NATION

PASSWORD

Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Hitler
48
37%
Stalin
59
45%
Mao
23
18%
 
Total votes : 130

User avatar
Mirkana
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1971
Founded: Oct 08, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Mirkana » Fri May 29, 2009 2:49 am

Hitler. Stalin and Mao never tried to kill people for the crime of being born.
Impeach Ramses, Legalize Monotheism, Slavery is Theft, MOSES 1400 BCE

Pro: Democracy, Egalitarianism, Judaism, Separation of Church and State, Israel, Arab Spring, Gay Rights, Welfare, Universal Healthcare, Regulated Capitalism, Scientific Rationalism, Constitutional Monarchy
Against: Dictatorships, Racism, Nazism, Theocracy, Anti-Semitism, Sexism, Homophobia, Imperialism, Creationism, Genocide, Slavery

Alien Space Bats wrote:
Rokartian States wrote:There sure is a lot of damning and fucking going around in here. :lol:

It's the international nature of the board.

In some places, it's Saturday night; in other places, Sunday morning.


Blazedtown wrote:Because every decision ever is a secret conspiracy to keep the brothers down.

User avatar
Querinos
Diplomat
 
Posts: 508
Founded: Jan 01, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Querinos » Fri May 29, 2009 3:12 am

Hernan Cortes

User avatar
Lizardiar
Minister
 
Posts: 3171
Founded: May 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Lizardiar » Fri May 29, 2009 3:39 am

Mirkana wrote:Hitler. Stalin and Mao never tried to kill people for the crime of being born.


Didn't Hitler kill Jews just because they were there?
In all corners of the globe, the free people's slogan is this:
Speak to Fascists in the language of fire! With words of bullets! With sharp wit of bayonets!



Economic Left/Right: 4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Ring of Isengard
Diplomat
 
Posts: 840
Founded: Feb 22, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Ring of Isengard » Fri May 29, 2009 3:44 am

Lizardiar wrote:
Mirkana wrote:Hitler. Stalin and Mao never tried to kill people for the crime of being born.


Didn't Hitler kill Jews just because they were there?

No.
CI
Economic Left/Right: -5.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.97
Add 3399 to post count (+puppet)

Europe was created by history. America was created by philosophy - Maggie T

User avatar
Lizardiar
Minister
 
Posts: 3171
Founded: May 21, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Lizardiar » Fri May 29, 2009 3:47 am

Then why did he kill them?
In all corners of the globe, the free people's slogan is this:
Speak to Fascists in the language of fire! With words of bullets! With sharp wit of bayonets!



Economic Left/Right: 4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.41

User avatar
Puchi
Secretary
 
Posts: 28
Founded: Dec 13, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Puchi » Fri May 29, 2009 4:02 am

Lizardiar wrote:Then why did he kill them?

In Nazi ideology, because they were evil. They intentionally harmed the society.

You see, during the middle ages Jews were not allowed to own land (and hence farm) or practice trade. So the only thing that was left was money lending. That meant the Jews became an educated segment of society, This turned into an advantage in the 20th century when educat5ion was suddenly much more valuable, which led to the Jews occupying top posts: they were the lawyers, the doctors, the scientisits, the bankers. Freud, Einstein... The Jews became overrepresented in the upper class. Of course, ethincal Germans got jealous, and the Nazis started claiming that the Jews were the elite because of a sionist conspiracy. The Jews killed Jesus because they are evil. The Jews caused Germany's defeat in World War I because they are evil. The Jews brought on the great depression (when someone's rucher than you, it's easy to blame him for your poverty) because they are evil. So let's kill them so they won't be able to cause any more harm!It's hard to believe that most of Germany fell for this fucked up logic.

Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.

Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.

I don't think Marx is to blame. He created the ideology, sure. But that's like blaming Nobel for everyone who died because of dynamite. Or hell, let's blame the inventor of the wheel for car deaths! And the manufactures of knives for any murder done by a knife!

The ones who did (or ordered in this case) the actual killing are to blame. If you read the communist manifesto, Marx didn't intend for the bourgouise to be physically destroyed: simply have their property confisticated and become the working class (not that I agree with that either, but that's not the point).

User avatar
82 Eridani
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Feb 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin?

Postby 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 4:13 am

Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama
America's right wing really is going crazy.

The Romulan Republic wrote:To elaborate on what I just posted, I think that both men were mentally disturbed to some extent,
Very likely, we know that they were abused as children.

Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.

Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.
No he did not, Marx made a prediction of the future which turned out to be wrong, he did not actually advocate it (though he did think that the issue would be forced in some countries).

Yootopia wrote:Anyway, Hitler, because he fucked an alright country up, unlike Stalin and Mao, who were working with nothing.
Germany was hardly an alright country when Hitler took power (didn't they teach you about what the economy was like back then).

Pevisopolis wrote:Stalin was simply a dictator who killed more than Hitler (largely through fear, paranoia, and personal bias/dislike) and forever left a black stain on Marxism. I blame Stalin on the attitude of so many people who think Communism is intended to be an authoritarian Dictatorship.
Communism isn't intended as an authoritarian dictatorship, but every time someone tries it that's what the result has ended up being.

Results matter more than intentions.

Milks Empire wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:None of the above. They all helped build the world we live in today. Remember, the villain is just as necessary for progress as the hero.

If nothing else, they provide an example of what not to do.
Most regimes through history are examples of what not to do.

Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:As much of a fucked up, paranoid Georgian Stalin was, with out him the USSR wouldn't have been a super power, let alone beat the Nazis.
I suspect the Trotskyists would disagree with you.

Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Also, those former USSR countries forget that they had people in the government too, so they can't blame Russia for everything. Besides, Stalin was Georgian.
People who would have been sent to Siberia had they angered Stalin.

Would you have said anything about stupid policies if Stalin were your boss?

User avatar
Vojvodina-Nihon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1003
Founded: Jul 27, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin?

Postby Vojvodina-Nihon » Fri May 29, 2009 9:01 am

Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama

I think you made a typo there, friend. You misspelled "George W. Bush." Well, at least you got the right number of letters.







I have to say that, while Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were genocidal, mass-murdering fanatics, their existence is more or less necessary for society to have evolved to what it is today. Without them we never would have learned some important lessons about how easy it is for a normal person like you or me to become an instrument of the systematic extermination of entire races, political groups, and social classes, and how self-serving government policies and autocratic rule can easily cause the deaths of millions. Or something. My opinion on which is worse has already been stated by someone else, anyway, something like whether it was worse to die of cancer of the lungs or of the stomach.
One of many Czardas puppets. I regarded this as my main account upon creating it and for several years thereafter, but these days, that's no longer important.
Death is patient, death is kind.
It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.
It does not dishonour others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.
Death does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.
It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

User avatar
82 Eridani
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Feb 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin?

Postby 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 9:27 am

Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:
Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama

I think you made a typo there, friend. You misspelled "George W. Bush." Well, at least you got the right number of letters.
Well said.

Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:I have to say that, while Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were genocidal, mass-murdering fanatics, their existence is more or less necessary for society to have evolved to what it is today. Without them we never would have learned some important lessons about how easy it is for a normal person like you or me to become an instrument of the systematic extermination of entire races, political groups, and social classes, and how self-serving government policies and autocratic rule can easily cause the deaths of millions. Or something. My opinion on which is worse has already been stated by someone else, anyway, something like whether it was worse to die of cancer of the lungs or of the stomach.
The Milgram experiments were also important in terms of showing us what we can do (it's only due to them being able to get followers that those dictators were able to cause problems).

User avatar
Vojvodina-Nihon
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1003
Founded: Jul 27, 2007
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin?

Postby Vojvodina-Nihon » Fri May 29, 2009 9:32 am

82 Eridani wrote:
Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:
Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama

I think you made a typo there, friend. You misspelled "George W. Bush." Well, at least you got the right number of letters.
Well said.
Ayumutopia was making a joke at the expense of conservatives. I followed up with a joke at the expense of left-wingers (and grammar naz-- er, geeks). My apologies if it failed to amuse.
One of many Czardas puppets. I regarded this as my main account upon creating it and for several years thereafter, but these days, that's no longer important.
Death is patient, death is kind.
It does not envy, it does not boast, it is not proud.
It does not dishonour others, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no record of wrongs.
Death does not delight in evil but rejoices with the truth.
It always protects, always trusts, always hopes, always perseveres.

User avatar
Secruss
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1232
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Secruss » Fri May 29, 2009 10:22 am

Image
Stalin was a great leader.

Mao starved his people to death on ACCIDENT and Hitler drove the Third Reich into the ground.
"How now!" cried Jupiter "Are you not yet content? You have what you asked for and so you have only yourselves to blame for your misfortunes."

User avatar
82 Eridani
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Feb 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 10:46 am

Secruss wrote:Stalin was a great leader.
I hope you're joking.
Last edited by 82 Eridani on Fri May 29, 2009 10:46 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Jaegersland
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 8
Founded: May 09, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Jaegersland » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:12 pm

Stalin didn't start the Communist regime in Russia, and while Hitler did start the Third Reich, I think Mao was the worst, as the Chinese Communist regime is still up today and is quite corrupt, while the ROC in Taiwan is what I would prefer to rule all of China.

User avatar
Falsonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 264
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Falsonia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:14 pm

Jaegersland wrote:Stalin didn't start the Communist regime in Russia, and while Hitler did start the Third Reich, I think Mao was the worst, as the Chinese Communist regime is still up today and is quite corrupt, while the ROC in Taiwan is what I would prefer to rule all of China.


ROC's not much better.

Also, nice gravedig.

User avatar
Ravea
Senator
 
Posts: 3622
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Ravea » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:22 pm

Can we combine all three of them into Hadolf Malin?

Or...Joe Hidong?

Or...Madolf Stitler?
~Omnia mutantur, nihil interit~

User avatar
Falsonia
Envoy
 
Posts: 264
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Falsonia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:26 pm

Ravea wrote:Can we combine all three of them into Hadolf Malin?

Or...Joe Hidong?

Or...Madolf Stitler?


Why don't we create a new triumvirate of evil.

Hadolf Malin, Joe Hidong, and Madolf Stitler.

User avatar
82 Eridani
Attaché
 
Posts: 73
Founded: Feb 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby 82 Eridani » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:30 pm

Jaegersland wrote:Stalin didn't start the Communist regime in Russia,
But he was far worse than the people who did.

Jaegersland wrote:and while Hitler did start the Third Reich, I think Mao was the worst, as the Chinese Communist regime is still up today and is quite corrupt
The current Chinese government is a big improvement over what Mao created (although that's not exactly very hard to do given the great leap backwards he imposed).

Falsonia wrote:
Jaegersland wrote:while the ROC in Taiwan is what I would prefer to rule all of China.
ROC's not much better.
At the moment it very much is a lot better (back when the west started to actually talk to China they were about as bad as each other).

User avatar
Tina Fey
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Apr 11, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Tina Fey » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:08 pm

The Chinese cultural revolution caused the death of 30 million people. And Mao had sex with underage virgins. So just by his idiocy and creepines Mao wins.

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Vetalia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:26 pm

Hitler. He really went above and beyond either of the others in terms of sheer sadistic brutality. Hell, even Lavrentii Beria was tamer than a lot of the top Nazis in the SS...
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
Jello Biafra
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6402
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Jello Biafra » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:27 pm

While the crimes of Stalin and Mao are horrifying, Hitler was a bit worse. While killing someone at all is awful, Hitler targeted people for death specifically, whereas most of Stalin and Mao's killings were random. The law considers deliberate, targeted killing to be worse than random killing, and for good reason.

User avatar
Noble Hierachs
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 4
Founded: Jun 02, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Noble Hierachs » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:28 pm

None, the Prophet of Truth was way better.

User avatar
Maurepas
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36403
Founded: Apr 17, 2009
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Maurepas » Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:32 pm

Imll have to vote Stalin, simply because he's the one Id least want to live with...Mao and Hitler most likely wouldnt have killed me personally, :unsure:

User avatar
Tokyoni
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1335
Founded: Jan 18, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Tokyoni » Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:46 pm

Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.

Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.


This statement is so idiotic I don't even fully know how to respond. It's about parallel to blaming the Crusades, Inquisition, Witch Hunts, and Holocaust on Jesus Christ (all of which were claimed to have his blessing)...
Proud Juche Socialist - VICTORY TO GADAFFI!!!
Citizen of the World.
It is necessary to expose the false propaganda of the imperialists and thoroughly dispel the illusion that the imperialists will give up their positions in the colonies and dependent countries with good will. It is wrong to try to avoid the struggle against imperialism under the pretext that independence and revolution are important, but that peace is still more precious. The oppressed peoples can liberate themselves only through struggle. This is a simple and clear truth confirmed by history.

~ Kim Il-Sung
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
はい、本当に日本語が話せる。
하지만 한국어를 할 수 없어요. 어려워요.

User avatar
Gauntleted Fist
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10061
Founded: Aug 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Gauntleted Fist » Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:47 pm

Tokyoni wrote:
Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.

Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.


This statement is so idiotic I don't even fully know how to respond. It's about parallel to blaming the Crusades, Inquisition, Witch Hunts, and Holocaust on Jesus Christ (all of which were claimed to have his blessing)...

Image

User avatar
Cameroi
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15788
Founded: Dec 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Re: Hitler or Stalin or Mao?

Postby Cameroi » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:58 am

my cat says mao. but i don't always agree with him.
truth isn't what i say. isn't what you say. isn't what anybody says. truth is what is there, when no one is saying anything.

"economic freedom" is "the cake"
=^^=
.../\...

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Cruzes Unidas de Frioborsarmarto, Factorio Inc, La Xinga, Page, Philjia, Shearoa, Singaporen Empire, Tinhampton, Untecna, Uvolla

Advertisement

Remove ads