NATION

PASSWORD

why abortion is good.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

DO YOU AGREE WITH THE BELOW STATEMENT'S MESSAGE?

Yes
136
39%
No
213
61%
 
Total votes : 349

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:18 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
I seem to recall you saying that killing any human being is wrong, period. Stop making excuses for your hypocrisy.

Screaming "hypocrisy" isn't getting you anywhere. I already told you. Killing someone is wrong, but protection is a legal reason to do so. I never said killing someone for protection was right, but you're acting like it.


And laws are subjective, therefore once again, you have no argument. You are making excuses for yourself, it's rather annoying.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:19 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
I seem to recall you saying that killing any human being is wrong, period. Stop making excuses for your hypocrisy.

Screaming "hypocrisy" isn't getting you anywhere. I already told you. Killing someone is wrong, but protection is a legal reason to do so. I never said killing someone for protection was right, but you're acting like it.

Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:19 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Hm?

right before the entire fetus is out of the mothers body it is sentient, therefore it is stilla fetus and sentient

Why don't we define sentient? This seems to be another vague concept.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:19 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Hm?

right before the entire fetus is out of the mothers body it is sentient, therefore it is stilla fetus and sentient


I think you two are talking about different stages in fetal development.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:20 am

Zeth Rekia wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Screaming "hypocrisy" isn't getting you anywhere. I already told you. Killing someone is wrong, but protection is a legal reason to do so. I never said killing someone for protection was right, but you're acting like it.

Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

so again, a three day old is not a person?
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:21 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Vazdania wrote:right before the entire fetus is out of the mothers body it is sentient, therefore it is stilla fetus and sentient


I think you two are talking about different stages in fetal development.

OOOHHHHHHHHH, so what type of fetus are YOU talking about then HMMMMM O_o at what age is it still ok to still abort?
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:21 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

so again, a three day old is not a person?

in what context? Inside the uterus or outside?

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:21 am

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
I think you two are talking about different stages in fetal development.

OOOHHHHHHHHH, so what type of fetus are YOU talking about then HMMMMM O_o at what age is it still ok to still abort?

Fetus... duh. As far as I can recall, there's only one type of fetus.
Last edited by Zeth Rekia on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:22 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:21 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

so again, a three day old is not a person?


Uh, they are self-aware are they not?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:22 am

Vazdania wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:We have the most developed brains, and therefore, are the most intelligent species on this planet.

Disagreed once again, whther or not ones brain is developed does not acuratlly represent intellegence. a 13 year old may know more than a 30 year old

The adult's brain is still more developed. Are you denying that we are the most intelligent species on the planet? Do you see monkeys living in cities, having governments, religions, cultures, etc.?

(You should proofread what you write, by the way.)
Last edited by Birkinghamia on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:22 am

Inexplicability wrote:
Vazdania wrote:right before the entire fetus is out of the mothers body it is sentient, therefore it is stilla fetus and sentient

Why don't we define sentient? This seems to be another vague concept.



Definition of SENTIENT
1: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
merriam-webster
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Cameroi » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:22 am

well urban poor certainly aren't a majority of criminals. and at least some urban poor are only urban because they're not well enough off to become rural poor. so i don't agree with that PART of the op statement.

but i DO agree abortion is a mostly positive thing. that if its a killing it is indeed a mercy killing. its good for two reasons, one for which i would give the o.p. a: "close but no see-gar". that it is certainly no "mercy" to force anyone to be born into circumstances where they would be an unaffordable burden; but even more: that humans are something planet earth has rather a more then sufficient abundance of.
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:23 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

so again, a three day old is not a person?

Not unless the government AND the mother gives them personhood.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:23 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Screaming "hypocrisy" isn't getting you anywhere. I already told you. Killing someone is wrong, but protection is a legal reason to do so. I never said killing someone for protection was right, but you're acting like it.


And laws are subjective, therefore once again, you have no argument. You are making excuses for yourself, it's rather annoying.

"Killing" does not pertain to laws in general. Are you or are you not ending the life of a fetus?
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:24 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Disagreed once again, whther or not ones brain is developed does not acuratlly represent intellegence. a 13 year old may know more than a 30 year old

The adult's brain is still more developed. Are you denying that we are the most intelligent pecies on the planet? Do you see monkeys living in cities, having governments, religions, cultures, etc.?

(You should proofread what you write, by the way.)

You are judging other species by our own standards. Intelligence is subjective.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:24 am

Inexplicability wrote:
Vazdania wrote:right before the entire fetus is out of the mothers body it is sentient, therefore it is stilla fetus and sentient

Why don't we define sentient? This seems to be another vague concept.


Generally the definition is:

1. Ability to perceive or feel things

2. Responsive to or conscious of sense impression.

3. Finely sentient in perception or feeling.

4. Aware

Depending on which definition you use, all life can be considered sentient. Animals however would fall under them all.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:24 am

Vazdania wrote:Definition of SENTIENT
1: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
merriam-webster

Fetuses are not sentient, therefore, are not people.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:25 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Disagreed once again, whther or not ones brain is developed does not acuratlly represent intellegence. a 13 year old may know more than a 30 year old

The adult's brain is still more developed. Are you denying that we are the most intelligent pecies on the planet? Do you see monkeys living in cities, having governments, religions, cultures, etc.?

(You should proofread what you write, by the way.)

dissprove it please! I see primates form very social groups that resemble human social groups, therefore I must assume that there is some sort of peer pressure going on which makes me further assume that they are aware of themself.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:26 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Disagreed once again, whther or not ones brain is developed does not acuratlly represent intellegence. a 13 year old may know more than a 30 year old

The adult's brain is still more developed. Are you denying that we are the most intelligent species on the planet? Do you see monkeys living in cities, having governments, religions, cultures, etc.?

(You should proofread what you write, by the way.)


Apes do have cultures and primitive forms of religion. Monkeys, I'm not sure. Ants build "cities". Again, intelligence is HIGHLY subjective.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:26 am

Cameroi wrote:well urban poor certainly aren't a majority of criminals. and at least some urban poor are only urban because they're not well enough off to become rural poor. so i don't agree with that PART of the op statement.

but i DO agree abortion is a mostly positive thing. that if its a killing it is indeed a mercy killing. its good for two reasons, one for which i would give the o.p. a: "close but no see-gar". that it is certainly no "mercy" to force anyone to be born into circumstances where they would be an unaffordable burden; but even more: that humans are something planet earth has rather a more then sufficient abundance of.

Yes, Isn't it cruel to allow a baby to be born in such circumstances? It really isn't beneficial to anyone.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:27 am

Vazdania wrote:
Zeth Rekia wrote:Fetuses are not people. You're only a person when you're self-aware. That's later in development.

so again, a three day old is not a person?

A three day old is self aware.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:27 am

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
And laws are subjective, therefore once again, you have no argument. You are making excuses for yourself, it's rather annoying.

"Killing" does not pertain to laws in general. Are you or are you not ending the life of a fetus?


Yes. Are you are or you not ending the life of bacteria, cows, chickens, pigs, sheep, etc. etc. etc.? If you use the word "killing" you contradict yourself.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:27 am

Zeth Rekia wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Definition of SENTIENT
1: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
merriam-webster

Fetuses are not sentient, therefore, are not people.

yes, they are. yes, They can.

furthermore, are people in a coma, still sentient? is sentient a way to define a person???
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Zeth Rekia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18387
Founded: Oct 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeth Rekia » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:27 am

Mavorpen wrote:Apes do have cultures and primitive forms of religion. Monkeys, I'm not sure. Ants build "cities". Again, intelligence is HIGHLY subjective.

Apes actually form clans, from what I can remember. These clans sometimes do engage in violent conflict over food and females or whatnot.

Not much to do with abortion though.

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:27 am

Vazdania wrote:
Inexplicability wrote:Why don't we define sentient? This seems to be another vague concept.



Definition of SENTIENT
1: responsive to or conscious of sense impressions <sentient beings>
merriam-webster


Let's stop saying "sentient" then, since it applies to puppies too.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aeyariss, Alvecia, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Celritannia, Ifreann, Kerwa, Point Blob, Saiwana, Thebrin, Tiralta, United Technocratia, Valrifall, Xinisti

Advertisement

Remove ads