Another blogger killed by the Zetas.

[North Calaveras]

The one thing i love about totalitarian regimes, this kind of shit gets put down fast.

[Neu Leonstein]

Then you stop taking retarded stances toward the whole thing and legalize marijuana and take away a huge chunk of their profits/motivation.

This.

Mexico is screwed, Honduras, Guatemala and so on are even more screwed. And all because of the war on drugs. If you let big pharma provide cocaine and methadone on a large scale, you take away the demand and the cartels will eat themselves up. It's not hard. It's just politically infeasible.

[Neu Leonstein]

The one thing i love about totalitarian regimes, this kind of shit gets put down fast.

That's only because the regime is the cartel. North Korea is a good case in point.

[North Calaveras]

The one thing i love about totalitarian regimes, this kind of shit gets put down fast.

That's only because the regime is the cartel. North Korea is a good case in point.

Exactly, we shouldn't treat Mexico as an ally anymore, they are way to corrupt and are leaking their violence and crime into the US.

[Pieman City]

Silly internet users trying to actually take on real problems with petty threats.


Some people are getting far too big headed with all the hacking going on. Makes em think they're invincible. And now more people are dead. Good job them

[Tubbsalot]

Exactly, we shouldn't treat Mexico as an ally anymore, they are way to corrupt and are leaking their violence and crime into the US.

I agree. We should cut off all support to Mexico, so that the USA has almost a new Somalia on its borders to leak violence and crime in. Finally, Southerners will be bitching about an actual problem. Totally worth it.

[Norstal]

That's only because the regime is the cartel. North Korea is a good case in point.

Exactly, we shouldn't treat Mexico as an ally anymore, they are way to corrupt and are leaking their violence and crime into the US.

Boy, am I glad you're not one of our diplomats.

[North Calaveras]

Exactly, we shouldn't treat Mexico as an ally anymore, they are way to corrupt and are leaking their violence and crime into the US.

I agree. We should cut off all support to Mexico, so that the USA has almost a new Somalia on its borders to leak violence and crime in. Finally, Southerners will be bitching about an actual problem. Totally worth it.

Did I say cut off all support? Think before you type.

[New Manvir]

I read that a lot of the Zetas are ex-Kaibalis(sp?). They're a highly trained special ops group(Guatamal, I believe), and their training desensitizes them to taking life. You can't just "kicak then in the nuts". This isn't high school. It's the real world you're playing in, and.people.will die.

Then you stop taking retarded stances toward the whole thing and legalize marijuana and take away a huge chunk of their profits/motivation.

Seriously, this. All this blood is being spilled for no reason, other than Harry Anslinger being a huge fucking cunt 70 years ago.

[Tubbsalot]

I agree. We should cut off all support to Mexico, so that the USA has almost a new Somalia on its borders to leak violence and crime in. Finally, Southerners will be bitching about an actual problem. Totally worth it.

Did I say cut off all support? Think before you type.

No, you said "don't treat them as an ally anymore," which I guess implies an even more extreme reaction than the one I noted. Would you support an invasion of Mexico, perhaps? Shall we just kill everyone in the country? Problem solved, I guess.

Consider the possibility that you were less-than-exact in your wording.

[New Manvir]

The one thing i love about totalitarian regimes, this kind of shit gets put down fast.

Authoritarian policies by the state is the reason for this existing in the first place.

[North Calaveras]

Did I say cut off all support? Think before you type.

No, you said "don't treat them as an ally anymore," which I guess implies an even more extreme reaction than the one I noted. Would you support an invasion of Mexico, perhaps? Shall we just kill everyone in the country? Problem solved, I guess.

Consider the possibility that you were less-than-exact in your wording.

I might have been but really? killing everyone in mexico? That's crazy, even for me lol

I say we start punishing them for their problem leaking into our nation.

[United World Order]

Then you stop taking retarded stances toward the whole thing and legalize marijuana and take away a huge chunk of their profits/motivation.

This.

Mexico is screwed, Honduras, Guatemala and so on are even more screwed. And all because of the war on drugs. If you let big pharma provide cocaine and methadone on a large scale, you take away the demand and the cartels will eat themselves up. It's not hard. It's just politically infeasible.

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

[Tubbsalot]

Authoritarian policies by the state is the reason for this existing in the first place.

More precisely, authoritarian policies have provided financial opportunities for such gangs. Those policies don't necessarily foster gang activity, in and of themselves.

I might have been but really? killing everyone in mexico? That's crazy, even for me lol

I say we start punishing them for their problem leaking into our nation.

Again, I look forward to the day where the extra pressure on Mexico from your ill-conceived punishment causes a national collapse and exponential growth in illegal activity and problems leaking into the US.

