Cill Charthaigh wrote:It's sort of an honor thing.
That kind of honor is for sexist chumps.
Advertisement

by New England and The Maritimes » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:26 pm
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

by Motuka » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:43 pm
Cill Charthaigh wrote:It's sort of an honor thing.

by Greed and Death » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:44 pm

by The USOT » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:45 pm


by Genivaria » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:54 pm
greed and death wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:
That kind of honor is for sexist chumps.
Not really it is more of a recognition that your not really dating the daughter but also dating the whole family and should strive to considered a good bf to both the girl herself and to her family.
As for why the guy ask the dad, well because he will give us an answer we understand he speaks man. Asking the mom may result in a bf getting confused by womanese.
Women tend to ask the mom just not as directly and full of alot more confusing womanese.


by New Conglomerate » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:56 pm

by Bluth Corporation » Tue Dec 13, 2011 7:59 pm
As for why the guy ask the dad, well because he will give us an answer we understand he speaks man. Asking the mom may result in a bf getting confused by womanese.

by Erinkita » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:03 pm
greed and death wrote:New England and The Maritimes wrote:
That kind of honor is for sexist chumps.
Not really it is more of a recognition that your not really dating the daughter but also dating the whole family and should strive to considered a good bf to both the girl herself and to her family.
As for why the guy ask the dad, well because he will give us an answer we understand he speaks man. Asking the mom may result in a bf getting confused by womanese.
Women tend to ask the mom just not as directly and full of alot more confusing womanese.

by Xeng He » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:07 pm
Erinkita wrote:Do you really have such a hard time understanding women when they talk?
This seems more like something a character in a sitcom would say.
'Womanese'? Really?
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.

by The USOT » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:14 pm
There is a very large difference between hoping you raised someone right and that person being property.The Black Forrest wrote:Trotskylvania wrote:I hardly consider the continued observance of a reactionary tradition harkening to the days when a daughter was the property of her father to be in anyway "honorable".
She lives at home she is technically property. But that is beside the point.
The girl has basically given permission. It's a big thing to the father to see his "little girl" be married to somebody else. You hope you raised her right to pick to decent guy and the fact he still asks is honorable.
)
by Erinkita » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:23 pm
Xeng He wrote:Erinkita wrote:Do you really have such a hard time understanding women when they talk?
This seems more like something a character in a sitcom would say.
'Womanese'? Really?
In his defense, I know what he's talking about. It's not in the least confusing to me, but I get what he's saying.
Women oftentimes won't do things directly, at least in Western culture, as much as men. They'll make innuendo towards an idea. Overtures and the like, rather than saying outright.

by Karolyland » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:23 pm

by Xeng He » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:27 pm
Erinkita wrote:That's the tendency, yeah, but it's not indecipherable, is it?

Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.

by Xeng He » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:28 pm
Karolyland wrote:
It may be a result of social upbringing to some extent that "womanese" is more likely to be found among women - the stereotype had to develop somehow - but confusing lack of directness in communication certainly doesn't have to be an exclusively woman phenomenon, probably more of a personality quirk found in both genders.
Blazedtown wrote:[an ism is] A term used by people who won't admit their true beliefs, or don't have any.

by Salciana » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:30 pm

by Euronion » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:34 pm
Nazi Flower Power wrote:Why do so many guys still think that it's up to a girl's father to decide if you are allowed to date her?
I've had a couple of different guys that were interested in me, but then got absurdly nervous about the possibility that my dad might not approve. None of them has ever been concerned that my mom might have a problem with them.
It's really not helpful to be so paranoid. If you're dating a girl and she's worried about what her dad thinks, then you have a reason to be concerned; but otherwise you're just making things more nerve-wracking than they need to be. If it seems like a guy is more concerned about my dad's opinion than mine, that causes problems in the relationship.
Ladies, do your dads chase away would-be boyfriends, or did they chase away would-be boyfriends when you were younger?
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by New Conglomerate » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:36 pm
Euronion wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:Why do so many guys still think that it's up to a girl's father to decide if you are allowed to date her?
I've had a couple of different guys that were interested in me, but then got absurdly nervous about the possibility that my dad might not approve. None of them has ever been concerned that my mom might have a problem with them.
It's really not helpful to be so paranoid. If you're dating a girl and she's worried about what her dad thinks, then you have a reason to be concerned; but otherwise you're just making things more nerve-wracking than they need to be. If it seems like a guy is more concerned about my dad's opinion than mine, that causes problems in the relationship.
Ladies, do your dads chase away would-be boyfriends, or did they chase away would-be boyfriends when you were younger?
Because your mother is most likely not the one who is going to chase your boyfriend down with a rifle if you get pregnant

by Katganistan » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:38 pm
United Dependencies wrote:Wait wait wait, you're a female?

by Katganistan » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:39 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Because dating is a temporary transfer of ownership of the girl from the father to the bf. Marriage is a permanent transfer of said property.
Marriage and dating have always been this, and they will always be this. They cannot be made egalitarian. They cannot be purged of sexism.

by Euronion » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:43 pm
New Conglomerate wrote:Euronion wrote:
Because your mother is most likely not the one who is going to chase your boyfriend down with a rifle if you get pregnant
Anyone who chases anyone down with a rifle is likely to end up with a pound of lead in their chest courtesy of a local SWAT team.
Literal 'Shotgun' weddings aren't actually that common.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Dread Lady Nathicana » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:47 pm
Euronion wrote:Nazi Flower Power wrote:Why do so many guys still think that it's up to a girl's father to decide if you are allowed to date her?
I've had a couple of different guys that were interested in me, but then got absurdly nervous about the possibility that my dad might not approve. None of them has ever been concerned that my mom might have a problem with them.
It's really not helpful to be so paranoid. If you're dating a girl and she's worried about what her dad thinks, then you have a reason to be concerned; but otherwise you're just making things more nerve-wracking than they need to be. If it seems like a guy is more concerned about my dad's opinion than mine, that causes problems in the relationship.
Ladies, do your dads chase away would-be boyfriends, or did they chase away would-be boyfriends when you were younger?
Because your mother is most likely not the one who is going to chase your boyfriend down with a rifle if you get pregnant

by Idaho Conservatives » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:51 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Marriage and dating have always been this, and they will always be this. They cannot be made egalitarian. They cannot be purged of sexism.


by Euronion » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:56 pm
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Barefoot Lands » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:57 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Big Jim summed it up nicely.
I too asked my father-in-law. It became a bragging point for him.
I have a daughter and yes I will be a jack ass to my girls boyfriends.
Simple reason: If the boy is willing to put up with my bullshit, he really likes her.

by Euronion » Tue Dec 13, 2011 8:58 pm
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Euronion wrote:
Because your mother is most likely not the one who is going to chase your boyfriend down with a rifle if you get pregnant
My daughter tells all prospective boyfriends that as intimidating as he can look, it isn't her father they need to worry about.
It's me. And for damn good reason.
As for that other piffle about 'property' and the like - give me a fething break. This isn't the dark ages, believe it or not, and we women ARE capable of making our own choices, whether you choose to agree with that or not. Your dysfunction. Not mine, FST. Kindly stop trying to make it seem otherwise.
And the gender issues and miscommunication? Pfft. Just because 'society' or whatever tells you 'this is how it is', doesn't mean you have to buy into it. Communication is the key to air power. And a solid relationship.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Cannot think of a name, Des-Bal, El Lazaro, Elwher, Fractalnavel, Gravlen, Greater Miami Shores 3, Neo-American States, Nilokeras, Ostroeuropa, Qwuazaria, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, TheKeyToJoy, Vassenor, Wallenburg, Wrekstaat
Advertisement