Advertisement

by Russenich » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:34 am

by Chimaea » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:37 am
Russenich wrote:Wrong Wrong wrong. How could anyone be for Nudism. I mean gayness could be seen as natural but Nudism, please no.


by Saint Clair Island » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:46 am
Russenich wrote:Wrong Wrong wrong. How could anyone be for Nudism. I mean gayness could be seen as natural but Nudism, please no.

by Sdaeriji » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:50 am
Russenich wrote:Wrong Wrong wrong. How could anyone be for Nudism. I mean gayness could be seen as natural but Nudism, please no.

by Parthenon » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:51 am
Rentalia wrote: There are more much more immoral thing like TV show where children are tought to be greedy materialistic consumistic drone,film with random explicit sex scenes or conservative propaganda that teach children that war is something to be proud of

by Tonzapan » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:53 am


by Saint Clair Island » Mon Aug 31, 2009 7:55 am
Parthenon wrote:Rentalia wrote: There are more much more immoral thing like TV show where children are tought to be greedy materialistic consumistic drone,film with random explicit sex scenes or conservative propaganda that teach children that war is something to be proud of
How did I guess some little BS Marxist rant was on the way when I read "WE SHOULD GIVE THE MINORITY RIGHTS EVEN THOUGH I AM NOT PART OF IT"?

by Treznor » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:08 am
Russenich wrote:Wrong Wrong wrong. How could anyone be for Nudism. I mean gayness could be seen as natural but Nudism, please no.

by Dumb Ideologies » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:16 am


by Cabra West » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:18 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:We can't let people go around naked. Think of the children!
*Arrests all of you for thinking about naked kids*


by Natapoc » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:28 am
everywhere. 
by Pope Joan » Mon Aug 31, 2009 8:49 am

by Saint Clair Island » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:03 am
Natapoc wrote:What is wrong with the human body? No argument presented justifies outlawing it.
Oh... and when you shake hands with someone you are touching naked body parts of someone else. Hands are naked! Except for people who wear gloves everywhere.

by Lucky Bicycle Works » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:13 am
Dumb Ideologies wrote:We can't let people go around naked. Think of the children!
*Arrests all of you for thinking about naked kids*

by Lucky Bicycle Works » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:19 am
Saint Clair Island wrote:Natapoc wrote:What is wrong with the human body? No argument presented justifies outlawing it.
Society (i.e. the majority) is uncomfortable with the display of certain body parts; hence, society should be permitted to ban the display of those body parts.
Seems as reasonable an argument as any.

by Saint Clair Island » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:23 am
Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:Saint Clair Island wrote:Natapoc wrote:What is wrong with the human body? No argument presented justifies outlawing it.
Society (i.e. the majority) is uncomfortable with the display of certain body parts; hence, society should be permitted to ban the display of those body parts.
Seems as reasonable an argument as any.
Congratulations. You are in favour of the burqa.
Hang on, aren't you kinda middling on the burqa?
Hang the fuck on. You are in favour of the enforcement of the burqa, with legal sanctions, on public streets.
Because society is uncomfortable with the display of a woman's face, and hence should be permitted to ban the display of a woman's face.

by The imperian empire » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:26 am

by Lucky Bicycle Works » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:30 am
The imperian empire wrote:I'm pretty sure being naked in public in the UK is legal, it only becomes illegal if you perform a lewd act.


by Poliwanacraca » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:32 am

by Niur » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:34 am

by Saint Clair Island » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:37 am
Poliwanacraca wrote:I think it is entirely reasonable to require that the genitals and anus be covered when in public, because there are inherent health risks in letting people rub their assholes on things. It has been correctly pointed out that there are also inherent health risks in letting people breathe on things - the rather important distinction is that there are pretty darn obvious reasons to let people breathe in public; there really isn't a reason that anyone needs to bare their ass in public.

by Allied Governments » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:40 am

by Treznor » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:43 am
Allied Governments wrote:The recent trend of threads seems to be suggesting humans want to lose much of our culture and human identity.
What you are suggesting, and the recent string of thread I've been seeing, is to make ourselves once again intelligent animals, clothing ourselves is a sign of intelligence, it's a sign of cultural identity (clothes oftentimes hold some sort of cultural value, depending on where you live.)

by Lucky Bicycle Works » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:46 am
Saint Clair Island wrote:Lucky Bicycle Works wrote:Saint Clair Island wrote:Society (i.e. the majority) is uncomfortable with the display of certain body parts; hence, society should be permitted to ban the display of those body parts.
Seems as reasonable an argument as any.
Congratulations. You are in favour of the burqa.
Hang on, aren't you kinda middling on the burqa?
Hang the fuck on. You are in favour of the enforcement of the burqa, with legal sanctions, on public streets.
Because society is uncomfortable with the display of a woman's face, and hence should be permitted to ban the display of a woman's face.
Certain societies are, yes. In those societies,enforcement of the burqa is perfectly okay.
In the Anglosphere, in what we'd call "American society" or "English society" or "Australian society", display of women's faces is quite acceptable, so enforcing burqas is just silly.
Moreover, society's opinions change. Two hundred years ago enslavement of black people on the basis of skin colour was acceptable and legally justifiable. Nowadays, it's totally immoral and wrong.

by Andorias » Mon Aug 31, 2009 9:46 am
Rentalia wrote:I'm not a naturist but I don't see why someone and the law should force someone to wear cloth.
We think there is something wrong in "those body parts" because we are trained like that from childhood in the same way that muslim women are brainwashed that there is something wrong to reveal their form or their hair
some common objection
a)You are a pervent....you just should see naked chicks!
No i'm no a pervent and i know that for every naturist "chicks" there should be 9 man and 6 fat old lady naturist. I just want to defend the rights of a minority(naturist)
b)If we legalize nudism the world will be a immense immoral orgy
no naturist will continue to be a minority. IN catalonia naturism is legal and see someone walking naked is uncommon
c)Who think about the children?
Nude is natural. I don't mind if my daughter or my sister see a nude guy.I mind if my daughter or my sister see an Anorexic top model and want to become like her
There are more much more immoral thing like TV show where children are tought to be greedy materialistic consumistic drone,film with random explicit sex scenes or conservative propaganda that teach children that war is something to be proud of

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arval Va, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, EuroStralia, Google [Bot], In-dia, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Jamesian Republic, The Pirateariat, Torrocca, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement