Liuzzo wrote:You can't win just playing to the base whether you are an R or D. I would not go as far as to call him 100% conservative. I also don't think that he could do that again. It's the time and context that made him able to do as well as as he did. He couldn't do that not. I am a fiscal conservative and slightly more liberal on social issues. Let the party keep drifting further towards the base and let them see insignificance for years to come. The American people are less authoritarian than people try to make them out to be. Freedom is derived from the people not government.
People who say things like "we need to move away from the base" are the reason the Republican Party is looking more blue by the day - soon there won't even be a voice for conservatives in U.S. Politics. It'll just be a choice between "liberal" or "crack-pot fringe liberal". I'm tired of voting always meaning choosing the lesser of the two evils. I'm a small Federal Government, Large State Power - pro Abortionist. Why should I have to choose? Why can't someone get with the program? Where's my change I can believe in? Nowhere to be found. Liberals never say: "we need to move from the base" - they say: "let's expand our base to include every single American".
But I digress, no - Reagan was not 100% conservative, Just as Obama isn't 100% liberal (he's 99.9999%). And the political attack machines on both sides of the aisle too strong now to someone like Reagan or Obama to happen again. As long as human beings run the government - they will always be corrupted by the power. So shouldn't we be trying to limit the power we put in the hands of a few? Think about it.






