
SNF!! Can't wait!!
Advertisement

by New West Guiana » Tue Oct 04, 2011 4:35 pm


by Bluth Corporation » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:17 am
| Rank | Team | Old Rating | Old Rank | New Rating | Rank Change | % Rating Change |
| 1 | Baltimore Ravens | 1.000 | 1 | 1.000 | 0 | 0.00% |
| 2 | Green Bay Packers | 0.876 | 2 | 0.893 | 0 | 1.94% |
| 3 | New England Traitors | 0.875 | 3 | 0.865 | 0 | -1.14% |
| 4 | New Orleans Satans | 0.819 | 5 | 0.849 | 1 | 3.66% |
| 5 | Houston Texans | 0.814 | 6 | 0.824 | 1 | 1.23% |
| 6 | Detroit Lions | 0.793 | 8 | 0.746 | 2 | -5.93% |
| 7 | Pittsburgh Stealers | 0.850 | 4 | 0.714 | -3 | -16.00% |
| 8 | New York Giants | 0.739 | 9 | 0.699 | 1 | -5.41% |
| 9 | San Diego Chargers | 0.680 | 10 | 0.692 | 1 | 1.76% |
| 10 | New York Jets | 0.802 | 7 | 0.657 | -3 | -18.08% |
| 11 | Tennessee Titans | 0.567 | 15 | 0.644 | 4 | 13.58% |
| 12 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.656 | 11 | 0.608 | -1 | -7.32% |
| 13 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.581 | 14 | 0.557 | 1 | -4.13% |
| 14 | Chicago Bears | 0.555 | 16 | 0.544 | 2 | -1.98% |
| 15 | Buffalo Bills | 0.597 | 13 | 0.542 | -2 | -9.21% |
| 16 | Washington Redskins | 0.502 | 18 | 0.542 | 2 | 7.97% |
| 17 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.513 | 17 | 0.535 | 0 | 4.29% |
| 18 | Oakland Raiders | 0.631 | 12 | 0.535 | -6 | -15.21% |
| 19 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.500 | 19 | 0.480 | 0 | -4.00% |
| 20 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.477 | 20 | 0.450 | 0 | -5.66% |
| 21 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.385 | 21 | 0.403 | 0 | 4.68% |
| 22 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.355 | 24 | 0.344 | 2 | -3.10% |
| 23 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.380 | 22 | 0.333 | -1 | -12.37% |
| 24 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.325 | 26 | 0.287 | 2 | -11.69% |
| 25 | Carolina Panthers | 0.285 | 27 | 0.278 | 2 | -2.46% |
| 26 | Denver Broncos | 0.349 | 25 | 0.263 | -1 | -24.64% |
| 27 | Cleveland Browns | 0.365 | 23 | 0.257 | -4 | -29.59% |
| 28 | Miami Dolphins | 0.249 | 28 | 0.207 | 0 | -16.87% |
| 29 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.000 | 32 | 0.087 | 3 | N/A |
| 30 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.011 | 31 | 0.056 | 1 | 409.09% |
| 31 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.091 | 29 | 0.034 | -2 | -62.64% |
| 32 | St. Louis Rams | 0.016 | 30 | 0.000 | -2 | -100.00% |
by Sibirsky » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:28 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:My mathematical NFL rankings after week 4:
Rank Team Old Rating Old Rank New Rating Rank Change % Rating Change 1 Baltimore Ravens 1.000 1 1.000 0 0.00% 2 Green Bay Packers 0.876 2 0.893 0 1.94% 3 New England Traitors 0.875 3 0.865 0 -1.14% 4 New Orleans Satans 0.819 5 0.849 1 3.66% 5 Houston Texans 0.814 6 0.824 1 1.23% 6 Detroit Lions 0.793 8 0.746 2 -5.93% 7 Pittsburgh Stealers 0.850 4 0.714 -3 -16.00% 8 New York Giants 0.739 9 0.699 1 -5.41% 9 San Diego Chargers 0.680 10 0.692 1 1.76% 10 New York Jets 0.802 7 0.657 -3 -18.08% 11 Tennessee Titans 0.567 15 0.644 4 13.58% 12 Philadelphia Eagles 0.656 11 0.608 -1 -7.32% 13 San Francisco 49ers 0.581 14 0.557 1 -4.13% 14 Chicago Bears 0.555 16 0.544 2 -1.98% 15 Buffalo Bills 0.597 13 0.542 -2 -9.21% 16 Washington Redskins 0.502 18 0.542 2 7.97% 17 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.513 17 0.535 0 4.29% 18 Oakland Raiders 0.631 12 0.535 -6 -15.21% 19 Atlanta Falcons 0.500 19 0.480 0 -4.00% 20 Dallas Cowboys 0.477 20 0.450 0 -5.66% 21 Cincinnati Bengals 0.385 21 0.403 0 4.68% 22 Arizona Cardinals 0.355 24 0.344 2 -3.10% 23 Indianapolis Colts 0.380 22 0.333 -1 -12.37% 24 Minnesota Vikings 0.325 26 0.287 2 -11.69% 25 Carolina Panthers 0.285 27 0.278 2 -2.46% 26 Denver Broncos 0.349 25 0.263 -1 -24.64% 27 Cleveland Browns 0.365 23 0.257 -4 -29.59% 28 Miami Dolphins 0.249 28 0.207 0 -16.87% 29 Kansas City Chiefs 0.000 32 0.087 3 N/A 30 Seattle Seahawks 0.011 31 0.056 1 409.09% 31 Jacksonville Jaguars 0.091 29 0.034 -2 -62.64% 32 St. Louis Rams 0.016 30 0.000 -2 -100.00%

by Bluth Corporation » Wed Oct 05, 2011 11:35 am
Sibirsky wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:My mathematical NFL rankings after week 4:
Rank Team Old Rating Old Rank New Rating Rank Change % Rating Change 1 Baltimore Ravens 1.000 1 1.000 0 0.00% 2 Green Bay Packers 0.876 2 0.893 0 1.94% 3 New England Traitors 0.875 3 0.865 0 -1.14% 4 New Orleans Satans 0.819 5 0.849 1 3.66% 5 Houston Texans 0.814 6 0.824 1 1.23% 6 Detroit Lions 0.793 8 0.746 2 -5.93% 7 Pittsburgh Stealers 0.850 4 0.714 -3 -16.00% 8 New York Giants 0.739 9 0.699 1 -5.41% 9 San Diego Chargers 0.680 10 0.692 1 1.76% 10 New York Jets 0.802 7 0.657 -3 -18.08% 11 Tennessee Titans 0.567 15 0.644 4 13.58% 12 Philadelphia Eagles 0.656 11 0.608 -1 -7.32% 13 San Francisco 49ers 0.581 14 0.557 1 -4.13% 14 Chicago Bears 0.555 16 0.544 2 -1.98% 15 Buffalo Bills 0.597 13 0.542 -2 -9.21% 16 Washington Redskins 0.502 18 0.542 2 7.97% 17 Tampa Bay Buccaneers 0.513 17 0.535 0 4.29% 18 Oakland Raiders 0.631 12 0.535 -6 -15.21% 19 Atlanta Falcons 0.500 19 0.480 0 -4.00% 20 Dallas Cowboys 0.477 20 0.450 0 -5.66% 21 Cincinnati Bengals 0.385 21 0.403 0 4.68% 22 Arizona Cardinals 0.355 24 0.344 2 -3.10% 23 Indianapolis Colts 0.380 22 0.333 -1 -12.37% 24 Minnesota Vikings 0.325 26 0.287 2 -11.69% 25 Carolina Panthers 0.285 27 0.278 2 -2.46% 26 Denver Broncos 0.349 25 0.263 -1 -24.64% 27 Cleveland Browns 0.365 23 0.257 -4 -29.59% 28 Miami Dolphins 0.249 28 0.207 0 -16.87% 29 Kansas City Chiefs 0.000 32 0.087 3 N/A 30 Seattle Seahawks 0.011 31 0.056 1 409.09% 31 Jacksonville Jaguars 0.091 29 0.034 -2 -62.64% 32 St. Louis Rams 0.016 30 0.000 -2 -100.00%
How are you calculating these, Bluth? Or at least, what data goes into it?

by Langorham » Thu Oct 06, 2011 4:39 am

by Bluth Corporation » Thu Oct 06, 2011 7:25 am
Langorham wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Points scored vs. points allowed, offensive yards vs. defensive yards allowed, offensive vs. defensive starting field position.
Do you also include return yards from punts, kickoffs and return yards from fumbles and interceptions? And what about turnovers? All of these effect starting field position and points scored and allowed.

by Langorham » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:08 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:Langorham wrote:
Do you also include return yards from punts, kickoffs and return yards from fumbles and interceptions? And what about turnovers? All of these effect starting field position and points scored and allowed.
Thus, they're already factored in by my use of points scored vs. points allowed and starting field position.
Turnovers are deliberately left out, because they're mostly a matter of luck. I also weigh the actual result against a Pythagorean expectation to account for things like that.

by Bluth Corporation » Thu Oct 06, 2011 9:40 am
Langorham wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Thus, they're already factored in by my use of points scored vs. points allowed and starting field position.
Turnovers are deliberately left out, because they're mostly a matter of luck. I also weigh the actual result against a Pythagorean expectation to account for things like that.
Okay, but, and you knew there was a but. Somehow no matter what one does or says there always seems to be a but involved.![]()
I do not think turnovers are a matter of luck. Some teams practice stripping the ball from players, tip drills, etc., and some do not.
Also some players have a knack for being in the right place at the right time
and some players ( cough-cough, reference the Lions vs Cowboys ) have a knack for making turnovers.

by Langorham » Thu Oct 06, 2011 11:53 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:Langorham wrote:
Okay, but, and you knew there was a but. Somehow no matter what one does or says there always seems to be a but involved.![]()
I do not think turnovers are a matter of luck. Some teams practice stripping the ball from players, tip drills, etc., and some do not.
And that's not the same thing as actually creating a turnover, since it's still pretty random as far as who actually comes up with it.Also some players have a knack for being in the right place at the right time
See, I just don't believe that. It's a statistical anomaly that will regress to the mean over time, and so you can't count on it happening again, and for that very reason it's not very relevant to determining how good an individual player or team is.and some players ( cough-cough, reference the Lions vs Cowboys ) have a knack for making turnovers.
This is different, but again, creating a loose ball or forcing bad throws that lend themselves to being picked off is one thing, but actually coming up with the fumble or the pick is a matter of luck.

by Chetssaland » Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:07 pm

by Kentsland » Thu Oct 06, 2011 6:48 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Ok, one quarter of the season is done, which means it's time for an educated prediction for the playoffs.
NFC East: Dallas
NFC North: Green Bay
NFC South: New Orleans
NFC West: Arizona
WC: Detroit
Tampa
AFC West: Oakland
AFC South: Houston
AFC North: Baltimore
AFC East: New England
WC: Tennessee
New York

by Chetssaland » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:26 pm
Kentsland wrote:Chetssaland wrote:Ok, one quarter of the season is done, which means it's time for an educated prediction for the playoffs.
NFC East: Dallas
NFC North: Green Bay
NFC South: New Orleans
NFC West: Arizona
WC: Detroit
Tampa
AFC West: Oakland
AFC South: Houston
AFC North: Baltimore
AFC East: New England
WC: Tennessee
New York
Titans in WC? I think the Bills have a better chance over them or say the Steelers.
And i pick 49ers over Cardinals.

by Maurepas » Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:45 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Kentsland wrote:
Titans in WC? I think the Bills have a better chance over them or say the Steelers.
And i pick 49ers over Cardinals.
The Bills are more of a 'believe it when I see it' type of team. Pittsburgh has been fairly sub-par this year. San Fran and Arizona have been on opposite sides of close games this year... but I don't have it in my heart to send Alex Smith to the playoffs. I have a gut feeling the tide will shift in the west.

by Kentsland » Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:42 pm
Maurepas wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
The Bills are more of a 'believe it when I see it' type of team. Pittsburgh has been fairly sub-par this year. San Fran and Arizona have been on opposite sides of close games this year... but I don't have it in my heart to send Alex Smith to the playoffs. I have a gut feeling the tide will shift in the west.
They beat the Patriots, what more do you want? Who have the Titans beaten that are better than the Patriots?

by Miley World » Fri Oct 07, 2011 12:59 pm

by Kentsland » Fri Oct 07, 2011 1:07 pm
Miley World wrote:Tennessee have a good qb, the best rb and a good defense, why they wouldn't make the playoffs?
My predictions:
NFC East: Philadelphia
NFC North: Green Bay
NFC South: New Orleans
NFC West: Arizona
WC: Detroit
Tampa
AFC West: San Diego
AFC South: Tennessee
AFC North: Baltimore
AFC East: NY Jets
WC: New England
Houston

by Chetssaland » Fri Oct 07, 2011 8:10 pm
Maurepas wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
The Bills are more of a 'believe it when I see it' type of team. Pittsburgh has been fairly sub-par this year. San Fran and Arizona have been on opposite sides of close games this year... but I don't have it in my heart to send Alex Smith to the playoffs. I have a gut feeling the tide will shift in the west.
They beat the Patriots, what more do you want? Who have the Titans beaten that are better than the Patriots?

by New West Guiana » Fri Oct 07, 2011 9:18 pm

by The lepearchauns » Sat Oct 08, 2011 9:10 am

by Bluth Corporation » Sun Oct 09, 2011 10:55 am

by Mytannion » Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:16 am

by Mytannion » Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:25 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: America Republican Edition, Andsed, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Kubra, Mestovakia, Mezzigiorno rp 2000s, Necroghastia, Northern Seleucia, Picairn, Raskana, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, Thermodolia, Tinhampton
Advertisement