NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion(do guys have a say?)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:You didn't address my point. At all. Why should people abstain?

Because it's the responsible thing to do unless you're prepared to face the consequences.

Do you drive your car out of the driveway to go on a joy ride without expecting to pay for gas later?

And getting an abortion is facing the consequences. What's so hard to get about that?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

Newmoonrising wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:Pregnancy doesn't leave you nearly disabled. I realize there is much discomfort, but life is important than that. And like I've stated, we know what can happens when you have sex.

I've heard stories from my theology teacher about women who have farmed and given birth to their children behind bushes. Pregnancy sucks but it not like someone cut off some of your limbs.


when you have been pregnant you can talk about it.

it is very debilitating and very dangerous. some women spend MONTHS on bed rest so that they can successfully deliver a healthy child.
whatever

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:
The part where every woman who gets pregnant is a stupid whore who should have shut her dumb slut legs if she didn't want to be pregnant and carry it to term.

Aren't strawmen fun? :)


Hellenic Protectorates wrote:Yes, actually she can escape dealing with a pregnancy.

It's called keeping her legs shut.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:52 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:The law is enforcement of moral code.

Murder is illegal and abortion is not. What part of that are you having a problem with?


The part where I give a damm about what the law says
Remember, the Japanese aren't people, and slavery is totally cool and shit.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Yes, and abortion is one way of dealing with that possibility. What business of yours is it what I do with the contents of my womb?

When the contents of your womb will eventually become a person with a say who would NEVER consent to being flushed down a damn drain...

Considerable.

The contents have not yet become a person. If I were to kill a child, mine or someone else's, yes, you would have an interest because that would make me a murderer. Until those contents become a person, you can just go away, that you very much.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Yes, and abortion is one way of dealing with that possibility. What business of yours is it what I do with the contents of my womb?

When the contents of your womb will eventually become a person with a say who would NEVER consent to being flushed down a damn drain...

Considerable.

But they don't object now. Because they can't. They have the same amount of ability to vocalize their disagreement as a goldfish.

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:I don't have a problem with that at all.

My problem is the ways that abortion is being used.

None of your business.

The "none of your business" argument is as overused as it is flawed.

Millions are poor and hungry in Africa. By your reasoning it's none of our business because those countries' autocratic rulers should be able to do what they want with their own country.

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Jedi8246 wrote:The law is enforcement of moral code.

uhhuh

and what is your point?

:roll:

You wanna say that we are trying to force moral code by saying when abortions should happen. That's what you are doing by saying abortion should happen when you say.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Eridanuus
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 115
Founded: Aug 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Eridanuus » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

The Warrior Hearted wrote:sure, they have a say. It doesnt mean the women has to listen to them, though


Agreed

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:53 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:When the contents of your womb will eventually become a person with a say who would NEVER consent to being flushed down a damn drain...

Considerable.

But they don't object now. Because they can't. They have the same amount of ability to vocalize their disagreement as a goldfish.

So then, wouldn't animal cruelty laws apply in this case?

Be careful. You're cornering yourself.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:54 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:Really? You really deny how difficult it is to be pregnant? I can scarcely believe it...

And as I've stated, the possibility has nothing to do with anything. Consent to sex doesn't equal consent to pregnancy.

Consent to sex = consent to the possibility of pregnancy

Saying otherwise is flat out denying biology.

of course it is.

for both the man and the woman (if its manman or womanwoman, not so much.)

so if the woman gets pregnant she has to deal with it. abortion is one option of how to deal with it.
whatever

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:54 pm

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:Aren't strawmen fun? :)


Hellenic Protectorates wrote:Yes, actually she can escape dealing with a pregnancy.

It's called keeping her legs shut.


Well, he didn't say anywhere in that post the word "rape".

'Cuz, you know, women's legs can't be FORCED apart.

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Yes, and abortion is one way of dealing with that possibility. What business of yours is it what I do with the contents of my womb?

When the contents of your womb will eventually become a person with a say who would NEVER consent to being flushed down a damn drain...

Considerable.


I think you have a very distorted view of the whole thing.

Do you think people murder future human beings arbitrarily?

Do you think it's like tossing away a... Well, a mass of cells, for these people?

User avatar
Ceannairceach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26637
Founded: Sep 05, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Ceannairceach » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:55 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Ceannairceach wrote:But they don't object now. Because they can't. They have the same amount of ability to vocalize their disagreement as a goldfish.

So then, wouldn't animal cruelty laws apply in this case?

Be careful. You're cornering yourself.

Sure. Lets go by that. The fetus should be terminated because it can't function by itself, not even biologically. And, like a heavily injured animal, it has to be put down.

You said something about cornering...?

@}-;-'---

"But who prays for Satan? Who in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it most..." -Mark Twain

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:55 pm

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Murder is illegal and abortion is not. What part of that are you having a problem with?


The part where I give a damm about what the law says
Remember, the Japanese aren't people, and slavery is totally cool and shit.

So change the law and make abortion illegal. It's your right. Or are you one of those who can't be bothered lifting a finger to work for your moral principles but enjoy lecturing everyone here about them, I forget?
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:55 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:When the contents of your womb will eventually become a person with a say who would NEVER consent to being flushed down a damn drain...

Considerable.

The contents have not yet become a person. If I were to kill a child, mine or someone else's, yes, you would have an interest because that would make me a murderer. Until those contents become a person, you can just go away, that you very much.

I'm assuming you're Lockeian, right?

User avatar
New England and The Maritimes
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28872
Founded: Aug 13, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New England and The Maritimes » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:56 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
New England and The Maritimes wrote:


Well, he didn't say anywhere in that post the word "rape".

'Cuz, you know, women's legs can't be FORCED apart.


Women don't get the right to decide what happens to their bodies where possible. Obviously women are demonstrably not human beings and as such aren't entitled to these rights. Otherwise, him and the rest of the anti choice brigade might be... :o wrong.
All aboard the Love Train. Choo Choo, honeybears. I am Ininiwiyaw Rocopurr:Get in my bed, you perfect human being.
Yesterday's just a memory

Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Some people's opinions are based on rational observations, others base theirs on imaginative thinking. The reality-based community ought not to waste it's time refuting delusions.

Also, Bonobos
Formerly Brandenburg-Altmark Me.

User avatar
Jedi8246
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6132
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Capitalist Paradise

Postby Jedi8246 » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:56 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Newmoonrising wrote:I've heard stories from my theology teacher about women who have farmed and given birth to their children behind bushes. Pregnancy sucks but it not like someone cut off some of your limbs.


when you have been pregnant you can talk about it.

it is very debilitating and very dangerous. some women spend MONTHS on bed rest so that they can successfully deliver a healthy child.

What century do you live in? Modern medical technology allows most women to work for the majority of their pregnancy. The case you state is an exception, not a rule.
Official Member of the Fall of Gods RP Council
Conservative Morality wrote:When you call Bieber feminine, you insult all women.


Agadar wrote:Next thing you know, God turns out to be some weird green space monster with tentacles and a monocle.


Khadgar wrote:Oddly enough, a lot of people who are plotting to harm other people aren't really interested in legal niceties.
Rank #87 in World Cup
Factbook
Jedi8246 is a far-right social libertarian. He is also a non-interventionist and somewhat culturally conservative. Jedi8246's scores (from 0 to 10):
Economic issues: +9.53 right
Social issues: -7.91 libertarian
Foreign policy: -7.32 non-interventionist
Cultural identification: +0.92 conservative

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111675
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:56 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:None of your business.

The "none of your business" argument is as overused as it is flawed.

Millions are poor and hungry in Africa. By your reasoning it's none of our business because those countries' autocratic rulers should be able to do what they want with their own country.

False equivalence. Starvation in Africa is not the same as you keeping your legal fingers out of my womb.
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:57 pm

Ceannairceach wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:So then, wouldn't animal cruelty laws apply in this case?

Be careful. You're cornering yourself.

Sure. Lets go by that. The fetus should be terminated because it can't function by itself, not even biologically. And, like a heavily injured animal, it has to be put down.

You said something about cornering...?

Ah ah ah, now you're putting words in my mouth.

You said "as a goldfish". Goldfish aren't inherently incapable of supporting themselves. Fetuses are not injured.

User avatar
Newmoonrising
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1073
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Newmoonrising » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:57 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Newmoonrising wrote:I've heard stories from my theology teacher about women who have farmed and given birth to their children behind bushes. Pregnancy sucks but it not like someone cut off some of your limbs.


when you have been pregnant you can talk about it.

it is very debilitating and very dangerous. some women spend MONTHS on bed rest so that they can successfully deliver a healthy child.

And some don't, your point? It's not a blanket thing, My theology teacher was a medical practitioner. Also in most developed countries the danger is lessened allot.

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:57 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:The "none of your business" argument is as overused as it is flawed.

Millions are poor and hungry in Africa. By your reasoning it's none of our business because those countries' autocratic rulers should be able to do what they want with their own country.

False equivalence. Starvation in Africa is not the same as you keeping your legal fingers out of my womb.

Actually, by your reasoning it's exactly the same.

Name a difference.

User avatar
The Rich Port
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38094
Founded: Jul 29, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby The Rich Port » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:58 pm

Hellenic Protectorates wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:The contents have not yet become a person. If I were to kill a child, mine or someone else's, yes, you would have an interest because that would make me a murderer. Until those contents become a person, you can just go away, that you very much.

I'm assuming you're Lockeian, right?


I'm assuming that YOU are only half a Republican.

This social "conservative" view that abortions should be banned conflicts with the other "conservative" view that the government should not intervene in the private lives of citizens.

New England and The Maritimes wrote:
The Rich Port wrote:
Well, he didn't say anywhere in that post the word "rape".

'Cuz, you know, women's legs can't be FORCED apart.


Women don't get the right to decide what happens to their bodies where possible. Obviously women are demonstrably not human beings and as such aren't entitled to these rights. Otherwise, him and the rest of the anti choice brigade might be... :o wrong.


You read my MIND. :eek:

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:58 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
The part where I give a damm about what the law says
Remember, the Japanese aren't people, and slavery is totally cool and shit.

So change the law and make abortion illegal. It's your right. Or are you one of those who can't be bothered lifting a finger to work for your moral principles but enjoy lecturing everyone here about them, I forget?


Neither. I just have zero confidence in the ability of the state to act in any fashion other then it's own self-interest, the only laws that get passed are the ones that benefit the powers that be.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:59 pm

Jedi8246 wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:uhhuh

and what is your point?

:roll:

You wanna say that we are trying to force moral code by saying when abortions should happen. That's what you are doing by saying abortion should happen when you say.


im not saying anything about when abortions should happen. that decision is up to the woman who chooses it. i am as against forcing a woman to have an abortion as i am against outlawing legal abortion.

you arent actually forcing a moral code either. you have no say over whether or not abortions happen. all *I* am saying is that other people have no reason to take YOUR personal moral code into consideration when making their own life decisions.
whatever

User avatar
Hellenic Protectorates
Diplomat
 
Posts: 652
Founded: Oct 31, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Hellenic Protectorates » Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:59 pm

The Rich Port wrote:
Hellenic Protectorates wrote:I'm assuming you're Lockeian, right?


I'm assuming that YOU are only half a Republican.

This social "conservative" view that abortions should be banned conflicts with the other "conservative" view that the government should not intervene in the private lives of citizens.


Falsely assuming I'm a Republican. Strike one.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Dazchan, Freedomanica, Life empire, Nilokeras, Picairn, Techocracy101010, The Holy Therns, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads