nah, the nationality thing only works in non-immigrant countries. and even there, that's just because it serves as a shorthand way of describing culture.
Advertisement

by Free Soviets » Wed Oct 19, 2011 7:51 am

by Milks Empire » Wed Oct 19, 2011 11:03 am
Kirrig wrote:Free Soviets wrote:its not a presumption, its the definition. ethnicity is self-affirmed group identity based on culture.
I believe I pointed out earlier that ethnicity is not just about culture, it could also be based on nationality. On the other hand, it seems to me to be frequently treated as a biological concept as well, which turns out to be in error (for now.)
The American Chinese question is quite interesting, although slightly off topic (althogh not as much as the next post.) I think they mean they are a Chinese individual who is American, this is because a Chinese American is the reverse. The problem arises because 'Chinese' can be either a noun or an adjective.
Milks Empire, by stating your ethnic background are you giving an example of how you would determine your ethnicity?

by Kirrig » Fri Nov 04, 2011 7:27 pm
Daistallia 2104 wrote:Kirrig, since you seem to be unable to take hints, allow me make it explicitly clear - you are being ignored.
"Have you ever noticed... our caps... they have skulls on them..."
"Hans... are we the baddies?"

by Free Soviets » Sat Nov 05, 2011 12:36 pm
Kirrig wrote:Free Soviets wrote:nah, the nationality thing only works in non-immigrant countries. and even there, that's just because it serves as a shorthand way of describing culture.
I disagree, nationality is far more foolproof than culture; there are no shades of grey with it (except in a minority of cases).
Kirrig wrote:I do not think that any one, using ethnicity as a practical tool, considers it to be a cultural concept. Censuses certainly do not seem to, and nor does anything I have ever come across.

by Bluth Corporation » Sat Nov 05, 2011 1:45 pm
Free Soviets wrote:Kirrig wrote:I disagree, nationality is far more foolproof than culture; there are no shades of grey with it (except in a minority of cases).
that's crazy. take a place like namibia. namibians can be anybody from the white descendents of european settlers to san bushmen and loads of things in between. knowing that somebody is namibian tells you almost nothing about their ethnicity.Kirrig wrote:I do not think that any one, using ethnicity as a practical tool, considers it to be a cultural concept. Censuses certainly do not seem to, and nor does anything I have ever come across.
anthropologists do, and its their concept. hell, just check wiki.
the census certainly would not be my go-to place for coherent ideas on group identities. they can't even decide what 'race' is.

by Turan Federasyonu » Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:05 pm

by Bluth Corporation » Sat Nov 05, 2011 2:21 pm
Turan Federasyonu wrote:the nationality is based on ethnicity. A person with other ethncity cant be a real "nationmate""

by Kemaliste » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:06 pm

by Bluth Corporation » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:11 pm

by Kemaliste » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:13 pm
Bluth Corporation wrote:Hmm?

by Bluth Corporation » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:17 pm

by Kemaliste » Sat Nov 05, 2011 5:24 pm

by Turan Federasyonu » Mon Nov 07, 2011 2:49 am
Bluth Corporation wrote:Turan Federasyonu wrote:the nationality is based on ethnicity. A person with other ethncity cant be a real "nationmate""
Indeed, it's not terribly surprising hearing that from someone with a Turkish flag.
Though that's obviously not the case throughout much of the rest of the world.

by Arumdaum » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:14 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:Bluth Corporation wrote:
Indeed, it's not terribly surprising hearing that from someone with a Turkish flag.
Though that's obviously not the case throughout much of the rest of the world.
I am not from Turkey, dear friend. Everybody may use any flag he wants in this "democratic socialist" site. Democracy and socialism, isnt it paradoxal?
by Arumdaum » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:17 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:the nationality is based on ethnicity. A person with other ethncity cant be a real "nationmate""

by SD_Film Artists » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:43 am

by Letonija » Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:56 am

by Biop » Mon Nov 07, 2011 6:06 am

by Sith Korriban » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:14 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:the nationality is based on ethnicity. A person with other ethncity cant be a real "nationmate""

by Aethelstania » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:31 am

by Quoi de Neuf » Mon Nov 07, 2011 8:46 am
Turan Federasyonu wrote:the nationality is based on ethnicity. A person with other ethncity cant be a real "nationmate""

by Turan Federasyonu » Mon Nov 07, 2011 12:28 pm

by Sith Korriban » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:27 pm
Turan Federasyonu wrote:You think so because most of you are from immigrant sociies like america, canada, australia and so on. İn places where the vast majority are local indegineous people from one background the ethnicity is the nationality
Say it ain't so! What a revelation! One might just as easily say that because I put socks in a drawer, I tend to call it a sock drawer! Amazing!
by Distruzio » Mon Nov 07, 2011 11:56 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Dreria, El Lazaro, Gun Manufacturers, Nantoraka, Neo-American States, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rary, The Grand Fifth Imperium, TURTLESHROOM II, Utquiagvik
Advertisement