NATION

PASSWORD

Feminist type.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:08 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Dakini wrote:Newsflash: You're not perfect.


I know. That's the problem that needs fixing.

You didn't address other two most recent posts I made.

Also, I fail to see how your sacrifice of happiness has made you more perfect. You haven't explained it at all.
Last edited by Dakini on Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:08 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:It's certainly desirable, but it's just not possible.

If perfection were all we strived for, we'd probably be more miserable than we are already, and that's saying a lot.

The universe isn't perfect, life isn't perfect, and our most perfect people are still imperfect.

IMO, it would take me a few trillion years to reach perfection, and even then I wouldn't want it.


Misery is a fair price. Happiness just gets in the way of self-betterment.


If perfection isn't possible, then you spent your whole life being miserable trying to achieve something that is cosmologically impossible.

That's like diving into a black hole thinking Heaven is on the other side of the event horizon.

If you think you can do this, you need a humility check.

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:12 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Natapoc wrote:If you had 1% of the science backing up you're ideas as the vegan movement has I'd be interested. But you've still not shown any science that actually backs up your assertions.


HIV exists. Pregnancy exists. Condoms don't always work.


1: Yes, and so does the flu. Does that mean you should avoid all human contact?
2: Yes, and most people view it as a wonderful thing. It brings new life into the world; a whole new life to experience the joys and pains of existence.
3: Neither do vaccines.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:13 am

Dakini wrote:Monogamy exists. STD tests exist.


1. How can I trust them to always be monogamous?

2. STD tests produce false negatives on occasion, you know.

The pill exists. IUDs exist. Sponges exist. Diaphraghms exist. You know you can use more than one form of birth control at once, yes?
Oh plus: Sometimes women want to be pregnant.


1. Other than abortion, these can all fail, and many are unpleasant. Abortion is also an unpleasant and psychologically troubling experience.

2. They only want to be pregnant in order to reproduce. Externalized reproduction would fix this.

The morning after pill exists. Backup methods of birth control exist. *yawn*

Plus, you've already made the point that you're even opposed to sex that involves two women... so I don't see how any of these issues concern lesbians (the HIV transmission rate for girl-on-girl action is like 0, lesbians can't get pregnant from having sex with other women and lesbians probably aren't using condoms).


Sex between two women can still potentially transmit some diseases. Besides, I still don't believe that sex and love are simultaneously compatible. They are non-commuting operators.

Still, lesbians are the least bad of a bad thing.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:How is perfection undesirable? It's the only possible reason for being, to strive toward becoming as perfect as possible.

And then what?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am

Norstal wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:How is perfection undesirable? It's the only possible reason for being, to strive toward becoming as perfect as possible.

And then what?


You enjoy it.

Or you hate it, if misery comes along with it.

And you're never satisfied.

THE END. :lol:

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:15 am

Tlaceceyaya wrote:1: Yes, and so does the flu. Does that mean you should avoid all human contact?
2: Yes, and most people view it as a wonderful thing. It brings new life into the world; a whole new life to experience the joys and pains of existence.
3: Neither do vaccines.


1. I tend to avoid human contact anyway. I can't trust other people to be properly hygienic. They're all disease farms, as far as I'm concerned.

2. But the pregnancy itself sucks.

3. Not quite a perfect analogy. Vaccines are good for everyone who isn't allergic. They help at all times. Condoms are only necessary because we have sex.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:16 am

Norstal wrote:And then what?


You never get to perfection, so there is no "Then what?" to be had.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:18 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Norstal wrote:And then what?


You never get to perfection, so there is no "Then what?" to be had.


... So why are you even bothering?

Normally, I'd expect you to make the "it's the journey, not the destination" argument, which I guess would be OK, but YOUR journey involves isolating yourself from everyone that can make the journey interesting.

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:20 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Dakini wrote:Monogamy exists. STD tests exist.


1. How can I trust them to always be monogamous?

2. STD tests produce false negatives on occasion, you know.

1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.

The pill exists. IUDs exist. Sponges exist. Diaphraghms exist. You know you can use more than one form of birth control at once, yes?
Oh plus: Sometimes women want to be pregnant.


1. Other than abortion, these can all fail, and many are unpleasant. Abortion is also an unpleasant and psychologically troubling experience.

2. They only want to be pregnant in order to reproduce. Externalized reproduction would fix this.

1. The failure rate on all of these is low and when combined with one of more forms of birth control (e.g. the pill + spermicidal sheets + condom) you're pretty much not going to get pregnant. Not every woman experiences abortion as a psychologically troubling experience and even if they did, who do you think you are to tell women they should not take these risks anyway? We're big girls, we can take care of ourselves, thank you very much. If I want to go sky diving, I don't want you to try and tell me I shouldn't. I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself and making my own decisions, thank you very much. Please refrain from patronizing me and acting like you know what's best for me when you clearly don't.
2. It doesn't need to be fixed. As much as it would be convenient, I'm fine with the idea of getting pregnant eventually (and actually, a few women I know have experienced pregnancy as a positive experience).

The morning after pill exists. Backup methods of birth control exist. *yawn*

Plus, you've already made the point that you're even opposed to sex that involves two women... so I don't see how any of these issues concern lesbians (the HIV transmission rate for girl-on-girl action is like 0, lesbians can't get pregnant from having sex with other women and lesbians probably aren't using condoms).


Sex between two women can still potentially transmit some diseases.

Rates are pretty low for the ones that can't be cured.

Besides, I still don't believe that sex and love are simultaneously compatible. They are non-commuting operators.

Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.

Still, lesbians are the least bad of a bad thing.

...uh huh. So now you're promoting heterophobia?

And you still haven't acknowledged the other post where I point out that you don't know anything at all about my dietary preferences and made a bunch of false claims about what I believe.
Last edited by Dakini on Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:21 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:21 am

The Rich Port wrote:... So why are you even bothering?

Normally, I'd expect you to make the "it's the journey, not the destination" argument, which I guess would be OK, but YOUR journey involves isolating yourself from everyone that can make the journey interesting.


It's the drive toward perfection that matters. As you get closer, you become better. Happiness is a bad thing, as it leads to complacency.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Norstal wrote:And then what?


You never get to perfection, so there is no "Then what?" to be had.

Then you're not working towards perfection. Just something entirely different. Kinda like a ship being lost, trying to search for a non-existent lighthouse.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111682
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am

Dakini wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
1. How can I trust them to always be monogamous?

2. STD tests produce false negatives on occasion, you know.

1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.


1. Other than abortion, these can all fail, and many are unpleasant. Abortion is also an unpleasant and psychologically troubling experience.

2. They only want to be pregnant in order to reproduce. Externalized reproduction would fix this.

1. The failure rate on all of these is low and when combined with one of more forms of birth control (e.g. the pill + spermicidal sheets + condom) you're pretty much not going to get pregnant. Not every woman experiences abortion as a psychologically troubling experience and even if they did, who do you think you are to tell women they should not take these risks anyway? We're big girls, we can take care of ourselves, thank you very much. If I want to go sky diving, I don't want you to try and tell me I shouldn't. I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself and making my own decisions, thank you very much. Please refrain from patronizing me and acting like you know what's best for me when you clearly don't.
2. It doesn't need to be fixed. As much as it would be convenient, I'm fine with the idea of getting pregnant eventually (and actually, a few women I know have experienced pregnancy as a positive experience).


Sex between two women can still potentially transmit some diseases.

Rates are pretty low for the ones that can't be cured.

Besides, I still don't believe that sex and love are simultaneously compatible. They are non-commuting operators.

Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.

Still, lesbians are the least bad of a bad thing.

...uh huh. So now you're promoting heterophobia?

And you still haven't acknowledged the other post where I point out that you don't know anything at all about my dietary preferences and made a bunch of false claims about what I believe.

It's so gratifying to know that everyone loves lesbians (I wonder if the netowkrs would be interested in a sit-com?). And yes, he is promoting heterophobia. He's promoting complete celibacy, complete isolation and complete emotional detachment. Kind of like in that Simon and Garfunkel song,"I Am A Rock."
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55628
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:23 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:I try to give up all my desires completely. I try to completely isolate myself from friendship, love, and human contact. I put myself through hell, all to become morally perfect. And people still judge me as bad for it.


You know who to make them stop?

Stop judging them.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:26 am

Farnhamia wrote:It's so gratifying to know that everyone loves lesbians (I wonder if the netowkrs would be interested in a sit-com?). And yes, he is promoting heterophobia. He's promoting complete celibacy, complete isolation and complete emotional detachment. Kind of like in that Simon and Garfunkel song,"I Am A Rock."

And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.

User avatar
Four-sided Triangles
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5537
Founded: Aug 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:26 am

Dakini wrote:1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.


1. But trust is never absolute. There's always doubt.
2. But false negatives do occur, yes?

1. The failure rate on all of these is low and when combined with one of more forms of birth control (e.g. the pill + spermicidal sheets + condom) you're pretty much not going to get pregnant. Not every woman experiences abortion as a psychologically troubling experience and even if they did, who do you think you are to tell women they should not take these risks anyway? We're big girls, we can take care of ourselves, thank you very much. If I want to go sky diving, I don't want you to try and tell me I shouldn't. I'm perfectly capable of taking care of myself and making my own decisions, thank you very much. Please refrain from patronizing me and acting like you know what's best for me when you clearly don't.
2. It doesn't need to be fixed. As much as it would be convenient, I'm fine with the idea of getting pregnant eventually (and actually, a few women I know have experienced pregnancy as a positive experience).


You're comfortable with being pregnant? Doesn't that mean that you think women should be pregnant, or at least that it's a good thing when they get pregnant?

Rates are pretty low for the ones that can't be cured.


But still nonzero.

Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.


It's a scientifically explicable, neurochemically reductionist process. I can learn everything there is to know about it from reading.

...uh huh. So now you're promoting heterophobia?


How does that follow?

And you still haven't acknowledged the other post where I point out that you don't know anything at all about my dietary preferences and made a bunch of false claims about what I believe.


Fine, my response is this. You're not judgmental enough.
This is why gay marriage will destroy American families.
Gays are made up of gaytrinos and they interact via faggons, which are massless spin 2 particles. They're massless because gays care so much about their weight, and have spin 2, cause that's as much spin as particles can get, and liberals love spin. The exchange of spin 2 particles creates an attractive force between objects, which is why gays are so promiscuous. When gays get "settle down" into a lower energy state by marrying, they release faggon particles in the form of gaydiation. Everyone is a little bit gay, so every human body has some gaytrinos in it, meaning that the gaydiation could cause straight people to be attracted to gays and choose to turn gay.

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55628
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:28 am

Dakini wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Misery is a fair price. Happiness just gets in the way of self-betterment.

Newsflash: You're not perfect.


add on:

And you never will be perfect.
Last edited by The Black Forrest on Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:28 am, edited 1 time in total.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Tlaceceyaya
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9932
Founded: Oct 17, 2011
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Tlaceceyaya » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Says a virgin who has abstained from relationships. What the fuck do you think you know about love, romance or sex? What you've read? Let me tell you: you don't know the first thing about what you're talkin about here.


It's a scientifically explicable, neurochemically reductionist process. I can learn everything there is to know about it from reading.


You can understand that it creates certain effects, but if you do not experience them then you cannot truly judge them.
Economic Left/Right -9.75, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian -8.87
Also, Bonobos.
I am a market socialist, atheist, more to come maybe at some point
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

User avatar
Seibertron
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1265
Founded: Oct 10, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Seibertron » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Natapoc wrote:If you had 1% of the science backing up you're ideas as the vegan movement has I'd be interested. But you've still not shown any science that actually backs up your assertions.


HIV exists. Pregnancy exists. Condoms don't always work.

Are these reasons why sex is wrong?
But it isn't just that though is it? You are also against men having erections, non- reproductive acts like oral and anal and even just thinking about sex.
Join the Super Robot Mecha Multiverse today!
メリー クリスマス

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111682
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:30 am

Dakini wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:It's so gratifying to know that everyone loves lesbians (I wonder if the netowkrs would be interested in a sit-com?). And yes, he is promoting heterophobia. He's promoting complete celibacy, complete isolation and complete emotional detachment. Kind of like in that Simon and Garfunkel song,"I Am A Rock."

And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.

And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:32 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Dakini wrote:And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.

And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.

Oh my God Farn.

I wanna see Eve's Daughter (the separatist feminist) expression when she sees that a guy is aligned with her views. It'll be so damn funny and ironic.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:34 am

Four-sided Triangles wrote:
Dakini wrote:1. You develop trust.
2. False positives are more common.


1. But trust is never absolute. There's always doubt.
2. But false negatives do occur, yes?

1. No there isn't. I trust my partner completely, I wouldn't have married him if I didn't. Just because you have never experienced absolute trust doesn't mean that it doesn't exist.
2. HIV tests are run twice before results are returned to a patient. The odds of two false positives (or false negatives) is very low since the odds of a single false negative or positive is low (you should know how to calculate the probability on this). They run them twice for both initially negative and positive results because a false positive is often linked with things like suicide while a false negative can lead to someone thinking they're safe when they're not.


You're comfortable with being pregnant? Doesn't that mean that you think women should be pregnant, or at least that it's a good thing when they get pregnant?

I think that if a woman wants to be pregnant, it's a good thing if she gets pregnant. If she doesn't want to be pregnant, it's a good thing if she remains un-pregnant.
Women neither should nor shouldn't be pregnant at any given time; it should be up to the individual woman to decide when she's ready to be pregnant and then if she does make this choice, I wish her all luck in her attempts.


But still nonzero.

There's a nonzero risk that I'll be hit by a car if I walk outside. Should I abstain from going outside too?


It's a scientifically explicable, neurochemically reductionist process. I can learn everything there is to know about it from reading.

As someone who has experienced love and sex simultaneously I can tell you that at the very least, your literature review is incomplete (and also, you know, the study of human sexuality is ongoing).


How does that follow?

Lesbians are better than heterosexual women? How is that not heterophobic?


Fine, my response is this. You're not judgmental enough.
[/quote]
Who died and made you god?
Last edited by Dakini on Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:35 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Dakini wrote:And of course, he does this all while patronizing women on top of it and claiming to be a feminist. yippie.

And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.


Gah, you're right.

The more we argue with him, the more he can say the world is trying to break his morals.

BAD TRP. *smacks self* :(

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111682
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:36 am

Norstal wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:And we fall for it and stroke his ego by arguing with him. You know, I heard about these things, they're new, called ... blogs, I think, some sort of interwebs thingy you can use to put your thoughts and musings out there for people to read. Kind of like a public diary. Maybe FST should get one.

Oh my God Farn.

I wanna see Eve's Daughter (the separatist feminist) expression when she sees that a guy is aligned with her views. It'll be so damn funny and ironic.

No kidding.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
The Congregationists
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1770
Founded: May 15, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Congregationists » Thu Dec 08, 2011 11:56 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Four-sided Triangles wrote:I try to give up all my desires completely. I try to completely isolate myself from friendship, love, and human contact. I put myself through hell, all to become morally perfect. And people still judge me as bad for it.

Not bad, just ... misguided.

And what a great idea for a song.


A winter's day in a deep and dark December ...

The FIRST thing that popped into my mind. Good call :clap:
•Criticism of sentimental love, marriage, sex, religion, and rituals.
•Valuing reason over emotion and imagination
•Ironic, indirect, and impersonal (objective) representation of ideas.
•Uncompromising criticism of romantic illusions.
•Advocacy of pragmatism and disapproval of idealism and ideology.
•Especially vehement opposition to neo-liberalism, social democracy, communism, libertarianism and feminism.
•Satirisation of irrational and whimsical attitudes of the so-called creative class.
•Criticism of social, political, cultural, and moral customs and manners of the contemporary society.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Heavenly Assault, Ifreann, In-dia, Incelastan, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, USS Monitor, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads