NATION

PASSWORD

US Marines and mistreatment of Taliban dead

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:17 pm

The fastest way to a stable and secure government is to shoot as many people as possible then piss on their bodies.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:17 pm

Cromarty wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Absolutely. If they experianced first hand the damage that their tatics cause to innocenet people, perhaps the rural population would change its mind on sending its young ones off on a one way trip to Allah...

Yep.. cos that worked in Vietnam

and Northern Ireland

and the Basque Coutnry

and in almost every other fucking insurgency in the fucking history of mankind.


Selous Scouts much? What about Malaya?

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:18 pm

Cromarty wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I always assumed the goal of the Allied mission was to restore a proper government and beat the Taliban. As it is, they are failing.

Which is clearly why the Taliban are fucking negotiating with the allies.

Yep, NATO are losing the war so the Taliban are negotiating.



The Taliban in talks is a win for them. What were you expecting? Huge parades through Kabul?

For them, making world powers sit down and agree with them is a far bigger status symbol than anything gone before.

User avatar
Strykla
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6538
Founded: Oct 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Strykla » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:19 pm

With the Rule of Engagement and stuff, there is a very fine balance that must carefully maintained. Too loose, and you can have shootings like My Lai Massacre; too strict, and Operation Red Wings repeats will shatter morale and lose you the war in a snap. Yeah, we take the moral high ground by having rules of warfare, even some that are half-assed(Case in point, hollow-point bullets). But there is a point where you really do need to give in to reality and become a combat pragmatist. If the Taliban pissed off the Chinese, with their lack of care about the enemy, we'd be saying 'What Taliban? Weren't they nuked, like, a decade ago?'
Last edited by Strykla on Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lord Justice Clerk of the Classical Royalist Party, NSG Senate. Hail, Companion!

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:19 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Cromarty wrote:Yep.. cos that worked in Vietnam

and Northern Ireland

and the Basque Coutnry

and in almost every other fucking insurgency in the fucking history of mankind.


Selous Scouts much? What about Malaya?


You mean the guys who absorbed captured combatants to bolster their skill and prowess?

lol what
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Keronians
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18231
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Keronians » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:20 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Keronians wrote:
Morality?

Taking the moral high ground the whole operation relies on?


I always assumed the goal of the Allied mission was to restore a proper government and beat the Taliban. As it is, they are failing.

Serrland wrote:
So you would support the USA becoming an openly terroristic nation?


I would support the USA taking a harder line on insurgents supported by terrorists. Treating them like proper combatants is getting nobody anywhere.

Farnhamia wrote:We're the good guys. Or we're supposed to be. Suppose you enlist. You might get a tour in Afghanistan if you hurry. Then come on back and tell us all about using 14th century tactics.


And I am sure your Afgan alter ego would say the exact same thing about Taliban soldiers. Good is meerly the product of opinion.


I said "relies on".

If you behave the same way, what's stopping the Afghans from saying:

"Woah, hold on. You say he's evil because A, B and C, but you're doing C, B and A... What makes you any different?"
Proud Indian. Spanish citizen. European federalist.
Political compass
Awarded the Bronze Medal for General Debating at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards. Awarded Best New Poster at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards.
It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it; consequently, the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.
George Orwell
· Private property
· Free foreign trade
· Exchange of goods and services
· Free formation of prices

· Market regulation
· Social security
· Universal healthcare
· Unemployment insurance

This is a capitalist model.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:21 pm

Oterro wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Selous Scouts much? What about Malaya?


You mean the guys who absorbed captured combatants to bolster their skill and prowess?

lol what


Who better to beat the Taliban than the Taliban themselves? If you infiltrate the close-knit tribal system of the Taliban and cause cracks in it, the entire organization breaks appart utterly through a lack of trust.

User avatar
Keronians
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18231
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Keronians » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:21 pm

Strykla wrote:With the Rule of Engagement and stuff, there is a very fine balance that must carefully maintained. Too loose, and you can have shootings like My Lai Massacre; too strict, and Operation Red Wings repeats will shatter morale and lose you the war in a snap. Yeah, we take the moral high ground by having rules of warfare, even some that are half-assed(Case in point, hollow-point bullets). But there is a point where you really do need to give in to reality and become a combat pragmatist. If the Taliban pissed off the Chinese, with their lack of care about the enemy, we'd be like 'What Taliban? Weren't they nuked, like, a decade ago?'


