Advertisement

by Bales Rant » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:33 am

by The Blaatschapen » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:37 am
Bales Rant wrote:Other posters have mentioned some of the most important things such as making sure your appearance is up to scratch (nice footwear is important) and being confident but keeping it natural.
Now, I'm not a man with loads of experience but one thing I've noticed is that a lady will become more interested in you if you don't show too much interest in her. Obviously, such a game is both risky and tricky and whether to use it depends on context and your judgement based on experience (or initution the first time) - things such as the setting, whether you've been introduced by a mutual friend at a house party (like I was), or whether you've just randomly met in a bar etc. So, you don't want to come across as completely disinterested or aloof or a sociopath because she will become completely disinterested very quickly. But if you get the balance right by 'playing it cool' and not revealing too much about yourself or spending all night talking with just her, she might well wonder why you're not so forthcoming with her and it therefore adds to your mystic. This is good.
Secondly, if you've gone on to gain a lady's interest, sometimes - but by no means all of the time - she will test your strength of character by playfully insulting you or something about you. Even if it's funny don't laugh just smile slightly and immediately hitback with a similar playful insult that one-ups her. She is testing whether you will stand up for yourself, and hence her. This is also good.
I'm not particularly confident, I'm quite shy, plus I don't think much of myself in terms of attractiveness, so the most important thing for me is to gauge whether she is attracted to me and hence whether it's worth bothering asking her out in the first place. 90% of it is in her body language and mannerisms.
I don't know them all but these are the major ones I look(ed) for: eye contact (makes eye contact, quickly looks down or to the sides, back to eye contact), legs crossed pointing towards you, playing with or otherwise managing her hair, the closer her promixity to you the better, exposing her palms and wrists towards you and/or touching her neck, mimicing your behaviour (i.e. you take a sip of your drink and then she does), she finds excuses to touch you or does it in casual passing, she rubs the lips of her mouth together, she might ask you about your relationship status, she might well laugh at your unfunny jokes, she will use your name in conversation, and she will smile - alot.

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:43 am
Bales Rant wrote:Now, I'm not a man with loads of experience but one thing I've noticed is that a lady will become more interested in you if you don't show too much interest in her.
Obviously, such a game is both risky and tricky and whether to use it depends on context and your judgement based on experience (or initution the first time) - things such as the setting, whether you've been introduced by a mutual friend at a house party (like I was), or whether you've just randomly met in a bar etc. So, you don't want to come across as completely disinterested or aloof or a sociopath because she will become completely disinterested very quickly. But if you get the balance right by 'playing it cool' and not revealing too much about yourself or spending all night talking with just her, she might well wonder why you're not so forthcoming with her and it therefore adds to your mystic. This is good.

by Tahar Joblis » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:46 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:*tries to memorize that whole list of things she might do*
Can't she just say it? Much easier *nods*

by Bales Rant » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:48 am
The Blaatschapen wrote:*tries to memorize that whole list of things she might do*
Can't she just say it? Much easier *nods*

by Arkinesia » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:50 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:Not really. Your analogy was quite sexist. The art of "picking up chicks" is quite sexist in and of itself. Your analogies involving women as fish to be caught or deer to be hunted is quite dehumanizing, and it suggests that you see male/female relationships as inherently predatory.
Maybe you're projecting. I went to college on a campus that had a lot of deer and seeing them was part of the delight of being there...but if you went around screaming at them they'd never show up. Did you ever think about that? Did you, huh? That maybe people might have another reason for wanting to run into a deer other than hunt it? No, you didn't. You shouldered in with your expectations, projecting your 'hunting centric' view of the world on everyone...do you feel proud of yourself, what with your inability to view deer as nothing other than targets for hunters?
See, I can extrapolate too.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.

by The-_Sicarii » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:52 am
Novus Honoris wrote:just be yourself.

by The Congregationists » Wed Jan 11, 2012 11:54 am
Tahar Joblis wrote:Bales Rant wrote:Now, I'm not a man with loads of experience but one thing I've noticed is that a lady will become more interested in you if you don't show too much interest in her.
This is true.Obviously, such a game is both risky and tricky and whether to use it depends on context and your judgement based on experience (or initution the first time) - things such as the setting, whether you've been introduced by a mutual friend at a house party (like I was), or whether you've just randomly met in a bar etc. So, you don't want to come across as completely disinterested or aloof or a sociopath because she will become completely disinterested very quickly. But if you get the balance right by 'playing it cool' and not revealing too much about yourself or spending all night talking with just her, she might well wonder why you're not so forthcoming with her and it therefore adds to your mystic. This is good.
Baiting and teasing also works on men. If anything, "playing hard to get" works better on men than it does on women - with women, you have to balance playing hard to get with making sure you've got her attention in the first place, since she's typically employing a passive approach. For women dealing with certain men, in fact, the "slut" factor of the Madonna/Whore complex sometimes makes playing hard to get necessary to get anywhere serious.
Playing hard to get a pretty clever method of manipulation, and it works reasonably well. People tend to value things that they worked hard to get a lot more, and that includes relationships.
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Jan 11, 2012 6:51 pm
1000 Cats wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Not really. Your analogy was quite sexist. The art of "picking up chicks" is quite sexist in and of itself. Your analogies involving women as fish to be caught or deer to be hunted is quite dehumanizing, and it suggests that you see male/female relationships as inherently predatory.
For once, I agree. He could have used a better analogy. Still made me
1000 Cats wrote:Less threatening synopsis of the "girl-hunting" metaphor: be Zen.

