
by I V Stalin » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:35 pm

by Fionnuala_Saoirse » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:37 pm
I V Stalin wrote:Apart from stringing out a tenuous and extremely poor taste metaphor (in fact, could he have found one more offensive?) long beyond breaking point, how far out of touch does this show the Church to be if this sort of rhetoric is not only published but encouraged under its name?

by Makaar » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:38 pm

by Escchelary » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:38 pm

by Dumb Ideologies » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:39 pm
I V Stalin wrote:Apologies if already posted...
A leader of a UK political party, and former London councillor, Alan Craig, has written an article for the Church of England Newspaper, referring to the leaders of gay rights groups as the "Gaystapo" and "the gay Wehrmacht", saying they have occupied the "Sudetenland social uplands of the Home Office" and have "crushed" culture beyond the gay community "under their pink jackboot". Apparently it is "only 1938 and Nazi expansionist ambitions are far from sated". Craig goes on to describe the leaders of Stonewall and OutRage! as "Oberkommandos" and that same-sex marriage would be "the invasion of Poland".
Oh, and the editor of the newspaper has defended the article, though admitted "[Craig] has not won a lot of support with readers". No shit?
Apart from stringing out a tenuous and extremely poor taste metaphor (in fact, could he have found one more offensive?) long beyond breaking point, how far out of touch does this show the Church to be if this sort of rhetoric is not only published but encouraged under its name?

by Bananatria » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:39 pm

by I V Stalin » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:40 pm
Makaar wrote:It's been a couple of years since I last studied Nazi Germany but remind me: were they pro- or anti-gay?

by The Republic of Lanos » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:40 pm


by Milks Empire » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:40 pm
I V Stalin wrote:Apologies if already posted...
A leader of a UK political party, and former London councillor, Alan Craig, has written an article for the Church of England Newspaper, referring to the leaders of gay rights groups as the "Gaystapo" and "the gay Wehrmacht", saying they have occupied the "Sudetenland social uplands of the Home Office" and have "crushed" culture beyond the gay community "under their pink jackboot". Apparently it is "only 1938 and Nazi expansionist ambitions are far from sated". Craig goes on to describe the leaders of Stonewall and OutRage! as "Oberkommandos" and that same-sex marriage would be "the invasion of Poland".
Oh, and the editor of the newspaper has defended the article, though admitted "[Craig] has not won a lot of support with readers". No shit?
Apart from stringing out a tenuous and extremely poor taste metaphor (in fact, could he have found one more offensive?) long beyond breaking point, how far out of touch does this show the Church to be if this sort of rhetoric is not only published but encouraged under its name?

by Allrule » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:41 pm
Makaar wrote:It's been a couple of years since I last studied Nazi Germany but remind me: were they pro- or anti-gay?

by Bananatria » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:41 pm

by Meryuma » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:42 pm
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH

by Marcheria » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:43 pm

by Grave_n_idle » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:44 pm
I V Stalin wrote:Apologies if already posted...
A leader of a UK political party, and former London councillor, Alan Craig, has written an article for the Church of England Newspaper, referring to the leaders of gay rights groups as the "Gaystapo" and "the gay Wehrmacht", saying they have occupied the "Sudetenland social uplands of the Home Office" and have "crushed" culture beyond the gay community "under their pink jackboot". Apparently it is "only 1938 and Nazi expansionist ambitions are far from sated". Craig goes on to describe the leaders of Stonewall and OutRage! as "Oberkommandos" and that same-sex marriage would be "the invasion of Poland".
Oh, and the editor of the newspaper has defended the article, though admitted "[Craig] has not won a lot of support with readers". No shit?
Apart from stringing out a tenuous and extremely poor taste metaphor (in fact, could he have found one more offensive?) long beyond breaking point, how far out of touch does this show the Church to be if this sort of rhetoric is not only published but encouraged under its name?

by The UK in Exile » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:45 pm

by Oterro » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:45 pm

by Bananatria » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:46 pm

by Wikkiwallana » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:50 pm
Dumb Ideologies wrote:Halt!
Just because these people are stupid, wrong and highly dangerous does not mean you have the right to make them feel sad.
Avenio wrote:Just so you know, the use of the term 'sheep' 'sheeple' or any other herd animal-based terminology in conjunction with an exhortation to 'think outside the box' or stop going along with groupthink generally indicates that the speaker is actually more closed-minded on the subject than the people that he/she is addressing. At least, in my experience at least.

by I V Stalin » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:51 pm
The UK in Exile wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/09/gaystapo-alan-craig-gay-rights
"The Church of England Newspaper has no official status. I don't read it and hadn't seen the original article on 28 October. Neither, apparently, had the paper's editor who says he is too busy always to read the stuff he publishes, but assures us that if he had, he would have asked Craig to tone down his language a bit."

by Demonatrix » Wed Nov 09, 2011 1:52 pm
Grave_n_idle wrote:It'spossiblethat 'Alan Craig' is a penis.

by Angleter » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:00 pm

by Ceannairceach » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:02 pm
Demonatrix wrote:Grave_n_idle wrote:It'spossiblethat 'Alan Craig' is a penis.
...Probable... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alan_Craig

by Unslavery » Wed Nov 09, 2011 2:04 pm
I V Stalin wrote:The UK in Exile wrote:http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/nov/09/gaystapo-alan-craig-gay-rights
"The Church of England Newspaper has no official status. I don't read it and hadn't seen the original article on 28 October. Neither, apparently, had the paper's editor who says he is too busy always to read the stuff he publishes, but assures us that if he had, he would have asked Craig to tone down his language a bit."
It carries recruitment adverts for the C of E. The Church is, therefore, implicitly endorsing the newspaper.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Vyahrapura
Advertisement