NATION

PASSWORD

Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:15 pm

Bales Rant wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
exactly the only way we are going to have to give them back is if the UN says we have to give them back.

Not because they can force us but because the alternative is ending up with a similar international reputation as Israel. its not a price the british will bear.


Sorry, UKIE I wasn't making a statement. I meant to ask you a question: 'There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands then?'


they'd need a significant military build up (years of purchasing and training) to go it alone. that would be obvious enough for us to re-enforce to the point that it becomes impossible. so based on the reasonable assumption that our intel will notice preparations to take the islands back. There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands.

a more troubling scenario is a quick and dirty military pact among brazil/argentina/venezuela. between the three of them they could strike the balance of military power in latin americas favour. currently the odds of that happening are nil. however since a week is a long time in politics and every four years we need to worry about new leaders in these places, it needs to be monitored.
Last edited by The UK in Exile on Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:16 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Bales Rant
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bales Rant » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:19 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Bales Rant wrote:
Sorry, UKIE I wasn't making a statement. I meant to ask you a question: 'There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands then?'


they'd need a significant military build up (years of purchasing and training) to go it alone. that would be obvious enough for us to re-enforce to the point that it becomes impossible. so based on the reasonable assumption that our intel will notice preparations to take the islands back. There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands.

a more troubling scenario is a quick and dirty military pact among brazil/argentina/venezuela. between the three of them they could strike the balance of military power in latin americas favour. currently the odds of that happening are nil. however since a week is a long time in politics and every four years we need to worry about new leaders in these places, it needs to be monitored.


Interesting, cheers. That said, I'm not really seeing the militarisation shes on about.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:26 pm

Prince William has been sent there as an SAR pilot, a type 45 (brand new) destroyer has been sent there, a submarine has been sent there. a foreign minister has declared he will visit for the 30th aniversary of the 1982 war.

all SAR pilots go there at some point, the type 45 is been sent to replace the duty frigate thats always there. but the submarine deployment is non-routine. its been approved by the prime minister and in the context its not hard to see why kirchner might assume that the other two have also been approved by cameron. thereby concluding he's shifting military units for domestic political advantage, by threatening argentina.
Last edited by The UK in Exile on Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:28 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10780
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:59 pm

Seems Ecuador has joined the club.

Read this - http://edition.cnn.com/2012/02/05/world ... +Recent%29


Found out Peru's current President also supports Argentina.

Read this - http://www.presstv.ir/detail/223010.html

In April and May 1982, Peru secretly provided a squadron of 10 to 14 (sources differ) Mirage V fighter jets, weapons that included torpedoes and Exocet missiles, and its Navy provided the transport for war materiel to Argentina that had been acquired in Israel.
Last edited by Rio Cana on Tue Feb 07, 2012 6:08 pm, edited 2 times in total.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:09 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
When did I say I wanted the SAME empire? I want a British empire, but not like the one we had before.



What makes British Empire, superior to say, a Swiss Empire?

Because Britain isn't a tyranny by majority whose largest party is racist?
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:13 pm

Machtergreifung wrote: Besides America, not many nations gained freedom through force of arms. None after the Industrial Revoultion.

This is hilarious. Actually hilarious. You show your ignorance of history here.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Feb 07, 2012 7:18 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:False. There was the Portuguese Colonial War, Algerian War of Independence, Namibian War of Independence and the First Indochina War are all cases in which nations gained their nationhood through force of arms after the Industrial Revolution.


None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

The formation of the Federation of Malaysia was directly caused by the Malay Emergency.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Forsher
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21516
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
New York Times Democracy

Postby Forsher » Tue Feb 07, 2012 8:39 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
That may be so, but I'd rather revoke a peoples right to vote in order to govern them better than they could.


And what if they want the right to self determination? Pretty sure thats in the UN Charter somewhere. That is the same as me coming into your house and dictating how to live your life better, and I bring a regiment of redcoats to do it.

The problem with ex-colonial countries is there was a lack of people who knew how to govern when Britain left. If a proper process of establishing a good civil service had been set up prior to withdrawal, then Zimbabwe might still have a currency of its own.


