by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:37 am
by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:41 am
by Forster Keys » Thu Jan 05, 2012 3:49 am
The Murry wrote:(Image)
In the last Australian federal election the Prime Minister said 3 day before the polls opened
"There will be no CARBON TAX under the government I lead"
The election ended in a hung parliment where Julia Gillard remains PM, she maintains power in the house of Reps. with a coaliton of the Labour party, the Greens and 2 independence. In the Senate the greens have the ability to swing a vote in any dirrection they so wish.
During mid last year Julia Gillard informed the people of Australia that there would infact be a Carbon Tax under her government.
Do you think this is ok?
Do you think the Governor General should sack her?
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:12 am
Meowfoundland wrote:Is this still fucking going on? I am actually really tired of people whining that someone broke a campaign promise. GET OVER IT. It's happened before, and it will happen again, and if you think the Liberals are any better look up why we have a GST.
by Forster Keys » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:15 am
The Murry wrote:Meowfoundland wrote:Is this still fucking going on? I am actually really tired of people whining that someone broke a campaign promise. GET OVER IT. It's happened before, and it will happen again, and if you think the Liberals are any better look up why we have a GST.
ahhh, GST Howard admitted he had made a mistake in saying it was a bad idea so he took us to election with GST as a pollicy.
Also I admit that this one lie is not really sack worthy, but when you consider that there has not been a single pollicy success under her government or Mr. Rudd's...
by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:18 am
The Murry wrote:Meowfoundland wrote:Is this still fucking going on? I am actually really tired of people whining that someone broke a campaign promise. GET OVER IT. It's happened before, and it will happen again, and if you think the Liberals are any better look up why we have a GST.
ahhh, GST Howard admitted he had made a mistake in saying it was a bad idea so he took us to election with GST as a pollicy.
Also I admit that this one lie is not really sack worthy, but when you consider that there has not been a single pollicy success under her government or Mr. Rudd's...
Forster Keys wrote:Sorry. I've got to give you this old gem.
http://www.awu.net.au/109589607626152_5 ... 0569191203
by Maladie » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:29 am
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:31 am
Meowfoundland wrote:The Murry wrote:
ahhh, GST Howard admitted he had made a mistake in saying it was a bad idea so he took us to election with GST as a pollicy.
Also I admit that this one lie is not really sack worthy, but when you consider that there has not been a single pollicy success under her government or Mr. Rudd's...
What are you counting as a success? How much you personally like it, or how well it works? Because my money is on the former.
by Tubbsalot » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:32 am
The Murry wrote:most people dislike pollicies that do not work
by Rotovia- » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:38 am
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:39 am
Tubbsalot wrote:The Murry wrote:most people dislike pollicies that do not work
Most people dislike policies which hurt them or which they are ideologically opposed to.
You may note that "which don't work" didn't appear in the above sentence.
Most people don't know enough to judge whether certain policies work.
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:41 am
Rotovia- wrote:Here we go again. In a Westminster democracy a government is formed by the monarch or their representative upon it being able to command the support of the majority of the lower house of Parliament. In the event no one grouping of members of parliament (I.E. a political party) has an outright majority, they must assure the Queen or Her representative that they can.
When Australians elected a Parliament where Labor and the Coalition of the Liberals and National could both not form government, both groups were forced to secure the support of independents in order to form government, by convention. Labor obtained the support of the Greens in exchange for upholding what remained ALP policy and assuring passage of emissions pricing and trading measures.
by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:44 am
The Murry wrote:Tubbsalot wrote:Most people dislike policies which hurt them or which they are ideologically opposed to.
You may note that "which don't work" didn't appear in the above sentence.
Most people don't know enough to judge whether certain policies work.
Mate I dare you to do google search on Labour pollicy faliures...
by Meowfoundland » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:45 am
The Murry wrote:Rotovia- wrote:Here we go again. In a Westminster democracy a government is formed by the monarch or their representative upon it being able to command the support of the majority of the lower house of Parliament. In the event no one grouping of members of parliament (I.E. a political party) has an outright majority, they must assure the Queen or Her representative that they can.
When Australians elected a Parliament where Labor and the Coalition of the Liberals and National could both not form government, both groups were forced to secure the support of independents in order to form government, by convention. Labor obtained the support of the Greens in exchange for upholding what remained ALP policy and assuring passage of emissions pricing and trading measures.
Is she not leading the government
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:47 am
by Kirrig » Thu Jan 05, 2012 4:49 am
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"
by Tubbsalot » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:08 am
The Murry wrote:Mate I dare you to do google search on Labour pollicy faliures...
by Forster Keys » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:13 am
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:28 am
by Forster Keys » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:31 am
by The Murry » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:34 am
Forster Keys wrote:The Murry wrote:
I have tried but I can not seem to find it could you please post a link
Sure can.
http://greens.org.au/policies
For the TLDR version you could also visit wikipedia.
by Forster Keys » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:37 am
The Murry wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
Sure can.
http://greens.org.au/policies
For the TLDR version you could also visit wikipedia.
The bit about how Australia is run or the Greens interpritation there of
by Aethelstania » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:43 am
by Saint Jade IV » Thu Jan 05, 2012 5:45 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Neu California, New haven america, The Isstu Alliance
Advertisement