Sanguinthium wrote:Hitler, However was a christian.The Archregimancy wrote:
I'm not going to indulge him, Farn.
I know what I do for a living, you know what I do for a living, and we can both be amused at the contention that I know 'absolutely nothing' about Norse paganism.
It might not, however, be appreciated that in addition to what I do for a living, I used to live in Iceland - where, as it happens, I once met the self-proclaimed High Priest of Odin. Though it might be more relevant to note that the Poetic Edda is a standard part of the school curriculum.
His continued attempts to explain away, or adapt, his extensive factual errors as either irrelevant, or by covering up factual errors by making further factual errors (such as stating that a date of 1277 - which itself doesn't relate to any significant event in Dante's life given Signor Alighieri was born in c.1265 - is somehow relevant to a statement that a work written from 1308-1321 is 14th-century in date) have by now so undermined his credibility that I don't see any point in wasting my time by countering the multiple factual errors of someone who clearly knows so little about something he thinks he knows so much about.
But I did get a laugh out of the contention that a statement by the not terribly important Florentine historian Filippo Villani (his uncle was far more important) should be taken as an official position on the Divine Comedy as Catholic dogma. An awful lot of people over the last few centuries have referred to Shakespeare and Mozart as in some manner 'divinely inspired'; I eagerly await Sanguinthium's argument that Titus Andronicus demonstrates that eating your children after they've been baked into a pie is an accepted part of Anglican doctrine, or that the Masonic opera Die Zauberflöte is held in equal regard in Catholic doctrine to the Catholic requiem mass.
Unlike Queen Victoria, I am very much amused, and hope that Sanguinthium will continue to provide us with this level of rich entertainment for some days to come.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
I realise Johz meant that to be gently sarcastic, but I would stress that - from my position - there's nothing grudging about it. There are several atheist or non-Christian posters who have contributed to this thread who have consistently shown - in this thread and in others - that while they oppose Christianity, they do so from a position of knowledge about those aspects they oppose, usually combined with a willingness to be corrected when they make a factual error, or perhaps to learn more about a specific issue that interests them, even where it's obvious they'll continue to disagree both with that issue specifically and Christianity generally. They have amply earned my respect, even though it's obvious there are some things over which we will no doubt always disagree.
They're certainly not going to dig themselves a hole of factual error, and then make that hole ever-deeper by spending 30 something pages continuing to repeat those factual errors, or attempting to explain away the factual errors by making even more factual errors.
you seem to omit about 2/3 of my post, mr mod- thou are ignorant! did you even read my sources?
repost time!
anyway, just because YOU claim it to be legend doesnt mean that nobody believes it. my local priest said he exhumed to remains of Trajen. in his ashes. wonder how that one workedbesides...
the Bible wrote:"All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for refutation, for correction, and for training in righteousness..." (2 Timothy 3:16 NAB)
Baldr is not anything close to Nordic Jesus.
Baldr predates Christianity in scandinavia. Thor is the only Norse god who would qualify as a Jesus is either Tyr or Thor, and neither of them were even trying to pretend to be peaceful.
Do try to stop trolling me- its starting to bug me.
-1 for Godwinning the thread.
What was the question? I've forgotten.


besides...




), Buddhist philosophy teachings, or even the fucking Qur'an, it only tells stories rather than instruct and guide. It's very open-to-interpretation like a novel, or more nipped and picked than the other texts. Granted, the Hindus have thousands of sects, but they all have the same under-current (dharma).
