You didn't address other two most recent posts I made.
Also, I fail to see how your sacrifice of happiness has made you more perfect. You haven't explained it at all.
Advertisement

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:08 am

by The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:08 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:The Rich Port wrote:It's certainly desirable, but it's just not possible.
If perfection were all we strived for, we'd probably be more miserable than we are already, and that's saying a lot.
The universe isn't perfect, life isn't perfect, and our most perfect people are still imperfect.
IMO, it would take me a few trillion years to reach perfection, and even then I wouldn't want it.
Misery is a fair price. Happiness just gets in the way of self-betterment.

by Tlaceceyaya » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:12 am
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:13 am
Dakini wrote:Monogamy exists. STD tests exist.
The pill exists. IUDs exist. Sponges exist. Diaphraghms exist. You know you can use more than one form of birth control at once, yes?
Oh plus: Sometimes women want to be pregnant.
The morning after pill exists. Backup methods of birth control exist. *yawn*
Plus, you've already made the point that you're even opposed to sex that involves two women... so I don't see how any of these issues concern lesbians (the HIV transmission rate for girl-on-girl action is like 0, lesbians can't get pregnant from having sex with other women and lesbians probably aren't using condoms).

by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:How is perfection undesirable? It's the only possible reason for being, to strive toward becoming as perfect as possible.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am


by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am
Tlaceceyaya wrote:1: Yes, and so does the flu. Does that mean you should avoid all human contact?
2: Yes, and most people view it as a wonderful thing. It brings new life into the world; a whole new life to experience the joys and pains of existence.
3: Neither do vaccines.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:16 am

by The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:18 am

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:20 am
The pill exists. IUDs exist. Sponges exist. Diaphraghms exist. You know you can use more than one form of birth control at once, yes?
Oh plus: Sometimes women want to be pregnant.
1. Other than abortion, these can all fail, and many are unpleasant. Abortion is also an unpleasant and psychologically troubling experience.
2. They only want to be pregnant in order to reproduce. Externalized reproduction would fix this.
The morning after pill exists. Backup methods of birth control exist. *yawn*
Plus, you've already made the point that you're even opposed to sex that involves two women... so I don't see how any of these issues concern lesbians (the HIV transmission rate for girl-on-girl action is like 0, lesbians can't get pregnant from having sex with other women and lesbians probably aren't using condoms).
Sex between two women can still potentially transmit some diseases.
Besides, I still don't believe that sex and love are simultaneously compatible. They are non-commuting operators.
Still, lesbians are the least bad of a bad thing.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:21 am
The Rich Port wrote:... So why are you even bothering?
Normally, I'd expect you to make the "it's the journey, not the destination" argument, which I guess would be OK, but YOUR journey involves isolating yourself from everyone that can make the journey interesting.

by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am
Dakini wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
1. How can I trust them to always be monogamous?
2. STD tests produce false negatives on occasion, you know.
1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.
1. Other than abortion, these can all fail, and many are unpleasant. Abortion is also an unpleasant and psychologically troubling experience.
2. They only want to be pregnant in order to reproduce. Externalized reproduction would fix this.
1. The failure rate on all of these is low and when combined with one of more forms of birth control (e.g. the pill + spermicidal sheets + condom) you're pretty much not going to get pregnant. Not every woman experiences abortion as a psychologically troubling experience and even if they did, who do you think you are to tell women they should not take these risks anyway? We're big girls, we can take care of ourselves, thank you very much. If I want to go sky diving, I don't want you to try and tell me I shouldn't. I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself and making my own decisions, thank you very much. Please refrain from patronizing me and acting like you know what's best for me when you clearly don't.
2. It doesn't need to be fixed. As much as it would be convenient, I'm fine with the idea of getting pregnant eventually (and actually, a few women I know have experienced pregnancy as a positive experience).
Sex between two women can still potentially transmit some diseases.
Rates are pretty low for the ones that can't be cured.Besides, I still don't believe that sex and love are simultaneously compatible. They are non-commuting operators.
Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.Still, lesbians are the least bad of a bad thing.
...uh huh. So now you're promoting heterophobia?
And you still haven't acknowledged the other post where I point out that you don't know anything at all about my dietary preferences and made a bunch of false claims about what I believe.

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:I try to give up all my desires completely. I try to completely isolate myself from friendship, love, and human contact. I put myself through hell, all to become morally perfect. And people still judge me as bad for it.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:26 am
Farnhamia wrote:It's so gratifying to know that everyone loves lesbians (I wonder if the netowkrs would be interested in a sit-com?). And yes, he is promoting heterophobia. He's promoting complete celibacy, complete isolation and complete emotional detachment. Kind of like in that Simon and Garfunkel song,"I Am A Rock."

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:26 am
Dakini wrote:1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.
1. The failure rate on all of these is low and when combined with one of more forms of birth control (e.g. the pill + spermicidal sheets + condom) you're pretty much not going to get pregnant. Not every woman experiences abortion as a psychologically troubling experience and even if they did, who do you think you are to tell women they should not take these risks anyway? We're big girls, we can take care of ourselves, thank you very much. If I want to go sky diving, I don't want you to try and tell me I shouldn't. I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself and making my own decisions, thank you very much. Please refrain from patronizing me and acting like you know what's best for me when you clearly don't.
2. It doesn't need to be fixed. As much as it would be convenient, I'm fine with the idea of getting pregnant eventually (and actually, a few women I know have experienced pregnancy as a positive experience).
Rates are pretty low for the ones that can't be cured.
Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.
...uh huh. So now you're promoting heterophobia?
And you still haven't acknowledged the other post where I point out that you don't know anything at all about my dietary preferences and made a bunch of false claims about what I believe.

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:28 am

by Tlaceceyaya » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.
It's a scientifically explicable, neurochemically reductionist process. I can learn everything there is to know about it from reading.
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Seibertron » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am

by Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am
Dakini wrote:Farnhamia wrote:It's so gratifying to know that everyone loves lesbians (I wonder if the netowkrs would be interested in a sit-com?). And yes, he is promoting heterophobia. He's promoting complete celibacy, complete isolation and complete emotional detachment. Kind of like in that Simon and Garfunkel song,"I Am A Rock."
And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.

by Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:32 am
Farnhamia wrote:Dakini wrote:And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.
And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:34 am
You're comfortable with being pregnant? Doesn't that mean that you think women should be pregnant, or at least that it's a good thing when they get pregnant?
But still nonzero.
It's a scientifically explicable, neurochemically reductionist process. I can learn everything there is to know about it from reading.
How does that follow?
[/quote]
Fine, my response is this. You're not judgmental enough.

by The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:35 am
Farnhamia wrote:Dakini wrote:And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.
And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.


by Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:36 am
Norstal wrote:Farnhamia wrote:And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.
Oh my God Farn.
I wanna see Eve's Daughter (the separatist feminist) expression when she sees that a guy is aligned with her views. It'll be so damn funny and ironic.

by The Congregationists » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:56 am
Farnhamia wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:I try to give up all my desires completely. I try to completely isolate myself from friendship, love, and human contact. I put myself through hell, all to become morally perfect. And people still judge me as bad for it.
Not bad, just ... misguided.
And what a great idea for a song.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Heavenly Assault, Ifreann, In-dia, Incelastan, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, USS Monitor, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement