NATION

PASSWORD

Pregnant mom arrested for forgetting to pay for sandwich

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
OnyxCog
Civil Servant
 
Posts: 10
Founded: Oct 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby OnyxCog » Fri Nov 04, 2011 12:01 pm

The Onyx Cog has something to say about this.

First. Wouldn't it be the cashier or deli workers fault for not making them pay for the sandwiches during checkout?

Second. The fact that the manager had no clue that the child would be taken away is absolute crap. You are having two people arrested what do you think is gonna happen to the child is she going with her parents to booking?

Third. I hope that this manager is fired and spit upon in society because of his retardation.

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:36 am

Conserative Morality wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:How dare that store manager not have any common sense!

Yes, because common sense = "I'm going to break store policy and risk my job for a potential shoplifter because she's pregnant."


Common sense = Letting them pay and not having them arrested. The couple were stupid too. They should have just threw $10 at him and left with their groceries.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:53 am

Wiztopia wrote:Common sense = Letting them pay and not having them arrested. The couple were stupid too. They should have just threw $10 at him and left with their groceries.

Common sense = Letting shoplifters go free by just paying. We've already been over why that's a fucking stupid idea.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:14 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:Common sense = Letting them pay and not having them arrested. The couple were stupid too. They should have just threw $10 at him and left with their groceries.

Common sense = Letting shoplifters go free by just paying. We've already been over why that's a fucking stupid idea.


Letting people who already paid for $50 worth of groceries go free is not a stupid idea.

User avatar
Volnotova
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8214
Founded: Nov 08, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Volnotova » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:16 pm

And in the end, all the bureaucracy involved cost more then those groceries.

:palm: (Repeat ad infinitum)
A very exclusive and exceptional ice crystal.

A surrealistic alien entity stretched thin across the many membranes of the multiverse.
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:You are the most lawful neutral person I have ever witnessed.


Polruan wrote:It's like Humphrey Applebee wrote a chapter of the Talmud in here.

User avatar
Keronians
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18231
Founded: Oct 15, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Keronians » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:18 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:Common sense = Letting them pay and not having them arrested. The couple were stupid too. They should have just threw $10 at him and left with their groceries.

Common sense = Letting shoplifters go free by just paying. We've already been over why that's a fucking stupid idea.


We have?
Proud Indian. Spanish citizen. European federalist.
Political compass
Awarded the Bronze Medal for General Debating at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards. Awarded Best New Poster at the 11th Annual Posters' Awards.
It is almost universally felt that when we call a country democratic we are praising it; consequently, the defenders of every kind of regime claim that it is a democracy, and fear that they might have to stop using the word if it were tied down to any one meaning.
George Orwell
· Private property
· Free foreign trade
· Exchange of goods and services
· Free formation of prices

· Market regulation
· Social security
· Universal healthcare
· Unemployment insurance

This is a capitalist model.

User avatar
The Murtunian Tribes
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6919
Founded: Oct 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby The Murtunian Tribes » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:21 pm

Volnotova wrote:And in the end, all the bureaucracy involved cost more then those groceries.

:palm: (Repeat ad infinitum)

The bureaucracy must expand to meet the needs of the expanding bureaucracy.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:21 pm

Keronians wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Common sense = Letting shoplifters go free by just paying. We've already been over why that's a fucking stupid idea.


We have?

Yes. Whether you agree with the conclusion or not, it has been gone over...
*nods*
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:23 pm

I agree they should have been given a chance to pay for it, the police overreacted, but what difference does it make that she's pregnant? She shouldn't receive special treatment when it comes to paying for things, if that's what you're saying.
Last edited by Geilinor on Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Joshuahood
Diplomat
 
Posts: 902
Founded: Jun 14, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Joshuahood » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:24 pm

Meowfoundland wrote:They should have remembered to pay. It was an overreaction on the store's part, though.

And do people actually eat things from a store before they pay for them?


I saw a woman start eating out of a box of chocolates while waiting in line to pay for them. I wanted to slap her, it was that stupid. Just pay for it, then gorge yourself :palm:
Romulus Dion-Capulet Diablessa Potentia, Son of Elindra Kshrlmnt and Avakael Diablessa. Proud Grandson of Heras Savaer Dion
Former WA Delegate of Unknown
Raids participated in (regardless of outcome): 26

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55645
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:29 pm

Please people.

