
by Burchadinger » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:36 am

by RoI2 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:37 am

by Hawkryl » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:37 am

by Burchadinger » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:40 am

by Germova » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:44 am

by Andorias » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:45 am
Burchadinger wrote:As a Democrat I hate all of em' but I would believe Mitt Romney would be the best choice.. What do you guys think?

by Discount Liquor World » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:46 am

by RoI2 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:47 am
Burchadinger wrote:"bump"

by Burchadinger » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:47 am
Discount Liquor World wrote:Colin Powell

by Burchadinger » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:48 am

by -Bretonia- » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:48 am

by Maerngau » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:49 am

by Gendara » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:56 am

by Tubbsalot » Tue Sep 01, 2009 3:59 am

by Zirilrath » Tue Sep 01, 2009 4:20 am
by Anemos Major » Tue Sep 01, 2009 5:56 am
Imperial Factbook | Diplomatic Communications Channel | A Collection of Essays
Anemonian State Arms Export Authority | Aeryr IECpl | Imperial College Ismalyr

by Katganistan » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:04 am

by Meoton » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:07 am

by Tubbsalot » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:12 am


by South Lorenya » Tue Sep 01, 2009 6:53 am

by Risottia » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:02 am

by Meoton » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:04 am
Risottia wrote:Ralph Nader.

by Ketrily » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:06 am
Tubbsalot wrote:Side note: actually, I hope the Republicans put up an intelligent, charismatic candidate who fully appreciates the country's problems and works to fix them, rather than to fix himself a nice slice of money. Ideally he would be polite and understanding, and able to reasonably and logically debate with the "other side." And if the Democrats run Obama again*, they can have a mutually respectful, insightful presidential debate which ends with both of them, and the viewers, being better-educated about the state of the nation and the philosophies we should live by.
But I know they'll run a fundie or something.
*hah, what the hell does this mean? Don't ask me. That was meant to be "and WHEN they run Obama again", I suppose.

by New Heliopolis » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:14 am

JJ Place wrote: just because an organization tells you that them taking money from you isn't theft because they have more rights than any other organization is one of the lamest arguments a person can utilize in a debate; saying that the government can do what it likes because it writes it's own law is intellectually dishonest, and flies in the face of all reality.
Lucantis wrote:If a fat man puts you in a bag at night, don't worry I told Santa I wanted you for Christmas.

by Vault 10 » Tue Sep 01, 2009 7:16 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Neu California, Shazbotdom, The Pirateariat
Advertisement