NATION

PASSWORD

Falkland islands protest outside Brit embassy in BA

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Super Bwitain
Minister
 
Posts: 2868
Founded: Apr 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Super Bwitain » Tue Feb 07, 2012 2:59 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
That may be so, but I'd rather revoke a peoples right to vote in order to govern them better than they could.


And what if they want the right to self determination? Pretty sure thats in the UN Charter somewhere. That is the same as me coming into your house and dictating how to live your life better, and I bring a regiment of redcoats to do it.

The problem with ex-colonial countries is there was a lack of people who knew how to govern when Britain left. If a proper process of establishing a good civil service had been set up prior to withdrawal, then Zimbabwe might still have a currency of its own.


Hell, I'd take a chance to improve my life.

I'll give you the second one.
Bill Nye is watching: The Coalition Of Steel

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:00 pm

Super Bwitain wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:

What makes British Empire, superior to say, a Swiss Empire? What about a Andorrian Empire?


Did I ever say anything about superiority?

Anyway, size, wealth, healthcare etc. etc. Would make an empire superior to another.


Yes, because we are the biggest. But what about Russia? They're pretty big.

Health? You have to be kidding, 7th for heart disease deaths, 3rd for obesity, with the most obese men in the world?

User avatar
Celephais
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 447
Founded: Feb 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Celephais » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:00 pm

Vellosia wrote:If people can't govern themselves, then I think there is a very strong case to be made.


There's all sorts of interesting definitions of "can't govern themselves" possible. It's an interventionist's hawk dream, basically a blank cheque.
"Pay no attention to what critics say. No statue has ever been erected in honour of a critic." - Jean Sibelius

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5720
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:01 pm

You should stop the threadjack.
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
Super Bwitain
Minister
 
Posts: 2868
Founded: Apr 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Super Bwitain » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:02 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
Did I ever say anything about superiority?



Yes, because we are the biggest. But what about Russia? They're pretty big.

Health? You have to be kidding, 7th for heart disease deaths, 3rd for obesity, with the most obese men in the world?


"Anyway, size, wealth, healthcare etc. etc. Would make an empire superior to another."

I never referred to the British empire, just Empires in general.
Bill Nye is watching: The Coalition Of Steel

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:03 pm

Super Bwitain wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
And what if they want the right to self determination? Pretty sure thats in the UN Charter somewhere. That is the same as me coming into your house and dictating how to live your life better, and I bring a regiment of redcoats to do it.

The problem with ex-colonial countries is there was a lack of people who knew how to govern when Britain left. If a proper process of establishing a good civil service had been set up prior to withdrawal, then Zimbabwe might still have a currency of its own.


Hell, I'd take a chance to improve my life.

I'll give you the second one.


We you even alive during the empire? And I don't think you would take to well to being told what to do with someone who didnt speak your language, understand your culture or customs and thought he knew what was best for you.

It's like trying to teach a Middle Age serf how best to get along with his lord and bishop...

User avatar
Fnordgasm 5
Senator
 
Posts: 3749
Founded: Nov 15, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Fnordgasm 5 » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:04 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
Did I ever say anything about superiority?

Anyway, size, wealth, healthcare etc. etc. Would make an empire superior to another.


Yes, because we are the biggest. But what about Russia? They're pretty big.

Health? You have to be kidding, 7th for heart disease deaths, 3rd for obesity, with the most obese men in the world?


Kidding? I think it's an excellent idea! There's nothing like a bit of empire building to whip a man into shape an help him shed a few pounds..
Fnordgasm 5 is a twat.

User avatar
Vellosia
Senator
 
Posts: 4278
Founded: May 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vellosia » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:05 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
Hell, I'd take a chance to improve my life.

I'll give you the second one.


We you even alive during the empire? And I don't think you would take to well to being told what to do with someone who didnt speak your language, understand your culture or customs and thought he knew what was best for you.

It's like trying to teach a Middle Age serf how best to get along with his lord and bishop...


If you can demonstrate how someone in some tinpot African dictatorship ruled by a nutcase is better off now than they were when a real government was in place that actually cared about infrastructure, healthcare and an economy, then yes.

But I somehow doubt it.
Back after a long break.

