Of course, CTOAN also thinks Wynton Marsalis plays jazz, so I'd take anything he says with a grain of salt
Advertisement
by Bluth Corporation » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:08 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:12 pm
by Tekania » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:14 pm
West Vandengaarde wrote:Vilayet wrote:
What, exactly, is your objection to recess appointments?
Mine personally is that they undercut the ability of the congress to check the appointments of the president. In this case, while the congress was being a gaggle of idiots, it still should be able to use its powers to manipulate policy.
by Free Soviets » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:17 pm
by New England and The Maritimes » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:19 pm
Free Soviets wrote:so has anybody ever even attempted to provide a justification for filibusters of executive branch positions? like, the filibuster is pretty indefensible in any case, but why should the minimal functioning of the executive branch be subject to minoritarian rule from the senate?
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.
by Free Soviets » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:22 pm
Tekania wrote:West Vandengaarde wrote:Mine personally is that they undercut the ability of the congress to check the appointments of the president. In this case, while the congress was being a gaggle of idiots, it still should be able to use its powers to manipulate policy.
Well, then they should have held a hearing on the appointments and voted it down, rather than blocking the vote in the first place. The department that needs the head was already established by policy. I really don't have an issue with this.
by Farnhamia » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:27 pm
Free Soviets wrote:Tekania wrote:
Well, then they should have held a hearing on the appointments and voted it down, rather than blocking the vote in the first place. The department that needs the head was already established by policy. I really don't have an issue with this.
i honestly have an issue with the senate having a role in the process of appointments at all, outside of judges, ambassadors, and maybe cabinet secretaries. if the legislative branch wants say over the functioning of various departments, they should pass laws like normal people.
by Keronians » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:29 pm
by Disserbia » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:34 pm
by Nationstatelandsville » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:34 pm
Keronians wrote:Damn, Michelle let Obama get his balls out of her purse!
by Gauthier » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:50 pm
by Alien Space Bats » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:50 pm
JuNii wrote:Yeah... if he can't get what he wants, find a way that won't require you working with the other side... good work President Obama!
by Swkoll » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:53 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:You know, I used to be anti-Obama.
Then the anti-Obama folks opened their mouths and I listened to what they had to say.
Now I'm pro-Obama.
by Free Soviets » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:57 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:i honestly have an issue with the senate having a role in the process of appointments at all, outside of judges, ambassadors, and maybe cabinet secretaries. if the legislative branch wants say over the functioning of various departments, they should pass laws like normal people.
Article II, Section 2, paragraph 2: "[The President] shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law: but the Congress may by Law vest the Appointment of such inferior Officers, as they think proper, in the President alone, in the Courts of Law, or in the Heads of Departments."
You have senatorial issues, as I recall. But I suppose that paragraph could be amended.
by Bluth Corporation » Wed Jan 04, 2012 3:59 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:JuNii wrote:Yeah... if he can't get what he wants, find a way that won't require you working with the other side... good work President Obama!
For Republicans, "working with us" means "capitulating to us".
Today's Republicans don't know how to compromise. Offer them 99% of what they want, and they'll shout in your face: "Where the fuck is the other 1%?!?"
by Alien Space Bats » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:20 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Alien Space Bats wrote:For Republicans, "working with us" means "capitulating to us".
Today's Republicans don't know how to compromise. Offer them 99% of what they want, and they'll shout in your face: "Where the fuck is the other 1%?!?"
It's the entitlement mentality endemic to conservatives. They're all lazy welfare queens, wanting everything handed to them on a silver platter without having to do any work or put forth any effort.
by New Conglomerate » Wed Jan 04, 2012 4:38 pm
Alien Space Bats wrote:This is why I'm half convinced that if they don't win the next election, they'll try to stage an armed revolt to seize power. They've certainly worked themselves up to the necessary level of fanatical hysteria for it.
by Xsyne » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:29 pm
You-Gi-Owe wrote:
Seriously, do we need more paid government positions that allocate more taxpayer dollars? I really doubt it.
How about getting rid of some useless government postions? The Department of Energy, perhaps? The Department of Agriculture, too, perhaps?
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by Free Soviets » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:35 pm
JuNii wrote:Yeah... if he can't get what he wants, find a way that won't require you working with the other side... good work President Obama!
by Xsyne » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:37 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?
by New Sapienta » Wed Jan 04, 2012 5:37 pm
by Taren » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:06 pm
by Ashmoria » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:10 pm
Taren wrote:I am rather puzzled how so many can praise him for acting like a dictator, but at the same time i can not make a good comment because i have not heard about this and i don't trust goverment media, goverment media in this case refers to the outlets that still think thay are mainstream but are in fact the dieing media like cnn, fox, abc, msnbc and others.
by Bluth Corporation » Wed Jan 04, 2012 6:11 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Big Eyed Animation, Infected Mushroom, Tillania
Advertisement