NATION

PASSWORD

Abortion(do guys have a say?)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:02 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
well, unless its rape they were not forced to have sex

No-one is talking about having sex. We're talking about being pregnant and whether or not women should have the final say in whether or not to have an abortion.

The "forced into it" was in reference to a woman being forced to keep a pregnancy that she does not wish to continue.

Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy unless you can prove that women are impregnated every time they have sex.


consent to sex is consent to an act designed to make people pregnant. if someone does not acknowledge the possibility of pregnancy then its too bad for them

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:02 am

Galloism wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
So i can just get in a time machine and convince your mom to have an abortion and thats OK?

I doubt that he would say a word about it if you did it.

:mad:
Usually I'm the one posting the shorter, more succinct response...
:mad:
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:03 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:No-one is talking about having sex. We're talking about being pregnant and whether or not women should have the final say in whether or not to have an abortion.

The "forced into it" was in reference to a woman being forced to keep a pregnancy that she does not wish to continue.

Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy unless you can prove that women are impregnated every time they have sex.


consent to sex is consent to an act designed to make people pregnant. if someone does not acknowledge the possibility of pregnancy then its too bad for them

Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:05 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:It depends on the circumstances, e.g. you cant kill someone else if their in your body
And then doens't the feotus get to choose what happens to its body?

Yes, actually you can. See my post about justifiable homicide.
The foetus (not being a person) is incapable of making choices, and even if it was it would not have the right to violate a person's bodily autonomy.


i have already said why your wrong about justifiable homicide and what gives someone the right to then make that foetus' choices for it? I dont care about this violation of a persons autonomy argument becausekilling is worse.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:06 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:No-one is talking about having sex. We're talking about being pregnant and whether or not women should have the final say in whether or not to have an abortion.

The "forced into it" was in reference to a woman being forced to keep a pregnancy that she does not wish to continue.

Consent to sex is not consent to pregnancy unless you can prove that women are impregnated every time they have sex.


consent to sex is consent to an act designed to make people pregnant. if someone does not acknowledge the possibility of pregnancy then its too bad for them

sex can lead to pregnancy. and it would indeed be silly not to acknowledge that possibility, especially if both people are fertile (heterosexual sex only. non-procreative sex not considered).

but we dont have to be bound by biology any more. we can make our own decisions about whether or not to conceive and whether or not to continue a particular pregnancy. its not 100% but its SOOOO much better than just 50 years ago when the government didnt let you make those decisions legally.
whatever

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:06 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
consent to sex is consent to an act designed to make people pregnant. if someone does not acknowledge the possibility of pregnancy then its too bad for them

Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.


Similiarly, Child Support is punishment for men who can't keep it in their pants
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:07 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
So i can just get in a time machine and convince your mom to have an abortion and thats OK?

I'd prefer you didn't.
*shrugs*
On the other hand, if you can actually manage it I wouldn't be in any position to oppose it since I wouldn't actually be a person yet.


but how moral or ethical doyouthink that is?

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:08 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.


Similiarly, Child Support is punishment for men who can't keep it in their pants

Except of course, the fact that it isn't... What with child support not being gender specific and all...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:08 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
I did answer it,and shall again:
not if involves the death of someone else

Abortion does not involve the death of a person, so I guess you are fine with it then...
Ookawauso wrote:what do you think sex is for? biologically speaking?

I don't care what sex is for biologically. I have never had sex with the intention of reproducing.


I don't give one why youdo it, and the foetus dies.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:09 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.


Similiarly, Child Support is punishment for men who can't keep it in their pants

the women face the same "punishment" for those same children that the man is paying child support for.
whatever

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:10 am

Erinkita wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
I did answer it,and shall again:
not if involves the death of someone else

what do you think sex is for? biologically speaking?

Then I consider your position immoral.

:blink: What do you think sex is for? Are you trying to argue that the only reason anybody has sex is for procreation?


Biologically speaking: yes, pleasure is just a way to make sure we do it, it is the incentive not the purpose.

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:10 am

Dyakovo wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Similiarly, Child Support is punishment for men who can't keep it in their pants

Except of course, the fact that it isn't... What with child support not being gender specific and all...


Okay, even if the application of the law is theoritically equal (big if) in practice it's not. It's a law that dispropitionately effects men, on the grounds that he was unfortunate enough to get the wrong person pregnant, and doesn't control the womb and therefore has no ability to control the outcome.

Consent to sex is not consent to parenthood.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Osirian Systems
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 20
Founded: Oct 25, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Osirian Systems » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:10 am

Making a serious point, I'm pro-Abortion. Not pro-choice, pro-abortion. We're overpopulated and we should cull the numbers down.

As for the idea that rape/condom breakage etc. should be cause to allow an abortion and others such as recklessness should be banned is prepostorous. Circumstantial abortion is a lie. Why should it matter if someone is raped or stupid when the end outcome is the same? It's the destruction of human life.

As for those that argue that you're alive when you're born and thus you're not murdered if it's before hand then you're off our g'damn rocker. You're life as soon as you're sperm.

That said, I have no qualms about allowing abortion simply on the grounds that there's too many of us.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:11 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Yes, actually you can. See my post about justifiable homicide.
The foetus (not being a person) is incapable of making choices, and even if it was it would not have the right to violate a person's bodily autonomy.


i have already said why your wrong about justifiable homicide1 and what gives someone the right to then make that foetus' choices for it?2 I dont care about this violation of a persons autonomy3 argument becausekilling is worse.

