Actually they were used before that, by I think the Spanish and the Americans.
It was one of the piss poor excuses Churchill used to try and justify it.
Advertisement
by The Matthew Islands » Sun Jan 15, 2012 3:33 am
Souseiseki wrote:as a posting career in the UK Poltics Thread becomes longer, the probability of literally becoming souseiseki approaches 1

by Horsefish » Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:29 am
The Matthew Islands wrote:Actually they were used before that, by I think the Spanish and the Americans.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.
Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.
The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

by CaptainOzz » Sun Jan 15, 2012 4:54 am

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Jan 15, 2012 5:04 am

by Tagmatium » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:01 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:Apparently Salmond wants to bring the voting age to 16 because of there being more popularity with independence with the young. I may have more respect for the SNP if they just got on with the vote now rather than trying to select the best possible time to vote with the best possible people.
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

by Kirrig » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:23 am
Tagmatium wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:Apparently Salmond wants to bring the voting age to 16 because of there being more popularity with independence with the young. I may have more respect for the SNP if they just got on with the vote now rather than trying to select the best possible time to vote with the best possible people.
I'm beginning to become somewhat convinced that Salmond only wants independence and damn all the rest that it could entail.
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by Trixiestan » Sun Jan 15, 2012 6:27 am
Tagmatium wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:Apparently Salmond wants to bring the voting age to 16 because of there being more popularity with independence with the young. I may have more respect for the SNP if they just got on with the vote now rather than trying to select the best possible time to vote with the best possible people.
I'm beginning to become somewhat convinced that Salmond only wants independence and damn all the rest that it could entail.

by Kulverint » Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:27 am

by Angleter » Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:39 am
Kulverint wrote:Uthopia wrote:I agree with you, british nationalists made great atrocities during the history like in Africa I wont be surprised if they wont respect the democratic will of the scotish people.
So you think a government consisting of 28% Scots would invade and subjugate Scotland if they voted yes?
Please, live in the real world, not the fantasy land you inhabit where everything must end in war.

by Kleomentia » Sun Jan 15, 2012 7:57 am

by Kulverint » Sun Jan 15, 2012 8:20 am
Angleter wrote:Kulverint wrote:So you think a government consisting of 28% Scots would invade and subjugate Scotland if they voted yes?
Please, live in the real world, not the fantasy land you inhabit where everything must end in war.
But British EVIL. Alan Rickman will come to take away Scotland's freedom.

by Cromarty » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:16 pm
Dominion of Integrated States wrote:The British Invented the non combatrnt internment camp in the Boar War.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack

by Proloteriat » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:19 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:22 pm
CaptainOzz wrote:I'm sure Scotland loves it's free prescriptions, tuition fees, fire & rescue service, police force, NHS, ambulance service, devolved parliment, social care & welfare along with all the other what nots it couldn't afford without the British taxpayer, I'm all for Scottish independence! Let's see how long that north sea oil lasts you, hm?

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:23 pm
Proloteriat wrote:Whatever the people say is what I think. I don't mind either way. I am Welsh but I have no strong opinions for or against scottlands independence but I am against Welsh independence as it is not sustainable.

by Marcurix » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:26 pm
Alyakia wrote:CaptainOzz wrote:I'm sure Scotland loves it's free prescriptions, tuition fees, fire & rescue service, police force, NHS, ambulance service, devolved parliment, social care & welfare along with all the other what nots it couldn't afford without the British taxpayer, I'm all for Scottish independence! Let's see how long that north sea oil lasts you, hm?
we need to find some way to make people read entire threads before posting
SD_Film Artists wrote:Proloteriat wrote:Whatever the people say is what I think. I don't mind either way. I am Welsh but I have no strong opinions for or against scottlands independence but I am against Welsh independence as it is not sustainable.
Actually it might be more sustainable than Scotland; Wales would be a very small nation if it were independent, but IIRC at least it isn't living off its parents (England) and then thinking it'll be so cool to be independent as is the case with Scotland. An independent Wales will be more sustainable, albiet still pointless in my humble opinion..

by Seperates » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:26 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:28 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Proloteriat wrote:Whatever the people say is what I think. I don't mind either way. I am Welsh but I have no strong opinions for or against scottlands independence but I am against Welsh independence as it is not sustainable.
Actually it might be more sustainable than Scotland; Wales would be a very small nation if it were independent, but IIRC at least it isn't living off its parents (England*) and then thinking it'll be so cool to be independent as is the case with Scotland. An independent Wales will be more sustainable, albiet still pointless in my humble opinion..
*not that Wales is England's child; that'll be places like America.

by Seperates » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:30 pm

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:32 pm
Alyakia wrote:Staeny wrote:
Private property how? Using money that the monarchy got from being the monarchy? I no like....
i'm not familiar with victorias personal finances
Because the union allows for Scotland to be part of something bigger, more powerful... Heck, as a part of the UK, Scotland has a permenant seat on the UN security council. not to say that I'm against giving greater freedoms to the Scottish Parliament.
If the UK, France and Germany became one we would get pretty close to getting back to "ruling the world" status. Bigger, more powerful. But no one that loves the UK ever seems up for that, for some reason. Perhaps due to ego and nationalism.

by SD_Film Artists » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:36 pm
by Alyakia » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:38 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Alyakia wrote:i'm not familiar with victorias personal finances
If the UK, France and Germany became one we would get pretty close to getting back to "ruling the world" status. Bigger, more powerful. But no one that loves the UK ever seems up for that, for some reason. Perhaps due to ego and nationalism.
And not sharing 300 years as a globe conquering island.

by Zersium » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:40 pm
Alyakia wrote:SD_Film Artists wrote:
And not sharing 300 years as a globe conquering island.
If you only support unions with countries that you're already unified with I'd love to see what you'd have said in the 1600s.
"300 years as a globe conquering" island is pretty much ego and nationalism. Because hey, people love talking about how awesome the Empire was.
by Alyakia » Sun Jan 15, 2012 12:40 pm
SD_Film Artists wrote:Alyakia wrote:Wales, being far far more integrated with England, also doesn't leech from it (as much!!!) because Scotland is poor and their sole reason for any sort of political movement is FREEEEEEEEDOM and feeling cool. Good post.
Well I wouldn't say sole reason, but if I interview some Scottish 16 yr olds (the age of which Alex Salmond wants the vote to be brought down to in this referendum) I don't think I'd get- "Because Scotland could survive and even thrive very well with North Sea oil and the progressive social/economic policies which I've seen to be much better than those of Labour and the Conservatives".
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Arin Graliandre, El Lazaro, Eurocom, Galloism, Harvanite, Umeria, Valyxias, Wolfram and Hart, Xind
Advertisement