Not Our School, You've Got The AIDS

by **New England and The Maritimes** » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:19 pm

Bulgharia wrote:Well I feel sorry for you - you're not guilty.

Such a relief, god forbid he had... *gasp*... *gulp* s...s.... I can't say it!

by **Erinkita** » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:21 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Bulgharia wrote:Well I feel sorry for you - you're not guilty.

Such a relief, god forbid he had... *gasp*... *gulp* s...s.... I can't say it!

*she.

Which would probably make it a lot worse had I engaged in the unthinkable horror of... *thunder*... coitus. It'd probably make me a vile temptress of some sort.

by **Farnhamia** » Fri Dec 09, 2011 8:28 pm

Erinkita wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Such a relief, god forbid he had... *gasp*... *gulp* s...s.... I can't say it!

*she.

Which would probably make it a lot worse had I engaged in the unthinkable horror of... *thunder*... coitus. It'd probably make me a vile temptress of some sort.

Oh, we have openings for all kinds of temptresses, my dear. Vile, of course, and sly and stealthy ... We should talk.

Oh, and coitus is not a requirement. We did away with that in the 1600s.

by **Desperate Measures** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:17 am

I'm learning a lot in this thread. I'm gonna go spit on my girlfriend until she gets pregnant.

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:38 am

The fact is HIV people should be isolated,because they are dangerous. This school is commiting discriminacy, but the boy can transmit the disease.

By the way, most HIV people are driven crazy by the thought of being ill. There was a case in my country, where a man had sex with 72 women trying to infect them.

by **Dazchan** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:44 am

Bulgharia wrote:The fact is HIV people should be isolated,because they are dangerous.

Or... they could be treated like normal people. Because, you know, that's what they are.

Bulgharia wrote:This school is commiting discriminacy, but the boy can transmit the disease.

Only through certain bodily fluids coming into direct contact with a mucous membrane or an open wound.

Bulgharia wrote:By the way, most HIV people are driven crazy by the thought of being ill.

Yeah, I'm gonna need a source for that one, champ.

Bulgharia wrote:There was a case in my country, where a man had sex with 72 women trying to infect them.

I'm guessing that man is not the boy whose been rejected from this school, which makes this almost entirely irrelevant.

by **Erinkita** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:45 am

Bulgharia wrote:The fact is HIV people should be isolated,because they are dangerous. This school is commiting discriminacy, but the boy can transmit the disease.

Ah yes, the concentration camps for the diseased. Margaret Thatcher thought of it before you.

Bulgharia wrote:By the way, most HIV people are driven crazy by the thought of being ill. There was a case in my country, where a man had sex with 72 women trying to infect them.

Well, that little anecdote is certainly a convincing argument. As we all know, one man who may or may not exist certainly constitutes "most HIV people".
Bulgharia, I ask you sincerely, please stop acting as if you know what you're talking about.

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:47 am

Can't you read? That man was driven crazy by the disease, that's why he did it. And imagine that:

The boy is accepted into school. On the second day, he meets super hot girl, which however, refuse to go with him because he has AIDS. Then, he rapes her, trying to make her ill.

by **Farnhamia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:48 am

Bulgharia wrote:Can't you read? That man was driven crazy by the disease, that's why he did it. And imagine that:

The boy is accepted into school. On the second day, he meets super hot girl, which however, refuse to go with him because he has AIDS. Then, he rapes her, trying to make her ill.

You base this on what?

by **Milks Empire** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:48 am

Bulgharia wrote:Can't you read? That man was driven crazy by the disease

Source.

by **Farnhamia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:49 am

Desperate Measures wrote:I'm learning a lot in this thread. I'm gonna go spit on my girlfriend until she gets pregnant.

one of you will swell up if you do that but I guarantee it won't be her.

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:49 am

He stated it on a TV show. He wasn't convicted by the way.
Farnhamia, on my imagination. What if this boy decide to give some punishments?

by **Desperate Measures** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:49 am

Bulgharia wrote:The fact is HIV people should be isolated,because they are dangerous. This school is commiting discriminacy, but the boy can transmit the disease.

By the way, most HIV people are driven crazy by the thought of being ill. There was a case in my country, where a man had sex with 72 women trying to infect them.

There was a case in my country where a man knifed 72 women to death. We must ban knives. And men.

by **Erinkita** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:49 am

Bulgharia wrote:Can't you read? That man was driven crazy by the disease, that's why he did it. And imagine that:

The boy is accepted into school. On the second day, he meets super hot girl, which however, refuse to go with him because he has AIDS. Then, he rapes her, trying to make her ill.

Oh my god! That situation which you just invented and have no reason to believe will ever happen is absolutely terrifying!
(By the way, he has HIV, not AIDS)
But what if a man who doesn't have HIV meets a super hot girl who refuses to go with him for some other reason? We must isolate all men!

by **Milks Empire** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:50 am

Bulgharia wrote:He stated it on a TV show.

Source.

by **Dazchan** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:50 am

Bulgharia wrote:Can't you read?

Fortunately, yes.

Bulgharia wrote: That man was driven crazy by the disease, that's why he did it.

Source?

Preferably one that says that this is a common occurrence and not just one person who happened to be both mentally ill and HIV+

Bulgharia wrote:And imagine that:

The boy is accepted into school. On the second day, he meets super hot girl, which however, refuse to go with him because he has AIDS. Then, he rapes her, trying to make her ill.

Because 13 year old HIV+ boys are all rapists?

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:51 am

The healthy man can still decide to rape her - then he will be a rapist and will be convicted.
But HIV men can transmit diseases and still rape - they are more dangerous.

by **Erinkita** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:52 am

Bulgharia wrote:The healthy man can still decide to rape her - then he will be a rapist and will be convicted.
But HIV men can transmit diseases and still rape - they are more dangerous.

Do you have a reason to believe this boy might be a rapist?

by **Dazchan** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:53 am

Bulgharia wrote:The healthy man can still decide to rape her - then he will be a rapist and will be convicted.
But HIV men can transmit diseases and still rape - they are more dangerous.

You seem to have overlooked the part where you have to demonstrate that this boy is a rapist.

by **Desperate Measures** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:53 am

Farnhamia wrote:
Desperate Measures wrote:I'm learning a lot in this thread. I'm gonna go spit on my girlfriend until she gets pregnant.

one of you will swell up if you do that but I guarantee it won't be her.

huh?

Hmmmm.... perhaps I should go educate myself before I follow this "spit on the lady" path. I'll use things like books and doctors and "thinking".

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:54 am

At the moment - no? But he can decide to do such things if he is rejected by the society (which he will be).

That's why, he must be isolated.

by **Milks Empire** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:54 am

Dazchan wrote:
Bulgharia wrote:The healthy man can still decide to rape her - then he will be a rapist and will be convicted.
But HIV men can transmit diseases and still rape - they are more dangerous.

You seem to have overlooked the part where you have to demonstrate that this boy is a rapist.

You have a better chance of seeing me get pregnant the old-fashioned way than of ever seeing Bulgharia do anything but dodge challenges like that (and I'm a guy).

by **Dazchan** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:55 am

Bulgharia wrote:At the moment - no? But he can decide to do such things if he is rejected by the society (which he will be).

That's why, he must be isolated.

So in order to prevent him from turning into a rapist through societal rejection (which you've yet to prove that he will), you plan to reject him from society?

by **Bulgharia** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:56 am

You're not a man. You already stated that you are a gay.

by **Four-sided Triangles** » Sat Dec 10, 2011 1:56 am

Are we finished playing with this one yet?

Not Our School, You've Got The AIDS

Who is online