What he said, basically.
Advertisement

by Nightkill the Emperor » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:04 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

by Maurepas » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:08 pm

by Hittanryan » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:09 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:I will father children that will come pre-installed with Christianity 95


by Sociobiology » Fri Jan 06, 2012 10:24 pm
The Blaatschapen wrote:Sociobiology wrote: why would researching other religions be necessary, he was born atheist so he is just returning to factory defaults. To molest the analogy further ask yourself why a god would build people with atheism pre-installed?
I will father children that will come pre-installed with Christianity 95

by Aesthetica » Fri Jan 06, 2012 11:09 pm

by Dyakovo » Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:33 am
Imsogone wrote:Erinkita wrote:I think it's more to do with the misconception that agnostocism is a middle ground between atheism and theism, and the further misconception that you have to deny the existence of a god in order ot be an atheist.
I think it's funny that all atheists seem to be Christian atheists, as if there's only one god that you can't believe in and that there are no other gods that you can't believe in.

by Dyakovo » Sat Jan 07, 2012 1:35 am
Streamland wrote:Imsogone wrote:
I think it's funny that all atheists seem to be Christian atheists, as if there's only one god that you can't believe in and that there are no other gods that you can't believe in.
Since we were Christians before being atheists, we were atheistic towards the other religions already anyway.

by Streamland » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:11 am
Sociobiology wrote: why would researching other religions be necessary, he was born atheist so he is just returning to factory defaults. To molest the analogy further ask yourself why a god would build people with atheism pre-installed?

by Risottia » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:25 am
Seperates wrote:I have noticed that over the past couple years, the influx of outspoken atheists on the forum has increased. While I can't say it was that dramatic, I can say that based on numerous religion polls throughout the site's history, about 40-50% of the site is god-less.
So, Atheists of NSG, why are you an atheist?

by Zebbstar » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:30 am
Thalam wrote:Also, you gotta love a thread full of non-atheists telling atheists what atheists believe.


by Greater Mackonia » Sat Jan 07, 2012 3:57 am

by Cameroi » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:04 am

by The Fifth Dominion » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:04 am
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Seperates wrote:If you didn't notice, or failed to read, as so many Christians do their own scriptural writings, the question wasn't addressed to you, so kindly bugger off.
However, why do I not believe in God? Because there is no reason to. God is not required, he does not reside within us until you prove he does so. Does he actually affect us? If so, where and how? And if not, the honest skeptical question isn't "Why not believe in God?" but "Why believe in God?"
Ad hominem attacks in the first sentence? Gee, that's nice. And you cannot limit responses in NSG. You can ask, but without enforcement law means nothing.
So without irrefutable scientific evidence, by our current standards, you refuse to believe in something? Before microscopes, we did not know that microorganisms existed. So what you are saying is that until Janssen, cells were nonexistent?
I believe in God because that was the most logical conclusion. Even if we are simply a series of arbitrary quirks in an infinite and ever expanding universe, which is entirely possible, the idea that in said universe there is no higher order of being is simply laughable.
Now the other reason is based on faith. It is the reason I do not attempt to convince atheists to believe in God, aside from debating the particularly rude ones. Having studied the Word, all aspects, not just those found in the King James or New International but the Lost Books and the Jeffersonian Bible, I am quite certain that there is, or was, a higher power at work. Perhaps one of human creation.

by New England and The Maritimes » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:07 am
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Streamland » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:09 am
The Fifth Dominion wrote:there is always Pascal's Wager. Look it up.

by New England and The Maritimes » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:11 am
The Fifth Dominion wrote:Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Ad hominem attacks in the first sentence? Gee, that's nice. And you cannot limit responses in NSG. You can ask, but without enforcement law means nothing.
So without irrefutable scientific evidence, by our current standards, you refuse to believe in something? Before microscopes, we did not know that microorganisms existed. So what you are saying is that until Janssen, cells were nonexistent?
I believe in God because that was the most logical conclusion. Even if we are simply a series of arbitrary quirks in an infinite and ever expanding universe, which is entirely possible, the idea that in said universe there is no higher order of being is simply laughable.
Now the other reason is based on faith. It is the reason I do not attempt to convince atheists to believe in God, aside from debating the particularly rude ones. Having studied the Word, all aspects, not just those found in the King James or New International but the Lost Books and the Jeffersonian Bible, I am quite certain that there is, or was, a higher power at work. Perhaps one of human creation.
Im with you bro. Now let us destroy these heathens! /joke And besides (to the atheists) there is always Pascal's Wager. Look it up.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Aesthetica » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:14 am
The Fifth Dominion wrote:Im with you bro. Now let us destroy these heathens! /joke And besides (to the atheists) there is always Pascal's Wager. Look it up.

