NATION

PASSWORD

why abortion is good.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

DO YOU AGREE WITH THE BELOW STATEMENT'S MESSAGE?

Yes
136
39%
No
213
61%
 
Total votes : 349

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:49 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Uh? Murder is determined by law. Law is subjective. Murder is subjective. It's simple.

Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:50 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Uh? Murder is determined by law. Law is subjective. Murder is subjective. It's simple.

Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.

Killing someone isn't subjective. It just depends on when you count something as a human being and why killing a human being is wrong.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:50 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
You do realize fruit aren't alive right...?

exactly!!! we cant eat things that are alive! fruit arent alive SOOOO they are ok :D


i never said that. We can eat plants because we need to survive. We can live without meat however, thus killing them has no logical basis, making it immoral.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Vazdania wrote:exactly!!! we cant eat things that are alive! fruit arent alive SOOOO they are ok :D


i never said that. We can eat plants because we need to survive. We can live without meat however, thus killing them has no logical basis, making it immoral.

but you dont wanna kill the poor plants D: do you???
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:51 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.

So true! Our morals of killing are all cultural. Other cultures think it is perfectly fine to kill humans.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:52 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
Uh? Murder is determined by law. Law is subjective. Murder is subjective. It's simple.

Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


You were asked twice if I should be allowed to refuse to give you a lifesaving bloodtransfusion. Am I, even though that refusal would mean you'd die ?
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:52 pm

The Alma Mater wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Who says so? I thought all human beings were equal.


Again: can you force me to give up some of my organs and/or blood to save your life, or are they my choice to give ?

Of course not. Because human beings are equal, so everyone has the same right as another to give voluntarily.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:53 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
i never said that. We can eat plants because we need to survive. We can live without meat however, thus killing them has no logical basis, making it immoral.

but you dont wanna kill the poor plants D: do you???


It's the ability to feel pain that's important in that topic. If you want to starve to death that's fine.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:53 pm

The Alma Mater wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


You were asked twice if I should be allowed to refuse to give you a lifesaving bloodtransfusion. Am I, even though that refusal would mean you'd die ?

Sorry if I'm busy and I can't stalk the thread. See my post above.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:54 pm

The Alma Mater wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


You were asked twice if I should be allowed to refuse to give you a lifesaving bloodtransfusion. Am I, even though that refusal would mean you'd die ?

yes, that is your blood. If you would love to then go for it. but you should not be forced to give up something of yourself to save something else ( another point why its ok to abort if the mothers life is at stake....)
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:54 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
The Flood wrote:
Only a fool believes the law is always right. AKA SOPA


That was his point. Law is subjective, therefore murder is subjective. Thanks for proving our point.


I'm not talking about murder as dictated by the law, the law is wrong. I am talking about what murder truly is, killing a human being, and that is NOT subjective. It is an act of pure malice and the fact that any government allows abortion disturbs me to the very core.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:54 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Again: can you force me to give up some of my organs and/or blood to save your life, or are they my choice to give ?

Of course not. Because human beings are equal, so everyone has the same right as another to give voluntarily.

All human beings are equal in what way?
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:55 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Vazdania wrote:but you dont wanna kill the poor plants D: do you???


It's the ability to feel pain that's important in that topic. If you want to starve to death that's fine.

can you prove? I would like a link as proof
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:55 pm

Inexplicability wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.

So true! Our morals of killing are all cultural. Other cultures think it is perfectly fine to kill humans.


Well, killing is killing no matter what culture you are in. Murder is the one that is subjective.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Birkinghamia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 668
Founded: Jul 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Birkinghamia » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:56 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.

I think human beings are on a completely different level than any of those things you mentioned.
Economic Left/Right: 0.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.67

Christian, moderate, New Yorker.
Ich spreche Deutsch.

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:56 pm

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
That was his point. Law is subjective, therefore murder is subjective. Thanks for proving our point.


I'm not talking about murder as dictated by the law, the law is wrong. I am talking about what murder truly is, killing a human being, and that is NOT subjective. It is an act of pure malice and the fact that any government allows abortion disturbs me to the very core.

