since the year 1833 until 1982 Argentina only had preponderant economic situation because the majority of products that kelpers earned were of Argentinian origin
So, I can to explain too that from 1833 to 1834 the real power in the Malvinas Island was under the rule of ANTONIO "GAUCHO"RIVERO.An Argentinian warrior, jaja

Wow, so much BS to just prove that indeed, you have absolutely nothing constructive or valid to add aside from being racist. Why am I not surprised?

Oh, and please, before posting here, learn some English. Using a translator doesn't help.

[Ifreann]

What if Britain gives them a nuclear submarine?

Then they can have fun trying to rear sheep to pay for it.

Of course, if they don't have a nuclear sub they can have fun getting invaded by Argentina.

[Vitaphone Racing]

If people bothered to do their homework.... they would see Britain's claim over the islands is shaky at best however Argentina's is no better. If the Argentinian attempt to regain control of the inslands in 1982 was illegal then the British attempt to re-establish control of the islands in 1833 must also be considered to be illegal. Consider also that the British made no formal claim of the islands until 1765, despite discovering it in 1690, by which time the French has already made a claim.

Thus neither Britain nor Argentina has any claim over the islands in my opinion. Falkland islanders can leave and give the islands back to France who was officially "there first"

[Ceannairceach]

If people bothered to do their homework.... they would see Britain's claim over the islands is shaky at best however Argentina's is no better. If the Argentinian attempt to regain control of the inslands in 1982 was illegal then the British attempt to re-establish control of the islands in 1833 must also be considered to be illegal. Consider also that the British made no formal claim of the islands until 1765, despite discovering it in 1690, by which time the French has already made a claim.

Thus neither Britain nor Argentina has any claim over the islands in my opinion. Falkland islanders can leave and give the islands back to France who was officially "there first"

France, I believe, relinquished its claim. Thus, the strongest claim is held by the British, the locally supported government.

[Forsher]

If people bothered to do their homework.... they would see Britain's claim over the islands is shaky at best however Argentina's is no better. If the Argentinian attempt to regain control of the inslands in 1982 was illegal then the British attempt to re-establish control of the islands in 1833 must also be considered to be illegal. Consider also that the British made no formal claim of the islands until 1765, despite discovering it in 1690, by which time the French has already made a claim.

Thus neither Britain nor Argentina has any claim over the islands in my opinion. Falkland islanders can leave and give the islands back to France who was officially "there first"

The French are not the Maori. You can buy stuff off them without having to expect to give it back in a few decades or more. (To those that are ready to accuse me of Racism, this hass paraphrased the words of the immortal Billy T.)