Let this one die. It's been argued to death and about every possible tangent has been mentioned.

Let it die........
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:04 pm

Joshuahood wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:They should have remembered to pay. It was an overreaction on the store's part, though.

And do people actually eat things from a store before they pay for them?


I saw a woman start eating out of a box of chocolates while waiting in line to pay for them. I wanted to slap her, it was that stupid. Just pay for it, then gorge yourself :palm:


:roll: Because there is totally something wrong with eating while in line. Those damn scumbag thieves should all have their asses beat.

User avatar
Dazchan
Senator
 
Posts: 3779
Founded: Mar 24, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dazchan » Sat Nov 05, 2011 3:45 pm

Wiztopia wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:Common sense = Letting shoplifters go free by just paying. We've already been over why that's a fucking stupid idea.


Letting people who already paid for $50 worth of groceries go free is not a stupid idea.


Dazchan wrote:A lot of the people I went to school with were shoplifters. You know what? Every single one of them would buy something while shoplifting. They did this for two reasons:
1. It made the checkout operator less likely to suspect them of shoplifting in the first place, and
2. If they were caught, they could claim that they forgot about the Mars bar in their pocket

You're quick to call the manager a "retard" for following policy, yet you're ignorant of how shoplifters work.
If you can read this, thank your teachers.

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Sat Nov 05, 2011 6:52 pm

Dazchan wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:
Letting people who already paid for $50 worth of groceries go free is not a stupid idea.


Dazchan wrote:A lot of the people I went to school with were shoplifters. You know what? Every single one of them would buy something while shoplifting. They did this for two reasons:
1. It made the checkout operator less likely to suspect them of shoplifting in the first place, and
2. If they were caught, they could claim that they forgot about the Mars bar in their pocket

You're quick to call the manager a "retard" for following policy, yet you're ignorant of how shoplifters work.


Doesn't matter. They should have just left after giving him the $10. Also not every single person buys something while shoplifting.

User avatar
Dazchan
Senator
 
Posts: 3779
Founded: Mar 24, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dazchan » Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:11 pm

Wiztopia wrote:
Dazchan wrote:


Doesn't matter. They should have just left after giving him the $10.


:palm: Why? If they were genuine shoplifters, then they would be encouraged to do it over and over again.

Wiztopia wrote: Also not every single person buys something while shoplifting.


Because that's totally what I said.
Last edited by Dazchan on Sat Nov 05, 2011 8:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you can read this, thank your teachers.

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Sun Nov 06, 2011 1:51 pm

Dazchan wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:
Doesn't matter. They should have just left after giving him the $10.


:palm: Why? If they were genuine shoplifters, then they would be encouraged to do it over and over again.

Wiztopia wrote: Also not every single person buys something while shoplifting.


Because that's totally what I said.


They probably weren't. Either way we can establish that they were stupid for not leaving after giving him $10. That is what you implied.

User avatar
Dazchan
Senator
 
Posts: 3779
Founded: Mar 24, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dazchan » Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:01 pm

Wiztopia wrote:
Dazchan wrote:
:palm: Why? If they were genuine shoplifters, then they would be encouraged to do it over and over again.



Because that's totally what I said.


They probably weren't.


I found your problem.

Wiztopia wrote:That is what you implied.


No, I really didn't. I stated that every shoplifter I knew does that. The implication is that it is common, not universal.
If you can read this, thank your teachers.

User avatar
Ovisterra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16017
Founded: Jul 17, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Ovisterra » Sun Nov 06, 2011 3:24 pm

Pretty heartless store owner. I mean come on. She honestly forgot to pay for the sandwich, and she then offered to do it when she realized, but that's not enough for Mister Head Up His Own Ass the manager, who obviously hasn't heard of a thing called "an honest mistake".
Removing the text from people's sigs doesn't make it any less true. I stand with Yalta.

User avatar
Cill Charthaigh
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1031
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Pregnant mom arrested for forgetting to pay for sandwich

Postby Cill Charthaigh » Sun Nov 06, 2011 7:49 pm

The store did overreact and yes, it was wrong to detain them. But why the hell does it matter that she's pregnant?
According to OnTheIssues, I'm a moderate libertarian.
Political Compass - Economic Left/Right: -1.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.10


Cill Charthaigh is currently in the year 1984, beginning in the year 1968. On the 2nd of every month, Cill Charthaigh advances by one year.

"Cill Charthaigh I love you. Show us the light, LORD AND SAVIOR" - NSG

please guys give me some love hmmmbbbbb

Let me guess, someone stole your sweet roll?

AT LAST I HAVE RETURNED FROM MY TRAVELS TO REDDIT. I return reformed!

User avatar
The Alma Mater
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 25619
Founded: May 23, 2004
Ex-Nation

Postby The Alma Mater » Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:21 pm

Cill Charthaigh wrote:The store did overreact and yes, it was wrong to detain them. But why the hell does it matter that she's pregnant?


Being forgetful and hungry are symptoms of being pregnant, making the story that it was not done on purpose slightly more likely.
Getting an education was a bit like a communicable sexual disease.
It made you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and then you had the urge to pass it on.
- Terry Pratchett, Hogfather

User avatar
Tekania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21669
Founded: May 26, 2004
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Tekania » Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:39 pm

Ovisterra wrote:Pretty heartless store owner. I mean come on. She honestly forgot to pay for the sandwich, and she then offered to do it when she realized, but that's not enough for Mister Head Up His Own Ass the manager, who obviously hasn't heard of a thing called "an honest mistake".


It was a manager, not owner. The manager was merely following company policy because he likes being able to have a job which provides him with income to feed himself and have a dry place to sleep.
Last edited by Tekania on Sun Nov 06, 2011 11:42 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Such heroic nonsense!

User avatar
Wiztopia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7605
Founded: Mar 05, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Wiztopia » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:22 am

Dazchan wrote:
Wiztopia wrote:
They probably weren't.


I found your problem.

Wiztopia wrote:That is what you implied.


No, I really didn't. I stated that every shoplifter I knew does that. The implication is that it is common, not universal.


And your problem is assuming they were.

Also yes you were. "yet you're ignorant of how shoplifters work."

User avatar
Dazchan
Senator
 
Posts: 3779
Founded: Mar 24, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Dazchan » Mon Nov 07, 2011 3:35 am

Wiztopia wrote:
Dazchan wrote:
I found your problem.



No, I really didn't. I stated that every shoplifter I knew does that. The implication is that it is common, not universal.


And your problem is assuming they were.


Well, we can assume they shoplifted, because they did. I have made no comment on the intention, other than to note that they were treated no differently to any other shoplifter who was caught.

Wiztopia wrote:Also yes you were. "yet you're ignorant of how shoplifters work."


Which you are, as demonstrated by your inability to comprehend that some shoplifters do, in fact, make a purchase to disguise their theft.
If you can read this, thank your teachers.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:53 am

Ovisterra wrote:Pretty heartless store owner. I mean come on. She honestly forgot to pay for the sandwich, and she then offered to do it when she realized, but that's not enough for Mister Head Up His Own Ass the manager, who obviously hasn't heard of a thing called "an honest mistake".

I like how you assume that she couldn't possibly be lying...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:04 am

The Alma Mater wrote:
Cill Charthaigh wrote:The store did overreact and yes, it was wrong to detain them. But why the hell does it matter that she's pregnant?


Being forgetful and hungry are symptoms of being pregnant, making the story that it was not done on purpose slightly more likely.

Her husband was pregnant too? The stories don't really play this up, but they do mention that *two* sandwiches were eaten, but only ever mention *one* being eaten by the pregnant woman. What's her husband's excuse for forgetting?

Also, I have friends who have had babies recently, somehow they've managed to avoid pigging out in a store and then "forgetting" to pay for what they ate. Being pregnant doesn't turn a woman into a retard for 9 months.
Last edited by Dakini on Mon Nov 07, 2011 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Arin Graliandre, Benuty, Commonwealth of Adirondack, Dimetrodon Empire, Forsher, Kathol Rift, Nerodanus, Pilipinas and Malaya, Pizza Friday Forever91, Reloviskistan, Roighelm, Rusozak, Spratly Islands, Vivida Vis Animi

Advertisement

Remove ads