New Bazlantis wrote:Kouralia wrote:Hot damn! That's a hell-uva lotta prescadent! Let's hand it over right now. [/sarcasm]
Erm, so basically you're saying:
- We should give them to Argentina as their claim is stronger due to their temp. colony ther.
- The argument of self-determination is not applicable in this situation because of something that happened around 200 years ago may cloud the judgement of people today.
It shouldn't belong to the UK. Its merely a hang over from your imperialist past and if you really cared about the Falkland Islanders you would make them an independent state. And on your second point I would say it would be pretty easy to get them to support a British action considering they're all British!
And an independent Falklands will last 5 minutes before Argentina invaded.
The facts are this:
1. The current occupants of the Falkland Islanders want to be British, not Argentina.
2. Britain 4 times before the war offered to go to legally binding International Arbitration, not Argentina.
3. Britain defended it's territory in the early 80s from foreign aggression, not Argentina, who were the aggressors.
4. The British claim to the islands is the strongest, not Argentina's which is based around 'oh but they're really close to us'.
5. The only other legitimate claim would be of the original inhabitants of the islands, who were not Argentinian.