1: No, you've blathered on with some bullshit that does not even remotely address justifiable homicide.
2: No-one is making any decisions for the foetus at all, however, even if they were they would be justified in doing so because the foetus is completely incapable of making decisions.
3: I know. And I disagree with your claim that women should be slaves.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:11 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Erinkita wrote:Then I consider your position immoral.

:blink: What do you think sex is for? Are you trying to argue that the only reason anybody has sex is for procreation?


Biologically speaking: yes, pleasure is just a way to make sure we do it, it is the incentive not the purpose.

Animals have sex for pleasure. Like bonobos.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_sex ... r_pleasure
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:11 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Abortion does not involve the death of a person, so I guess you are fine with it then...

I don't care what sex is for biologically. I have never had sex with the intention of reproducing.


I don't give one why youdo it, and the foetus dies.

Yeah, so? A foetus is not a person.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:12 am

Ashmoria wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Similiarly, Child Support is punishment for men who can't keep it in their pants

the women face the same "punishment" for those same children that the man is paying child support for.


Yeah......of all the jobless mothers riding on child support checks that proves this isn't true.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Zanarkenisia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 537
Founded: Sep 21, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Zanarkenisia » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:13 am

Osirian Systems wrote:Making a serious point, I'm pro-Abortion. Not pro-choice, pro-abortion. We're overpopulated and we should cull the numbers down.

As for the idea that rape/condom breakage etc. should be cause to allow an abortion and others such as recklessness should be banned is prepostorous. Circumstantial abortion is a lie. Why should it matter if someone is raped or stupid when the end outcome is the same? It's the destruction of human life.

As for those that argue that you're alive when you're born and thus you're not murdered if it's before hand then you're off our g'damn rocker. You're life as soon as you're sperm.

That said, I have no qualms about allowing abortion simply on the grounds that there's too many of us.

Sperm is only half potential personhood.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:13 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:the women face the same "punishment" for those same children that the man is paying child support for.


Yeah......of all the jobless mothers riding on child support checks that proves this isn't true.

:rofl:
You really think that child support covers all the cost of raising a child?
:rofl:
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Erinkita
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14478
Founded: Sep 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Erinkita » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:13 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Erinkita wrote:Then I consider your position immoral.

:blink: What do you think sex is for? Are you trying to argue that the only reason anybody has sex is for procreation?


Biologically speaking: yes, pleasure is just a way to make sure we do it, it is the incentive not the purpose.

'Biologically speaking'. So, the only reason apart from the reasons you've deliberately decided to ignore using your arbitrary qualifier designed to exclude all other possible motivators. Good job. You've established... nothing.
Loan me a dragon, I wanna see space.
Justice for Jane Doe

User avatar
Ookawauso
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 166
Founded: Sep 28, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ookawauso » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:13 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
consent to sex is consent to an act designed to make people pregnant. if someone does not acknowledge the possibility of pregnancy then its too bad for them

Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.


Pregnancy is a way to ensure the continual survival of non a-sexual species.
if you have sex with no intention of having a child then you should be careful and make sure you use contraceptives properly.

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:15 am

Erinkita wrote:
Ookawauso wrote:
Biologically speaking: yes, pleasure is just a way to make sure we do it, it is the incentive not the purpose.

'Biologically speaking'. So, the only reason apart from the reasons you've deliberately decided to ignore using your arbitrary qualifier designed to exclude all other possible motivators. Good job. You've established... nothing.

I think we should ban non-scientists for improperly using scientific theories. Seriously.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
GeneralHaNor
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6996
Founded: Sep 03, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby GeneralHaNor » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:15 am

Dyakovo wrote:
GeneralHaNor wrote:
Yeah......of all the jobless mothers riding on child support checks that proves this isn't true.

:rofl:
You really think that child support covers all the cost of raising a child?
:rofl:


Well no, my mother spent far to much of that check on booze and crack.
Victorious Decepticons wrote:If they said "this is what you enjoy so do this" and handed me a stack of my favorite video games, then it'd be far different. But governments don't work that way. They'd hand me a dishrag...
And I'd hand them an insurgency.
Trotskylvania wrote:Don't kid yourself. The state is a violent, destructive institution of class dictatorship. The fact that the proles have bargained themselves the drippings from their master's plates doesn't legitimize the state.

User avatar
Erinkita
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14478
Founded: Sep 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Erinkita » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:16 am

Ookawauso wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:Ahhh... Now we get down to the reality of it...
Pregnancy is punishment for sluts.

I was wondering how long it would take you to get there.


Pregnancy is a way to ensure the continual survival of non a-sexual species.
if you have sex with no intention of having a child then you should be careful and make sure you use contraceptives properly.

And if you made a mistake, then your body no longer belongs to you. That's what you get for being careless. Let that be a lesson to you, dirty girl.
Loan me a dragon, I wanna see space.
Justice for Jane Doe

User avatar
Erinkita
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14478
Founded: Sep 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Erinkita » Thu Oct 27, 2011 8:16 am

GeneralHaNor wrote:
Dyakovo wrote: :rofl:
You really think that child support covers all the cost of raising a child?
:rofl:


Well no, my mother spent far to much of that check on booze and crack.

Heroin in my mother's case.
Loan me a dragon, I wanna see space.
Justice for Jane Doe

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Corrian, Costa Fierro, Free Stalliongrad, Gun Manufacturers, Lord Dominator, Malcaria

Advertisement

Remove ads