by Leepaidamba » Sat Jan 07, 2012 4:58 am
Aesthetica wrote:The Fifth Dominion wrote:Im with you bro. Now let us destroy these heathens! /joke And besides (to the atheists) there is always Pascal's Wager. Look it up.
Don't have to look it up, as Pascal's Wager is a retarded piece of pseudo logic...
It would only be valid if 1) there was only one religion with one god, and 2) the probability of said religion being factual was a 50/50 chance.
However since there are more than one religions in the world (Total number of cults, creeds etc., is somewhere around 30,000) then on an even probability spread, the chance that YOUR cult is right falls to 1/30,000, leaving a 29,999/1 chance you're wrong.
Abandon YOUR religion now, it's the most sensible choice, Pascal's wager, right?
Factbook Official name: the Grand Duchy of Leepaidamba Short name: Amba AKA: the Grand Duchy Demonym: Leepaidamban/Amban HoS: co-Grand Dukes David I and Anna I HoG: Premier Jaap de Waal Region: Nederland Map by PB FlagsNational animal: Rabit National motto: "Paene est non." (Almost is not) National anthem: " 't Lied der Vrijheid" (the Song of Freedom) CapitalsCurrency: Amban Florin/Aƒ Languages
| No news |

by Bottle » Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:05 am
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:So without irrefutable scientific evidence, by our current standards, you refuse to believe in something? Before microscopes, we did not know that microorganisms existed. So what you are saying is that until Janssen, cells were nonexistent?
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:I believe in God because that was the most logical conclusion. Even if we are simply a series of arbitrary quirks in an infinite and ever expanding universe, which is entirely possible, the idea that in said universe there is no higher order of being is simply laughable.
Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Now the other reason is based on faith. It is the reason I do not attempt to convince atheists to believe in God, aside from debating the particularly rude ones. Having studied the Word, all aspects, not just those found in the King James or New International but the Lost Books and the Jeffersonian Bible, I am quite certain that there is, or was, a higher power at work. Perhaps one of human creation.

by Red zephie » Sat Jan 07, 2012 6:08 am
Bottle wrote:Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:So without irrefutable scientific evidence, by our current standards, you refuse to believe in something? Before microscopes, we did not know that microorganisms existed. So what you are saying is that until Janssen, cells were nonexistent?
Do you really think that if you don't believe in something, it doesn't exist? Do you really think belief works that way?
I'm sure there are lots of things that exist which we don't know about. But that doesn't mean I'm going to assume the existence of things for which we have no evidence, on the off chance that one of them turns out to be something that actually exists. Instead, I'm going to be humble enough to accept that there is much I don't know, and therefore I shouldn't go around assuming that I'm going to have answers to everything...I'm sure not going to assume that I know there is an all-powerful omniscient creator-being whose feelings and opinions were shared with a bunch of Bronze Age nomads because the nomads wrote a book about it.Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:I believe in God because that was the most logical conclusion. Even if we are simply a series of arbitrary quirks in an infinite and ever expanding universe, which is entirely possible, the idea that in said universe there is no higher order of being is simply laughable.
Order does not require intelligence or intent.
Your logic is not like our Earth logic.Simon Cowell of the RR wrote:Now the other reason is based on faith. It is the reason I do not attempt to convince atheists to believe in God, aside from debating the particularly rude ones. Having studied the Word, all aspects, not just those found in the King James or New International but the Lost Books and the Jeffersonian Bible, I am quite certain that there is, or was, a higher power at work. Perhaps one of human creation.
And that's fine...for you. But really, your reason for refraining from trying to convince atheists is a bit flawed. You should refrain because you've got nothing that would convince anybody else. You have nothing BUT your feelings, your opinions, and your faith. Which means that you have yet to provide anybody with any reason to give a shit.
I'm sure you FEEL like there's a God. I'm sure you THINK that, based on your readings of those Bronze Age nomads. I'm sure you KNOW IN YOUR HEART or whatever else. But none of those things constitute evidence of any kind. Your opinions and feelings about those things carry exactly the same weight as my cousin's opinions and feelings about Big Foot.
Kindly stop whimpering about how mean it is for people to not be more courteous while you insult their intelligence with your insubstantial non-arguments. Have the humility to recognize that you know nothing more than anybody else, and you're demanding that people show special respect for your GUESSES.

by Ashmoria » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:22 am
Maurepas wrote:Well, I've never enjoyed church. Everytime I've went it was focused on getting you to put money in the collection plates(when I was in Sunday School, for example, they'd pit the boys vs the girls and whoever put in the most money got candy. Kind of a problem when you're only bringing like $1 and other kids are bringing $25-$30 and your team loses), or on the Preacher's kid being the center of attention. And Adult services always just put me to sleep.
Frankly I just found the people at the Church to be people I don't wish to associate with.
Further, Religion is pretty irrelevant to my life. I don't really feel the need for it, and I'm a big fan of looking at the world as logically as possible, and faith doesn't really fit in all that well with that mindset.

by Ashmoria » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:27 am
by New Genoa » Sat Jan 07, 2012 7:41 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -Astoria-, Abserdia, Alvecia, Amenson, American Legionaries, Bhurmesia, Eahland, Ethel mermania, Grand matrix of Dues ex machina, Imperial British State, Incelastan, Primitive Communism, Rhanukhan, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Archregimancy, The Astral Mandate, Thermodolia, Vassenor
Advertisement