I still stand by my point that Britain is no longer a superpower.
Advertisement

by Dzvasdvsdv » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:39 pm

by Virtud Tierra » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:41 pm

by Buffett and Colbert » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:41 pm

You-Gi-Owe wrote:If someone were to ask me about your online persona as a standard of your "date-ability", I'd rate you as "worth investigating further & passionate about beliefs". But, enough of the idle speculation on why you didn't score with the opposite gender.

by Yootopia » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:48 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Vietnam was a war America went into to support our French allies.
Veitnam was a decisive French defeat. Nothing to do with America, we just killed like 60% of their population and left it to its own devices.

by GetBert » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:52 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Vietnam was a war America went into to support our French allies.
Veitnam was a decisive French defeat. Nothing to do with America, we just killed like 60% of their population and left it to its own devices.

by Yootopia » Mon Sep 07, 2009 1:54 pm
GetBert wrote:Back to China and Taiwan, I think China's kung fu is probably the best

by Samatolian City-States » Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:23 pm

by Gauthier » Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:41 pm

by Maurepas » Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:43 pm

by Rikese » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:53 pm
2) The Vietnam war was a decisive South Vietnamese and American defeat. The French got booted out 20 years before the real end of the Vietnam War.
3) 60% of the Vietnamese population was absolutely not killed.
United Russian States wrote:Thrid Russia is moving towards an much larger force consiting of all volanteer soilders.
Mad hatters in jeans wrote:do you even expect for a minute i'd want to discuss anything further with you if you continue to show no respect to my opinions?

by The Imperial Navy » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:55 pm

by The Imperial Navy » Mon Sep 07, 2009 3:57 pm


by The Parthians » Mon Sep 07, 2009 4:02 pm

by Yootopia » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:34 pm
Rikese wrote:2) The Vietnam war was a decisive South Vietnamese and American defeat. The French got booted out 20 years before the real end of the Vietnam War.
Tactical victory, strategic defeat.
3) 60% of the Vietnamese population was absolutely not killed.
~15%

by Virtud Tierra » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:38 pm

by Yootopia » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:52 pm
Virtud Tierra wrote:Ugh, people forget that Taiwan is on an island, a pretty good distance from the mainland
and the ROC navy and airforce outlasses the PRC's shit no matter how you look at it.
They are pretty safe on that island. PRC simply doesn't have the technology or hardware to pull off a successful invasion.
Taiwan isn't Tibet. Don't mix the two together.

by Chrobalta » Mon Sep 07, 2009 7:56 pm
Maurepas wrote:My immediate thought is NATO would as it would likely come to ROC's aid...
But, Im not so sure, as we have alot, as in an ungodly amount, of economic interests in the PRC, and we also dont officially recognize the ROC anymore, and therefore, upon further speculation, I feel like we'd probably remain neutral, or at best funneling them funds and supplies secretly, and the ROC'd likely be swamped...

by Epicnopolis » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:00 pm
Twigica wrote:Without the EU/UN/America interfering China would win hands down. With the aforementioned country/commities it would depend on who started the war and why.


by Khodoristan » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:01 pm

by Niur » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:02 pm
Dzvasdvsdv wrote:No-one cares about chinks battling it out tbh.

by Fartsniffage » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:03 pm

by Virtud Tierra » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:04 pm
Yootopia wrote:Virtud Tierra wrote:Ugh, people forget that Taiwan is on an island, a pretty good distance from the mainland
About 180 kms, which is, what, 20 minutes tops for a plane and a day's trip at the most on any kind of relatively quick boat.and the ROC navy and airforce outlasses the PRC's shit no matter how you look at it.
I don't really see how, seeing as they're both slightly crap, but the PRC has more of it, especially in terms of submarines.They are pretty safe on that island. PRC simply doesn't have the technology or hardware to pull off a successful invasion.
Feh, not like they couldn't just build some more ships.Taiwan isn't Tibet. Don't mix the two together.
Yeah I don't think anyone did?

by Niur » Mon Sep 07, 2009 8:04 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Haganham, Hwiteard, Lysset, Necroghastia, Of Memers, Page, Senscaria, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Torisakia, Wizlandia
Advertisement