NATION

PASSWORD

More Falklands Trouble

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:24 am

New Bazlantis wrote:
Kouralia wrote:Hot damn! That's a hell-uva lotta prescadent! Let's hand it over right now. [/sarcasm]



Erm, so basically you're saying:

- We should give them to Argentina as their claim is stronger due to their temp. colony ther.
- The argument of self-determination is not applicable in this situation because of something that happened around 200 years ago may cloud the judgement of people today.


It shouldn't belong to the UK. Its merely a hang over from your imperialist past and if you really cared about the Falkland Islanders you would make them an independent state. And on your second point I would say it would be pretty easy to get them to support a British action considering they're all British! :palm:

And an independent Falklands will last 5 minutes before Argentina invaded.

The facts are this:
1. The current occupants of the Falkland Islanders want to be British, not Argentina.
2. Britain 4 times before the war offered to go to legally binding International Arbitration, not Argentina.
3. Britain defended it's territory in the early 80s from foreign aggression, not Argentina, who were the aggressors.
4. The British claim to the islands is the strongest, not Argentina's which is based around 'oh but they're really close to us'.
5. The only other legitimate claim would be of the original inhabitants of the islands, who were not Argentinian.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:24 am

New Bazlantis wrote:It shouldn't belong to the UK. Its merely a hang over from your imperialist past and if you really cared about the Falkland Islanders you would make them an independent state. And on your second point I would say it would be pretty easy to get them to support a British action considering they're all British! :palm:

Argentina should belong to Argentina. Its merely a hang over from armed mob and if you really cared about Argentina, you would make them Spanish Colony. They may disagree, but that is obvious cos they are all Argentine!
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Kouralia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15122
Founded: Oct 30, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Kouralia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:28 am

Cromarty wrote:And an independent Falklands will last 5 minutes before Argentina invaded.


And it also lacks major industry or enough of an economy to survive on its own...

Just like those 'Independant Cornwall' idiots.
Kouralia:
Me:
20s, Male,
Britbong, Bi,
Atheist, Cop
Sadly ginger.

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:28 am

Obviously its still to soon since the empire's collapse to talk about your ridiculous overseas 'possessions'.

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:32 am

New Bazlantis wrote:Obviously its still to soon since the empire's collapse to talk about your ridiculous overseas 'possessions'.

An empire is a state with politico-military dominion of populations who are culturally and ethnically distinct from the imperial (ruling) ethnic group and its culture — unlike a federation, an extensive state voluntarily composed of autonomous states and peoples.
When people culturally and ethnically identify themselves as British; how exactly is this a relationship of an empire?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Kulverint
Minister
 
Posts: 3033
Founded: Jul 19, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Kulverint » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:34 am

New Bazlantis wrote:British attitude over the Falklands is disgusting. You're like children fighting over your corner of the sandbox. The empire is gone, give it up, man. You can barely run your own affairs let alone those of territories half a world away.

We can easily run our own affairs, thank you very much.

We're not the ones fighting over the sandbox, its you who are constantly desperate to get the corner of the sandbox. If its so insignificant, why do you want it so much?

And why on earth would we avoid drilling for valuable oil because some people who've never owned the islands and who we destroyed in a war 30 years ago might get offended?

Tell me, what would likely be the first thing Argentina would do when they got control of the Falkland Islands? You can't drill for oil because that would offend Britain, and since its just the corner of the sandbox, you won't get anything else from it...

User avatar
Gauntleted Fist
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10061
Founded: Aug 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauntleted Fist » Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:36 am

New Bazlantis wrote:It shouldn't belong to the UK. Its merely a hang over from your imperialist past and if you really cared about the Falkland Islanders you would make them an independent state.

What part of "The Falklanders want to remain British" do you not get?



New Bazlantis wrote:And on your second point I would say it would be pretty easy to get them to support a British action considering they're all British! :palm:

What the fuck. So Britain should give away British citizens to another country because of...something incoherent that you haven't quite stated yet?
Last edited by Gauntleted Fist on Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:36 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:09 am

New Bazlantis wrote:That being said however I think that it is very (very) unlikely anything military will come to this ...


Indeed. It's taken 30 years for Argentina to recover from the last time they tried to encroach on British territory.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:10 am

First of all, I'm Australian, not Argentine.

Kulverint wrote:
New Bazlantis wrote:British attitude over the Falklands is disgusting. You're like children fighting over your corner of the sandbox. The empire is gone, give it up, man. You can barely run your own affairs let alone those of territories half a world away.

We can easily run our own affairs, thank you very much.


Oh, is that so? Well, excuse me.

Kulverint wrote:We're not the ones fighting over the sandbox, its you who are constantly desperate to get the corner of the sandbox. If its so insignificant, why do you want it so much?

And why on earth would we avoid drilling for valuable oil because some people who've never owned the islands and who we destroyed in a war 30 years ago might get offended?

Tell me, what would likely be the first thing Argentina would do when they got control of the Falkland Islands? You can't drill for oil because that would offend Britain, and since its just the corner of the sandbox, you won't get anything else from it...


Although I am not Argentine, I can see this as being a principle matter. As I stated earlier this move is one by Mercosur, not Argentina. It is a symbolic move against the waning dominance of the West over places like South America and serves to illustrate that they do not intend to allow themselves to be pushed around by former 'great' colonial, imperialistic powers. These nations, most particularly Brasil, are the major powers of the future and this is an example of them becoming aware of this.

You should avoid drilling for oil because obviously the image of grubby Western fingers soaking up the natural resources of what is believed by the Mercosur nations as belonging to South Americans is bound to cause a diplomatic rift. And let's be honest, the last the UK needs is more troubles on their hands, especially those dealing with external matters.

I just wish that the ego of the UK could take a back seat once in a while when dealing with issues regarding its overseas 'possessions'. The British belong in Britain, not off the coast of Argentina and I can guarantee you if the Argentines made claim to the Shetland Islands and bolstered it with military forces, air bases and naval vessels you would act in exactly the same way as they are now.

Time to let go.

(As for your "but they wanna be British" argument I believe it shares similarities with the Quebecois "we wanna be French" jazz.)

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:10 am

New Bazlantis wrote:It shouldn't belong to the UK. Its merely a hang over from your imperialist past and if you really cared about the Falkland Islanders you would make them an independent state. And on your second point I would say it would be pretty easy to get them to support a British action considering they're all British! :palm:


Do you realise your second point contradicts your first?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
New Bazlantis
Envoy
 
Posts: 273
Founded: Jul 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Bazlantis » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:11 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
New Bazlantis wrote:That being said however I think that it is very (very) unlikely anything military will come to this ...


Indeed. It's taken 30 years for Argentina to recover from the last time they tried to encroach on British territory.


Did you get a little nationalist ego boost when you wrote that?

UNIBOT DIED FOR YOUR SINS: REPENT!

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:13 am

New Bazlantis wrote:I just wish that the ego of the UK could take a back seat once in a while when dealing with issues regarding its overseas 'possessions'.


Have you looked at a map of the Empire recently?
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:19 am

New Bazlantis wrote:Although I am not Argentine, I can see this as being a principle matter. As I stated earlier this move is one by Mercosur, not Argentina. It is a symbolic move against the waning dominance of the West over places like South America and serves to illustrate that they do not intend to allow themselves to be pushed around by former 'great' colonial, imperialistic powers. These nations, most particularly Brasil, are the major powers of the future and this is an example of them becoming aware of this.

You should avoid drilling for oil because obviously the image of grubby Western fingers soaking up the natural resources of what is believed by the Mercosur nations as belonging to South Americans is bound to cause a diplomatic rift. And let's be honest, the last the UK needs is more troubles on their hands, especially those dealing with external matters.
We should avoid using our resources to avoid pissing off a nation that's trying it's hardest to steal our territory from us? :eyebrow:

I just wish that the ego of the UK could take a back seat once in a while when dealing with issues regarding its overseas 'possessions'. The British belong in Britain, not off the coast of Argentina and I can guarantee you if the Argentines made claim to the Shetland Islands and bolstered it with military forces, air bases and naval vessels you would act in exactly the same way as they are now.
because clearly an argentine invasion of british sovereign territory is exactly the same as the Falklands which have been ours for over 100 years and are populated by people who want to remain in Union with us.

Time to let go.
And fuck self determination!

(As for your "but they wanna be British" argument I believe it shares similarities with the Quebecois "we wanna be French" jazz.)
Opinion polls indicate continued union within Canada has more support than union with France.
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:20 am

New Bazlantis wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Indeed. It's taken 30 years for Argentina to recover from the last time they tried to encroach on British territory.


Did you get a little nationalist ego boost when you wrote that?


No. Read my post history, I'm about the least nationalist person you're likely to meet.

I'm talking about the casualties, the loss of 60 aircraft which couldn't be replaced after the war due to the financial hardship and political turmoil in Argentina, the knock-on effects like the weakening of the image of the military in Argentina, etc.

The last thing Argentina wants now is a war... but the Tories would love one, especially this one.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
The Bazlantian Diplomatic Authority
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 9
Founded: Dec 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The Bazlantian Diplomatic Authority » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:20 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:
New Bazlantis wrote:I just wish that the ego of the UK could take a back seat once in a while when dealing with issues regarding its overseas 'possessions'.


Have you looked at a map of the Empire recently?


Yep, not much left to it these days, which explains why your hanging on tooth and nail with all your grand stubbornness to this one.
DIPLOMATIC REPRESENTATIVE OF NEW BAZLANTIS/BAZLANTIS

User avatar
Briutannia
Attaché
 
Posts: 99
Founded: May 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Briutannia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:21 am

New Bazlantis is a typical socialist, dripping wet with self-hatred of the western world.
Libertarian-conservative
Supporter of: the UK Independence Party (UKIP) & Ron Paul 2012

Nation state: Imperial Confederacy of Briutannia
Region, nation state belonging to: Imperial Council

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:21 am

The Bazlantian Diplomatic Authority wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
Have you looked at a map of the Empire recently?


Yep, not much left to it these days...


Indeed. If the UK took much more of a back seat, they'd be riding in someone else's car.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Great Agram
Diplomat
 
Posts: 986
Founded: May 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Agram » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:22 am

I dont get why dont the british give the Falkladns to Argentina if they were able to negotiate with Spain about gibraltar.

User avatar
Horsefish
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7402
Founded: Jun 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Horsefish » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:22 am

New Bazlantis wrote:I just wish that the ego of the UK could take a back seat once in a while when dealing with issues regarding its overseas 'possessions'. The British belong in Britain, not off the coast of Argentina and I can guarantee you if the Argentines made claim to the Shetland Islands and bolstered it with military forces, air bases and naval vessels you would act in exactly the same way as they are now.


See, this would be the same apart from a few key diffrences-Argentinia doesn't have any claims over the Shetlands, the residents of the Shetlands want to be Scottish/British and there has been a permenant British setlement there for quite a lon time. You make it sound like Britian swooped in and kicked out the argies from the Falklands. We didn't, IIRC Britian has the longest standing continous claim to the islands, Argintina has a fuzzy historic claim at best.

Really, you should be defending the Falkland isles from Argentinian imperialism.

New Bazlantis wrote:Did you get a little nationalist ego boost when you wrote that?


I'm pretty sure GnI is American.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.

Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.

Georgism wrote:
Geniasis wrote:Maybe if you showered every now and then...

That's what the Nazis said, we're not falling for that one again.

The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

What's wrong with a little destruction?

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:24 am

Great Agram wrote:I dont get why dont the british give the Falkladns to Argentina if they were able to negotiate with Spain about gibraltar.

Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

User avatar
Great Agram
Diplomat
 
Posts: 986
Founded: May 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Agram » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:25 am

New Conglomerate wrote:
Great Agram wrote:I dont get why dont the british give the Falkladns to Argentina if they were able to negotiate with Spain about gibraltar.

Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.

The people of Gibraltar want to be british either, and britain share its souverenitiy with spain nevertheless

User avatar
Briutannia
Attaché
 
Posts: 99
Founded: May 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Briutannia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:26 am

New Conglomerate wrote:
Great Agram wrote:I dont get why dont the british give the Falkladns to Argentina if they were able to negotiate with Spain about gibraltar.

Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.


Ah but you see THE EMPIRE!! THE IMPERIALISTS!! TAKING THE RESOURCES!! WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE!! etc etc.

We'll never get through to these people in their silly little world.
Libertarian-conservative
Supporter of: the UK Independence Party (UKIP) & Ron Paul 2012

Nation state: Imperial Confederacy of Briutannia
Region, nation state belonging to: Imperial Council

User avatar
Horsefish
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7402
Founded: Jun 06, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Horsefish » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:27 am

Great Agram wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.

The people of Gibraltar want to be british either, and britain share its souverenitiy with spain nevertheless


The historical claims/history of the island are a little bit mor ecomplicated than the Falklands. Thats why.
Areopagitican wrote:I'm not an expert in the field of moron, but what I think he's saying is that if you have to have sex with Shakira (or another dirty ethnic), at the very least, it must be part of a threesome with a white woman. It's a sacrifice, but someone has to make it.

Geniasis wrote:Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go bludgeon some whales to death with my 12-ft dick.

Georgism wrote:
Geniasis wrote:Maybe if you showered every now and then...

That's what the Nazis said, we're not falling for that one again.

The Western Reaches wrote:I learned that YOU are the reason I embarrassed myself by saying "Horsefish" instead of "Seahorse" this one time in school.

What's wrong with a little destruction?

User avatar
Cromarty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6198
Founded: Oct 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Cromarty » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:28 am

Great Agram wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.

The people of Gibraltar want to be british either, and britain share its souverenitiy with spain nevertheless

Because Spain didn't try to invade Gib in the 80's?

Because Spain didn't reject our offer of legally binding arbitration over Gib 4 times?
Cerian Quilor wrote:There's a difference between breaking the rules, and being well....Cromarty...
<Koth>all sexual orientations must unite under the relative sexiness of madjack
Former Delegate of Osiris
Brommander of the Cartan Militia: They're Taking The Cartans To Isengard!
Кромартий

User avatar
New Conglomerate
Minister
 
Posts: 3467
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Conglomerate » Tue Dec 27, 2011 9:28 am

Briutannia wrote:
New Conglomerate wrote:Falklanders don't want to be Argentinian. They want to be British. Overwhelmingly, in fact.


Ah but you see THE EMPIRE!! THE IMPERIALISTS!! TAKING THE RESOURCES!! WORKERS OF THE WORLD UNITE!! etc etc.

We'll never get through to these people in their silly little world.

Please, cut the ideological crap. There are plenty of British socialists on this forum who want the Falklands to stay British.
Current WA Delegate of The NationStates Community.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Fahran, Greater Ziegenian Reich, Grinning Dragon, Incelastan, Kerwa, Kubra, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Pizza Friday Forever91, Point Blob

Advertisement

Remove ads