And sex improves their well-being, as well as bringing in new sentient lifeforms which can enjoy life. We base morality on our instincts - As social mammals, we view helping others as good.
Advertisement

by Tlaceceyaya » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:35 am
Dimitri Tsafendas wrote:You are guilty not only when you commit a crime, but also when you do nothing to prevent it when you have the chance.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:37 am
1000 Cats wrote:And what does that involve? The pursuit of pleasure and happiness? The realization of the basic drives they were born with? Emotional self-actualization? Frankly, I don't see how roboticizing the world is maximizing its well-being.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:38 am
Natapoc wrote:What you're not seeming to understand is that it's not the fact that you are specifically targeting one gender or the other or both for your critique (still you should admit you have talked much more about what you view as flawed about females then what you view as flawed about males)
It's that you have a desire to control the sexuality of others as if you had any say at all in what others do or a right to judge it in all cases. Even in the case of a pure, innocent sexual relationship in which no objectification is there and both partners are doing it out of love and desire.
Sex is neither unhygienic, Dangerous, Irrational, nor is it degrading unless it's made to be so by the individuals participating.
You should support your assertions better because this sounds like typical patriarchy enabling talking points to me.

by 1000 Cats » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:41 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:1000 Cats wrote:And what does that involve? The pursuit of pleasure and happiness? The realization of the basic drives they were born with? Emotional self-actualization? Frankly, I don't see how roboticizing the world is maximizing its well-being.
Freed from as many base biological desires and needs as possible, humanity can focus on greater things, like intellectual and artistic pursuits, and the fostering of universal compassion.
Norstal wrote:You are a hatiater: one who radiates hate.
Meryuma wrote:No one is more of a cat person than 1000 Cats!
FST wrote:Any sexual desires which can be satiated within a healthy and consensual way should be freed from shame. Bizarre kinks and fetishes are acceptable and nothing to be ashamed of as long as they are acted out in a context where everyone consents and no one is hurt.

by Natapoc » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:46 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Natapoc wrote:What does that even mean? Now you're ranking oppression? is racial discrimination not as real as sexual discrimination? How can you say that one form of discrimination is fundamentally more "primary" then others?
You haven't kept up with radical feminism, have you?

by AiliailiA » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:52 am

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:05 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Natapoc wrote:From your position of male privilege I suppose pushing your assertions about others sexuality(you've still not explained why sex is bad for women) on people seems totally natural and normal.
If I push it on women it's sexist. If I push it on women and men it's still sexist. I can't win.
Sex is unhygienic,
dangerous,
irrational,
and degrading.
What further explanation is necessary?

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:09 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Red Indos2 wrote:I'd have to say the same thing about eating.
If there were a feasible way to eliminate that, I'd advocate food celibacy too.
Don't you get it? I hate my humanity. I hate my body. I hate my biological needs. I hate my desires. I hate the mistakes that I make.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:10 am
Dakini wrote:And how about you don't project your hatred for all of this onto other people?

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:11 am

by Kvatchdom » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:12 am

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:12 am
Dakini wrote:Why? Why should others hate them? Because you do? Because you know better than us poor heroin-addict equivalent women?

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:18 am

by Seibertron » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:19 am
Natapoc wrote:Four-sided Triangles wrote:
I'm pushing it on men too, you know. I'm advocating it as universal for everyone. The only way to permanently and completely get rid of sexism is to get rid of sex entirely. No genders = no gender discrimination.
From your position of male privilege I suppose pushing your assertions about others sexuality(you've still not explained why sex is bad for women) on people seems totally natural and normal.

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:19 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Of course. Most IG's do.
You wish to affect the human race. Her gender has as much of a say in the matter as we do.

by The Black Forrest » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:21 am

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:24 am
The Black Forrest wrote:Internet Genius.
You do not know what is best for all. You know what is best for you.

by Great Nepal » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:25 am

by The Rich Port » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:26 am

by The Aryan Nations » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:29 am
Four-sided Triangles wrote:Tlaceceyaya wrote:1: Why not? It's natural.
2: So you would just genetically engineer all babies to be male?
3: No it doesn't. For bonobos, it's mostly used for social bonding.
4: Why?
5: Yes, but so is eating, or socializing.
1. So is cancer.
2. If genetic engineering reaches that point, the decision belongs to the parent(s).
3. And that means that it doesn't require one to view others as a sex object? Besides, we're not bonobos. They're cousins.
4. I don't know, it's just hard not to. The penis is forced in. Look, this is a bit too graphic for NSG.
5. Not really. Socialization is a higher-order function, and eating is unavoidable.

by The Aryan Nations » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:31 am

by Dakini » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:33 am

by Four-sided Triangles » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:37 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Comfed, Heavenly Assault, Ifreann, In-dia, Incelastan, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Port Caverton, Shrillland, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, USS Monitor, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement