NATION

PASSWORD

Another blogger killed by the Zetas.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Zarkenis Ultima
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43383
Founded: Feb 22, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Zarkenis Ultima » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:13 am

United World Order wrote:
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:
While that is true, legalizing drugs would still cut off their source of income. They would run out of money, eventually.


You really beileve there gonna legalize? People have been trying for years to legalize such drugs...Mostly why they were illegalized was because of its addictiveness and the side effects. Legalize Pot yeah i see that happening but all drugs? No thats not gonna happen no matter what.


No, I don't believe that. You commented that legalizing drugs wouldn't make that much of an impact because they were fighting for territory. I merely pointed out that if such a thing happened they would eventually run out of funds.
Hello! I'm your friendly neighborhood roleplayer cat. If you need any help, send me a TG and I'll see what I can do!
P2TM Community Discussion Thread
Take a look at my latest roleplay! Come journey with us to somewhere in the dark.

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:15 am

New Manvir wrote:
United World Order wrote:
Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.


And why do they have that money? Because the US governments drug policies have led to a plant, that has been cultivated for thousands of years in almost any environment, being sold for more per ounce than silver and other precious metals.

They fight for territory, so they can control such a lucrative black market. Eliminate the Black Market and you eliminate the violence.


You think they'd figure that out anytime soon? Probably not

User avatar
Anemos Major
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12691
Founded: Jun 01, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Anemos Major » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:15 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:
Arkinesia wrote:Ooh, Zetas, you so cool, you hang fat nerds.

Who the fuck can take these guys seriously? They're the late-20s version of the high school bully. Kick 'em in the nuts and they'll learn their place.

Seriously? They're just about the most dangerous organised crime syndicate on the planet. "Kicking them in the nuts" is what the Mexican government has tried for years. And it lost and is a failed state now, at least in the parts of the country the cartels call their own.


Being Japanese, and fully aware of Japanese organised crime, I can't help but view the Zetas with disdain.

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:16 am

Zarkenis Ultima wrote:
United World Order wrote:
You really beileve there gonna legalize? People have been trying for years to legalize such drugs...Mostly why they were illegalized was because of its addictiveness and the side effects. Legalize Pot yeah i see that happening but all drugs? No thats not gonna happen no matter what.


No, I don't believe that. You commented that legalizing drugs wouldn't make that much of an impact because they were fighting for territory. I merely pointed out that if such a thing happened they would eventually run out of funds.


I understand but by the time that happens they will have enough saved for years.

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:16 am

North Calaveras wrote:Exactly how "enormously helpful" has it been?

I wouldn't know, but it clearly hasn't been a magical pill.

Still, it's better to give a pill to someone and not have them recover, than it is to smother them to death with a pillow.

United World Order wrote:Well where else you gonna find it? FOX? NBC? bullshit.. they hardly talk about it.

True, but that doesn't mean I'll trust someone who knows just as much as me, which is to say almost nothing at all.
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:16 am

North Calaveras wrote:Exactly how "enormously helpful" has it been?

Well, Mexico still exists. Hard to think it wouldn't be even more of a narco state already if the government couldn't count on a massive backer. And, although the environment is different, you've got to remember that US assistance eventually allowed the Colombian government to defeat FARC and the Colombian cartels for the most part. That's why there's indications that a lot of the coca farming is happening further north (or in Venezuela) now. I think as the government gets more control in former FARC areas, that'll only get more, and so the governments in Central America will get taken over by the Mexican cartels.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:18 am

Anemos Major wrote:
Neu Leonstein wrote:Seriously? They're just about the most dangerous organised crime syndicate on the planet. "Kicking them in the nuts" is what the Mexican government has tried for years. And it lost and is a failed state now, at least in the parts of the country the cartels call their own.


Being Japanese, and fully aware of Japanese organised crime, I can't help but view the Zetas with disdain.


Their two different organazations so to speak. So their pretty different. By Japanese Organised Crime you mean the Yakuza?

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:18 am

Tubbsalot wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Exactly how "enormously helpful" has it been?

I wouldn't know, but it clearly hasn't been a magical pill.

Still, it's better to give a pill to someone and not have them recover, than it is to smother them to death with a pillow.

United World Order wrote:Well where else you gonna find it? FOX? NBC? bullshit.. they hardly talk about it.

True, but that doesn't mean I'll trust someone who knows just as much as me, which is to say almost nothing at all.


Stop comparing to a pill, that's a terrible way to put it in perspective. You just said aid would be enormously helpful and then you said that the US is already providing said aid and I asked how that's working out and all you got it

" I wouldn't know" Why would you say it's helpful and the US is already doing it yet show no evidence of progress?
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Zarkenis Ultima
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43383
Founded: Feb 22, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Zarkenis Ultima » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:18 am

United World Order wrote:
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:
No, I don't believe that. You commented that legalizing drugs wouldn't make that much of an impact because they were fighting for territory. I merely pointed out that if such a thing happened they would eventually run out of funds.


I understand but by the time that happens they will have enough saved for years.


Yes, yes they would. I don't have arguments to deny that. I was just saying.
Last edited by Zarkenis Ultima on Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Hello! I'm your friendly neighborhood roleplayer cat. If you need any help, send me a TG and I'll see what I can do!
P2TM Community Discussion Thread
Take a look at my latest roleplay! Come journey with us to somewhere in the dark.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:19 am

Anemos Major wrote:Being Japanese, and fully aware of Japanese organised crime, I can't help but view the Zetas with disdain.

Well, organised crime in Japan is certainly less socially disruptive. Only having seen a few documentaries, they seem to be governed by standards of behaviour. But then, the Japanese state has a kind of weird relationship with them anyway. Prostitution and gambling seem more tolerable businesses than industrial-scale drug logistics, anyway.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:19 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Exactly how "enormously helpful" has it been?

Well, Mexico still exists. Hard to think it wouldn't be even more of a narco state already if the government couldn't count on a massive backer. And, although the environment is different, you've got to remember that US assistance eventually allowed the Colombian government to defeat FARC and the Colombian cartels for the most part. That's why there's indications that a lot of the coca farming is happening further north (or in Venezuela) now. I think as the government gets more control in former FARC areas, that'll only get more, and so the governments in Central America will get taken over by the Mexican cartels.


Mexico will exist even if narcos had 100%, the nation of Mexico would still exist, just under different management.
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:19 am

Zarkenis Ultima wrote:
United World Order wrote:
I understand but by the time that happens they will have enough saved for years.


Yes, yes they would. I don't have arguments to deny that. I was just saying.


Yeah i know, I was just explaining is all.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:20 am

United World Order wrote:
Zarkenis Ultima wrote:
No, I don't believe that. You commented that legalizing drugs wouldn't make that much of an impact because they were fighting for territory. I merely pointed out that if such a thing happened they would eventually run out of funds.


I understand but by the time that happens they will have enough saved for years.

Ideally at that point they just retire and live the lives of rich people.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:20 am

United World Order wrote:
New Manvir wrote:
And why do they have that money? Because the US governments drug policies have led to a plant, that has been cultivated for thousands of years in almost any environment, being sold for more per ounce than silver and other precious metals.

They fight for territory, so they can control such a lucrative black market. Eliminate the Black Market and you eliminate the violence.


You think they'd figure that out anytime soon? Probably not


If I keep yelling, maybe they will eventually. I'm tired of tolerating this stupid bullshit.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
Neu Leonstein
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5771
Founded: Oct 23, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Neu Leonstein » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:22 am

North Calaveras wrote:Mexico will exist even if narcos had 100%, the nation of Mexico would still exist, just under different management.

That seems a tad pedantic. I know Mexico wouldn't suddenly turn into a big whole. But the state would no longer be around. The new management would presume one cartel having sufficient control over the entire country, which if it was possible seems to be many years of warfare away.
“Every age and generation must be as free to act for itself in all cases as the age and generations which preceded it. The vanity and presumption of governing beyond the grave is the most ridiculous and insolent of all tyrannies. Man has no property in man; neither has any generation a property in the generations which are to follow.”
~ Thomas Paine

Economic Left/Right: 2.25 | Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.33
Time zone: GMT+10 (Melbourne), working full time.

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:22 am

New Manvir wrote:
United World Order wrote:
You think they'd figure that out anytime soon? Probably not


If I keep yelling, maybe they will eventually. I'm tired of tolerating this stupid bullshit.


You should.

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:23 am

United World Order wrote:
New Manvir wrote:
If I keep yelling, maybe they will eventually. I'm tired of tolerating this stupid bullshit.


You should.


I should what?
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:23 am

Neu Leonstein wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Mexico will exist even if narcos had 100%, the nation of Mexico would still exist, just under different management.

That seems a tad pedantic. I know Mexico wouldn't suddenly turn into a big whole. But the state would no longer be around. The new management would presume one cartel having sufficient control over the entire country, which if it was possible seems to be many years of warfare away.


Correct, but "Mexico" would still exist
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
Tubbsalot
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9196
Founded: Oct 17, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Tubbsalot » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:23 am

North Calaveras wrote:Stop comparing to a pill, that's a terrible way to put it in perspective. You just said aid would be enormously helpful and then you said that the US is already providing said aid and I asked how that's working out and all you got it

" I wouldn't know" Why would you say it's helpful and the US is already doing it yet show no evidence of progress?

I compared it to that once. Take a chill pill.

As NL has pointed out, Mexico still exists, and it's hard to know whether that would be the state without US security/intel assistance. It might not have rid the country of gangs, but that doesn't mean it's been useless - you have to rein them in before you can bring them down.

North Calaveras wrote:Mexico will exist even if narcos had 100%, the nation of Mexico would still exist, just under different management.

I doubt that would be much comfort to anyone involved.
"Twats love flags." - Yootopia

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:23 am

Arkinesia wrote:Ooh, Zetas, you so cool, you hang fat nerds.
Who the fuck can take these guys seriously? They're the late-20s version of the high school bully. Kick 'em in the nuts and they'll learn their place.


Los Zetas is a much more serious threat in that, they're just as dangerous (if not more so) than the mafia was at their peak. They make insane amounts of money with their illegal activities and can buy weapons which will often outgun the police. Mexico can't even begin to take them on, until they can get corruption under control.
Last edited by Saiwania on Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:30 am, edited 5 times in total.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:24 am

Cartels controling Mexico? Impossible they'd be fighting way to much to actually run the country. It will just make things worse for Mexico

User avatar
North Calaveras
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16483
Founded: Mar 22, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby North Calaveras » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:24 am

Tubbsalot wrote:
North Calaveras wrote:Stop comparing to a pill, that's a terrible way to put it in perspective. You just said aid would be enormously helpful and then you said that the US is already providing said aid and I asked how that's working out and all you got it

" I wouldn't know" Why would you say it's helpful and the US is already doing it yet show no evidence of progress?

I compared it to that once. Take a chill pill.

As NL has pointed out, Mexico still exists, and it's hard to know whether that would be the state without US security/intel assistance. It might not have rid the country of gangs, but that doesn't mean it's been useless - you have to rein them in before you can bring them down.

North Calaveras wrote:Mexico will exist even if narcos had 100%, the nation of Mexico would still exist, just under different management.

I doubt that would be much comfort to anyone involved.


1. I already stated that it would still exist

2. Obviously
Government: Romanist Ceasarist Dictatorship
Political Themes: Nationalism, Romanticism, Ceasarism, Militarism, Social Liberalism, Cult of Personality
Ethnic Groups: American, Latino, Filipino

User avatar
United World Order
Senator
 
Posts: 4180
Founded: Jun 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United World Order » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:25 am

New Manvir wrote:
United World Order wrote:
You should.


I should what?


Keep yelling.

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:29 am

United World Order wrote:
New Manvir wrote:
I should what?


Keep yelling.


I'll keep doing that.

The Drug War pisses me off. It's a manufactured problem with a simple remedy that we keep continuing to ignore. It's as if society shot itself in the foot, and then instead of reaching for the phone and first aid kit that's right beside us, we stare at the gaping wound and yell at it to heal itself.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

User avatar
New Manvir
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6821
Founded: Jan 06, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby New Manvir » Sat Nov 12, 2011 12:32 am

North Calaveras wrote:
Tubbsalot wrote:More precisely, authoritarian policies have provided financial opportunities for such gangs. Those policies don't necessarily foster gang activity, in and of themselves.


Again, I look forward to the day where the extra pressure on Mexico from your ill-conceived punishment causes a national collapse and exponential growth in illegal activity and problems leaking into the US.


Cause you have a better idea huh?

I'm just giving my "ill-conceived" opinion on the matter. I would never want Mexico to collapse, I never even hinted towards that. I would be more down to instal a military dictatorship.


There are plenty of better ideas, and all of them cost less money and kill less people.
I am from Canada | I'm some kind of Socialist | And also Batman
"Never be deceived that the rich will permit you to vote away their wealth." - Lucy Parsons
Socialism is an economic system characterised by social ownership of the means of production and co-operative management of the economy. "Social ownership" may refer to cooperative enterprises, common ownership, state ownership, citizen ownership of equity, or any combination of these. There are many varieties of socialism and there is no single definition encapsulating all of them. They differ in the type of social ownership they advocate, the degree to which they rely on markets or planning, how management is to be organised within productive institutions, and the role of the state in constructing socialism.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, The Matthew Islands, Upper Ireland

Advertisement

Remove ads