Advertisement
by Aeronos » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:09 pm
by Femnipotent » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:09 pm
Zeth Rekia wrote:I think you man sexual orientation choice, darling. As opposed to misandry.
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:09 pm
Femnipotent wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Because all men are evil and members of the arsonist jaywalker patriarchy.
All of us are part of the patriarchy, by hook or by crook, and all men whether willing are not are the intended recipients of patriarchal power which subjugates women. Whether an individual man is in a position of power over an individual woman or not means nothing in the face of overwhelming societal pressures. Until that changes, I am not going to waste my time on the so called 'good' or 'feminist' men. They can no more change what their society has been set up to give them than I can change the fact that no matter how 'nice' a man is, he will be given power over me. I refuse.
by The Mindset Reborn » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:09 pm
Vellosia wrote:Femnipotent wrote:Oh is this one of those nonsensical arguments that goes, "sure you can form romantic relationships only with women for the rest of your life and engage only in lesbian sex, but you're still actually heterosexual?"
Ok sure, if people want to claim that doing this doesn't matter and I'm still a heterosexual, I suppose the claims are ultimately meaningless as it would change nothing.
Sexuality is what you're attracted to - not how you choose to live.
by Nature-Spirits » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:09 pm
Femnipotent wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Because all men are evil and members of the arsonist jaywalker patriarchy.
All of us are part of the patriarchy, by hook or by crook, and all men whether willing are not are the intended recipients of patriarchal power which subjugates women. Whether an individual man is in a position of power over an individual woman or not means nothing in the face of overwhelming societal pressures. Until that changes, I am not going to waste my time on the so called 'good' or 'feminist' men. They can no more change what their society has been set up to give them than I can change the fact that no matter how 'nice' a man is, he will be given power over me. I refuse.
by Seibertron » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:10 pm
Femnipotent wrote:Blazedtown wrote:
Because all men are evil and members of the arsonist jaywalker patriarchy.
All of us are part of the patriarchy, by hook or by crook, and all men whether willing are not are the intended recipients of patriarchal power which subjugates women. Whether an individual man is in a position of power over an individual woman or not means nothing in the face of overwhelming societal pressures. Until that changes, I am not going to waste my time on the so called 'good' or 'feminist' men. They can no more change what their society has been set up to give them than I can change the fact that no matter how 'nice' a man is, he will be given power over me. I refuse.
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
Nature-Spirits wrote:Femnipotent wrote:All of us are part of the patriarchy, by hook or by crook, and all men whether willing are not are the intended recipients of patriarchal power which subjugates women. Whether an individual man is in a position of power over an individual woman or not means nothing in the face of overwhelming societal pressures. Until that changes, I am not going to waste my time on the so called 'good' or 'feminist' men. They can no more change what their society has been set up to give them than I can change the fact that no matter how 'nice' a man is, he will be given power over me. I refuse.
My household is matriarchal. I, being male, am a feminist and more than happy to let women run the world, as women are superior to men.
by Hydesland » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
by Vellosia » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
Aeronos wrote:As a bisexual female: lol.
Ex-girlfriend was a massive bitch. My present boyfriend treats me much better. You get awful girls, and you get awful guys. It sounds like a pretty awful way to choose sexuality I have to say; one based not on love, but on hate. But whatever, it's ultimately your call I guess...
by Zeth Rekia » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
Femnipotent wrote:Sexual orientation as it is now used refers to so called 'natural' and inherent alignments. My choice is not based on so called 'nature', but rather on a process of self-socialisation based on ideological goals.
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
Hydesland wrote:What makes you think sexual orientation is purely a product of upbringing? Last I checked the evidence for that was particularly weak. Might you be 'choosing' to adopt that view because it is ideologically convenient? Yes, I think you might.
by Ertae » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:11 pm
by Vellosia » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:12 pm
Nature-Spirits wrote:My household is matriarchal. I, being male, am a feminist and more than happy to let women run the world, as women are superior to men.
by Demonatrix » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:12 pm
Femnipotent wrote:The Yremia Corporate wrote:Actually Lesbians have the highest rate of domestic violence, so there goes your bullshit.
Yes, so a group of 'Masculinists' have been trying to claim. Ridiculous. Just the sort of gaslighting I referred to in another thread, where men play the victim and pretend that they are being subjected to stunning physical and emotional and sexual violence at the hands of women, and that feminists are hiding it all behind lies about male violence.
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:12 pm
by Femnipotent » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Mourro wrote:I think this is where the distinction between nature and culture should be made. I think I already mentioned instinct, which in my opinion is basically nature, hence what is 'natural' to us. You seem to describe feelings which are influenced by culture, e.g. certain governments/countries etc telling certain peoples that they ought to live in a certain way, be it directly or more subtly. But when we talk about 'love' and 'attraction', I cannot possibly believe that any rule, government or culture could restrict the nature of those things. If you look at virtually any civilization that ever existed, evidence of all sexualities exists. This is regardless as to whether it was condemned, encouraged or whatever else. I don't think it's a 'given' that we can no longer understand our natural feelings for people any more, only that society has become far more complicated in certain places for us to realise a 'real' attraction.
by Seibertron » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:13 pm
Nature-Spirits wrote:as women are superior to men.
by Nature-Spirits » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:13 pm
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:13 pm
by Zeth Rekia » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:13 pm
The Yremia Corporate wrote:In other words she is only a level 5 feminist, and you need that all important sexuality change or level 7 is out of reach! noooooooo
by Nature-Spirits » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:14 pm
The Yremia Corporate wrote:Oh yeah, someone remind me how women are superior to men?
by The Yremia Corporate » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:14 pm
by Vexenite » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:14 pm
by Gauthier » Fri Nov 11, 2011 12:14 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Deblar, Emotional Support Crocodile, General TN, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Ifreann, Ineva, Ors Might, Plan Neonie, Ravemath, Singaporen Empire, Stellar Colonies, TescoPepsi, The Black Forrest, Tungstan, W3C [Validator], Xoshen
Advertisement