Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

[Tagmatium]

It's probably not you who is being that here.

Dont worry .You´ll win always this challenge

Ok, to clear this issue up, would you mind explaining what you meant by this:

Like Man´s Islands?????DE FACTO

Also, respect for a fairly good put-down

[Ifreann]

I think the clear solution here is to pretend to make the Falklands a wholly independent state, but have it secretly stay British and sneak the population pictures of the Queen under cover of darkness once a month.

[Super Bwitain]

It's probably not you who is being that here.

Dont worry .You´ll win always this challenge

The put down would have been better if you put "always" before "win".

But good job nonetheless.

[The UK in Exile]

de facto, not de jure.

Context? Please?

thought I had replied to this. Puricelli considers contential argentina to be de facto argentinian territory and argentinia plus falklands to be legally argentinan territory.

[Scholencia]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

[Ifreann]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

The right to protest really isn't the issue at hand.

[Farnhamia]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

No one's said they shouldn't.

[Ifreann]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

No one's said they shouldn't.

Ha ha! Ninja'd by seconds!

[Scholencia]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

The right to protest really isn't the issue at hand.

Than what?

[Tekania]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

No one is stopping them from protesting... We're just ridiculing them over their protest which seeks to deny the rights of others to legal self-determination.

[Ifreann]

The right to protest really isn't the issue at hand.

Than what?

Who should own the Falkland Islands. Argentina wants them, Britain and the Islanders don't agree.

[Farnhamia]

The right to protest really isn't the issue at hand.

Than what?

Whether the Falklands should be British or Argentinian.

[Farnhamia]

We looked like the Three Stooges trying to all go through the same door there.

[Super Bwitain]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

Your point?

[The Matthew Islands]

The UN said we have to solve this peacefully with dialogue, which I think is diplomatic code for telling Argentina to fuck off because the UN won't do anything.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldne ... -moon.html

[Fartsniffage]

I think the clear solution here is to pretend to make the Falklands a wholly independent state, but have it secretly stay British and sneak the population pictures of the Queen under cover of darkness once a month.

Naughty pictures?

[Forsher]

Context? Please?

thought I had replied to this. Puricelli considers contential argentina to be de facto argentinian territory and argentinia plus falklands to be legally argentinan territory.

Ah, thanks. Also, makes sense.

[Scholencia]

everyone should have a right on a protest.

Your point?

Well, you know... Protest are one of basic standards of democraties.

[Farnhamia]

Your point?

Well, you know... Protest are one of basic standards of democraties.

True. Not the point of this thread, but true nonetheless.

[Super Bwitain]

Your point?

Well, you know... Protest are one of basic standards of democraties.

How is this relevant to whether the Falklands should be Argentine or British?

[Socialist States Owen]

Really?

Well, I'm sorry I disappointed you for not being as eloquent as you hoped I would be.

Anyway, who are you again?

I am somebody with better arguments than you..Ah, sure..Caragonia.I was post it the reasons because Argentina have the right with Argentinia Sovereign over Malvinas.
Is too large, the I dont post again

Is this post an eloquent joke?

You limies should just grant the Falklanders they're independence. Face the facts, the British Empire is dead.

Troll harder.

[Scholencia]

Well, you know... Protest are one of basic standards of democraties.

How is this relevant to whether the Falklands should be Argentine or British?

Maybe somebody should protest like somone else did....

[The Burgundy Plains]

The Falklands are with who they want to be with.

And the BBC article as well.

of far more concern than any other story to date is the american statement on the issue. by far the biggest threat to the falklands is hillary clinton or her successor deciding that the friendship of latin america is worth more than that of GB. the US taking a side in this has the potential to do far more damage than anything argentina can do.

Maybe we should consult some of the things that the people at Speaker's Square have said about America when making our decision

[Ushiku]

I am somebody with better arguments than you..Ah, sure..Caragonia.I was post it the reasons because Argentina have the right with Argentinia Sovereign over Malvinas.
Is too large, the I dont post again

Is this post an eloquent joke?

You limies should just grant the Falklanders they're independence. Face the facts, the British Empire is dead.

Troll harder.

Urgh, I have a new pet hate. It's up there with the use of "banter" as a codeword for being an evil head in the dark ages cock.

This new pet hate is denoting anything you disagree with as "trolling". Trolling is being an ass for being an ass's sake. Yes it's become a "popular" (social synonym for stupid and overrated by the idiot masses) meme, but not everyone you disagree with is a troll. Even someone who uses sarcasm isn't necessarily a troll. Some people do things for a reaction, but not all sarcastic remarks are trolling. A one off comment isn't enough to justify trolling, as trolls are usually persistent assholes.

Furthermore, even persistence isn't evidence enough of trolling. Genuinely stupid people often have the same vigour and belief that trolls have, yet trolls are usually worse in that they know better and do worse, whilst idiots are genuinely stupid and whilst a disgrace to humanity, don't go out of their way to act in that way, it's just their "nature" or rather a distorted form of "nurture" (or lack thereof).

Personally even as a British person I found the poster's comment hilarious social satire.

[Forsher]

Is this post an eloquent joke?



Troll harder.

Urgh, I have a new pet hate. It's up there with the use of "banter" as a codeword for being an evil head in the dark ages cock.

This new pet hate is denoting anything you disagree with as "trolling". Trolling is being an ass for being an ass's sake. Yes it's become a "popular" (social synonym for stupid and overrated by the idiot masses) meme, but not everyone you disagree with is a troll. Even someone who uses sarcasm isn't necessarily a troll. Some people do things for a reaction, but not all sarcastic remarks are trolling. A one off comment isn't enough to justify trolling, as trolls are usually persistent assholes.

Furthermore, even persistence isn't evidence enough of trolling. Genuinely stupid people often have the same vigour and belief that trolls have, yet trolls are usually worse in that they know better and do worse, whilst idiots are genuinely stupid and whilst a disgrace to humanity, don't go out of their way to act in that way, it's just their "nature" or rather a distorted form of "nurture" (or lack thereof).

Personally even as a British person I found the poster's comment hilarious social satire.

Aah! Run away, another whingeing Pom!

The issue is, how can you separate the dull from the trolls?