Am I the only one who giggled when I read "pissed off"? :unsure:
Proud Indian. Spanish citizen. European federalist.
Political compass
Awarded the Bronze Medal for General Debating at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards. Awarded Best New Poster at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards.
It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it; consequently, the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.
George Orwell
· Private property
· Free foreign trade
· Exchange of goods and services
· Free formation of prices

· Market regulation
· Social security
· Universal healthcare
· Unemployment insurance

This is a capitalist model.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 158995
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:21 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Serrland wrote:
Why shouldn't we condemn them? Should we validate their tactics by using them? "Oh, no, go ahead, fly another plane into our buildings. Do more car bombs. Go ahead - we'll do the same thing. They're perfectly valid tactics, see, we do it too!"


Absolutely. If they experianced first hand the damage that their tatics cause to innocenet people, perhaps the rural population would change its mind on sending its young ones off on a one way trip to Allah...

Maybe if you fly some planes into their buildings. Don't worry about volunteers, I'm sure their sacrifice will be rewarded in Heaven.

User avatar
Machtergreifung
Senator
 
Posts: 4748
Founded: Jul 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Machtergreifung » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:26 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
Absolutely. If they experianced first hand the damage that their tatics cause to innocenet people, perhaps the rural population would change its mind on sending its young ones off on a one way trip to Allah...

Maybe if you fly some planes into their buildings. Don't worry about volunteers, I'm sure their sacrifice will be rewarded in Heaven.


Just use drones. Such is the power of the nationstate.

User avatar
Dominion of Integrated States
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 140
Founded: Dec 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dominion of Integrated States » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:27 pm

In my humble oppinion and that of people I know who have fought in Afghanistan is that the Taliban are not terrorists but soldiers defending there home we should treat them with respect and dignity even though they are our enemies. They are human beings fighting for what they belave is right for there country and should be respected for the fact that they have laid down there lives.

PS Not trolling and have lost people in Afghan just think that all soldiers should be treated with respect.

User avatar
Chazicaria
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chazicaria » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:30 pm

I'd like to see some of the people in this thread go to Afghanistan, fight these savages, watch their brothers in arms kill your best friends, then come here and criticize these men. Sometimes war just pushes you too far and you end up doing shit like this, and these men shouldn't be blamed for having done this. Why don't you guys go out and get shot at by people who like nothing more than to behead you and slaughter your whole family? Why don't you go watch your friends get shot by these "men," huh? The pressures put on people during war are sometimes just too much, and they block out your sense of decency; this does not make you a war criminal that deserves dishonorable discharge. /rant

User avatar
Strykla
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6538
Founded: Oct 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Strykla » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:30 pm

Dominion of Integrated States wrote:In my humble oppinion and that of people I know who have fought in Afghanistan is that the Taliban are not terrorists but soldiers defending there home we should treat them with respect and dignity even though they are our enemies. They are human beings fighting for what they belave is right for there country and should be respected for the fact that they have laid down there lives.

PS Not trolling and have lost people in Afghan just think that all soldiers should be treated with respect.

Insurgents aren't soldiers.
Lord Justice Clerk of the Classical Royalist Party, NSG Senate. Hail, Companion!

User avatar
Zijeme
Diplomat
 
Posts: 763
Founded: Nov 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zijeme » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:31 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:Absolutely. If they experianced first hand [...] perhaps the rural population would change its mind on sending its young ones off on a one way trip to Allah...

Ah, so you are advocating terrorist attacks on villages. Should the US do some more of its historical massacres as well?

Machtergreifung wrote:the damage that their tatics cause to innocenet people

It is reciprocal.
The vandal shot his paint straight at the cow in the form of words like "twat", and later "fucknut" and "arsecandle".

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:31 pm

Machtergreifung wrote:
Oterro wrote:
You mean the guys who absorbed captured combatants to bolster their skill and prowess?

lol what


Who better to beat the Taliban than the Taliban themselves? If you infiltrate the close-knit tribal system of the Taliban and cause cracks in it, the entire organization breaks appart utterly through a lack of trust.

Who do you the fucking the Afghan Army are?

Oh yeah, elements of the now disbanded fucking muhjahadeen
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Serrland
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11968
Founded: Sep 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Serrland » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:31 pm

Chazicaria wrote:I'd like to see some of the people in this thread go to Afghanistan, fight these savages, watch their brothers in arms kill your best friends, then come here and criticize these men. Sometimes war just pushes you too far and you end up doing shit like this, and these men shouldn't be blamed for having done this. Why don't you guys go out and get shot at by people who like nothing more than to behead you and slaughter your whole family? Why don't you go watch your friends get shot by these "men," huh? The pressures put on people during war are sometimes just too much, and they block out your sense of decency; this does not make you a war criminal that deserves dishonorable discharge. /rant


Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

User avatar
Chazicaria
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chazicaria » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:33 pm

Serrland wrote:
Chazicaria wrote:I'd like to see some of the people in this thread go to Afghanistan, fight these savages, watch their brothers in arms kill your best friends, then come here and criticize these men. Sometimes war just pushes you too far and you end up doing shit like this, and these men shouldn't be blamed for having done this. Why don't you guys go out and get shot at by people who like nothing more than to behead you and slaughter your whole family? Why don't you go watch your friends get shot by these "men," huh? The pressures put on people during war are sometimes just too much, and they block out your sense of decency; this does not make you a war criminal that deserves dishonorable discharge. /rant


Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

Since when was pissing on the corpse of a savage who would, if given the chance, murder thousands a war crime?

