). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVCIerv9wBk
Watch it! The attempts to sound like a "normal" american are so funny!
Advertisement

by Natapoc » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:01 pm
). 
by Ashmoria » Mon Jan 09, 2012 9:06 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Black Forrest wrote:
Indeed. By firing people, he is making them entrepreneurs Copyrighted by RNC which makes them go out and create new businesses and make new jobs!
Exactly. See, what happened was, Dear Speaker Boehner and the New Model House of Republicans were all about jobs, jobs, jobs last year, but the evil Islamofascist Kenyan anti-colonialist, Barack Hussein Obama obstructed them by proposing legislation he knew would not create jobs, jobs, jobs and he also had the obstructionist almost-traitors in the Senate block anything the New Model House managed to pass anyway. Oh, the depth of that man's hatred for the United States is beyond belief.

by Free Soviets » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:34 pm

by Dracoria » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:36 pm
Free Soviets wrote:holy shit, huntsman's on a santorum-esque trajectory in new hampshire. he might take second. this could be fun yet!
by Cannot think of a name » Mon Jan 09, 2012 10:37 pm
Dracoria wrote:Free Soviets wrote:holy shit, huntsman's on a santorum-esque trajectory in new hampshire. he might take second. this could be fun yet!
This is turning into the inverse of the pre-vote part of the campaign. One after another, everyone will take second to Romney.
Should we place bets on which state Newt takes second in first?

by Free Soviets » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:41 am

by United Dependencies » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:48 am
Free Soviets wrote:game day in new hampshire!
the early results from dixville notch (haha) and hart's location are in. romney is in the lead with 7, paul has 5, huntsman is at 4, gingrich got 2, perry got 1.
that's votes, not percent.
Alien Space Bats wrote:2012: The Year We Lost Contact (with Reality).
Cannot think of a name wrote:Obamacult wrote:Maybe there is an economically sound and rational reason why there are no longer high paying jobs for qualified accountants, assembly line workers, glass blowers, blacksmiths, tanners, etc.
Maybe dragons took their jobs. Maybe unicorns only hid their jobs because unicorns are dicks. Maybe 'jobs' is only an illusion created by a drug addled infant pachyderm. Fuck dude, if we're in 'maybe' land, don't hold back.

by Free Soviets » Tue Jan 10, 2012 8:59 am

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:27 am
Free Soviets wrote:ok, so romney basically has this one in the bag - see his lead in dixville...and every poll ever done. but there looks to be a battle for second and a battle for fourth. my prediction:
mittens by 13 points
guy who believes in evolution just barely edging out GOOOOOOOLD!*
froth over newt by 2 as gingrich's collapse continues
and i guess perry is still running.
* (hey, that reminds me, how's that free state project going for you, liberts?)

by Glasgia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:31 am

by Ashmoria » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:32 am
Free Soviets wrote:ok, so romney basically has this one in the bag - see his lead in dixville...and every poll ever done. but there looks to be a battle for second and a battle for fourth. my prediction:
mittens by 13 points
guy who believes in evolution just barely edging out GOOOOOOOLD!*
froth over newt by 2 as gingrich's collapse continues
and i guess perry is still running.
* (hey, that reminds me, how's that free state project going for you, liberts?)

by Angleter » Tue Jan 10, 2012 9:59 am

by Gauthier » Tue Jan 10, 2012 10:15 am
New Conglomerate wrote:Dracoria wrote:
I'm kind of waiting for another Nixon. A beady-eyed, paranoid creature who doesn't (indeed cannot) rely on personal charisma or media affection, but who is extremely intelligent and rather moderate.
I'd be surprised if one of those showed up.
So far, you've got beady-eyed (Newt), paranoid (Paul), no charisma (Romney), no media affection (Santorum), and extremely intelligent and rather moderate (Huntsman) all separated and fighting with each other.

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 11:43 am
Gauthier wrote:New Conglomerate wrote:I'd be surprised if one of those showed up.
So far, you've got beady-eyed (Newt), paranoid (Paul), no charisma (Romney), no media affection (Santorum), and extremely intelligent and rather moderate (Huntsman) all separated and fighting with each other.
Maybe they'll transform and combine like Devastator?

by Hydesland » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:35 pm
Natapoc wrote:Here's a funny video. I agree, the only one who was honest about what he'd be doing on a saturday night was Ron Paul... He'd be reading an Austrian economics book (yeah he said textbook).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVCIerv9wBk
Watch it! The attempts to sound like a "normal" american are so funny!

by Natapoc » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:41 pm
Hydesland wrote:Natapoc wrote:Here's a funny video. I agree, the only one who was honest about what he'd be doing on a saturday night was Ron Paul... He'd be reading an Austrian economics book (yeah he said textbook).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cVCIerv9wBk
Watch it! The attempts to sound like a "normal" american are so funny!
Heh, although to be fair that was a pretty dumb question.

by The Black Forrest » Tue Jan 10, 2012 1:47 pm

by Zeppy » Tue Jan 10, 2012 2:55 pm
Natapoc wrote:It was a dumb question. Wouldn't it have been interesting if one of the candidates called him out on it and explained why such questions detract from important issues and are a waste of their time?

by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:43 pm

by Natapoc » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:47 pm
Farnhamia wrote:At 7:40 Eastern, Romney has a 13 percentage point lead over Paul, 37% to 24%, but Huntsman is hanging in there is third place with 14%.
. 
by Farnhamia » Tue Jan 10, 2012 5:53 pm
Natapoc wrote:Farnhamia wrote:At 7:40 Eastern, Romney has a 13 percentage point lead over Paul, 37% to 24%, but Huntsman is hanging in there is third place with 14%.
Just 5% are reporting though. Some early results from the last primary put Ron Paul in the lead. We won't really be able to guess until at least 30% come in but still fun to speculate.
New Hampshire Republican Primary
Jan 10, 2012 (5% of precincts reporting)
Mitt Romney 5,185 36.6%
Ron Paul 3,486 24.6%
Jon Huntsman 2,087 14.7%
Newt Gingrich 1,628 11.5%
Rick Santorum 1,428 10.1%
If Santorum holds that place he may no longer be seen as a viable candidate.
Let a girl have some fun, already.
by Natapoc » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:00 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Natapoc wrote:
Just 5% are reporting though. Some early results from the last primary put Ron Paul in the lead. We won't really be able to guess until at least 30% come in but still fun to speculate.
New Hampshire Republican Primary
Jan 10, 2012 (5% of precincts reporting)
Mitt Romney 5,185 36.6%
Ron Paul 3,486 24.6%
Jon Huntsman 2,087 14.7%
Newt Gingrich 1,628 11.5%
Rick Santorum 1,428 10.1%
If Santorum holds that place he may no longer be seen as a viable candidate.
Let a girl have some fun, already.
I notice that New Hampshire lost half its delegates because they didn't move the primary to date after February 1st.

by Xeng He » Tue Jan 10, 2012 6:01 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Let a girl have some fun, already.
I notice that New Hampshire lost half its delegates because they didn't move the primary to date after February 1st.
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Cong Wes, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Archregimancy, The Huskar Social Union, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement