The Stupidest War in History?

by **New Sapienta** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:42 pm

Great Agram wrote:
New Sapienta wrote:Not to offend, but this post is really hard to read.
Source for the bombing please
Angloamerican terroists? What?
Gadaffi said he would reject what?
Libya is an islamist yes, that is lamentable, but the poeple are to blame now instead.

The islamists party banned free spech, it legalises sharia law. there are not better than gadafi, in fact they are worser.The only diference is that the islamists are a puppet of the West , Gadafi in compare was a souvernous leader recpected in Third world countries At least Libya had the chance if Saif islam got the government. I think you are not stupid and google it, speak with somebody who is from Libya and hear what they say about the islamist. Stop aksing for a link, it is ignorant.

For fucks sake, I already said the Islamists in power are bad, the diffrence between them and Gadaffi is that the islamists were chosen by the people to be in charge, reagardless of wheter or not they are "worser".

Asking for a link is not ignorant, you have the burden of proof, not I.

by **United Dependencies** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:43 pm

The Seven Years War.

by **Squa Australis** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 5:45 pm

The Dano-Swedish Wars were stupid

by **New England and The Maritimes** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:07 pm

United Dependencies wrote:The Seven Years War.

There was kind of a purpose to that.

by **Knoxcrest** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:21 pm

1. WW1
2. Vietnam
3. Children's Crusade

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:24 pm

Knoxcrest wrote:1. WW1
2. Vietnam
3. Children's Crusade

You get another pick for #3.

by **Knoxcrest** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:25 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Knoxcrest wrote:1. WW1
2. Vietnam
3. Children's Crusade

You get another pick for #3.

Woo.

Spanish-American War.

by **Arcturus Novus** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:26 pm

Vietnam. Hands down.

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:26 pm

Knoxcrest wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:You get another pick for #3.

Woo.

Spanish-American War.

Good one. Still, without that it's probable that TR would not have become President. We wouldn't have Puerto Rico and without Puerto Rico we wouldn't have Buffy. Without the Philippines we wouldn't have had "Back To Bataan." So, you know, it's a trade-off.

by **Ionian Knights** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:27 pm

The war of Jenkin's Ear.

by **Knoxcrest** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:28 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Knoxcrest wrote:Woo.

Spanish-American War.

Good one. Still, without that it's probable that TR would not have become President. We wouldn't have Puerto Rico and without Puerto Rico we wouldn't have Buffy. Without the Philippines we wouldn't have had "Back To Bataan." So, you know, it's a trade-off.

We could have done without the Phillippines. Even if we lost Back to Bataan.

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:28 pm

Ionian Knights wrote:The war of Jenkin's Ear.

Always good for a chuckle. Not in Captain Jenkins' presence, though if you kept you voice down ...

by **North Calaveras** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:30 pm

Why do so many people think Vietnam was stupidest, it was used to prevent the spread of communism, it might have been a bad war but there are plenty of wars that are way more ridiculous.

by **Knoxcrest** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:31 pm

North Calaveras wrote:Why do so many people think Vietnam was stupidest, it was used to prevent the spread of communism, it might have been a bad war but there are plenty of wars that are way more ridiculous.

They think so because it was a complete military cluster-fuck, trying to fight the Korean War in Vietnam, and underestimating the enemy.

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:33 pm

Knoxcrest wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Good one. Still, without that it's probable that TR would not have become President. We wouldn't have Puerto Rico and without Puerto Rico we wouldn't have Buffy. Without the Philippines we wouldn't have had "Back To Bataan." So, you know, it's a trade-off.

We could have done without the Phillippines. Even if we lost Back to Bataan.

Wasn't one of the current Republican candidates born there?

by **Aglrinia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:37 pm

WWI, any American involvement in the Middle East & Asia.

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:40 pm

Aglrinia wrote:WWI, any American involvement in the Middle East & Asia.

Mmm ... I imagine the people living south of the Korean Demilitarized Zone would disagree. And the Kuwaitis.

by **Kirrig** » Fri Jan 20, 2012 8:43 pm

The Second Falkland s War, hands down.

Yet to be fought, but if it is it will win.

The Original was pretty daft too.

by **New England and The Maritimes** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:24 am

Kirrig wrote:The Second Falkland s War, hands down.

Yet to be fought, but if it is it will win.

The Original was pretty daft too.

Yeah, Argentina was led by a bunch of morons.

by **Kirrig** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:30 am

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Kirrig wrote:The Second Falkland s War, hands down.

Yet to be fought, but if it is it will win.

The Original was pretty daft too.

Yeah, Argentina was led by a bunch of morons.

I'd forgotten about this post.

by **Glasgia** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 3:37 am

Children's crusade

by **Zovuja** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:11 am

Turkish invasion of Cyprus

by **Zersium** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 4:19 am

I'd say 2008, Georgia vs Russia.

The Bear just said "Wow, you're dumb as shit."

Seriously, why did Georgia think they would win against an obviously-better equipped, better trained, and bigger military?

by **Hockey World** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:08 am

WWI

Anyone who says Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam needs to learn a little thing called perspective. Were they stupid? Yes, but by far nowhere near what WWI was.

by **Zersium** » Sat Jan 21, 2012 5:47 am

Hockey World wrote:WWI

Anyone who says Iraq, Afghanistan, or Vietnam needs to learn a little thing called perspective. Were they stupid? Yes, but by far nowhere near what WWI was.

Did they really do the same 18th century tactics (like in the British Empire vs USA) in WW1?

The Stupidest War in History?

Who is online