Keronians wrote:I don't really remember if I was 14 or 15, but I'm still in love with the girl.
Unfortunately.
?
Advertisement
by Newmoonrising » Sat Oct 15, 2011 3:51 pm
Keronians wrote:I don't really remember if I was 14 or 15, but I'm still in love with the girl.
Unfortunately.
by Tiami » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:28 pm
by Tiami » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:29 pm
by Isolated China » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:32 pm
Bodegraven wrote:Haha! I never expected so many people on Nationstates to be gullible enough to believe in love.
As you might notice, I don't believe in love, because the first person I thought I loved cheated on me, and after that I turned into something comparable to forever alone guy...
Since then, I had crushes, yes, but they got crushed by my friends who had a gotta catch them all moment as soon as I liked someone...
Please don't let my views offend you, I do not believe In many things, such as love and happiness... And if love does exist, I probably won't experience it anyway, because I am a pretty hopeless case.
by Tiami » Sat Oct 15, 2011 4:38 pm
by Distruzio » Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:00 pm
by Pesda » Sat Oct 15, 2011 5:37 pm
by Ryadn » Sat Oct 15, 2011 10:56 pm
Bodegraven wrote:Haha! I never expected so many people on Nationstates to be gullible enough to believe in love.
As you might notice, I don't believe in love, because the first person I thought I loved cheated on me
by Ryadn » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:02 pm
Distruzio wrote:I was 23. Everything I "felt" when I was younger was more akin to obsession and possession rather than love. Love is something you do, not something you feel.
by The Merchant Republics » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:21 pm
by Meryuma » Sat Oct 15, 2011 11:30 pm
Olthar wrote:1000 Cats wrote:No. It's a very meaningful term and has been given importance by every human culture across all chronology. It's also much more complex than your implied neurochemistry, involving a wide variety of somatic and psychological phenomena. You got the rest right, though.
Really? All human culture? I guess you didn't do so well in history class, eh? "Love" has really only existed since 18th century Europe started the Romanticism movement.
Bureaucracia wrote:Threlizdun wrote:I was 14. Words of the wise, make sure the person you love is actually attracted to your gender before you say anything.
Ha ha ha...oh man; this sort of reminds me of the first 'serious' relationship I had. After spending all of high school being the incorrigible tool who was too good to be in a relationship with anyone, despite having about six opportunities to pursue girls in my senior year that would've probably been worth it in retrospect, I finally gave in and started dating a girl three years my senior from across town about six months after graduating.
She soon confided in me that she was "pansexual and genderqueer", felt like a man trapped in a woman's body, was kind of a dominatrix, had a "special friend" of the same sex, and had recently broken up with a guy she was with for a year prior to dating me who was a complete psycho and was hell-bent on destroying me (I never figured out if he meant that in the metaphorical or literal sense) to get her back. The best part? All of that nonsense happened over a period of six weeks, as that's how long we went out. I mean, I've got no moral opposition to people feeling "genderqueer" or whatever, but...really. I'd like to be someone's boyfriend, not their full-time therapist.
Ah, young love. Perhaps I'll do better (or gain more freaky stories to rant about here, who knows) when I go to college in a few months.
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Bureaucracia » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:30 am
Meryuma wrote:You seem like you pretty obviously do morally oppose these things, or at least are emotionally troubled by them. You also seem to misunderstand what "genderqueer" means, and as well as what a girl is.
by Distruzio » Sun Oct 16, 2011 12:45 am
Ryadn wrote:Distruzio wrote:I was 23. Everything I "felt" when I was younger was more akin to obsession and possession rather than love. Love is something you do, not something you feel.
I agree, but I don't think that means you can't be in love at a younger age. I've been in love with at least two, maybe three people--at 15, 19 and 20 up to the present--and I think my understanding of love and the depth of my feeling has grown as I've aged, but that doesn't mean I wasn't in love at 15. I just loved the way a 15-year-old can. Of course, I was in love with that person for four years, so maybe that makes a difference. Even though I haven't seen her in years and things ended very badly and for a long time I kinda've wanted to run her down with my car, I still love her and always will. Which sucks, but I don't think it's really love if you can just stop.
by Meryuma » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:21 am
Bureaucracia wrote:Meryuma wrote:You seem like you pretty obviously do morally oppose these things, or at least are emotionally troubled by them. You also seem to misunderstand what "genderqueer" means, and as well as what a girl is.
Three things:
- I was working off of her definition of "genderqueer", so you may very well be right.
- If the act of being a bit perturbed by my ex-girlfriend's assigning of female gender pronouns to me and coming up with an "alternate female name" for me that she used from time to time - even when I politely told her that I didn't really feel all that comfortable with it - makes me "morally opposed" to the concept of being "genderqueer", then yeah, I suppose I am.
- I really, really, really feel like I should point out that her gender identity issues were not what led me to break off our brief relationship; it was certainly the rather severe case of battered wife syndrome she appeared to exhibit from her previous year-long relationship with an abusive man who acted more like a father neglecting his daughter than a boyfriend whilst dating her. The guy used to send threatening texts to her while we were alone together threatening to "destroy [me]", showed up at my place of employment while we were together on my break one day with the intent of assaulting me, and apparently slept with her (we weren't living together) a few nights before I ultimately called her up and said it was over. All the while, my then-girlfriend was living in some gray area between wanting to get the guy arrested and wanting to dump me to get back together with him, repeatedly informing me that she had "a special bond" with this guy who "provided for [her] health and security" (her words, not mine), and refusing to take any sort of advice from me on the matter or seek any sort of help. Am I horrible for wanting out of that?
Niur wrote: my soul has no soul.
Saint Clair Island wrote:The English language sucks. From now on, I will refer to the second definition of sexual as "fucktacular."
Trotskylvania wrote:Alternatively, we could go on an epic quest to Plato's Cave to find the legendary artifact, Ockham's Razor.
Norstal wrote:Gunpowder Plot: America.
Meryuma: "Well, I just hope these hyperboles don't...
*puts on sunglasses*
blow out of proportions."
YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
by Bodegraven » Sun Oct 16, 2011 1:53 am
Ryadn wrote:Bodegraven wrote:Haha! I never expected so many people on Nationstates to be gullible enough to believe in love.
As you might notice, I don't believe in love, because the first person I thought I loved cheated on me
And? If the first car you ever own gets stolen, does that mean you never had a car?
by Marvelous Gentlemen and Ladies » Sun Oct 16, 2011 3:40 am
by Pesda » Sun Oct 16, 2011 6:11 am
by Ryadn » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:21 pm
Bodegraven wrote:@ Isolated China:
Yes, that sound quite enjoyable.Ryadn wrote:
And? If the first car you ever own gets stolen, does that mean you never had a car?
I thought it was love, and she said she loved me, but then she started sleeping with other guys (note that I still haven't kissed anyone, 4-5 years later, and that she was 11 at the time.)
And since then, I just believe the idea of love exists of two things: the lust produced by the dopamine production in your brain and the commercial hell they put you through when you experience that.
To actually answer your question literally: Yes, you have owned that car, BUT a car isn't abstract, feelings, however, especially love, ARE abstract, so it is hard to know if you really had it.
by Nanatsu no Tsuki » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:23 pm
Slava Ukraini
Also: THERNSY!!
Your story isn't over;֍Help save transgender people's lives֍Help for feral cats
Cat with internet access||Supposedly heartless, & a d*ck.||Is maith an t-earra an tsíocháin.||No TGsRIP: Dyakovo & Ashmoria
by Desuforeverlulz » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:29 pm
by Desuforeverlulz » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:30 pm
Ryadn wrote:Bodegraven wrote:Haha! I never expected so many people on Nationstates to be gullible enough to believe in love.
As you might notice, I don't believe in love, because the first person I thought I loved cheated on me
And? If the first car you ever own gets stolen, does that mean you never had a car?
by Garyana » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:39 pm
by Natty Narwhal » Mon Oct 17, 2011 9:42 pm
by Isolated China » Mon Oct 17, 2011 10:42 pm
Bodegraven wrote:@ Isolated China:
Yes, that sound quite enjoyable.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cyptopir, Emotional Support Crocodile, New Fortilla, Tungstan
Advertisement