[Tubbsalot]

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

And your source for this is...?

[Zarkenis Ultima]

This.

Mexico is screwed, Honduras, Guatemala and so on are even more screwed. And all because of the war on drugs. If you let big pharma provide cocaine and methadone on a large scale, you take away the demand and the cartels will eat themselves up. It's not hard. It's just politically infeasible.

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

While that is true, legalizing drugs would still cut off their source of income. They would run out of money, eventually.

[United World Order]

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

And your source for this is...?

Youcan find it allover youtube they basicly show off gold plated weapons or the photos of police raids where they find all that,

You want source for The cartels only wanting territory? You don't need a source its pretty logical

[North Calaveras]

Authoritarian policies by the state is the reason for this existing in the first place.

More precisely, authoritarian policies have provided financial opportunities for such gangs. Those policies don't necessarily foster gang activity, in and of themselves.

I might have been but really? killing everyone in mexico? That's crazy, even for me lol

I say we start punishing them for their problem leaking into our nation.

Again, I look forward to the day where the extra pressure on Mexico from your ill-conceived punishment causes a national collapse and exponential growth in illegal activity and problems leaking into the US.

Cause you have a better idea huh?

I'm just giving my "ill-conceived" opinion on the matter. I would never want Mexico to collapse, I never even hinted towards that. I would be more down to instal a military dictatorship.

[Tubbsalot]

Youcan find it allover youtube

That's very useful information for me, but probably not in the way you intended.

You want source for The cartels only wanting territory? You don't need a source its pretty logical

So your source is "it makes sense in my head."

Great.

[United World Order]

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

While that is true, legalizing drugs would still cut off their source of income. They would run out of money, eventually.

You really beileve there gonna legalize? People have been trying for years to legalize such drugs...Mostly why they were illegalized was because of its addictiveness and the side effects. Legalize Pot yeah i see that happening but all drugs? No thats not gonna happen no matter what.

[Tubbsalot]

Cause you have a better idea huh?

I'm just giving my "ill-conceived" opinion on the matter. I would never want Mexico to collapse, I never even hinted towards that. I would be more down to instal a military dictatorship.

Yes, actually, I do. Security assistance for Mexico would be enormously more helpful (and that's what the US is providing right now).

A military dictatorship wouldn't help, considering the country has been basically in a state of emergency for years now. They can't root out the gangs, and that won't change no matter who's at the helm.

[Neu Leonstein]

Silly internet users trying to actually take on real problems with petty threats.

Some people are getting far too big headed with all the hacking going on. Makes em think they're invincible. And now more people are dead. Good job them

I actually applaud what they're doing. They stole a massive list of government officials that are involved in the drug trade. The zetas are killing them for revenge. But they did the right thing nonetheless.

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

They want territory to ship drugs into the US. That's what the fighting is about - wiping out competition for the corridors through which the drugs get shipped.

That's what the Mexican cartels are so good at. They started out as the logistics guys for the Colombians, but with the cartels there getting hammered, eventually the Mexicans integrated more and more of the supply chain into their own organisations. The Zetas joined a bit later when special forces troops switched sides for money, but are much the same otherwise.

[New Manvir]

This.

Mexico is screwed, Honduras, Guatemala and so on are even more screwed. And all because of the war on drugs. If you let big pharma provide cocaine and methadone on a large scale, you take away the demand and the cartels will eat themselves up. It's not hard. It's just politically infeasible.

Umm..The Cartels such as Zetas have all the money and drugs they need hence the gold plated weapons and large stash houses of drugs, They want territory thats what they're fighting for territory, Not for money or drugs...no, they want Territory.

And why do they have that money? Because the US governments drug policies have led to a plant, that has been cultivated for thousands of years in almost any environment, being sold for more per ounce than silver and other precious metals.

They fight for territory, so they can control such a lucrative black market. Eliminate the Black Market and you eliminate the violence.

[United World Order]

Youcan find it allover youtube

That's very useful information for me, but probably not in the way you intended.

You want source for The cartels only wanting territory? You don't need a source its pretty logical

So your source is "it makes sense in my head."

Great.

Well where else you gonna find it? FOX? NBC? bullshit.. they hardly talk about it.

[North Calaveras]

Cause you have a better idea huh?

I'm just giving my "ill-conceived" opinion on the matter. I would never want Mexico to collapse, I never even hinted towards that. I would be more down to instal a military dictatorship.

Yes, actually, I do. Security assistance for Mexico would be enormously more helpful (and that's what the US is providing right now).

A military dictatorship wouldn't help, considering the country has been basically in a state of emergency for years now. They can't root out the gangs, and that won't change no matter who's at the helm.

Exactly how "enormously helpful" has it been?