by Nornalhorst » Thu Jan 12, 2012 6:27 pm
The Congregationists wrote:Tahar Joblis wrote:This is true.
Baiting and teasing also works on men. If anything, "playing hard to get" works better on men than it does on women - with women, you have to balance playing hard to get with making sure you've got her attention in the first place, since she's typically employing a passive approach. For women dealing with certain men, in fact, the "slut" factor of the Madonna/Whore complex sometimes makes playing hard to get necessary to get anywhere serious.
Playing hard to get a pretty clever method of manipulation, and it works reasonably well. People tend to value things that they worked hard to get a lot more, and that includes relationships.
QFT. Get the balance right and the battle's 80% won.

by Provosa » Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:16 am

by Gallade » Fri Jan 13, 2012 7:35 am
Provosa wrote:It's not incredibly complicated, but here's something not to do:
I walked out of a club last week. I was around 20 degrees outside and I had no jacket, so I hurried to my car, but I get poked on the back and this guy wants my number and all that. I don't know anything about him, his interests, or anything, and he asks these things of me in a robotic manner. I show distanced body language and communicate how cold it is outside, that I just want to get in my car and go to sleep.
Fast forward to this week. He singles me out again and tries talking again. Doesn't share any interests or questions or ideas whatsoever. Just asks "Why can't we be friends?"
This put me on the defensive. I feel that if you're entering a club, leave any negativity at the door and promote everyone's happiness. But I had nothing to go on for this person -- I knew nothing about him and didn't really want to, the more I heard him speak.
I responded something like "This is unnatural. Do what you love and friends will just happen." I felt bad eh.

by The Congregationists » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:52 am
Nornalhorst wrote:Man too bad relationships require such confusing games.

by Samuraikoku » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:57 am
The Congregationists wrote:http://www.attractioninstitute.org/book/free-chapter

by Disserbia » Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:00 am
Chevrolet Corvette wrote:Hmm Depends if you take care of yourselfAnd also depends on what car you own i myself own a 1978 Trans Am 455 which my baby loves too xD

by The Congregationists » Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:09 am

by Samuraikoku » Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:12 am
The Congregationists wrote:Depends why that would be, Samuraikoku?
My observation and experience has been that the "involuntarily single" always have some hand in the authoring of their fate, although external circumstance can possibly impose that state on someone - the result of disease, accident, destitution or other misfortune. I don't know if that's your case. That said, the article I referenced wasn't just for "pick up artists." Those who most need the help in finding a mate can gain the most benefit from what it has to say. Read it.

by Heterodox Economists » Fri Jan 13, 2012 10:18 am
Nornalhorst wrote:I'm going to try make this as least bloggy as possible but I'm a pretty shy guy, nerdy, not very charismatic, with no understanding of women or really any social skill (I also find it extremely difficult to read body language and social cues so flirting is an alien concept), and zero sexual or relationship experience (well I've managed to go on a couple of "dates" before but they were total failures as the girls were just playing me the entire time, one date the girl tried her best to make it hell, and one other date no one even showed up) of any sort so I was wondering how exactly does someone get a girlfriend?
What makes some people unable to get a "mate" and others highly successful?
Also I was wondering how does someone go about dating and "asking someone out".
What were your dating experiences like?
I'll probably think of more questions as the thread progresses.

by The Blaatschapen » Fri Jan 13, 2012 9:45 pm
The Congregationists wrote:Nornalhorst wrote:Man too bad relationships require such confusing games.
It does and it doesn't. This is actually way, way more simple than you realize. In a way, it's a lot like Zen or Tao - trying to do it and reasoning it out is guaranteed to fail. It basically boils down to living a good life for its own sake. Think of the old story (Taoist I believe) about trying to catch a butterfly.
I'm not ordinarily given to plugging stuff like this - I have no need for it given that I've been married as long as some of you have been alive. But the link below is a good read on the subject. Give it a whirl.
http://www.attractioninstitute.org/book/free-chapter

by Nornalhorst » Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:57 am
The Congregationists wrote:Samuraikoku wrote:
What happens when you don't have that kind of possibility?
Depends why that would be, Samuraikoku?
My observation and experience has been that the "involuntarily single" always have some hand in the authoring of their fate, although external circumstance can possibly impose that state on someone - the result of disease, accident, destitution or other misfortune. I don't know if that's your case. That said, the article I referenced wasn't just for "pick up artists." Those who most need the help in finding a mate can gain the most benefit from what it has to say. Read it.

by The-_Sicarii » Sat Jan 14, 2012 11:50 am
Crispicaea wrote:Nornalhorst wrote:I'm going to try make this as least bloggy as possible but I'm a pretty shy guy, nerdy, not very charismatic, with no understanding of women or really any social skill (I also find it extremely difficult to read body language and social cues so flirting is an alien concept), and zero sexual or relationship experience (well I've managed to go on a couple of "dates" before but they were total failures as the girls were just playing me the entire time, one date the girl tried her best to make it hell, and one other date no one even showed up) of any sort so I was wondering how exactly does someone get a girlfriend?
What makes some people unable to get a "mate" and others highly successful?
Also I was wondering how does someone go about dating and "asking someone out".
What were your dating experiences like?
I'll probably think of more questions as the thread progresses.
Dude, you asked this question on NationStates... You do realise why we all waste our time on NS, right?
In all seriousness though, I've been the nice guy my whole life and was asked out by the female version of myself for being odd... You just never know. Find a nerdy girl though, they're the ones worth having.

by Caninope » Sat Jan 14, 2012 12:03 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:I've always assumed something about mutual social circles. I'm not particularly interested in the field, personally, but I find it fascinating.
Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.

by The Congregationists » Sat Jan 14, 2012 1:15 pm


by Mad Shaggers » Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:34 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Al-Momenta, Bre zil, Ifreann, Kubra, New Ciencia, Ryemarch, The Jamesian Republic, Urkennalaid, Valyxias, Zurkerx
Advertisement