Advertisement
by Mirkana » Fri May 29, 2009 2:49 am
by Lizardiar » Fri May 29, 2009 3:39 am
Mirkana wrote:Hitler. Stalin and Mao never tried to kill people for the crime of being born.
by Ring of Isengard » Fri May 29, 2009 3:44 am
Lizardiar wrote:Mirkana wrote:Hitler. Stalin and Mao never tried to kill people for the crime of being born.
Didn't Hitler kill Jews just because they were there?
by Lizardiar » Fri May 29, 2009 3:47 am
by Puchi » Fri May 29, 2009 4:02 am
Lizardiar wrote:Then why did he kill them?
Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.
Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.
by 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 4:13 am
America's right wing really is going crazy.Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama
Very likely, we know that they were abused as children.The Romulan Republic wrote:To elaborate on what I just posted, I think that both men were mentally disturbed to some extent,
No he did not, Marx made a prediction of the future which turned out to be wrong, he did not actually advocate it (though he did think that the issue would be forced in some countries).Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.
Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.
Germany was hardly an alright country when Hitler took power (didn't they teach you about what the economy was like back then).Yootopia wrote:Anyway, Hitler, because he fucked an alright country up, unlike Stalin and Mao, who were working with nothing.
Communism isn't intended as an authoritarian dictatorship, but every time someone tries it that's what the result has ended up being.Pevisopolis wrote:Stalin was simply a dictator who killed more than Hitler (largely through fear, paranoia, and personal bias/dislike) and forever left a black stain on Marxism. I blame Stalin on the attitude of so many people who think Communism is intended to be an authoritarian Dictatorship.
Most regimes through history are examples of what not to do.Milks Empire wrote:Big Jim P wrote:None of the above. They all helped build the world we live in today. Remember, the villain is just as necessary for progress as the hero.
If nothing else, they provide an example of what not to do.
I suspect the Trotskyists would disagree with you.Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:As much of a fucked up, paranoid Georgian Stalin was, with out him the USSR wouldn't have been a super power, let alone beat the Nazis.
People who would have been sent to Siberia had they angered Stalin.Chernobyl-Pripyat wrote:Also, those former USSR countries forget that they had people in the government too, so they can't blame Russia for everything. Besides, Stalin was Georgian.
by Vojvodina-Nihon » Fri May 29, 2009 9:01 am
Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama
by 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 9:27 am
Well said.Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama
I think you made a typo there, friend. You misspelled "George W. Bush." Well, at least you got the right number of letters.
The Milgram experiments were also important in terms of showing us what we can do (it's only due to them being able to get followers that those dictators were able to cause problems).Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:I have to say that, while Hitler, Stalin, and Mao were genocidal, mass-murdering fanatics, their existence is more or less necessary for society to have evolved to what it is today. Without them we never would have learned some important lessons about how easy it is for a normal person like you or me to become an instrument of the systematic extermination of entire races, political groups, and social classes, and how self-serving government policies and autocratic rule can easily cause the deaths of millions. Or something. My opinion on which is worse has already been stated by someone else, anyway, something like whether it was worse to die of cancer of the lungs or of the stomach.
by Vojvodina-Nihon » Fri May 29, 2009 9:32 am
Ayumutopia was making a joke at the expense of conservatives. I followed up with a joke at the expense of left-wingers (and grammar naz-- er, geeks). My apologies if it failed to amuse.82 Eridani wrote:Well said.Vojvodina-Nihon wrote:Ayumutopia wrote:Hitler or Stalin? They're nothing compared to their fellow socialist authoritarian Barack Obama
I think you made a typo there, friend. You misspelled "George W. Bush." Well, at least you got the right number of letters.
by Secruss » Fri May 29, 2009 10:22 am
by 82 Eridani » Fri May 29, 2009 10:46 am
I hope you're joking.Secruss wrote:Stalin was a great leader.
by Jaegersland » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:12 pm
by Falsonia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:14 pm
Jaegersland wrote:Stalin didn't start the Communist regime in Russia, and while Hitler did start the Third Reich, I think Mao was the worst, as the Chinese Communist regime is still up today and is quite corrupt, while the ROC in Taiwan is what I would prefer to rule all of China.
by Ravea » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:22 pm
by Falsonia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:26 pm
Ravea wrote:Can we combine all three of them into Hadolf Malin?
Or...Joe Hidong?
Or...Madolf Stitler?
by 82 Eridani » Tue Jun 02, 2009 6:30 pm
But he was far worse than the people who did.Jaegersland wrote:Stalin didn't start the Communist regime in Russia,
The current Chinese government is a big improvement over what Mao created (although that's not exactly very hard to do given the great leap backwards he imposed).Jaegersland wrote:and while Hitler did start the Third Reich, I think Mao was the worst, as the Chinese Communist regime is still up today and is quite corrupt
At the moment it very much is a lot better (back when the west started to actually talk to China they were about as bad as each other).Falsonia wrote:ROC's not much better.Jaegersland wrote:while the ROC in Taiwan is what I would prefer to rule all of China.
by Tina Fey » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:08 pm
by Vetalia » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:26 pm
by Jello Biafra » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:27 pm
by Noble Hierachs » Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:28 pm
by Maurepas » Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:32 pm
by Tokyoni » Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:46 pm
Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.
Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.
Saurisia wrote:People's Empire of the Rising Juche Sun
by Gauntleted Fist » Tue Jun 02, 2009 10:47 pm
Tokyoni wrote:Northwest Slobovia wrote:[x] Karl Marx.
Marx provided the insidiously brutal ideology that justified both Mao and Stalin (and also Pol Pot). Hitler briefly flirted with the commies as well. No Marx, no great butchers of the 20th century.
This statement is so idiotic I don't even fully know how to respond. It's about parallel to blaming the Crusades, Inquisition, Witch Hunts, and Holocaust on Jesus Christ (all of which were claimed to have his blessing)...
by Cameroi » Wed Jun 03, 2009 12:58 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aadhiris, Cruzes Unidas de Frioborsarmarto, Factorio Inc, La Xinga, Page, Philjia, Shearoa, Singaporen Empire, Tinhampton, Untecna, Uvolla
Advertisement