Hiddenrun wrote:If you can't afford it, you shouldn't have it.
Or not.
Advertisement
by Hydesland » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:41 am
by Treznor » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:42 am
Hiddenrun wrote:What a crock of shit.Treznor wrote:It's also profit-based. They therefore have a vested interest in taking money from people, while giving back as little as possible. That's not help so much as exploitation.
You buy rental insurance. It covers the value of all the goods within your rental unit. You pay a premium based on calculations of the value of your goods, and the assessed risk of their loss or damage. You pay that premium and hope that nothing ever actually happens. If something does happen, you collect, most likely far in excess of anything you have actually paid in. How is that fucking exploitation?
Hiddenrun wrote:And that's exactly as it should be. Why should the insurance company foot the bill for your idiocy? If you are paying low premiums because you were assessed as low risk, and suddenly you start making claims left and right, the insurance company is absolutely right in changing your assessed risk level to high, and upping your premiums.Treznor wrote: Got a little risk, because you had a traffic ticket or a previous illness? They won't cover you the way you're likely to need it. Too many problems? They'll help you so far and no farther.
Hiddenrun wrote:Treznor wrote:Sorry, profit-based assistance tends to fall far short of the mark. I'm looking for compassion, not greed.
Go to your mom for compassion. I'm not giving it. Your version of compassion is exactly what I'm taking about. Refusing to take care of yourself, or make necessary preparations, because you think someone should do this for you. You whine that insurance companies aren't compassionate enough, yet if you bothered to look into it, you'd find that compassion isn't nearly as important as ensuring you are covered in case of loss. Taking that step towards self-sufficiency is infinitely more practical than hoping for random compassion from strangers.
Help yourself. Say it, love it, live it.
by Trippoli » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:42 am
Hiddenrun wrote:Accident of birth? You're right, it's unfair that some people are born stupid, ugly, boring, or any number of unpleasant and undesired adjectives. Is that my problem? Should I be subsidizing the stupid, ugly, boring, or what have you?
Fuck. No.
by Hiddenrun » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:43 am
SD_Film Artists wrote:It seems like there's a lack of understanding here that it's an 'emergancy service' and 'helping the country' thing rather than a 'have sympathy on the poor' thing.
Poliwanacraca wrote:
Personally, I fail to see why we should worry about the opinions of self-centered little shits who think it's a horrible offense for the government to spend tax money on saving people's lives. If you drive on roads built with public funds, use products developed through publicly funded research, call the publicly funded police if someone breaks into your house, use running water connected to sewer systems built with public funds - if, in short, you do not live in a cave cut off from all society - you have ALREADY accepted the premise that the government should use tax money to improve people's lives. You don't like it? Go live in that cave and shit in a bucket. No one will miss you.
by Treznor » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:44 am
by Czardas » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:45 am
Hiddenrun wrote:Czardas wrote:Wait, you think people should be judged on what they contribute to the state, but you don't think the state should have any power to govern its citizens the way it best sees fit?
Someone who cannot work or in anyway care for themselves, is no good to themselves, to me, or to society.
by RoI2 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:46 am
by Kryozerkia » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:46 am
Trippoli wrote:Hiddenrun wrote:Accident of birth? You're right, it's unfair that some people are born stupid, ugly, boring, or any number of unpleasant and undesired adjectives. Is that my problem? Should I be subsidizing the stupid, ugly, boring, or what have you?
Fuck. No.
I guess it's safe to say that every Conservative are just cold-hearted dicks.
by Mackedamia » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:46 am
by Hiddenrun » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 am
Post-Unity Terra wrote:I'm not entirely sure what you're trying to say here. What you posted didn't make any sense, I was just correcting, not trying to make any kind of point.
Ourobora wrote:Not everyone is intelligent.
Not everyone is physically capable.
Yes, and intelligent people prepare for this.Ourobora wrote:'Bad things' can happen to anyone.
Paying for people to sit on welfare doesn't provide me with a place to drive or draw potable water from, now does it?Ourobora wrote:You pay taxes for roads, police, national disaster relief, a military, and probably space programs.
Ourobora wrote:I seriously don't understand why humans ought not to help other humans out.
by Niicha » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 am
Hiddenrun wrote:Niicha wrote:I have a few questions for Hiddenrun, and I apologize if it detracts. How do you feel about your taxes paying for things such as military, fire, police and garbage services? Do you not believe in some sort of social contract or any other societal obligations?
I think pretty much all of these things can be taken care of by private enterprise, with sensitive areas such as policing or military having some government oversight.
by Reagan States » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:47 am
Treznor wrote:
Yes, because people who are going through a crisis are going to have all the resources and stability they need to sue multi-billion dollar corporates for breach of contract. That makes perfect sense.
by Barringtonia » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:48 am
Hiddenrun wrote:Everyone else can frankly fuck off and get their hands out of my wallet.
by Hamilay » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:48 am
Mackedamia wrote:I think that this idea makes sense, heal thcare in my opinion, should only cover major health problems, cover heart attacks, sezures(if it is the first time you get one) strokes, most cancer treatments, and the inital costs of repairing a broken bone. I don't want to pay for little jimmys' flu shot because his mom threw there money away on material posetions for her son when she cheated on his father!
by Buxtahatche » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:48 am
by Trippoli » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:48 am
by Duetopia » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:49 am
by Non Aligned States » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:50 am
Hiddenrun wrote:If you want something, then find the means to acquire it yourself. It's fairly simple. Even the worst paying job in America will allow you to eat, clothe yourself in the most basic of ways and access some sort of shelter. If you desire goods or services beyond that, then work harder.
Hiddenrun wrote:No, it's arrogant and stupid not to plan for the worst.
by Czardas » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:50 am
Duetopia wrote:Free Soviets wrote:
jefferson would do just as well on this point. 'your stuff' is only yours because society says so. society can change the terms through legitimate democratic processes. you got a job on the understanding that your pay would include taxes, so it is no complaint at all to say that you are being taxed. you could try to argue that you shouldn't be taxed or that tax money shouldn't be used in certain ways. but the claim that stuff is yours does not ground either of those claims.
come on man, present arguments.
Not at all. Your property cannot be constitutionally taken away without due process. Thus US Constitution recognizes private ownership as a natural right. Notice that is recognizes it as such -- not establishes it as such.
The only taxes that the Constitution authorizes the government to collect are in order to fulfill its mandate. No new mandates may be established without a constitutional amendment (due to limitations set forth in the 10th amendment). Income tax may be imposed because of the 16h amendment, but it doesn't change the fact that what government does with the money may not be more than what the government is required to do.
Or to put it even more plainly, the 10th amendment forbids the government from doing anything that the government is not required to do by the Constitution. That includes (without limitation) prohibition on attempting to establish social justice. That is not to say that the government has to forestall social justice, it just means that it may not do anything to work towards it.
by Buxtahatche » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:50 am
Trippoli wrote:So Hiddenrun, this is your America?
Everyone is on their own, walking the same path to success, you see someone nearby collapse, dying. What do you do? Sounds like you walk on by, and you do.
As you march on, more and more people drop like flies. Until finally, YOU drop. You cry for helps and everybody ignores you, just walks on by. Because your "too Fat, or lazy, or stupid." Is that what YOU want?
by Poliwanacraca » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:51 am
Hiddenrun wrote:This does not translate into helping paraplegic mentally deficient people so they can continue to do absolutely nothing to improve our overall standard of living.
by Ourobora » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:51 am
by Duetopia » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:51 am
by RoI2 » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:51 am
Kryozerkia wrote:
RoI2, knock off the playground insults. If you can't be civil, don't bother posting.
by Trippoli » Fri Sep 04, 2009 8:52 am
Buxtahatche wrote:Trippoli wrote:So Hiddenrun, this is your America?
Everyone is on their own, walking the same path to success, you see someone nearby collapse, dying. What do you do? Sounds like you walk on by, and you do.
As you march on, more and more people drop like flies. Until finally, YOU drop. You cry for helps and everybody ignores you, just walks on by. Because your "too Fat, or lazy, or stupid." Is that what YOU want?
Sure is. In fact, that's ALL I want. To succeed of fail BY MY OWN MERIT. To rise to the level of my ability and stick there. That is what America is about. Let a man's friends help him when he is down- the government has no business mandating charity.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Elejamie, Fartsniffage, Nioya, The Black Forrest, The Matthew Islands, Uiiop
Advertisement