
Advertisement
by Sibirsky » Tue Sep 27, 2011 10:53 am


by F1-Insanity » Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:09 am


by Bluth Corporation » Tue Sep 27, 2011 11:41 am
| Rank | Team | Old Rating | Old Rank | New Rating | Rank Change | % Rating Change |
| 1 | Baltimore Ravens | 0.901 | 6 | 1.000 | 5 | 10.99% |
| 2 | Green Bay Packers | 0.908 | 5 | 0.876 | 3 | -3.52% |
| 3 | New England Traitors | 1.000 | 1 | 0.875 | -2 | -12.50% |
| 4 | Pittsburgh Stealers | 0.939 | 4 | 0.850 | 0 | -9.48% |
| 5 | New Orleans Satans | 0.885 | 7 | 0.819 | 2 | -7.46% |
| 6 | Houston Texans | 0.946 | 3 | 0.814 | -3 | -13.95% |
| 7 | New York Jets | 0.963 | 2 | 0.802 | -5 | -16.72% |
| 8 | Detroit Lions | 0.881 | 8 | 0.793 | 0 | -9.99% |
| 9 | New York Giants | 0.735 | 11 | 0.739 | 2 | 0.54% |
| 10 | San Diego Chargers | 0.759 | 10 | 0.680 | 0 | -10.41% |
| 11 | Philadelphia Eagles | 0.841 | 9 | 0.656 | -2 | -22.00% |
| 12 | Oakland Raiders | 0.653 | 14 | 0.631 | 2 | -3.37% |
| 13 | Buffalo Bills | 0.657 | 13 | 0.597 | 0 | -9.13% |
| 14 | San Francisco 49ers | 0.585 | 18 | 0.581 | 4 | -0.68% |
| 15 | Tennessee Titans | 0.620 | 15 | 0.567 | 0 | -8.55% |
| 16 | Chicago Bears | 0.705 | 12 | 0.555 | -4 | -21.28% |
| 17 | Tampa Bay Buccaneers | 0.555 | 19 | 0.513 | 2 | -7.57% |
| 18 | Washington Redskins | 0.600 | 17 | 0.502 | -1 | -16.33% |
| 19 | Atlanta Falcons | 0.612 | 16 | 0.500 | -3 | -18.30% |
| 20 | Dallas Cowboys | 0.531 | 20 | 0.477 | 0 | -10.17% |
| 21 | Cincinnati Bengals | 0.531 | 21 | 0.385 | 0 | -27.50% |
| 22 | Indianapolis Colts | 0.460 | 23 | 0.380 | 1 | -17.39% |
| 23 | Cleveland Browns | 0.424 | 25 | 0.365 | 2 | -13.92% |
| 24 | Arizona Cardinals | 0.476 | 22 | 0.355 | -2 | -25.42% |
| 25 | Denver Broncos | 0.442 | 24 | 0.349 | -1 | -21.04% |
| 26 | Minnesota Vikings | 0.398 | 26 | 0.325 | 0 | -18.34% |
| 27 | Carolina Pantders | 0.272 | 28 | 0.285 | 1 | 4.78% |
| 28 | Miami Dolphins | 0.316 | 27 | 0.249 | -1 | -21.20% |
| 29 | Jacksonville Jaguars | 0.214 | 30 | 0.091 | 1 | -57.48% |
| 30 | St. Louis Rams | 0.269 | 29 | 0.016 | -1 | -94.05% |
| 31 | Seattle Seahawks | 0.000 | 32 | 0.011 | 1 | N/A |
| 32 | Kansas City Chiefs | 0.052 | 31 | 0.000 | -1 | -100.00% |

by Icamera » Tue Sep 27, 2011 12:38 pm

Rynatia wrote:If I asked you to sleep with me would you answer with the same answer to this question?
by Sibirsky » Tue Sep 27, 2011 1:30 pm
Icamera wrote:
Cue the angry Eagles fans (aka me).
Okay, Vick's comments on the refs were totally justified. I don't know how many of you watched more than just his highlights last year, but he gets POUNDED every game. I even started counting how many of the hits on him in the 2010 season would have been roughing the passer calls on, say, Brady or Manning, and I was at 25-ish. The new and improved Michael Vick is too classy to say anything about it, but he's finally standing up for himself now since the refs seem to feel that he deserves to be treated like a running back.
Whew. Rant over.
(And as much as I hate this one, and hated this one, I've got to admit that the Post has some funny covers)

by F1-Insanity » Tue Sep 27, 2011 4:05 pm



by Chetssaland » Thu Sep 29, 2011 4:49 pm
Icamera wrote:
Cue the angry Eagles fans (aka me).
Okay, Vick's comments on the refs were totally justified. I don't know how many of you watched more than just his highlights last year, but he gets POUNDED every game. I even started counting how many of the hits on him in the 2010 season would have been roughing the passer calls on, say, Brady or Manning, and I was at 25-ish. The new and improved Michael Vick is too classy to say anything about it, but he's finally standing up for himself now since the refs seem to feel that he deserves to be treated like a running back.
Whew. Rant over.
(And as much as I hate this one, and hated this one, I've got to admit that the Post has some funny covers)

by The lepearchauns » Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:07 pm


by The lepearchauns » Thu Sep 29, 2011 5:08 pm


by New West Guiana » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:18 pm
The lepearchauns wrote:By the way...Go Bills! I wanna see the Eagles fans cry when they lose to the Bills next week

by Coffee Cakes » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:21 pm
The lepearchauns wrote:By the way...Go Bills! I wanna see the Eagles fans cry when they lose to the Bills next week
Transnapastain wrote:CC!
Posting mod mistakes now are we?
Well, sir, you can have a Vindictive warning for making us look incompetent
Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:You're Invisi Gay. Super hero of the Rainbow Equality Brigade!
Nana wrote:Being CC's bf is a death worse than fate.
Nana wrote:Finally, another reasonable individual.
Nana wrote: You're Ben. And Ben is many things wrapped into one being. :)
Quotes Singing Contest of DOOM Champ. SoftballGeniasis wrote:I've seen people lose credibility. It's been a while since I've seen it cast aside so gleefully.

by Maurepas » Thu Sep 29, 2011 10:32 pm
Chetssaland wrote:Icamera wrote:
Cue the angry Eagles fans (aka me).
Okay, Vick's comments on the refs were totally justified. I don't know how many of you watched more than just his highlights last year, but he gets POUNDED every game. I even started counting how many of the hits on him in the 2010 season would have been roughing the passer calls on, say, Brady or Manning, and I was at 25-ish. The new and improved Michael Vick is too classy to say anything about it, but he's finally standing up for himself now since the refs seem to feel that he deserves to be treated like a running back.
Whew. Rant over.
(And as much as I hate this one, and hated this one, I've got to admit that the Post has some funny covers)
Just so you know, when a quarterback leaves the pocket all quarterbrack rules are gone. Even if he's behind the line of scrimmage and still looking to pass, if he's outside the pocket area he can take those shots and won't get penalties.

by Bluth Corporation » Fri Sep 30, 2011 6:45 am
Maurepas wrote:Chetssaland wrote:
Just so you know, when a quarterback leaves the pocket all quarterbrack rules are gone. Even if he's behind the line of scrimmage and still looking to pass, if he's outside the pocket area he can take those shots and won't get penalties.
True, but I've seen some of the hits Vick takes even when he is in the pocket. If somebody hits Tom Brady's douchey face like that, they're getting fined out their ass.
Now personally, I don't like any of the rule changes, a guy like Brady shouldn't be able to play at all as long as he has if the game's played right, imo, but if you're going to have them, if you're going to have these stupid fines, you need to apply them equally, and not just to your pet players.

by Icamera » Fri Sep 30, 2011 7:51 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:True, but I've seen some of the hits Vick takes even when he is in the pocket. If somebody hits Tom Brady's douchey face like that, they're getting fined out their ass.
Now personally, I don't like any of the rule changes, a guy like Brady shouldn't be able to play at all as long as he has if the game's played right, imo, but if you're going to have them, if you're going to have these stupid fines, you need to apply them equally, and not just to your pet players.
Actually, Tom Brady is among the players who benefit from roughing the passer flags least often, in terms of flags thrown per pass. He gets a lot of attention on this point because of OMG BRADYPOUTYFACE, but guys really don't get called a lot for hitting him.
It bears mentioning that Vick is in the top ten in terms of flags received per pass.
Rynatia wrote:If I asked you to sleep with me would you answer with the same answer to this question?

by Maurepas » Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:35 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Maurepas wrote:True, but I've seen some of the hits Vick takes even when he is in the pocket. If somebody hits Tom Brady's douchey face like that, they're getting fined out their ass.
Now personally, I don't like any of the rule changes, a guy like Brady shouldn't be able to play at all as long as he has if the game's played right, imo, but if you're going to have them, if you're going to have these stupid fines, you need to apply them equally, and not just to your pet players.
Actually, Tom Brady is among the players who benefit from roughing the passer flags least often, in terms of flags thrown per pass. He gets a lot of attention on this point because of OMG BRADYPOUTYFACE, but guys really don't get called a lot for hitting him.
It bears mentioning that Vick is in the top ten in terms of flags received per pass.

by Serrland » Fri Sep 30, 2011 2:45 pm
Maurepas wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Actually, Tom Brady is among the players who benefit from roughing the passer flags least often, in terms of flags thrown per pass. He gets a lot of attention on this point because of OMG BRADYPOUTYFACE, but guys really don't get called a lot for hitting him.
It bears mentioning that Vick is in the top ten in terms of flags received per pass.
Yeah, but I don't think those numbers do the problem justice, I mean realisticaly how often do you really think Brady gets sacked per one hundred throws? I think a better way to gauge it would be how many flags per however many hits taken. too often I've watched a game and Brady finally gets sacked but he draws the flag, whereas in the same timeframe vickhas gone down four or five times and gotten none.
Now, a lot of that is just the effect of a good o-line versus an absolutely terrible one, but still I feel it bears mentioning. Also lolcutler, Hehe.

by Maurepas » Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:08 pm
Serrland wrote:Maurepas wrote:Yeah, but I don't think those numbers do the problem justice, I mean realisticaly how often do you really think Brady gets sacked per one hundred throws? I think a better way to gauge it would be how many flags per however many hits taken. too often I've watched a game and Brady finally gets sacked but he draws the flag, whereas in the same timeframe vickhas gone down four or five times and gotten none.
Now, a lot of that is just the effect of a good o-line versus an absolutely terrible one, but still I feel it bears mentioning. Also lolcutler, Hehe.
The hit-per-call thing is probably a good reason why Cutler is so high - if he gets sacked 5 or 6 times and hit 20 times a game he'll get more calls in a season than someone who gets hit maybe 20 times in a three game stretch. I feel bad for the kid. I didn't like trading for him - I really like Orton and wasn't happy to see him go. And it's not just that I've got a football and flag signed by him, he had a good Chicago Bear personality.

by Serrland » Fri Sep 30, 2011 3:11 pm
Maurepas wrote:Serrland wrote:
The hit-per-call thing is probably a good reason why Cutler is so high - if he gets sacked 5 or 6 times and hit 20 times a game he'll get more calls in a season than someone who gets hit maybe 20 times in a three game stretch. I feel bad for the kid. I didn't like trading for him - I really like Orton and wasn't happy to see him go. And it's not just that I've got a football and flag signed by him, he had a good Chicago Bear personality.
I admit, I felt bad for him towards the end of that Saints game, I mean, let's face it, New Orleans doesn't have the best D-Line in the league(One of the reasons I think their performance fell off from '09 is that the D-line is kind of on the old and fat side, heh), yet they were treating the Bears' O-line like it was nothing. I fear what happens to Cutler when they run into someone like Suh in Detroit,

by F1-Insanity » Sun Oct 02, 2011 1:39 pm


by Miss Defied » Sun Oct 02, 2011 2:20 pm

by Maurepas » Sun Oct 02, 2011 3:12 pm
F1-Insanity wrote:Epic performance there, Romo
. And Drew Brees had what I thought turned out to be a pretty cool play, he threw an interception, but what made it badass is that he himself got the tackle on it, how many QBs do that after throwing an interception? Not many, XD
by F1-Insanity » Sun Oct 02, 2011 4:31 pm
Lions down 24 at Dallas and win
And the G-men also come back and WIN!


by Idaho Conservatives » Sun Oct 02, 2011 7:10 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: America Republican Edition, Andsed, El Lazaro, Emotional Support Crocodile, Kubra, Mestovakia, Mezzigiorno rp 2000s, Necroghastia, Northern Seleucia, Picairn, Raskana, The Jamesian Republic, The marxist plains, Thermodolia, Tinhampton
Advertisement