NATION

PASSWORD

Nativity Scene Controversy in Central Texas

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Hittanryan
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9061
Founded: Mar 10, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Hittanryan » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:18 am

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Well then call out the police and get those damn crucifix-wearin' bastards out of our public schools. After all, that's excessive entanglement, they're trying to spread their message of hate and violence in a public forum of learning and reason!
Go catch those miserable homeless people who use the sidewalks to panhandle for change and sometimes have "God bless" written on their signs. They're using public property, so it should have to be stopped!
Stop those stupid religious folk from spreading their LIES in public parks, after all their use of public ground for religious purposes is excessive entanglement!

I hope you realize how utterly ridiculous that argument is :eyebrow:

How about a little fire, scarecrow?

Occupied Deutschland wrote:Until there is a Supreme Court case on the matter:
No, actually they aren't. As government approval of a private organization erecting a religious display on public land is not the government becoming "excessively entangled" in religion, I doubt they could be ruled in violation of anything for allowing the nativity scene to go up.
They could be in trouble if they didn't hang up the banner the atheists requested to have hung up. I don't know if they actually hung it up or not though :unsure:

Actually, there have been several Supreme Court cases on the subject of nativity scenes on public property. ACLU vs. Scarsdale established the so-called "reindeer rule," which states that nativity scenes on public property are only acceptable if accompanied by more secular Christmas symbols. I can't speak to the minutiae of the current Texas fight, but I would think it's irrelevant who put up the display: it's still on public property.
Last edited by Hittanryan on Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
In-character name of the nation is "Adiron," because I like the name better.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:23 am

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Yes. That strawman is ridiculous.

Then so is this case.
Government allowing religious message on public ground - check
Government not limiting that public ground to sole use by one religion - Maybe check.

Fixed
Occupied Deutschland wrote:I'm not sure if they hung the banner up or not, so they could be violating this one.

They haven't, so they are.
Last edited by Dyakovo on Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:24 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Flameswroth
Senator
 
Posts: 4773
Founded: Sep 05, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Flameswroth » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:25 am

So I just saw a copy of the banner the atheist group wants to have up alongside the nativity...and I have to say it's incredibly lackluster. The color scheme takes a stab at looking festive, but it's a far cry from actually being pleasing to look at. The nativity, it's meaning notwithstanding, is at least an arrangement of sculpture (plastic or otherwise), backlit for night-time with some artistic flair to it.

I'm not sure what they could do to something as plain as a banner to make it better...maybe put Santa and Jesus sharing egg nog at the North Pole or something...but as it is i wouldn't want to put that eyesore up either, if only because it's really not an attractive sign at all and sucks the fun out of the display.
Czardas wrote:Why should we bail out climate change with billions of dollars, when lesbians are starving in the streets because they can't afford an abortion?

Reagan Clone wrote:What you are proposing is glorifying God by loving, respecting, or at least tolerating, his other creations.

That is the gayest fucking shit I've ever heard, and I had Barry Manilow perform at the White House in '82.



User avatar
Aethelstania
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1063
Founded: Jun 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Aethelstania » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:27 am

As a Christian IM in two minds about this. As I would like to see Christmas decorations go up people celebrating Christmas and the like. However I really don't agree with evangelicalism and I think the state should be secular. So yea I think if its offending people or whatever it should come down , I just happen to think that's a shame ... plus on a kinda related note even though I don't like relegios zealots I don't understand evangelical aethiests I mean what really is the point.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Fri Dec 16, 2011 10:31 am

What did grammar ever do to you?
Aethelstania wrote:As a Christian IM in two minds about this. As I would like to see Christmas decorations go up people celebrating Christmas and the like. However I really don't agree with evangelicalism and I think the state should be secular. So yea I think if its offending people or whatever it should come down , I just happen to think that's a shame ... plus on a kinda related note even though I don't like relegios zealots I don't understand evangelical aethiests I mean what really is the point.

What is an aethiest?
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Glorious Freedonia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1866
Founded: Jun 09, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Glorious Freedonia » Fri Dec 16, 2011 1:16 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Risottia wrote:False.

In the US: July 4th & Veterans' Day. Just to quote two.

And Presidents Day, Martin Luther King Jr's birthday, Labor Day, Halloween, Thanksgiving, and New Years...

Thanksgiving is religioius and national.

User avatar
Maxen von Bismarck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Maxen von Bismarck » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:22 pm

Dyakovo wrote:
Occupied Deutschland wrote:Well then call out the police and get those damn crucifix-wearin' bastards out of our public schools. After all, that's excessive entanglement, they're trying to spread their message of hate and violence in a public forum of learning and reason!
Go catch those miserable homeless people who use the sidewalks to panhandle for change and sometimes have "God bless" written on their signs. They're using public property, so it should have to be stopped!
Stop those stupid religious folk from spreading their LIES in public parks, after all their use of public ground for religious purposes is excessive entanglement!

I hope you realize how utterly ridiculous that argument is :eyebrow:

Yes. That strawman is ridiculous.

Until you said that, I thought you were just trolling atheists.

:blush:

Unless, of course, you are and in that case you just broke NSG's annual irony contest. :clap:
Retired Nation. :)

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:23 pm

Glorious Freedonia wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:And Presidents Day, Martin Luther King Jr's birthday, Labor Day, Halloween, Thanksgiving, and New Years...

Thanksgiving is religioius and national.

How so? I've never considered it religious before.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Maxen von Bismarck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Maxen von Bismarck » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:27 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Glorious Freedonia wrote:Thanksgiving is religioius and national.

How so? I've never considered it religious before.

If it helps, I happen to have a copy of the first proclamation RE: Thanksgiving. You can judge for yourself it there are any religious overtones.

"The Holy God having by a long and Continual Series of his Afflictive dispensations in and by the present Warr with the Heathen Natives of this land, written and brought to pass bitter things against his own Covenant people in this wilderness, yet so that we evidently discern that in the midst of his judgements he hath remembered mercy, having remembered his Footstool in the day of his sore displeasure against us for our sins, with many singular Intimations of his Fatherly Compassion, and regard; reserving many of our Towns from Desolation Threatened, and attempted by the Enemy, and giving us especially of late with many of our Confederates many signal Advantages against them, without such Disadvantage to ourselves as formerly we have been sensible of, if it be the Lord's mercy that we are not consumed, It certainly bespeaks our positive Thankfulness, when our Enemies are in any measure disappointed or destroyed; and fearing the Lord should take notice under so many Intimations of his returning mercy, we should be found an Insensible people, as not standing before Him with Thanksgiving, as well as lading him with our Complaints in the time of pressing Afflictions: The Council has thought meet to appoint and set apart the 29th day of this instant June, as a day of Solemn Thanksgiving and praise to God for such his Goodness and Favour, many Particulars of which mercy might be Instanced, but we doubt not those who are sensible of God's Afflictions, have been as diligent to espy him returning to us; and that the Lord may behold us as a People offering Praise and thereby glorifying Him; the Council doth commend it to the Respective Ministers, Elders and people of this Jurisdiction; Solemnly and seriously to keep the same Beseeching that being persuaded by the mercies of God we may all, even this whole people offer up our bodies and souls as a living and acceptable Service unto God by Jesus Christ."


http://www.socastee.com/politics/histor ... giving.pdf
Last edited by Maxen von Bismarck on Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Nation. :)

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:29 pm

Maxen von Bismarck wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:How so? I've never considered it religious before.

If it helps, I happen to have a copy of the first proclamation RE: Thanksgiving. You can judge for yourself it there are any religious overtones.

"The Holy God having by a long and Continual Series of his Afflictive dispensations in and by the present Warr with the Heathen Natives of this land, written and brought to pass bitter things against his own Covenant people in this wilderness, yet so that we evidently discern that in the midst of his judgements he hath remembered mercy, having remembered his Footstool in the day of his sore displeasure against us for our sins, with many singular Intimations of his Fatherly Compassion, and regard; reserving many of our Towns from Desolation Threatened, and attempted by the Enemy, and giving us especially of late with many of our Confederates many signal Advantages against them, without such Disadvantage to ourselves as formerly we have been sensible of, if it be the Lord's mercy that we are not consumed, It certainly bespeaks our positive Thankfulness, when our Enemies are in any measure disappointed or destroyed; and fearing the Lord should take notice under so many Intimations of his returning mercy, we should be found an Insensible people, as not standing before Him with Thanksgiving, as well as lading him with our Complaints in the time of pressing Afflictions: The Council has thought meet to appoint and set apart the 29th day of this instant June, as a day of Solemn Thanksgiving and praise to God for such his Goodness and Favour, many Particulars of which mercy might be Instanced, but we doubt not those who are sensible of God's Afflictions, have been as diligent to espy him returning to us; and that the Lord may behold us as a People offering Praise and thereby glorifying Him; the Council doth commend it to the Respective Ministers, Elders and people of this Jurisdiction; Solemnly and seriously to keep the same Beseeching that being persuaded by the mercies of God we may all, even this whole people offer up our bodies and souls as a living and acceptable Service unto God by Jesus Christ."


http://www.socastee.com/politics/histor ... giving.pdf

Yeah, OK. I see it. May I ask the year it was printed?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Maxen von Bismarck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Maxen von Bismarck » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:32 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Maxen von Bismarck wrote:If it helps, I happen to have a copy of the first proclamation RE: Thanksgiving. You can judge for yourself it there are any religious overtones.

"The Holy God having by a long and Continual Series of his Afflictive dispensations in and by the present Warr with the Heathen Natives of this land, written and brought to pass bitter things against his own Covenant people in this wilderness, yet so that we evidently discern that in the midst of his judgements he hath remembered mercy, having remembered his Footstool in the day of his sore displeasure against us for our sins, with many singular Intimations of his Fatherly Compassion, and regard; reserving many of our Towns from Desolation Threatened, and attempted by the Enemy, and giving us especially of late with many of our Confederates many signal Advantages against them, without such Disadvantage to ourselves as formerly we have been sensible of, if it be the Lord's mercy that we are not consumed, It certainly bespeaks our positive Thankfulness, when our Enemies are in any measure disappointed or destroyed; and fearing the Lord should take notice under so many Intimations of his returning mercy, we should be found an Insensible people, as not standing before Him with Thanksgiving, as well as lading him with our Complaints in the time of pressing Afflictions: The Council has thought meet to appoint and set apart the 29th day of this instant June, as a day of Solemn Thanksgiving and praise to God for such his Goodness and Favour, many Particulars of which mercy might be Instanced, but we doubt not those who are sensible of God's Afflictions, have been as diligent to espy him returning to us; and that the Lord may behold us as a People offering Praise and thereby glorifying Him; the Council doth commend it to the Respective Ministers, Elders and people of this Jurisdiction; Solemnly and seriously to keep the same Beseeching that being persuaded by the mercies of God we may all, even this whole people offer up our bodies and souls as a living and acceptable Service unto God by Jesus Christ."


http://www.socastee.com/politics/histor ... giving.pdf

Yeah, OK. I see it. May I ask the year it was printed?

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. The year the proclamation was printed? I believe it was delivered orally.

Also, a nice linky I found with more recent Thanksgiving proclamations from Washington on down: http://www.pilgrimhall.org/ThanxProc1789.htm

Again, you can judge for yourself if there is a religious tone to them.
Last edited by Maxen von Bismarck on Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Nation. :)

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:40 pm

Maxen von Bismarck wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Yeah, OK. I see it. May I ask the year it was printed?

I'm not sure I understand what you're asking. The year the proclamation was printed? I believe it was delivered orally.

Also, a nice linky I found with more recent Thanksgiving proclamations from Washington on down: http://www.pilgrimhall.org/ThanxProc1789.htm

Again, you can judge for yourself if there is a religious tone to them.

Bah, I meant delivered. Thank you either way.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Maurepas » Fri Dec 16, 2011 2:40 pm

I don't have a problem with Nativity Scenes, but I do have a problem with them being on Courthouse lawns.

They are a symbol of Christianity and a Court is forbidden from endorsing religion of any kind.

User avatar
Crystalcliff Point
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1304
Founded: Oct 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Crystalcliff Point » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:13 pm

How about this: Some private citizen offers to allow the nativity scene erected on their private property? Then everyone's happy!

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Fri Dec 16, 2011 5:17 pm

Crystalcliff Point wrote:How about this: Some private citizen offers to allow the nativity scene erected on their private property? Then everyone's happy!

Yep.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
The Flood
Minister
 
Posts: 3422
Founded: Nov 24, 2011
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby The Flood » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:15 pm

Kobeanare wrote:
JuNii wrote:Never said it was an atheist symbol. I was trying to say that a Religiously neutral symbol should be satisfying to Atheists.

Why should it, if the Christians get their pro-Christian symbol?


Because the pro Christian symbol doesn't say 'atheists suck!' on it like the atheist 'symbol' does.
Agnostic
Asexual
Transgender, pronouns she / her

Pro-Life
Pro-LGBT
Pro-Left Wing
Pro-Socialism / Communism

Anti-Hate Speech
Anti-Fascist
Anti-Bigotry
Anti-Right Wing
Anti-Capitalism

Political Test
Political Compass
Personality Type: INFJ
I am The UNE now

User avatar
Kobeanare
Minister
 
Posts: 2767
Founded: Nov 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kobeanare » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:33 pm

Risottia wrote:
Vestr-Norig wrote:Well, its still stupid.The local inhabitans want it there, and it is undemocratical to deny their right to do so.

Democracy isn't exactly just "whatever the majority wants".

Of course it is. Which is why the US isn't a democracy.

User avatar
Kobeanare
Minister
 
Posts: 2767
Founded: Nov 02, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Kobeanare » Fri Dec 16, 2011 6:54 pm

The Flood wrote:
Kobeanare wrote:Why should it, if the Christians get their pro-Christian symbol?


Because the pro Christian symbol doesn't say 'atheists suck!' on it like the atheist 'symbol' does.

Even if it actually did, so what?

User avatar
Maxen von Bismarck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Maxen von Bismarck » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:29 pm

Desperate Measures wrote:
Crystalcliff Point wrote:How about this: Some private citizen offers to allow the nativity scene erected on their private property? Then everyone's happy!

Yep.

Like an atheist could ever be happy.
Retired Nation. :)

User avatar
Crystalcliff Point
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1304
Founded: Oct 23, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Crystalcliff Point » Fri Dec 16, 2011 7:30 pm

Maxen von Bismarck wrote:Like an atheist could ever be happy.

I'm pretty happy right now. Got my Metroid Fusion, and a warm cup of delicious tea. I guess a more accurate word would be content

Mind not discriminating against atheists in the future? Thanks.

My solution, the best working one. Can you think of a better, constitutional one?

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:15 pm

The Flood wrote:
Kobeanare wrote:Why should it, if the Christians get their pro-Christian symbol?


Because the pro Christian symbol doesn't say 'atheists suck!' on it like the atheist 'symbol' does.

It's implied. It's been implied ever since the Roman Empire took over Christianity, or vice versa. I never could tell.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Maxen von Bismarck
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 21, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Maxen von Bismarck » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:18 pm

Crystalcliff Point wrote:
Maxen von Bismarck wrote:Like an atheist could ever be happy.

I'm pretty happy right now. Got my Metroid Fusion, and a warm cup of delicious tea. I guess a more accurate word would be content

Mind not discriminating against atheists in the future? Thanks.

My solution, the best working one. Can you think of a better, constitutional one?


Pfft, if you think that's discrimination I think you need to stop being so 'content' and start 'living.'

I say the town puts up a sign that says "Happy Holidays."

http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/cgi-bin/g ... &invol=668

"The concept of a "wall" of separation between church and state is a useful metaphor but is not an accurate description of the practical aspects of the relationship that in fact exists."
Retired Nation. :)

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:20 pm

Maxen von Bismarck wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Yep.

Like an atheist could ever be happy.

Proven untrue. You made me laugh... though I'm not really an atheist. I'm agnostic. Or ignostic. Or agnostic atheist. Or maybe a weak atheist. Or something.
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111674
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:26 pm

Desperate Measures wrote:
Maxen von Bismarck wrote:Like an atheist could ever be happy.

Proven untrue. You made me laugh... though I'm not really an atheist. I'm agnostic. Or ignostic. Or agnostic atheist. Or maybe a weak atheist. Or something.

Make up your mind!!!!!
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Desperate Measures
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10149
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Desperate Measures » Fri Dec 16, 2011 8:30 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:Proven untrue. You made me laugh... though I'm not really an atheist. I'm agnostic. Or ignostic. Or agnostic atheist. Or maybe a weak atheist. Or something.

Make up your mind!!!!!

Not in this life. :lol:
"My loathings are simple: stupidity, oppression, crime, cruelty, soft music."
- Vladimir Nabokov US (1899 - 1977)
Also, me.
“Man has such a predilection for systems and abstract deductions that he is ready to distort the truth intentionally, he is ready to deny the evidence of his senses only to justify his logic”
- Fyodor Dostoyevsky Russian Novelist and Writer, 1821-1881
"All Clock Faces Are Wrong." - Gene Ray, Prophet(?) http://www.timecube.com
A simplified maxim on the subject states "An atheist would say, 'I don't believe God exists'; an agnostic would say, 'I don't know whether or not God exists'; and an ignostic would say, 'I don't know what you mean when you say, "God exists" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignosticism

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chessmistress, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Ifreann, Pizza Friday Forever91, Point Blob, Primitive Communism, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads