NATION

PASSWORD

Dating and Attraction

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
AETEN II
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12949
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby AETEN II » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:09 pm

Arumdaum wrote:
AETEN II wrote:I live in California.
However I happen to luckily go to school in the most conservative county, YAY!
My life is best summed up as the fact that I'm a godless nihilist and egotist yet sometimes find my hands around my own throat.
But enough about me, my problems and thoughts would take up all the memory in the universe. Back to the general girls problems and the OP's.

I'm Californian too, Ventura County.

I'm assuming Kern County?

Alright, back on topic.

Nah, it's Placer. Mormans outta the wazoo and churches that appear to be brainwashing corporations.
And I just lawled at that list. Ignoring the car and job, I'm fairly sure that's the opposite of what you want to do. Unless you're a douche who wants to be in those AXE commercials.
"Quod Vult, Valde Valt"

Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put out in K.P.


Nationstatelandsville wrote:"Why'd the chicken cross the street?"

"Because your dad's a whore."

"...He died a week ago."

"Of syphilis, I bet."

Best Gif on the internet.

User avatar
Nightkill the Emperor
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 88776
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nightkill the Emperor » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:10 pm

I'm actually not too sure.
Hi! I'm Khan, your local misanthropic Indian.
I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith.
P2TM RP Discussion Thread
If you want a good rp, read this shit.
Tiami is cool.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".

Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

Monfrox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
# went there....

It's Nightkill. He's been there so long he rents out rooms to other people at a flat rate, but demands cash up front.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:13 pm

If I absolutely had to date someone, I would pick a person I found physically repulsive, so that I could guarantee that I wasn't just dating them because of looks.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:14 pm

AETEN II wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:I'm Californian too, Ventura County.

I'm assuming Kern County?

Alright, back on topic.

Nah, it's Placer. Mormans outta the wazoo and churches that appear to be brainwashing corporations.
And I just lawled at that list. Ignoring the car and job, I'm fairly sure that's the opposite of what you want to do. Unless you're a douche who wants to be in those AXE commercials.


And the car is not even necessary.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Lost Earth
Diplomat
 
Posts: 672
Founded: Sep 22, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost Earth » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:14 pm

Acradians wrote:
Astrolinium wrote:
Glad I'm not the only one.



Wut did I dooo

You have a flag hauntingly similar to a user named four sided triangle. Look him up.

Edit: note his post above...
Last edited by Lost Earth on Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Republic of Lost Earth
Population: 3.022 Billion
Check out our fact book on our nation's page!
Government:
Executive
King Jonathan II (elected)
Chancellor Woofen
Vice Chancellor Squrile
Judicary
World Judge Von Clar
Council of Vice Judges (7 members)
Legislative
King Jonathan II (elected)
Assembly of Commons (60 elected members)
Military:
Defense: $8,723,179,917,152.61

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:15 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:1.) Get a car.
2.) Get a job (if over 18).
3.) Get money (optional, but having enough of it can overshadow the lack of a job).
4.) Treat women like objects.
5.) Be ruthlessly manipulative.

That works pretty well. If you're not willing to go that far, you might start by (a) studying behavior so you can recognize flirtation [read Cosmo and other "ladies' mags" if nothing else - they spend a lot of time talking about how to know if a guy is into you or if you're into a guy, where "you" is presumed female, generalize away from there] and (b) repeatedly asking one girl after another to hang out with you. (If you can collect a dozen rejections in a week, then you're probably getting somewhere.)

It also helps a lot to already be dating a girl. Women find men much more attractive when they're already taken. You might not find that helpful, though.


Sarcasm, much?

Nope.

I can also give you the skinny on how to have an easy time getting a boyfriend, if you like. It's not much more cheering, come down to it:

1.) Be skinny.
2.) Look pretty.
3.) Treat men like objects.
4.) Be ruthlessly manipulative.
5.) Lower standards, rinse, and repeat.

It's a little simpler for shy girls to get a boyfriend for the first time, because we expect men to take the active role in courtship and women to reject most of their suitors; all most women have to do to break a single spell is to lower their standards. This is why men bitch about not getting dates and women bitch about having shitty dates, really.

User avatar
Idaho Conservatives
Minister
 
Posts: 3066
Founded: Jul 27, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Idaho Conservatives » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:16 pm

AETEN II wrote:
Arumdaum wrote:I'm Californian too, Ventura County.

I'm assuming Kern County?

Alright, back on topic.

Nah, it's Placer. Mormans outta the wazoo and churches that appear to be brainwashing corporations


Think you got lots of Mormons there? IIRC, Idaho has the highest per capita population in the nation, and according to Google maps I have about 150 Mormon churches within twenty miles of my home.
"Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way" --General George S. Patton

If You're A Fellow Ham, TG me!!!
KF7LCE

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:17 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Sarcasm, much?

Nope.

I can also give you the skinny on how to have an easy time getting a boyfriend, if you like. It's not much more cheering, come down to it:

1.) Be skinny.
2.) Look pretty.
3.) Treat men like objects.
4.) Be ruthlessly manipulative.
5.) Lower standards, rinse, and repeat.

It's a little simpler for shy girls to get a boyfriend for the first time, because we expect men to take the active role in courtship and women to reject most of their suitors; all most women have to do to break a single spell is to lower their standards. This is why men bitch about not getting dates and women bitch about having shitty dates, really.


Yeah, I'm rejecting this. I don't see why one should be manipulative and treat the other group like objects. How would that give you a partner?

Edit: Just to be sure, I also reject being skinny and several other of the things on the list(save for perhaps getting a job, but that lies more in the self-improvement direction). But the two things I mentioned above are common in either list, so I'll attack those first :)
Last edited by The Blaatschapen on Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Arumdaum
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 24565
Founded: Oct 21, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Arumdaum » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:19 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Nope.

I can also give you the skinny on how to have an easy time getting a boyfriend, if you like. It's not much more cheering, come down to it:

1.) Be skinny.
2.) Look pretty.
3.) Treat men like objects.
4.) Be ruthlessly manipulative.
5.) Lower standards, rinse, and repeat.

It's a little simpler for shy girls to get a boyfriend for the first time, because we expect men to take the active role in courtship and women to reject most of their suitors; all most women have to do to break a single spell is to lower their standards. This is why men bitch about not getting dates and women bitch about having shitty dates, really.


Yeah, I'm rejecting this. I don't see why one should be manipulative and treat the other group like objects. How would that give you a partner?

Edit: Just to be sure, I also reject being skinny and several other of the things on the list(save for perhaps getting a job, but that lies more in the self-improvement direction). But the two things I mentioned above are common in either list, so I'll attack those first :)

Perhaps he's talking about short-term relationships that usually end up bad?
LITERALLY UNLIKE ANY OTHER RP REGION & DON'T REPORT THIS SIG
█████████████████▌TIANDI ____________██____██
_______███▌MAP _______________██_____██_████████
█████████████████▌WIKI _______██______██___██____██
_______████ DISCORD ________██████___██____██______█

____████__████ SIGNUP _________██___████___██____
__████_______████_____________██______██__________██
████____________████_______█████████___███████████

User avatar
Metanih
Senator
 
Posts: 3888
Founded: Jan 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Metanih » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:20 pm

Generally the way I get girlfriends is to be myself, even though I am one of the more shy people I know. Just get to know someone, and say what feels natural.
Nationstates Ninja
Second to Reploid Productions...
Everyone should watch this excellent show, and the movie Serenity.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0303461/

If you don't know me well, talk to me more. I have a DeviantArt account here. http://merin593.deviantart.com
Also, I am a pansexual genderfluid individual. If you don't know what that means, look it up. I deal with enough people asking in real life. . ;)

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:23 pm

The Blaatschapen wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Nope.

I can also give you the skinny on how to have an easy time getting a boyfriend, if you like. It's not much more cheering, come down to it:

1.) Be skinny.
2.) Look pretty.
3.) Treat men like objects.
4.) Be ruthlessly manipulative.
5.) Lower standards, rinse, and repeat.

It's a little simpler for shy girls to get a boyfriend for the first time, because we expect men to take the active role in courtship and women to reject most of their suitors; all most women have to do to break a single spell is to lower their standards. This is why men bitch about not getting dates and women bitch about having shitty dates, really.


Yeah, I'm rejecting this. I don't see why one should be manipulative and treat the other group like objects. How would that give you a partner?

Oh, I'm not saying that's what one should do; I'm saying that's what works.