User avatar
Super Bwitain
Minister
 
Posts: 2868
Founded: Apr 19, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Super Bwitain » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:06 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Super Bwitain wrote:
Hell, I'd take a chance to improve my life.

I'll give you the second one.


We you even alive during the empire? And I don't think you would take to well to being told what to do with someone who didnt speak your language, understand your culture or customs and thought he knew what was best for you.

It's like trying to teach a Middle Age serf how best to get along with his lord and bishop...


Final post before I stop the threadjack.

In the long-run, if me and my family came out better, if my people came out better, then it'd be worth it.
Bill Nye is watching: The Coalition Of Steel

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:11 pm

Super Bwitain wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
We you even alive during the empire? And I don't think you would take to well to being told what to do with someone who didnt speak your language, understand your culture or customs and thought he knew what was best for you.

It's like trying to teach a Middle Age serf how best to get along with his lord and bishop...


Final post before I stop the threadjack.

In the long-run, if me and my family came out better, if my people came out better, then it'd be worth it.


Yes, in that case I hope you enjoy getting whipped. Fair play if you do, takes all types.

Vellosia wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
We you even alive during the empire? And I don't think you would take to well to being told what to do with someone who didnt speak your language, understand your culture or customs and thought he knew what was best for you.

It's like trying to teach a Middle Age serf how best to get along with his lord and bishop...


If you can demonstrate how someone in some tinpot African dictatorship ruled by a nutcase is better off now than they were when a real government was in place that actually cared about infrastructure, healthcare and an economy, then yes.

But I somehow doubt it.


The one good thing about such dictatorships is that if enough people disaprove, a dictator can be deposed. If that dictator happens to be in the House of Commons or Downing Street, getting rid of them can be impossible, as several uprisings and rebellions have shown.

User avatar
The Common Territories
Attaché
 
Posts: 92
Founded: Apr 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Common Territories » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:15 pm

Since Argentina's regime change before the Falkland Island war it has sought to become the South American Superpower and has despised outer nations that poses territory in the continent. Meaning the UK. They still claim the Falkland Islands and the antarctic territory that Britain owns. Argentina wants to be the strongest nation in South America no doubt but it lost already trying to steal the Falklands so it's to scared to try again.

Basically it's not a safe idea to take on a world power with such a weak military. If they want to become stronger then take over other states nearby like Chili. Brazil will always be the South American superpower though.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:19 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
The one good thing about such dictatorships is that if enough people disaprove, a dictator can be deposed. If that dictator happens to be in the House of Commons or Downing Street, getting rid of them can be impossible, as several uprisings and rebellions have shown.


Image

ORLY?
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:42 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:What about a Andorrian Empire?

I'd be for an Andorran Empire.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:44 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
The one good thing about such dictatorships is that if enough people disaprove, a dictator can be deposed. If that dictator happens to be in the House of Commons or Downing Street, getting rid of them can be impossible, as several uprisings and rebellions have shown.


Image

ORLY?


True, butnot many sucessfull African revolts now, were there? Besides America, not many nations gained freedom through force of arms. None after the Industrial Revoultion.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:53 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
The UK in Exile wrote:
(Image)

ORLY?


True, butnot many sucessfull African revolts now, were there? Besides America, not many nations gained freedom through force of arms. None after the Industrial Revoultion.

False. There was the Portuguese Colonial War, Algerian War of Independence, Namibian War of Independence and the First Indochina War are all cases in which nations gained their nationhood through force of arms after the Industrial Revolution.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 3:54 pm

algeria.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:21 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
True, butnot many sucessfull African revolts now, were there? Besides America, not many nations gained freedom through force of arms. None after the Industrial Revoultion.

False. There was the Portuguese Colonial War, Algerian War of Independence, Namibian War of Independence and the First Indochina War are all cases in which nations gained their nationhood through force of arms after the Industrial Revolution.


None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:39 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:False. There was the Portuguese Colonial War, Algerian War of Independence, Namibian War of Independence and the First Indochina War are all cases in which nations gained their nationhood through force of arms after the Industrial Revolution.


None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

Ah, my mistake I didn't know you were talking about former members of the BE only. In that case you have Ireland, but that's about it.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:49 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
None of which were members of the British Empire, and South Africa was independant during the Namibian WoI.

Ah, my mistake I didn't know you were talking about former members of the BE only. In that case you have Ireland, but that's about it.


lol, good example. the focus on the BE is pretty arbitrary anyway.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Bales Rant
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bales Rant » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:53 pm

Don't know if this has been posted yet:

'Argentina to raise Falklands UK 'militarisation' at UN'

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Tue Feb 07, 2012 4:54 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Ah, my mistake I didn't know you were talking about former members of the BE only. In that case you have Ireland, but that's about it.


lol, good example. the focus on the BE is pretty arbitrary anyway.


Still, all that opposition to the Empire tells you something about it, no?

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:01 pm

Bales Rant wrote:Don't know if this has been posted yet:

'Argentina to raise Falklands UK 'militarisation' at UN'


yes, It demonstrates the point I made at the start of the thread, any military preparations work against us. all its done is given argentina a chance to force the dialogue forward in an area we don't have supremacy and rely on shaky american support. what of the british veto I hear you say? well that would be an irony in itself. months after condemning russia and calling for the UN to be reformed we block a resolution aimed at us personally and switch directions on UN reform because we won't get our way. capital. whichever offical, be it the PM, Chief of the Defense Staff or Junior MOD bean counter who authorized those movements should find his next job involves permenant posting to the falklands.

Machtergreifung wrote:
Still, all that opposition to the Empire tells you something about it, no?


yes, it doesn't however prove that a imperial despot is inherrently worse than homegrown one.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Bales Rant
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bales Rant » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:04 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Bales Rant wrote:Don't know if this has been posted yet:

'Argentina to raise Falklands UK 'militarisation' at UN'

yes, It demonstrates the point I made at the start of the thread, any military preparations work against us. all its done is given argentina a chance to force the dialogue forward in an area we don't have supremacy and rely on shaky american support. what of the british veto I hear you say? well that would be an irony in itself. months after condemning russia and calling for the UN to be reformed we block a resolution aimed at us personally and switch directions on UN reform because we won't get our way. capital. whichever offical, be it the PM, Chief of the Defense Staff or Junior MOD bean counter who authorized those movements should find his next job involves permenant posting to the falklands.


I'm not up to date with Argentine military capabilities. There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands then? I know their airforce is pretty much for shit nowadays.
Last edited by Bales Rant on Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:06 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The UK in Exile
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12023
Founded: Jul 27, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby The UK in Exile » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:07 pm

Bales Rant wrote:
I'm not up to date with Argentine military capabilities. There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands. I know their airforce is pretty much for shit nowadays.


exactly the only way we are going to have to give them back is if the UN says we have to give them back.

Not because they can force us but because the alternative is ending up with a similar international reputation as Israel. its not a price the british will bear.
"We fought for the public good and would have enfranchised the people and secured the welfare of the whole groaning creation, if the nation had not more delighted in servitude than in freedom"

"My actions are as noble as my thoughts, That never relish’d of a base descent.I came unto your court for honour’s cause, And not to be a rebel to her state; And he that otherwise accounts of me, This sword shall prove he’s honour’s enemy."

"Wählte Ungnade, wo Gehorsam nicht Ehre brachte."
DEFCON 0 - not at war
DEFCON 1 - at war "go to red alert!" "are you absolutely sure sir? it does mean changing the lightbulb."

User avatar
Bales Rant
Diplomat
 
Posts: 616
Founded: Jul 01, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Bales Rant » Tue Feb 07, 2012 5:09 pm

The UK in Exile wrote:
Bales Rant wrote:
I'm not up to date with Argentine military capabilities. There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands. I know their airforce is pretty much for shit nowadays.


exactly the only way we are going to have to give them back is if the UN says we have to give them back.

Not because they can force us but because the alternative is ending up with a similar international reputation as Israel. its not a price the british will bear.


Sorry, UKIE I wasn't making a statement. I meant to ask you a question: 'There's absolutely no way they could mount an operation and invade the Falklands then?'

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bali Kingdom, Democratic Poopland, Duvniask, Google [Bot], Ostroeuropa

Advertisement

Remove ads