Ourfgenstan wrote:I voted yes just to piss people off, but in all seriousness I doubt a single human being supports SOPA, yes, politicians aren't humans.
It doesn't piss people off if you tell them that's why you did it.
Advertisement

by Erinkita » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:26 am
Ourfgenstan wrote:I voted yes just to piss people off, but in all seriousness I doubt a single human being supports SOPA, yes, politicians aren't humans.

by Ourfgenstan (Ancient) » Sat Dec 31, 2011 10:34 am

by Tim-Opolis » Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:37 pm
<Koth - 06/30/2020> I mean as far as GPers go, Tim is one of the most iconic

by The Soviet Technocracy » Sat Dec 31, 2011 2:56 pm
Central Slavia wrote:
No.
The bill, as said rightly supports commercial interests, not political or public interests.
China does have extensive internet censorship , but simply to prevent the kind of problems that so-called social networks were able to stir elsewhere, and to prevent leaks of sensitive information.

by Sunny Marionette » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:03 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:One time in India, I managed to draw an elaborate battle scene in the sand with my piss. Granted, my friends aided me in this matter, but we finished with Darth Vader force choking a random Jedi. It was one of the greatest achievements of our lives.

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:09 pm
Condunum wrote:Where is the no opinion option?

by Robert Magoo » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:10 pm

by Inky Noodles » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:10 pm

by Auremena » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:10 pm

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:11 pm
Inky Noodles wrote:Activision is a major sponsor of the SOPA bill.
The makers of one of the gaming industries top selling series.

by Farnhamia » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:11 pm
Auremena wrote:The US government can't regulate the internet, it's an international structure.

by Galloism » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:11 pm

by Robert Magoo » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:11 pm
Auremena wrote:The US government can't regulate the internet, it's an international structure.

by Fjord-du-Saguenay » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:12 pm

by Auremena » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:12 pm
I never said it wasn't physically possible, I just mean it isn't right to claim something that belongs to the world as your own.

by Inky Noodles » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:13 pm

by Fellrike » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:13 pm

by Galloism » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:13 pm

by New Conglomerate » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:14 pm

by Robert Magoo » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:14 pm
Auremena wrote:I never said it wasn't physically possible, I just mean it isn't right to claim something that belongs to the world as your own.Robert Magoo wrote:China says otherwise. So long as they have the legal authority (not that they do; they don't) it's perfectly possible to regulate it's use within the US.

by Pendragonia » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:14 pm


by Robert Magoo » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:15 pm
Pendragonia wrote:Robert Magoo wrote:China says otherwise. So long as they have the legal authority (not that they do; they don't) it's perfectly possible to regulate it's use within the US.
And with the bulk of the servers that make the Internet work being located in the US, it'll screw overalot of peoplethe world.

by Galloism » Sat Dec 31, 2011 3:15 pm
Inky Noodles wrote:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhwuXNv8fJM
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: -The Rhineland-, American Legionaries, APOC Coalition, Bradfordville, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Dumb Ideologies, DutchFormosa, Gravlen, Gun Manufacturers, Kehlstein, La Xinga, Necroghastia, The Black Forrest, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement