Crispicaea wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
1a. By this logic, scratching an itch on your ass is a waste of potential life. Cloning isn't that far away. Given cloning technology, every skin cell is a "potential life." Every time you scratch your ass you're committing a holocaust of "potential lives."
1b. How exactly would you go about banning masturbation? How would you enforce such a stupid waste of money and police resources?
2. You're more anti-sex than I am because while I'm against masturbation, I'm not stupid enough to actually think that banning it is a plausible scenario. In addition, I'm not in favor of banning things just because I personally don't like them.
1a. Cloning is immoral.
1b. I wouldn't, it just ought not to happen. It can't be enforced, therefore it's a pointless law. Doesn't change morality.
2. See 1b.
According to whose morals? In my own opinion, the government should not be dealing in morals, it just makes a mess of everything.
You said previously masturbation it should be banned.

