No, you must mean, be killed by JEWS.
Advertisement
by EnragedMaldivians » Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:37 am
by Sagasou Wasfaa » Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:40 am
by Lunatic Goofballs » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:09 am
by Farnhamia » Thu Jan 05, 2012 11:09 am
by Milks Empire » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:00 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Bring this thread back on-topic.
by Anarchists communists and other pinkos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:07 pm
Sagasou Wasfaa wrote:a millitary/democratic society where justice is proper justice not in my home country of the uk where the police cant hurt criminals without being suspended its proper justice the works death penelty strong millitary law and order democratic election society
by Soviet Russia Republic » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:08 pm
by CTALNH » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:15 pm
by Rarth » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:16 pm
by Steel and Fire » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:16 pm
by Halgrond » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:49 pm
Lunatic Goofballs wrote:Do you think there is One True God Particle, or do you think there is a pantheon of god particles out there? And if the latter, do you think the God Particle of Thunder has a tiny little hammer?
by THE NEW NEWLY UNITED STATES » Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:53 pm
Ifreann wrote:I'm a godless, baby eating liberal, the kind conservative parents say is hiding under their children's beds waiting to abort their guns and take their babies.
by Toe-Cheeseland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:01 pm
by Meridiani Planum » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:08 pm
by Genivaria » Thu Jan 05, 2012 1:09 pm
Techno-progressivism, technoprogressivism, tech-progressivism or techprogressivism (a portmanteau combining "technoscience-focused" and "progressivism") is a stance of active support for the convergence of technological change and social change. Techno-progressives argue that technological developments can be profoundly empowering and emancipatory when they are regulated by legitimate democratic and accountable authorities to ensure that their costs, risks and benefits are all fairly shared by the actual stakeholders to those developments.[1][2]
by The USOT » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:10 pm
Genivaria wrote:Techno-progressive.Techno-progressivism, technoprogressivism, tech-progressivism or techprogressivism (a portmanteau combining "technoscience-focused" and "progressivism") is a stance of active support for the convergence of technological change and social change. Techno-progressives argue that technological developments can be profoundly empowering and emancipatory when they are regulated by legitimate democratic and accountable authorities to ensure that their costs, risks and benefits are all fairly shared by the actual stakeholders to those developments.[1][2]
Never knew there was a term for what I believe.
I'm sure you'll have heard me talk about renewable energy to improve individual self-suffiency.
by Greater Britainnia and Ireland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:55 pm
by Milks Empire » Thu Jan 05, 2012 2:59 pm
Greater Britainnia and Ireland wrote:My political ideology is a complicated one. It's Thatcherism economically, but less restrictive. I would ban trade unions. I'm a royalist, I believe in a constitutional monarch. I believe in universal healthcare. I also believe that there should be a ban on all leftist parties but I am a supporter of freedom of speech, press etc. I want the death penalty, more prisons. I don't want to be in the EU or in America's bed. I believe that Britain should have a strong military and that we should challenge American naval superiority. I wouldn't mind a secret police. I believe that the country should be run by a dictator who is elected when the previous dies, and is chosen from a number of political parties. I believe that Parliament should be for debating, no law passing. A cabinet should be present to advise. Seeing as there is nothing that describes this I have fitted into the ideology of my surname plus -ism.
by Greater Britainnia and Ireland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:10 pm
Milks Empire wrote:Greater Britainnia and Ireland wrote:My political ideology is a complicated one. It's Thatcherism economically, but less restrictive. I would ban trade unions. I'm a royalist, I believe in a constitutional monarch. I believe in universal healthcare. I also believe that there should be a ban on all leftist parties but I am a supporter of freedom of speech, press etc. I want the death penalty, more prisons. I don't want to be in the EU or in America's bed. I believe that Britain should have a strong military and that we should challenge American naval superiority. I wouldn't mind a secret police. I believe that the country should be run by a dictator who is elected when the previous dies, and is chosen from a number of political parties. I believe that Parliament should be for debating, no law passing. A cabinet should be present to advise. Seeing as there is nothing that describes this I have fitted into the ideology of my surname plus -ism.
You sound too much like this sack of shit.
by Anarchists communists and other pinkos » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:06 pm
Greater Britainnia and Ireland wrote:My political ideology is a complicated one. It's Thatcherism economically, but less restrictive. I would ban trade unions. I'm a royalist, I believe in a constitutional monarch. I believe in universal healthcare. I also believe that there should be a ban on all leftist parties but I am a supporter of freedom of speech, press etc. I want the death penalty, more prisons. I don't want to be in the EU or in America's bed. I believe that Britain should have a strong military and that we should challenge American naval superiority. I wouldn't mind a secret police. I believe that the country should be run by a dictator who is elected when the previous dies, and is chosen from a number of political parties. I believe that Parliament should be for debating, no law passing. A cabinet should be present to advise. Seeing as there is nothing that describes this I have fitted into the ideology of my surname plus -ism.
by Saint Jade IV » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:41 pm
by Trotskylvania » Thu Jan 05, 2012 9:49 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, General TN, Google [Bot], Kostane, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, The H Corporation
Advertisement