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:33 pm

Chazicaria wrote:
Serrland wrote:
Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

Since when was pissing on the corpse of a savage who would, if given the chance, murder thousands a war crime?

nsg.txt
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Strykla
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6538
Founded: Oct 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Strykla » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:33 pm

Serrland wrote:
Chazicaria wrote:I'd like to see some of the people in this thread go to Afghanistan, fight these savages, watch their brothers in arms kill your best friends, then come here and criticize these men. Sometimes war just pushes you too far and you end up doing shit like this, and these men shouldn't be blamed for having done this. Why don't you guys go out and get shot at by people who like nothing more than to behead you and slaughter your whole family? Why don't you go watch your friends get shot by these "men," huh? The pressures put on people during war are sometimes just too much, and they block out your sense of decency; this does not make you a war criminal that deserves dishonorable discharge. /rant


Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

Then 90% of the anti-heroes in media are war criminals. lol
Lord Justice Clerk of the Classical Royalist Party, NSG Senate. Hail, Companion!

User avatar
TFF
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 188
Founded: Jul 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby TFF » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:33 pm

Keronians wrote:
Machtergreifung wrote:
I always assumed the goal of the Allied mission was to restore a proper government and beat the Taliban. As it is, they are failing.



I would support the USA taking a harder line on insurgents supported by terrorists. Treating them like proper combatants is getting nobody anywhere.



And I am sure your Afgan alter ego would say the exact same thing about Taliban soldiers. Good is meerly the product of opinion.


I said "relies on".

If you behave the same way, what's stopping the Afghans from saying:

"Woah, hold on. You say he's evil because A, B and C, but you're doing C, B and A... What makes you any different?"


Because we're not doing A, B and C to our own people like they are doing to you and we're not doing C, B and A...we just have little P now and then.

User avatar
Oterro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16939
Founded: May 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Oterro » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:35 pm

Chazicaria wrote:
Serrland wrote:
Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

Since when was pissing on the corpse of a savage who would, if given the chance, murder thousands a war crime?


fucking lol.

I'd sig this but then nutters would think I actually thought that statement had any merit of worth, intellectually or aesthetically.
we, unlike the bourgeoisie, have nothing to lose and therefore our expression will be the only honest one, our words will be the only challenging ones and our art will be the one revolutionary expression. We need new noise and new voices and new canvases to become something more than the last poets of a useless generation.

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:35 pm

Strykla wrote:
Serrland wrote:
Committing war crimes does not a war criminal make?

Then 90% of the anti-heroes in media are war criminals. lol

Yes.

Yes they are.

Kinda helps make them anti-heros. (yes i know what an anti-hero actually is.)
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Zijeme
Diplomat
 
Posts: 763
Founded: Nov 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zijeme » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:37 pm

Chazicaria wrote:Since when was pissing on the corpse of a savage who would, if given the chance, murder thousands a war crime?

Oh, the bluster! The bravado!
The vandal shot his paint straight at the cow in the form of words like "twat", and later "fucknut" and "arsecandle".

User avatar
Chevrolet Corvette
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 366
Founded: Nov 05, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chevrolet Corvette » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:37 pm

Bravo i support them for doing this

Fuck the Taliban they deserve it i mean THEY CAN Torture / Cut NATO and US soliders but we can't even do that?

I call BULLSHIT and ALL AMERICAN AND NATO TROOPS SHOULD DO THIS TO EVERY "DEAD" Taliban


"DEAD" - Edited
Last edited by Chevrolet Corvette on Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:42 pm, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Chazicaria
Minister
 
Posts: 2475
Founded: Jul 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Chazicaria » Thu Jan 12, 2012 2:37 pm

Oterro wrote:
Chazicaria wrote:Since when was pissing on the corpse of a savage who would, if given the chance, murder thousands a war crime?


fucking lol.

I'd sig this but then nutters would think I actually thought that statement had any merit of worth, intellectually or aesthetically.

Notice that you didn't even respond, you simply called it unintelligent.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, Eternal Algerstonia, Floofybit, Haganham, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Mithridatium, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, The Nationalistic Republics of N Belarus, The United Penguin Commonwealth, The Vision, Valrifall, Westport and Holland, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads