NATION

PASSWORD

why abortion is good.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

DO YOU AGREE WITH THE BELOW STATEMENT'S MESSAGE?

Yes
136
39%
No
213
61%
 
Total votes : 349

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:37 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Yes. Are you are or you not ending the life of bacteria, cows, chickens, pigs, sheep, etc. etc. etc.? If you use the word "killing" you contradict yourself.

I see that you like being repetitive.

Humans are on a different level than other species (see above posts for an explanation why). I'm arguing that killing a human being is wrong. For some reason, you think that I'm talking about killing in general.


No, we are not. You have provided no explanations...? We are good at certain things, and other species are good at certain things that we cannot even begin to conceive of doing without technology. Intelligence is subjective, period.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:37 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Okay, let me stick with something more basic. How about language? Yes, they make sounds to communicate, but do they have a fully developed languages? In order to have any more than a basic society, language needs to be present for communication. Features of more developed societies include cities, governments, religions, and cultures.


Language is really not that big of a deal. Many species have the foundations of language. But really, do you think they need it? They have their own communication system. Language needs to be present? Have any sources for this?

Yes. Me having senses. I don't go outside and see squirrels practicing a religion, or talking with fully developed languages, or living in cities, etc.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:37 am

The Flood wrote:I've had enough of this. I agree with Birkinghamia and that's the end of this BS. Abortion is vile, despicable, evil, and wrong, end of discussion.

"LALALALA, I CANT FORM A COHERENT ARGUMENT, SO SCREW YOU MY OPINION IS RIGHT".

You're so childish. This is not the end of the discussion.

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:37 am

Vazdania wrote:then how can we go about defining a fetus as being a person based on being sentient???

People are-
1- An entity that has/had a personality.
2- And is/was a member of society.

Fetuses do not fit into the above, and are therefore, not people.
Last edited by Zeth Rekia on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:38 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:38 am

The Flood wrote:I've had enough of this. I agree with Birkinghamia and that's the end of this BS. Abortion is vile, despicable, evil, and wrong, end of discussion.


Good, we don't need another person who can't form a logical argument to save their own skin.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:39 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:I see that you like being repetitive.

Humans are on a different level than other species (see above posts for an explanation why). I'm arguing that killing a human being is wrong. For some reason, you think that I'm talking about killing in general.


No, we are not. You have provided no explanations...? We are good at certain things, and other species are good at certain things that we cannot even begin to conceive of doing without technology. Intelligence is subjective, period.

I have. Look at my other posts.

Technology is an adaptation we used because we are more intelligent than other species.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:39 am

http://www.inforefuge.com/contrasting-h ... munication

and although limited, they do with less and still flourish
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:39 am

The Flood wrote:I've had enough of this. I agree with Birkinghamia and that's the end of this BS. Abortion is vile, despicable, evil, and wrong, end of discussion.


Bye then. :)
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:40 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Language is really not that big of a deal. Many species have the foundations of language. But really, do you think they need it? They have their own communication system. Language needs to be present? Have any sources for this?

Yes. Me having senses. I don't go outside and see squirrels practicing a religion, or talking with fully developed languages, or living in cities, etc.


Again, languages are not that special. Again, there are other species with primitive forms of religion. Again, ants live in cities. You're basing your "logic" on subjective things.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:40 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No, we are not. You have provided no explanations...? We are good at certain things, and other species are good at certain things that we cannot even begin to conceive of doing without technology. Intelligence is subjective, period.

I have. Look at my other posts.

Technology is an adaptation we used because we are more intelligent than other species.

here is an example of something which gives us an upper hand, but I ask you, can you fly? LOL most birds can, its given them the upper hand at transporation and hunting. also, can you change the color of your skin like an octopus? that for them is invaluable.
Last edited by Vazdania on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:42 am, edited 1 time in total.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:42 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
No, we are not. You have provided no explanations...? We are good at certain things, and other species are good at certain things that we cannot even begin to conceive of doing without technology. Intelligence is subjective, period.

I have. Look at my other posts.

Technology is an adaptation we used because we are more intelligent than other species.


Um? Technology is the making, usage, and knowledge of using tools. Last time I checked, ants, crows, apes, etc. use technology, abet primitive forms. And also once again, what purpose do they have for using technology? They do fine without it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:42 am

Apparently, most people here think that humans aren't superior to other species. :palm:

Maybe not at the beginning, but we were able to move past other species. Go ahead and attempt to tell me that sponges are equal to humans. Anybody who thinks logically can see that it's completely false to believe that humans aren't superior in any way.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:43 am

Birkinghamia wrote:Apparently, most people here think that humans aren't superior to other species. :palm:

Maybe not at the beginning, but we were able to move past other species. Go ahead and attempt to tell me that sponges are equal to humans. Anybody who thinks logically can see that it's completely false to believe that humans aren't superior in any way.


Dear gods, can you READ PLEASE? We have said COUNTLESS times that humans are superior in certain cases, however we pale in comparison to other things, which we try to make up for with technology. Intelligence and superiority is SUBJECTIVE. Get the hell over it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:43 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:I have. Look at my other posts.

Technology is an adaptation we used because we are more intelligent than other species.


Um? Technology is the making, usage, and knowledge of using tools. Last time I checked, ants, crows, apes, etc. use technology, abet primitive forms. And also once again, what purpose do they have for using technology? They do fine without it.

Let me rephrase: Superior technology is an adaptation we use because we are more intelligent than other species.

"Doing fine without technology" does not relate to this at all. We could do fine without technology as well.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:45 am

Birkinghamia wrote:Apparently, most people here think that humans aren't superior to other species. :palm:

Maybe not at the beginning, but we were able to move past other species. Go ahead and attempt to tell me that sponges are equal to humans. Anybody who thinks logically can see that it's completely false to believe that humans aren't superior in any way.

you have a point in saying we have the ability to have domain over other species, BUT you must realize that we dont have the ability or knowledge that other species do. they have the intelliegence to do it whereas we do not. We have been given domain over animals but that does not mean we are neccisarily smarter then them

if humans are so smart as you claim, why do we aimlessly feed our dogs? XD they have trained US!!!
Last edited by Vazdania on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:45 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Um? Technology is the making, usage, and knowledge of using tools. Last time I checked, ants, crows, apes, etc. use technology, abet primitive forms. And also once again, what purpose do they have for using technology? They do fine without it.

Let me rephrase: Superior technology is an adaptation we use because we are more intelligent than other species.

"Doing fine without technology" does not relate to this at all. We could do fine without technology as well.


We are intelligent when it comes to using advanced tools. That does not mean we are intelligent in general. There are different types on intelligence. Y U NO READ FOR GODS SAKE?!

Uh? Please try to get rid of all technology, then try to go live. You'd fail miserably.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:46 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Let me rephrase: Superior technology is an adaptation we use because we are more intelligent than other species.

"Doing fine without technology" does not relate to this at all. We could do fine without technology as well.


We are intelligent when it comes to using advanced tools. That does not mean we are intelligent in general. There are different types on intelligence. Y U NO READ FOR GODS SAKE?!

Uh? Please try to get rid of all technology, then try to go live. You'd fail miserably.

well then we wouldnt have the ability to make fire D: then we wouldnt be able to eat cooked food which would make us all get diseases OH NO!
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:47 am

Mavorpen wrote:
The Flood wrote:I've had enough of this. I agree with Birkinghamia and that's the end of this BS. Abortion is vile, despicable, evil, and wrong, end of discussion.


Good, we don't need another person who can't form a logical argument to save their own skin.


No, I'm just sick of arguing with someone who is deluded, immoral, and outright wrong. Plus you've already lost this argument anyway.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:47 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Apparently, most people here think that humans aren't superior to other species. :palm:

Maybe not at the beginning, but we were able to move past other species. Go ahead and attempt to tell me that sponges are equal to humans. Anybody who thinks logically can see that it's completely false to believe that humans aren't superior in any way.


Dear gods, can you READ PLEASE? We have said COUNTLESS times that humans are superior in certain cases, however we pale in comparison to other things, which we try to make up for with technology. Intelligence and superiority is SUBJECTIVE. Get the hell over it.

Yes we've made up for it in technology - making us superior to other species. We had the ability to create superior technology, because we are more intelligent. If you think we aren't more intelligent, go look at a sponge and watch what it does, and tell me that we aren't more intelligent than it.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:48 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Um? Technology is the making, usage, and knowledge of using tools. Last time I checked, ants, crows, apes, etc. use technology, abet primitive forms. And also once again, what purpose do they have for using technology? They do fine without it.

Let me rephrase: Superior technology is an adaptation we use because we are more intelligent than other species.

"Doing fine without technology" does not relate to this at all. We could do fine without technology as well.

So you'd be fine living 20 years on average, with no entertainment, hunting with your hands for food?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:48 am

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Good, we don't need another person who can't form a logical argument to save their own skin.


No, I'm just sick of arguing with someone who is deluded, immoral, and outright wrong. Plus you've already lost this argument anyway.


That's funny. I seem to recall proving your outdated arguments several pages ago, and you did nothing but whine and complain that I'm wrong without giving any evidence why. Please go away and stop embarrassing yourself.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:49 am

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Good, we don't need another person who can't form a logical argument to save their own skin.


No, I'm just sick of arguing with someone who is deluded, immoral, and outright wrong. Plus you've already lost this argument anyway.

You've provided no solid evidence.
You've lost.
Goodbye.

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:50 am

Divair wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Let me rephrase: Superior technology is an adaptation we use because we are more intelligent than other species.

"Doing fine without technology" does not relate to this at all. We could do fine without technology as well.

So you'd be fine living 20 years on average, with no entertainment, hunting with your hands for food?


I guess that's the point. Those animals who "do fine" would do better if they too had tech.

Animals have technology of a sort. A bird's nest is technology.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:50 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Dear gods, can you READ PLEASE? We have said COUNTLESS times that humans are superior in certain cases, however we pale in comparison to other things, which we try to make up for with technology. Intelligence and superiority is SUBJECTIVE. Get the hell over it.

Yes we've made up for it in technology - making us superior to other species. We had the ability to create superior technology, because we are more intelligent. If you think we aren't more intelligent, go look at a sponge and watch what it does, and tell me that we aren't more intelligent than it.


Please stop with the sponge, no one is saying a sponge is very intelligent. Technology does not make us superior in intelligence, it helps us make things easier. Using technology to artificially enhance our appearance of intelligence is logically unsound. You want to prove we are more intelligent? Go survive without tools, you won't last a week.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:51 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Dear gods, can you READ PLEASE? We have said COUNTLESS times that humans are superior in certain cases, however we pale in comparison to other things, which we try to make up for with technology. Intelligence and superiority is SUBJECTIVE. Get the hell over it.

Yes we've made up for it in technology - making us superior to other species. We had the ability to create superior technology, because we are more intelligent. If you think we aren't more intelligent, go look at a sponge and watch what it does, and tell me that we aren't more intelligent than it.

we have dominion over animals, we are superior in specific areas, as they are superior to us in other ares, we are more intelligent in specific areas, whereas they are more intelligent in other areas. A sponge has mastered the ability to not need to eat for days on end whereas we need food to function properly. We have dominion over them (taken from the Bible) but that does not mean we are smarter in every aspect
Last edited by Vazdania on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:51 am, edited 1 time in total.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ma-li, Northern Socialist Council Republics, The Astral Mandate

Advertisement

Remove ads