Hang on. Aren't you pro-Malvinas?
That it Could be What it Is, Is What it Is

Stop making shit up, though. Links, or it's a God-damn lie and you know it.

The normie life is heteronormie

We won't know until 2053 when it'll be really obvious what he should've done. [...] We have no option but to guess.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Feb 07, 2012 9:50 pm

Cromarty wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

The formation of the Federation of Malaysia was directly caused by the Malay Emergency.

Forgot about Malaysia, thanks for the reminder.

User avatar
Nanatsu no Tsuki
Post-Apocalypse Survivor
 
Posts: 202544
Founded: Feb 10, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Nanatsu no Tsuki » Tue Feb 07, 2012 10:02 pm

SD_Film Artists wrote:
Cromarty wrote:Is the name of some fictional islands belonging to Argentina.

Which is fine, except this thread is about the very much not fictional islands named the Falklands.


I hope I'm not being pedantic but, what's the difference between'Falklands-Malvinas' and 'London-Londres'. Perhaps it's that "Malvinas" doesn't even try to sound like "Falklands".


One is the English version, while the other is the Spanish one. :)
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGs
RIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria

User avatar
Samuraikoku
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31947
Founded: May 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Samuraikoku » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:08 am

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
SD_Film Artists wrote:
I hope I'm not being pedantic but, what's the difference between'Falklands-Malvinas' and 'London-Londres'. Perhaps it's that "Malvinas" doesn't even try to sound like "Falklands".


One is the English version, while the other is the Spanish one. :)


That's why I call them Falklands in English and Malvinas in Spanish.

User avatar
Spiral Sun
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1926
Founded: Apr 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Spiral Sun » Wed Feb 08, 2012 4:26 am

Napkiraly wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

Ah, my mistake I didn't know you were talking about former members of the BE only. In that case you have Ireland, but that's about it.

Not entirely correct. The British willingly gave them independence after a certain date, though a large chunk of the island didn't want to leave.
You're so nice.
You're not good,
You're not bad,
You're just nice.
I'm not good,
I'm not nice,
I'm just right.
The Witch, Into the Woods

User avatar
Vilanto
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: May 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Who has rights to the Falklands. The u.k or Argentina?

Postby Vilanto » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:56 am

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/americas/ ... 17430.html

So recently, the Falklands is starting to cause major tenstions between the U.K and Argentina yet again. Argentina thinks the Falklands belong to them while the U.K believes the Falklands should be british territory. So what do you guys think?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111677
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:58 am

I woulld say the people posting in this 45-page thread have the rights.

And it is considered polite, at the very least, to give your opinion.
Last edited by Farnhamia on Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Vilanto
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: May 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vilanto » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:00 am

Farnhamia wrote:I woulld say the people posting in this 45-page thread have the rights.

And it is considered polite, at the very least, to give your opinion.


o.k.

I believe that this issue should be decided by the residents of the Falklands. They should choose what government they want to live under.

I didn't know that someone already posted for this story.
Last edited by Vilanto on Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:01 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111677
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:02 am

Vilanto wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:I woulld say the people posting in this 45-page thread have the rights.

And it is considered polite, at the very least, to give your opinion.


o.k.

I believe that this issue should be decided by the residents of the Falklands. They should choose what government they want to live under.

I didn't know that someone already posted for this story.

That's fine. I believe the residents of the Falklands have made it pretty clear that they want to be British.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Vilanto
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: May 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vilanto » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:04 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Vilanto wrote:
o.k.

I believe that this issue should be decided by the residents of the Falklands. They should choose what government they want to live under.

I didn't know that someone already posted for this story.

That's fine. I believe the residents of the Falklands have made it pretty clear that they want to be British.


If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?
Last edited by Vilanto on Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:06 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:06 am

Vilanto wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:That's fine. I believe the residents of the Falklands have made it pretty clear that they want to be British.


If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?

The Falknads was in the possesion of Spain which according to the Argentinians they inherit. In my opinion the Falklands should be Argentinian.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:08 am

Cromarty wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote: Besides America, not many nations gained freedom through force of arms. None after the Industrial Revoultion.

This is hilarious. Actually hilarious. You show your ignorance of history here.



So, nations that achived independance from Britain by throwing them out with force of arms-
America
Ireland (though they kept a fair portion of it for themselves)

Any others? Might have forgotten a great deal of my history, but you get the idea that any opposition to the British Empire was crushed pretty ruthlessly, and that begs the question as to why people were forced to fight for thier independance. This 'great' empire was nowhere near as great as many people imagine.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159079
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:09 am

Vilanto wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:That's fine. I believe the residents of the Falklands have made it pretty clear that they want to be British.


If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?

Otherwise all they'd be known for is being the place where Nazis go to hide from justice and having a song about how they shouldn't cry for some someone.
Last edited by Ifreann on Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111677
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:09 am

Scholencia wrote:
Vilanto wrote:
If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?

The Falknads was in the possesion of Spain which according to the Argentinians they inherit. In my opinion the Falklands should be Argentinian.

Only, no one who lives there agrees. Except that one guy who became an Argentine citizen.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Super Bwitain
Minister
 
Posts: 2868
Founded: Apr 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Super Bwitain » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:11 am

Machtergreifung wrote:
Cromarty wrote:This is hilarious. Actually hilarious. You show your ignorance of history here.



So, nations that achived independance from Britain by throwing them out with force of arms-
America
Ireland (though they kept a fair portion of it for themselves)

Any others? Might have forgotten a great deal of my history, but you get the idea that any opposition to the British Empire was crushed pretty ruthlessly, and that begs the question as to why people were forced to fight for thier independance. This 'great' empire was nowhere near as great as many people imagine.


It depends what you find "great" about it. For example, size. No one can deny that the British Empire was the largest in history, anf some people find that "great".
Bill Nye is watching: The Coalition Of Steel

User avatar
Vilanto
Attaché
 
Posts: 86
Founded: May 01, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vilanto » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:11 am

Scholencia wrote:
Vilanto wrote:
If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?

The Falknads was in the possesion of Spain which according to the Argentinians they inherit. In my opinion the Falklands should be Argentinian.


Wouldn't Spain have rights to the falklands then since it was the 1'st country to claim the island?

User avatar
Super Bwitain
Minister
 
Posts: 2868
Founded: Apr 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Super Bwitain » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:14 am

Scholencia wrote:
Vilanto wrote:
If that's the case, i wonder why Argentina wants the Falklands so badly?

The Falknads was in the possesion of Spain which according to the Argentinians they inherit. In my opinion the Falklands should be Argentinian.


The British kept their claim of the Falklands even after they left. We were around longer, we owned it longer and we claimed it longer. The Falklands are and should remain British.
Bill Nye is watching: The Coalition Of Steel

User avatar
Celephais
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 447
Founded: Feb 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Celephais » Wed Feb 08, 2012 9:17 am

Scholencia wrote:The Falknads was in the possesion of Spain which according to the Argentinians they inherit.


That proves Cameron right then - they are being colonialist, as they're basing their claim off the Spanish empire.

In my opinion the Falklands should be Argentinian.


It is not your opinion that matters (or mine), it is the islanders'. From the Telegraph comments section:

Mr Argentina is infatuated with his next door neighbour, Miss Falkland but the trouble is that Miss Falkland is in love with Mr UK who lives on the other side of the town.

Unfortunately Mr Argentina is pretty clueless when it comes to impressing the object of his desire, infact so much so that 30 years ago in a fit of obsessive pique he punched Miss Falkland in the face and tried to drag her off.

Unfortunately for him he didn't reckon on Mr UK storming over from the other side of town and beating him up pretty badly.

Now, after years of quietly sulking Mr Argentina has found out that Miss Falkland may have an inheritance and that has got him all steamed up again.

This time, weary of being beaten up infront of everyone again, he has decided to get the neighbourhood to gang up on Miss Falkland and is acting particularly obnoxiously, shoving dog excrement through her letter box and making nuisiance phone calls.

Mr Argentina constantly accuses Mr UK of being a pirate and a bully but all Mr UK and Miss Falkland want is to be left in peace.

When is Mr Argentina going to learn some manners?
"Pay no attention to what critics say. No statue has ever been erected in honour of a critic." - Jean Sibelius

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bali Kingdom, Democratic Poopland, Duvniask, Ostroeuropa

Advertisement

Remove ads