The Archregimancy wrote: and prefer John Cale's version of 'Hallelujah' over Leonard Cohen's original.
You say that like there are people who don't…
Where are these strange beings, and can I take a class to learn about them?Advertisement

by Wikkiwallana » Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:18 pm
The Archregimancy wrote: and prefer John Cale's version of 'Hallelujah' over Leonard Cohen's original.
Where are these strange beings, and can I take a class to learn about them?Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Wikkiwallana » Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:20 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by Kaeshar » Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:22 pm
Wikkiwallana wrote:Forsher wrote:
It basically says the Democrats are at fault. To end conservatism the Democrats must refuse to compromise, they must stick to their guns. And in the order that emerges in the wake of such, structured, thinking, a much freer America will emerge, financed by China...
Like I said, depressing.

by Farnhamia » Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:38 pm

by Farnhamia » Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:40 pm
Serrland wrote:Ashmoria wrote:i hate "hallelujah" its the worst best song ever. cohen's version is unlistenable. i cant even guess what people like about it.
I dunno about that. I saw him in concert here a few years ago now, and even in his advancing age he's a hell of a performer. Excellent stuff, really.

by Farnhamia » Sat Mar 17, 2012 2:53 pm


by The Steel Magnolia » Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:07 pm

by Farnhamia » Sat Mar 17, 2012 3:18 pm
The Steel Magnolia wrote:Something tells me we're a tad offtopic right now...
CHICAGO — For the first time in a generation, Republicans are preparing for the possibility that their presidential nomination could be decided at their national convention rather than on the campaign trail, a prospect that would upend one of the rituals of modern politics.
The race remains Mitt Romney’s to lose, and if he continues to accumulate delegates at a steady clip starting with contests in Puerto Rico on Sunday and Illinois on Tuesday, he has a good chance of amassing the 1,144 necessary to secure the nomination before the last primary, in Utah on June 26. But as he struggles to win the hearts of conservative voters and hold off a challenge from Rick Santorum, party leaders, activists and the campaigns are for the first time taking seriously the possibility that neither he nor anyone else will get to that total.

by Ashmoria » Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:19 pm
Farnhamia wrote:The Steel Magnolia wrote:Something tells me we're a tad offtopic right now...
Well ... shucks ...CHICAGO — For the first time in a generation, Republicans are preparing for the possibility that their presidential nomination could be decided at their national convention rather than on the campaign trail, a prospect that would upend one of the rituals of modern politics.
The race remains Mitt Romney’s to lose, and if he continues to accumulate delegates at a steady clip starting with contests in Puerto Rico on Sunday and Illinois on Tuesday, he has a good chance of amassing the 1,144 necessary to secure the nomination before the last primary, in Utah on June 26. But as he struggles to win the hearts of conservative voters and hold off a challenge from Rick Santorum, party leaders, activists and the campaigns are for the first time taking seriously the possibility that neither he nor anyone else will get to that total.
Link to the rest ...
I rather like a bit of uncertainty. Otherwise we have to sit through all the hype and bullshit for nothing.

by Shrillland » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:18 pm

by Serrland » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:20 pm
Shrillland wrote:Well Romney will certainly win here, even though Frothy's trying to stir up Downstate Conservatives. I think now that Romney's going to wind this up, and Texas will be his Coronation. If however Santorum wins there.......

by New Conglomerate » Sat Mar 17, 2012 7:21 pm
Serrland wrote:Shrillland wrote:Well Romney will certainly win here, even though Frothy's trying to stir up Downstate Conservatives. I think now that Romney's going to wind this up, and Texas will be his Coronation. If however Santorum wins there.......
I dunno man. Downstate will turn out to vote. Not sure if suburbia will. It's supposed to be high 70s and sunny, though, so that should boost turnout.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:21 pm
New England and The Maritimes wrote:It's official. Romney is a Gaffe singularity. He's on par with Dan Quayle and George Bush in saying stupid things nonstop.

by Shrillland » Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:33 pm

by Shrillland » Sat Mar 17, 2012 9:33 pm

by Tmutarakhan » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:47 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Mar 17, 2012 11:55 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:09 am
The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:It's official. Romney is a Gaffe singularity. He's on par with Dan Quayle and George Bush in saying stupid things nonstop.
Well while i havent been 100% up to date with this years GOP debates, i have been watching GOP debates from 2008 and Romney seemed like a very favorable candidate to me. Far better than Ron Paul and that NYC ex mayor, Gilliani i think? Anyway how things seem is mainly a matter of personal preferance.

by The United Soviet Socialist Republic » Sun Mar 18, 2012 12:12 am
Cannot think of a name wrote:The United Soviet Socialist Republic wrote:Well while i havent been 100% up to date with this years GOP debates, i have been watching GOP debates from 2008 and Romney seemed like a very favorable candidate to me. Far better than Ron Paul and that NYC ex mayor, Gilliani i think? Anyway how things seem is mainly a matter of personal preferance.
Only Mitt Romney from <3 1/2 hours is a valid Mitt Romney.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bemolian Lands, Corporate Collective Salvation, Deblar, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, Eternal Algerstonia, Ethel mermania, Glomb, Grinning Dragon, Onceluria, Port Caverton, Reloviskistan, Stellar Colonies, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Two Jerseys, The Union of Galaxies, Washington-Columbia
Advertisement