Treating people like objects works pretty well when it comes to getting by. This is why sociopaths tend to be extremely charming. (EDIT: I notice the link is implicitly sexist and assumes that only males are ever sociopathic. Women can and do treat men like objects as well. My point is that the charming nature of sociopaths is very well established.) If you don't actually care about the person and their feelings, you are free to act in whatever way seems most likely to alter their behavior to what you want it to be.
Last edited by Tahar Joblis on Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
AETEN II
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12949
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby AETEN II » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:26 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
The Blaatschapen wrote:
Yeah, I'm rejecting this. I don't see why one should be manipulative and treat the other group like objects. How would that give you a partner?

Oh, I'm not saying that's what one should do; I'm saying that's what works.

Treating people like objects works pretty well when it comes to getting by. This is why sociopaths tend to be extremely charming. If you don't actually care about the person and their feelings, you are free to act in whatever way seems most likely to alter their behavior to what you want it to be.

Yeah know, I'm either calling troll or shaving him bald to check if 666 is on his scalp.
"Quod Vult, Valde Valt"

Excuse me, sir. Seeing as how the V.P. is such a V.I.P., shouldn't we keep the P.C. on the Q.T.? 'Cause if it leaks to the V.C. he could end up M.I.A., and then we'd all be put out in K.P.


Nationstatelandsville wrote:"Why'd the chicken cross the street?"

"Because your dad's a whore."

"...He died a week ago."

"Of syphilis, I bet."

Best Gif on the internet.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:27 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:Oh, I'm not saying that's what one should do; I'm saying that's what works.

Treating people like objects works pretty well when it comes to getting by. This is why sociopaths tend to be extremely charming. (EDIT: I notice the link is implicitly sexist and assumes that only males are ever sociopathic. Women can and do treat men like objects as well. My point is that the charming nature of sociopaths is very well established.) If you don't actually care about the person and their feelings, you are free to act in whatever way seems most likely to alter their behavior to what you want it to be.


Thanks for confirming my preconceptions about how sex and relationships work. It actually makes me glad I'm celibate.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Yuktova
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11882
Founded: Feb 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Yuktova » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:28 pm

I dislike dating, and think it's wasteful. You know, you could just spend that wasted time doing something more intermit...

Like playing NS...
I'm Morrissey... Nice to meet you.
Goldsaver said: This is murder, not a romantic date!

User avatar
Mike the Progressive
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27544
Founded: Oct 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Mike the Progressive » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:30 pm

Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
Mike the Progressive wrote:Having confidence is the best way. So if you're a virgin, I recommend going to a place where prostitution is "legal" *coughs* and get it on. I was fortunate enough to lose my virginity to a girl who was also a virgin, meaning we rocked each other's (13 year old) worlds, even though in hindsight it was pretty bad. Sorry, losing track, um, you may be wondering: "But Mike the Awesome, what does this have to do with getting a girlfriend?" Simple, losing your virginity does wonder for your self-esteem/confidence.


Note: As far as I see it, in hypocritical society's views, a man who goes around being a man-slut is applauded for his "virility". However, if somebody of the female gender does the same, it's negative all of a sudden.

So if you lose your virginity...socially if you're a guy, it's a "good thing". If you're a girl, well, I don't think your action will get treated as well.

Then again, this is coming out of a virgin who only observes his surroundings.


Who cares? Fuck society. I worship, worship women who are sluts. Like Uni. She's awesome.

User avatar
Isengardslaves
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Jan 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

It's okay

Postby Isengardslaves » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:30 pm

Just wait till you find the right girl, (you'll know) and then be yourself (being who you're not brings you all kinds of trouble), be kind (trust me), and just act natural. Don't get nervous or freeze up. She's your date and you should enjoy the date while it lasts.
But for now, try and make friends, that aren't super-nerds like myself*, and be social. When your anti-social you're avoided and that may be why you can't get a girl friend.
Good luck!! :D
THE EXTERMINATOR SHALL RISE AGAIN!! :rofl:

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 164066
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:30 pm

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Tahar Joblis wrote:Oh, I'm not saying that's what one should do; I'm saying that's what works.

Treating people like objects works pretty well when it comes to getting by. This is why sociopaths tend to be extremely charming. (EDIT: I notice the link is implicitly sexist and assumes that only males are ever sociopathic. Women can and do treat men like objects as well. My point is that the charming nature of sociopaths is very well established.) If you don't actually care about the person and their feelings, you are free to act in whatever way seems most likely to alter their behavior to what you want it to be.


Thanks for confirming my preconceptions about how sex and relationships work. It actually makes me glad I'm celibate.

Didn't you already realise that everyone approaches romance and sex like sociopaths? I thought people learned that before puberty.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17410
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Mushet » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:31 pm

Never dated, kissed, did anything of that sort, women came on to me several times in the past but I was nervous so I froze them out

I just flirt with friends :p
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:31 pm

Arumdaum wrote:Perhaps he's talking about short-term relationships that usually end up bad?

Maintaining a relationship is indeed a different beast than getting into them in the first place, yes. ;)

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:32 pm

Mike the Progressive wrote:
Israslovakahzerbajan wrote:
Note: As far as I see it, in hypocritical society's views, a man who goes around being a man-slut is applauded for his "virility". However, if somebody of the female gender does the same, it's negative all of a sudden.

So if you lose your virginity...socially if you're a guy, it's a "good thing". If you're a girl, well, I don't think your action will get treated as well.

Then again, this is coming out of a virgin who only observes his surroundings.


Who cares? Fuck society. I worship, worship women who are sluts. Like Uni. She's awesome.


I don't worship anybody. But I agree I admire promiscuous women.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:32 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Thanks for confirming my preconceptions about how sex and relationships work. It actually makes me glad I'm celibate.

Didn't you already realise that everyone approaches romance and sex like sociopaths? I thought people learned that before puberty.


And here I am, believing in my Disney stories :(
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Tahar Joblis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9290
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tahar Joblis » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:37 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Thanks for confirming my preconceptions about how sex and relationships work. It actually makes me glad I'm celibate.

Didn't you already realise that everyone approaches romance and sex like sociopaths? I thought people learned that before puberty.

I think that training mostly happens in middle school, during the onset of puberty. :lol:

Of course, I missed middle school, so that would be pure speculation on my part. :p

More seriously, 4ST, it's not how sex and relationships work; it's what (unfortunately) works to get you sex and into relationships.

I would say that what the OP should do is spend more time hanging out with women. And, no, seriously, reading some women's mags and putting himself in female shoes [metaphorically] will probably help him put a few things into perspective that he just hasn't figured out yet.

User avatar
Chaos Crescent
Minister
 
Posts: 2582
Founded: Feb 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Chaos Crescent » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:37 pm

Mushet wrote:Never dated, kissed, did anything of that sort, women came on to me several times in the past but I was nervous so I froze them out

I just flirt with friends :p

Yeah and I think you have restraining orders against those here at least.
Dovie'andi se tovya sagain.
Mind what people do, not only what they say, for deeds will betray a lie. Willfully turning aside from the truth is treason to one's self.
Fun^10 x int^40=ir2
Timeline
I am your delusion.
Galactic Economic and Security Organization Member?

User avatar
The Blaatschapen
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 63227
Founded: Antiquity
Anarchy

Postby The Blaatschapen » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:39 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Didn't you already realise that everyone approaches romance and sex like sociopaths? I thought people learned that before puberty.

I think that training mostly happens in middle school, during the onset of puberty. :lol:

Of course, I missed middle school, so that would be pure speculation on my part. :p

More seriously, 4ST, it's not how sex and relationships work; it's what (unfortunately) works to get you sex and into relationships.

I would say that what the OP should do is spend more time hanging out with women. And, no, seriously, reading some women's mags and putting himself in female shoes [metaphorically] will probably help him put a few things into perspective that he just hasn't figured out yet.


Okay, I kinda agree with that last part. To get to know how people work one should spend time with them. And reading women mags will help you understand women that read women mags. After all, there must be something that makes those magazines popular.
The Blaatschapen should resign

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:43 pm

Tahar Joblis wrote:More seriously, 4ST, it's not how sex and relationships work; it's what (unfortunately) works to get you sex and into relationships.


Since that's how you get sex and relationships, this means that such horrid behavior is a necessary step in such things. Therefore, it is immoral to pursue them, correct?
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Atrito, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bovad, Ethel mermania, Galmat, Hekp, Hidrandia, Myrensis, Ors Might, Pale Dawn, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Phoeniae, Rusozak, Shrillland, Southland, The Two Jerseys, Tungstan, UMi-NazKapp Group, Valrifall, Vassenor, Washington Resistance Army, Zetaopalatopia

Advertisement

Remove ads