Jakaragua wrote:Very much, though sexism sadly has crept within the left every now and then.
Oh, I'd argue that it's more than 'now and then'.
Edit: I was searching for this article.
Advertisement
by Femnipotent » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:16 pm
Jakaragua wrote:Very much, though sexism sadly has crept within the left every now and then.
by Norstal » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:17 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Thinking individuals? I have no problem with judging people. I also have no problem with being judged.
I don't know, CM. I have a feeling that if it were me coming here and saying, "I'm going to see if I can eliminate men from my life as much as possible so I can concentrate on the idea of separatist feminism and see if it works for me," you wouldn't be quite as judgmental.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Demonatrix » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Ashmoria wrote:maybe you should try googling for techniques used by strict religious groups. there must be some people out there giving advice for their followers.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:18 pm
Farnhamia wrote:I don't know, CM. I have a feeling that if it were me coming here and saying, "I'm going to see if I can eliminate men from my life as much as possible so I can concentrate on the idea of separatist feminism and see if it works for me," you wouldn't be quite as judgmental.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:19 pm
Norstal wrote:Farnhamia wrote:I don't know, CM. I have a feeling that if it were me coming here and saying, "I'm going to see if I can eliminate men from my life as much as possible so I can concentrate on the idea of separatist feminism and see if it works for me," you wouldn't be quite as judgmental.
You wouldn't ignore people just because they're males, would you?
by Trotskylvania » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:20 pm
Your Friendly Neighborhood Ultra - The Left Wing of the Impossible
Putting the '-sadism' in PosadismKarl Marx, Wage Labour and Capital
Anton Pannekoek, World Revolution and Communist Tactics
Amadeo Bordiga, Dialogue With Stalin
Nikolai Bukharin, The ABC of Communism
Gilles Dauvé, When Insurrections Die"The hell of capitalism is the firm, not the fact that the firm has a boss."- Bordiga
by New Sapienta » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:21 pm
by Norstal » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:22 pm
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Ashmoria » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:23 pm
Norstal wrote:Ashmoria wrote:i dont think so.
since men are men and women are women they are not exactly the same. the trick is to find a way to see them as people AND as their gender but not foist your own preconceptions onto them.
wicked tricky.
Except she explicitly said she's not here to fix men. Only women. Yet, if men are still subjugated in this patriarchal society, what she wants is to actually free women and subjugate men.
So, although you might be right, I'm saying the OP has a different idea.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:24 pm
Ashmoria wrote:well ya know....
it makes sense for women to work on women first. in many ways the movement of women away from the hearth and home has promted change in men.
if men dont want to change--and many really dont--it makes no sense for women to devote themselves to it. if men DO want to change its better to get together with other men who want to change and work on it themselves.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:24 pm
Norstal wrote:Farnhamia wrote:*looks around* I thought I heard someone say something.
I might if I wanted to do an experiment for a few months, which is what Femnipotent is talking about. I might if that were part of the experiment.
I should've put males in quotes, as she just ignores anyone who disagrees with her.
by Femnipotent » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:25 pm
Trotskylvania wrote:It's not so much that it "crept in", but rather that it was always there to begin with.
Trotskylvania wrote:I have inadvertently schism-ed more than one socialist group by insisting that feminism and racial issues not be marginalized by the vulgar Marxists and manarchists.
by Femnipotent » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:26 pm
Ashmoria wrote:
well ya know....
it makes sense for women to work on women first. in many ways the movement of women away from the hearth and home has promted change in men.
if men dont want to change--and many really dont--it makes no sense for women to devote themselves to it. if men DO want to change its better to get together with other men who want to change and work on it themselves.
by Conserative Morality » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:26 pm
Ashmoria wrote:theres no way to know unless you do that work for yourself.
i assume that it differs from person to person.
by Norstal » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:27 pm
Ashmoria wrote:Norstal wrote:Except she explicitly said she's not here to fix men. Only women. Yet, if men are still subjugated in this patriarchal society, what she wants is to actually free women and subjugate men.
So, although you might be right, I'm saying the OP has a different idea.
well ya know....
it makes sense for women to work on women first. in many ways the movement of women away from the hearth and home has promted change in men.
if men dont want to change--and many really dont--it makes no sense for women to devote themselves to it. if men DO want to change its better to get together with other men who want to change and work on it themselves.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:27 pm
Femnipotent wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
well ya know....
it makes sense for women to work on women first. in many ways the movement of women away from the hearth and home has promted change in men.
if men dont want to change--and many really dont--it makes no sense for women to devote themselves to it. if men DO want to change its better to get together with other men who want to change and work on it themselves.
I wonder if I am also damned because I work with battered women and not battered men?
by Demonatrix » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Farnhamia wrote:If so, that's unfortunate. As much as I've been tempted - believe me, I've been tempted - I've never put anyone on Ignore.
by Norstal » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:29 pm
Farnhamia wrote:You have to ask? You should make a list of your faults and then turn yourself in at the nearest re-education center. They have those in Canada, don't they?
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★
New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.
IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10
NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.
by Femnipotent » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:30 pm
Farnhamia wrote:You have to ask? You should make a list of your faults and then turn yourself in at the nearest re-education center. They have those in Canada, don't they?
by Ashmoria » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:30 pm
Norstal wrote:Ashmoria wrote:
well ya know....
it makes sense for women to work on women first. in many ways the movement of women away from the hearth and home has promted change in men.
if men dont want to change--and many really dont--it makes no sense for women to devote themselves to it. if men DO want to change its better to get together with other men who want to change and work on it themselves.
I don't understand why multitasking is such a foreign concept in this world.
by Farnhamia » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:30 pm
by New Sapienta » Fri Oct 28, 2011 4:32 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Ariddia, Benuty, Celritannia, Connori Pilgrims, Hurtful Thoughts, KELTIONIALANG, Neu California, Uiiop
Advertisement