Why do you think that killing another human being is an act of pure malice?
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:56 pm

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
That was his point. Law is subjective, therefore murder is subjective. Thanks for proving our point.


I'm not talking about murder as dictated by the law, the law is wrong. I am talking about what murder truly is, killing a human being, and that is NOT subjective. It is an act of pure malice and the fact that any government allows abortion disturbs me to the very core.


No, murder is the unlawful killing of a human being. The law must dictate a certain case of killing as murder. This makes it subjective. Get over it.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:57 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Maybe "murder" isn't the right word. How about that it's killing a human being? Please tell me that you don't think killing something is subjective.


We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.


Are you one of them weirdies who thinks animals and plants are equal to humans? They aren't, they are not sentient beings, it is natural for us to eat animals. You can't claim to endorse logic and say that a filthy and delicious swine is equal to a human.

I bet you aren't even a vegetarian.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:57 pm

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
It's the ability to feel pain that's important in that topic. If you want to starve to death that's fine.

can you prove? I would like a link as proof


Peter Singer. Look him up.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:57 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
The Alma Mater wrote:
Again: can you force me to give up some of my organs and/or blood to save your life, or are they my choice to give ?

Of course not. Because human beings are equal, so everyone has the same right as another to give voluntarily.


So it is my choice to give you blood, give up you one of my organs or be hooked up to a device for 9 months that draws nutrients from my body to share with you and returns all kinds of poisons and hormones ? Even though a refusal to do so leads to your death ?

So why would your mother not have been allowed that choice ? Do I have more rights than your mom ?

And with that question - which has been asked dozens of times already (hence why I encourage people to read the topic before recycling arguments ad nauseam) I sadly must leave :(
Last edited by The Alma Mater on Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Inexplicability
Attaché
 
Posts: 74
Founded: Aug 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Inexplicability » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.

I think human beings are on a completely different level than any of those things you mentioned.

Why are human beings so special? I don't see anything that makes us on a completely different level- this seems sort of speciescentric to me.
“The greatest crimes in the world are not committed by people breaking the rules but by people following the rules. It’s people who follow orders that drop bombs and massacre villages”
— Banksy

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.


Are you one of them weirdies who thinks animals and plants are equal to humans? They aren't, they are not sentient beings, it is natural for us to eat animals. You can't claim to endorse logic and say that a filthy and delicious swine is equal to a human.


I bet you aren't even a vegetarian.


Uh, many animals are sentient. And what matters is their ability to feel pain. Go away please, your arguments have been addressed COUNTLESS times.
Last edited by Mavorpen on Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:58 pm

The Flood wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.


Are you one of them weirdies who thinks animals and plants are equal to humans? They aren't, they are not sentient beings, it is natural for us to eat animals. You can't claim to endorse logic and say that a filthy and delicious swine is equal to a human.

I bet you aren't even a vegetarian.

bibiclally we are equal, but we have dominion over them, they have a living spirit in them just as we do...furthermore, scientifically they respond to stimulas and can feel pain...they are equals to us but we have domain over them
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:59 pm

Inexplicability wrote:
Birkinghamia wrote:Of course not. Because human beings are equal, so everyone has the same right as another to give voluntarily.

All human beings are equal in what way?

The right to life.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Dec 26, 2011 11:59 pm

Birkinghamia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:
We kill things all the time. So that argument doesn't work at all. Killing a human in a circumstance that is determined by the law is murder. Thus you cannot say that only killing humans is bad, because that is murder. You MUST include all life when it comes to killing. Thus by saying killing is bad you admit eating meat, using antibiotics to kill living bacteria, etc. is immoral.

I think human beings are on a completely different level than any of those things you mentioned.


LOL! You said yourself that killing (which is the act of ending the live of another being) is bad. Everything that is alive falls under killing. You've backed yourself into a corner.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, The Matthew Islands, Upper Ireland, Urkennalaid

Advertisement

Remove ads