Advertisement

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:56 am

by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:58 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:"Women shouldn't have sex or be sex objects. They should have self-respect, and empower themselves by becoming successful in business, medicine, law, academia, politics, etc.."
"How dare you! You hate women!"
This is the problem with you modern sex-positive types.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Xsyne » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:58 am
Chernoslavia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.
Source?

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:01 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:"Women shouldn't have sex or be sex objects. They should have self-respect, and empower themselves by becoming successful in business, medicine, law, academia, politics, etc.."
"How dare you! You hate women!"
This is the problem with you modern sex-positive types.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:02 pm
Xsyne wrote:Saying that women who have sex don't have self-respect is pretty goddamn misogynist. As is saying women who have sex can't be successful in business, medicine, law, academia, politics, etc.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:03 pm
Dakini wrote:I mean, why don't you think that I have self-respect because I enjoy sex as well as doing science, for instance?

by The Congregationists » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:04 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:How is perfection undesirable? It's the only possible reason for being, to strive toward becoming as perfect as possible.
Newsflash: You're not perfect.
I know. That's the problem that needs fixing.



by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:04 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:I never said either one. However, I do think that having sex is a sign of less self-reliance than celibacy. Having sex shows a dependency on others.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:08 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Dakini wrote:I mean, why don't you think that I have self-respect because I enjoy sex as well as doing science, for instance?
I think you have less self-respect than you could have. If you never had sex or a relationship, you could focus all the extra time on doing more science, and thus being even more successful.
Now only if we could get rid of that damn need for sleep and eating. MORE SCIENCE!
by Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:08 pm
Norstal wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:I never said either one. However, I do think that having sex is a sign of less self-reliance than celibacy. Having sex shows a dependency on others.
Such as the purpose of humans. Cause, you know, we're social animals. Once you take sex away from women, they're not women anymore.
And yes, humanity sucks, but we are who we are. Pouting about it is irrational.

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:09 pm
Norstal wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:I never said either one. However, I do think that having sex is a sign of less self-reliance than celibacy. Having sex shows a dependency on others.
Such as the purpose of humans. Cause, you know, we're social animals. Once you take sex away from women, they're not women anymore.
And yes, humanity sucks, but we are who we are. Pouting about it is irrational.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:09 pm
If you never had sex or a relationship, you could focus all the extra time on doing more science, and thus being even more successful.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:10 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
I think you have less self-respect than you could have. If you never had sex or a relationship, you could focus all the extra time on doing more science, and thus being even more successful.
Now only if we could get rid of that damn need for sleep and eating. MORE SCIENCE!

by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:11 pm
Farnhamia wrote:No, humanity doesn't suck. Individual members of the race might, but on the whole, we're okay. But yeah, pouting is ineffective, unless you're two years old or younger, in which case it might be cute.
The Black Forrest wrote:You say humanity sucks like it's a bad thing.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:11 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Now only if we could get rid of that damn need for sleep and eating. MORE SCIENCE!

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:12 pm

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:13 pm
Dakini wrote:Lucky he's wrong. I don't know a single tenured professor who isn't in a long term relationship.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:14 pm

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:14 pm

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:15 pm
Dakini wrote:I don't see that happening.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:16 pm

by Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:18 pm
The Black Forrest wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
I think you have less self-respect than you could have. If you never had sex or a relationship, you could focus all the extra time on doing more science, and thus being even more successful.
Now only if we could get rid of that damn need for sleep and eating. MORE SCIENCE!

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:18 pm

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:20 pm
Dakini wrote:Yeah, so you wait for something that won't happen until after we're all dead (if at all) and I'll go live and love in the present.
And by the way, you're still wrong about women, self-respect and sex.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:22 pm
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Dakini wrote:Yeah, so you wait for something that won't happen until after we're all dead (if at all) and I'll go live and love in the present.
And by the way, you're still wrong about women, self-respect and sex.
All relationships turn sour, all love dies. Then, you'll just use the secrets you learned from intimacy to destroy each other's lives.
Friendship and love can only lead to betrayal and suffering.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Heavenly Assault, Ifreann, In-dia, Incelastan, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, USS Monitor, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement